US Politics, March 2023: "We want our own safe space, and we deserve it"

I agree, the right "repurposing, redefining and vilifying a word from the rhetoric of the left" (a thing they are really good at btw) when "politically correct" was the term in question seemed more eye-rolly and "get over yourselves" like, say, tree-hugger, compared to the weaponization of "woke." They are definitely amping up the "enemy of the state" rhetoric now.

Pantifa: Vulger Display of Woke

Yeah, but again, the difference isn't between the terms "PC" and "woke," it's between the overall tone and aims of the right-wing culture war. It doesn't matter what word they use to delegitimize and marginalize minority groups and the liberal worldview, what's different in 2023 vs. 1993 is 30 years of right-wing media saturation that has radicalized a big portion of white America. Combined with an emboldened progressive movement or movements, for sure, the actual gains in gay rights (and, of course, electing a Black president) have stoked a more strident backlash.

But none of that is inherent to the terms PC or woke, they're both right-wing code for "broadly liberal shit we don't like, especially as it pertains to race and gender."

A lot of stuff people call woke now is the exact same stuff they were calling PC 20-30 years ago, the field has just broadened.

i agree but i also agree w President Keyes that there is a nastier edge to weaponizing a word from popular black culture than from academia

Sure, in keeping with a much nastier, edgier right-wing mainstream.

Anti-PC rhetoric was viciously ableist ime. I feel like that might have shifted a little / become too taboo / hits too close to home ... or something? Idk maybe I'm just not seeing the right (wrong) content, or maybe the eugenics impulse that drives that stuff has been mostly directed in racist and transphobic directions

You have to remember that the ADA had just been passed in 1990, so ableism and bias against disabled people was very high among people who didn’t want to retrofit their business or stop using the “r” slur

(Shout out to the late, great Judy Heumann, for anyone that missed her passing.)

xp
ah right, that's a good point

rob & tabes otm - I remember being on an NFL message board, basically 'ground zero' if you want to familiarize yourself with what the scummiest people in America think, and there was an entire thread lambasting the existence of handicapped parking spaces and disability payments, and how that was leeching off of the government, and using the r-word to define these folks. this was early 2000s.

same thing w/ constantly seeing people parking in handicapped spots illegally and whining "y'all get more spots than us" (false - even nowadays)

just yesterday I heard someone use the line "and yet if you don't have a job, and don't want to work, the government will give you everything you need" and I wanted to be like "hold up a second" but then "nahh you really don't wanna hear where this is going"

tipsy and Neanderthal otm about how the right is using "woke," and the ways it's frightening as married to a fascist governance/activist agenda with a huge base that's been propagandized to for almost two generations at this point.

Also ironic lol at Desantis' office defining woke as "“slang term for activism… progressive activism” as if the right has no activism going on.

they use the word "woke" because it makes the ideology of the american left seem scary, alien, and not just a continuation of the broader liberal tradition (i.e., the expansion of rights and opportunities to more people).

kinda think the way to fight this stuff is to make them define 'woke' every time they use it

And to do it in a way that puts all the onus on them. "I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean?"

the humorous thing is you want to talk 'performative', go to any church

and talk to the people who go there at the church, then hang out with them later in the week outside of church, and compare the conversations you have

Also ironic lol at Desantis' office defining woke as "“slang term for activism… progressive activism” as if the right has no activism going on.

i don't know, i think this makes sense. they know that their own activists are based on hatred and the desire to promote their own preferred group (white straight christians) at the expense of everyone else. they assume that the left has a mirror version that is also based on the same kind of hatred. so much of the whole movement, maga-era but long before, is a battle against their own projected counterparts

I think the news and social media cycle resulted in a quick explosion of "anti-woke" sentiment but "politically correct" was absolutely weaponized and mocked. The attention concentrated on academics and anyone reactionaries deemed as too strident in their wording? Same deal.

And the institutionalization by organizations that codified some word choices while making minimal strides in actual behavior that followed so-called "politically correct" efforts are now mirrored in some diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.

The conflation of all of the things that draw ire -- those institutional changes that seem like little more than window dressing and jargon, and concentrating on the individuals that draw the most ire instead of analyzing the actual underlying goals and stances -- makes "woke" or "politically correct" or whatever the next thing is into a dumping ground for cultural conservatives.
You also end up with a handful of disaffected people who aren't necessarily that conservative just tiring of the dialogue and using the phrase as a punchline.

I think the thing I've learned with age is that the people who get called angry, strident, shrill, etc. probably have very specific reasons why they appear that way to others, and it often has a lot more to do with the listener not understanding than it does the speaker being "angry"

organizations that codified some word choices while making minimal strides in actual behavior

I've a sad, sinking feeling that the movement pushing for reparations for slavery and segregation will only lead to some formalized breast-beating language similar to the land acknowledgment rituals being propagated by white liberal institutions and nothing more substantial. Even the tattered remnants of affirmative action amount to more than that.

the smartest thing to do is keep fanning the flames of Trump v DeSantis until both stab each other during the first caucus

I'd prefer something likelier to be fatal.

xxp have you actually attended a meeting or event where there was a land acknowledgment ritual or is this a thing you've heard happens that you're viewing as performative and social fluff?

I think the latter happens, but there are some intersectional groups where it has a meaning, especially when it comes to water/land rights and specifically protests about oil or carbon pipelines that run right through indigenous land

The restoration of water/land rights as legally established in dozens of treaties the government has unilaterally abrogated would be a substantial outcome. The land acknowledgement rituals are not different from liberal support for reparations and while this support is meaningful it doesn't constitute a meaningful stopping place for BIPOC people, as when 'organizations codify some word choices while making minimal strides in actual behavior'.

I don't hear anyone right wing or rightist-adjacent relatives using "politically correct" on, say, Facebook anymore. I don't see them use "woke" either tbh. Maybe they're aware of who might be reading and thus show a modicum of decency.

I was at a comedy show that started off with with a verbal land acknowledgement, I found that a little weird.

Side note: It occurred to me this morning, while watching John Oliver's piece on DeSantis, which spent a possibly excessive amount of time on "what Trump nickname will do the most damage", that the best way to harm him with Republican primary voters would be if Trump were to start referring to him as "Harvard Ron DeSantis." Being educated is about the worst thing possible in MAGA world. They're like the Khmer Rouge about that shit.

I’m feeling that, except that Trump went to Penn.

Most of his followers have no idea what Penn is.

I was going to mention that, but I think 90% of the country has no idea what wharton business school is, but harvard is a pretty big name nationwide

I went to the Edith Wharton school.

I still have my Edith Wharton tie.

Hmm yeah maybe. And anyway, if Trump went there it must be OK.

the blood of the Trump washes away all sins

that was a good episode by the way, put all together like that it really does seem like DeSantis is going for this calculated asshole shtick which I think may not play too well in a general election. gonna really be something to watch him try to go after Trump.

So many Florida friends don't want a repeat of their Hilary's-got-this 2016 moment that they want to believe the GOP will coronate DeSantis. To believe a man's invincible after winning reelection by his margins last November is a natural thing, but Florida ain't Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, or....Georgia.

North Florida is, essentially, south Georgia.

put all together like that it really does seem like DeSantis is going for this calculated asshole shtick which I think may not play too well in a general election

It plays horribly outside Florida and with anyone who's not a right-wing maniac. Add to that the fact that he just has a really unpleasant personality, an annoying voice, and carries himself like a short person (I have no idea of his actual height) and he is a terminally flawed general election candidate. He seems incapable of registering or displaying pleasure, ever. Meanwhile Biden, whatever else you think of him, always seems to be enjoying his day.

i don't know, he has some additional hatred in his back pocket, don't count ron out yet

If you read only one article about the roots of Ron DeSantis's career in the legal laundering of the torturing of innocents, let this be it. (Seriously, political journalists, read this, because his work at Gitmo has been waaaaaaaaay underplayed.) https://t.co/8sEfA2yvDg

— Rick Perlstein (@rickperlstein) March 6, 2023

Yeah, it's great

Ope, looks like Meatball Ron went to far for Newt:

A Florida bill that would require bloggers who write about the state’s governor, Ron DeSantis, to register with the state proved a step too far even for the godfather of far-right Republicanism, the former US House speaker Newt Gingrich.

“The idea that bloggers criticising a politician should register with the government is insane,” Gingrich wrote on Twitter.

“It is an embarrassment that it is a Republican state legislator in Florida who introduced a bill to that effect. He should withdraw it immediately.”

I realized the other day, regarding my Pat Buchanan reference a while back: A lot of the conservative political agendas strike me as "dog chasing car" scenarios where, once they actually catch up with the car, they have absolutely no idea what to do. Or maybe they're angry some other dog got to the car first.

Of course the internet, but I sometimes wonder if the radicalisation of conservative politics comes from Boomers facing mortality and wanting to stamp society in their image before they lose control of politics. Of course us Gen Xs will gesture feebly toward the reins while Gen Y ascends to fill the power vacuum in a few years, but ...

The idea that bloggers criticising a politician should register with the government is insane

Newt is behind the times. Republican legislators in safe seats everywhere have grasped that floating insane ideas in bills costs them nothing politically and drives the boundaries of politics further toward normalizing white supremacist fascism, which brings them closer to realizing their ideal state.

drives the boundaries of politics further toward normalizing white supremacist fascism, which brings them closer to realizing their ideal state.

― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Monday, March 6, 2023 1:44 PM

sneaking suspicion says this might be the goal and our friend newt is concern trolling / dog whistling.

(stating the obvious: newt sucks. i just assume the opposite of everything he says. fuck`im.)

WATCH: Democrats need to "put more focus" on crime, says Rep. Jonathan Jackson (D-Ill.).

Jackson: "It's a violent culture that we have to turn around." @kwelkernbc: "Do Democrats run the risk of running too far left on this issue?"

Jackson: "Yes, absolutely." pic.twitter.com/terJ0EoMxt

— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) March 6, 2023

FUND THE POLICE FUND FUND FUND THE POLICE

The White House’s proposal would raise the net investment income tax, created by the Affordable Care Act, from 3.8 percent to 5 percent for all Americans earning more than $400,000 per year, in line with Biden’s pledge not to raise taxes for anyone under that threshold. The tax applies to capital gains and investment income. The plan also would expand this tax by applying it to more kinds of income from pass-through firms — businesses in which the owners pay taxes on their personal income taxes. Currently, these kinds of business owners do not pay this tax.

Additionally, the plan calls for expanding new rules reducing Medicare prescription drug payments beyond the measures approved last year as part of the Inflation Reduction Act. The plan would give the administration authority to negotiate what price the federal government pays for more drugs than the limited number approved as part of Democrats’ legislative package last year, while also speeding up the process for negotiations. The prescription drug changes would bring in an additional $200 billion for the Medicare trust fund, the plan states. The proposal would also cap co-pays for some generic drugs, such as those used to treat hypertension and high cholesterol, to $2 per prescription per month.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2023/03/07/biden-medicare-taxes-gop/