maybe make something like in the style of the "show formatting help" button on it
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:06 (sixteen years ago)
Yes...
― Keith, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:08 (sixteen years ago)
I also just want to mention how much I love blueski-2.css. It's so "in the spirit" of ILX and I am very fond of it.
― suggest banh mi (fields of salmon), Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:10 (sixteen years ago)
i dont know, maybe that didnt make sense
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:10 (sixteen years ago)
I think it probably did... I did it.
― Keith, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:14 (sixteen years ago)
Dropping the search instructions below the two forms would reduce the amount of scrolling required ... there could be a link at the top of the page to jump down to the instructions.
Are the two forms used about equally? I don't know if I've ever used the Given User feature. If there were a separate page for the Text Search form, I'd probably go there directly.
Just speaking from my own experience, having the Text Search form remember its settings from my most recent search, and selecting the text entry field automatically when I enter that page, would be great for doing repeated searches.
― Brad C., Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:15 (sixteen years ago)
oh cool xpost
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:21 (sixteen years ago)
I think ilx is just dandy.
I am another who would like to know how many posts I've made, Keith. Would be interesting as I've only ever been a sporadic poster but have been here for around 9 years. Eek.
― emil.y, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:22 (sixteen years ago)
Emily, 1,963 posts
― Keith, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:23 (sixteen years ago)
Brad, yes having it remember settings would be good, though obviously a bit harder.
the current post count is for the last 2 years (since relaunch) or all-time?
― tehresa, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:25 (sixteen years ago)
If it's all-time, then that's about 218 posts a year. 18 posts a month. 4.5 posts per week. Less than one per day. So technically I don't post here at all.
― emil.y, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:27 (sixteen years ago)
Tehresa, it's probably since relaunch, unless you used the same email address as you did before, as everyone re-registered.
― Keith, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:28 (sixteen years ago)
Hey keith, how about when someone clicks on a thread, you stick a "view previous page" above the first unread message, show the next 100 msgs, and if there are more, stick a "display all messages" @ the end. Not sure if some1 said this already but I think it's what others were getting at
― Al steak sauce: it's dad important (k3vin k.), Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:29 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks, Keith!
― Brad C., Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:30 (sixteen years ago)
OK I get that. To be honest, the code that displays the messages and does all that stuff is so massively complex I might have trouble - it's certainly the messiest bit of ILX. There's so much going on in different circumstances, but if I could figure it, then that would make some sense.
x-post
― Keith, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:31 (sixteen years ago)
Keith you are grebt and I'm sorry if that post came off a bit demanding or entitled!
Xp cool
― 8080's and internet break (k3vin k.), Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:33 (sixteen years ago)
Keith, would it be easy to create a yes/no preference that would let Admin Functions show for sitewide mods all the time?
This is all very cool, btw! I'm sorry nobody could go out to the pub tonight, but it's ILX's gain!
― Beanbag the Gardener (WmC), Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:35 (sixteen years ago)
Oh that's OK, it didnt... x-post.
Rock, yes that would be OK, but surprised you'd want it!
― Keith, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:36 (sixteen years ago)
could you do that for all mods?
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)
If I were to do it, I wouldn't differentiate.
― Keith, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)
everybody here is equally kind
I might hate it, but it would be cool to have the option, esp. on the occasional thread where 20 people want to know how many SBs they have. Currently, every time a mod refreshes the thread, the admin functions go away.
― Beanbag the Gardener (WmC), Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:41 (sixteen years ago)
oh actually iw as going to mention that on my cell browser (blackberry) the admin functions are ALWAYS there. not sure if that's fixable, obviously not a priority.
― tehresa, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:41 (sixteen years ago)
Dunno Tehresa, My work blackberry is broken at the moment, but I'll have a look when I get it sorted or get a new one. It's probably just because they just don't work very well!
― Keith, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:43 (sixteen years ago)
Alternatively, use the mobile interface and avoid the admin links altogether.
― Keith, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:44 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/BoardsXmlControllerServlet?stylesheet=mobile.xsl
yeah, that stylesheet results in lolhueg text for some reason? not a big deal/priority, really.
― tehresa, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:51 (sixteen years ago)
Is it still like that? I changed it to make it smaller, recently. If it's still too big, let me know and I'll change it.
― Keith, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:51 (sixteen years ago)
One version or other back in the mists of time changed the shape and filled-ness of the bullets in new answers depending on whether there were new answers since you last read it. This is probably a minor CSS thing, but can we have it back?
Also can we have a mobile interface that is a little more blackberry friendly, I should check out the mobile interface again and tell you what that means.
― Mornington Crescent (Ed), Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:56 (sixteen years ago)
Could the search function be changed so that if you put in a start date and no end date it searches everything newer than that date? At the moment it ignores the start date if there's no end date, so you have to make up a date in the future. Not much of a problem, but still...
(Possibly similar for end date and no start date, but I don't do that very often)
Thanks, sorry.
― a passing spacecadet, Saturday, 1 August 2009 23:57 (sixteen years ago)
Ed, that was never in my version so it's programming work, but I'll see what I can do.
Spacecadet, yes I didn't know that was an issue; it should behave as you say.
― Keith, Sunday, 2 August 2009 00:00 (sixteen years ago)
whoa that was cool. i just clicked on that link keith posted and now everything is awesome
― I love rainbow cookies (surm), Sunday, 2 August 2009 00:05 (sixteen years ago)
One request I have would be to notify me when a poll has ended that I had voted in. I could just bookmark the thread, but I don't care to follow all the discussion, I just want to know when the results are in.
― Jeff, Sunday, 2 August 2009 00:21 (sixteen years ago)
oh, i have one. on the page where it says youve successfully logged out of ilx, can there be a link to the front page?
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Sunday, 2 August 2009 00:23 (sixteen years ago)
seconded
this is really great keith, that we've gotten to the point where it's fun little fine-tuning stuff that we're thinking of
― avuenjo, Sunday, 2 August 2009 00:25 (sixteen years ago)
Only thing I'd like is a preview post option, not so much for checking typos but making sure links/pics/formatting shows up ok.
― DJ Angoreinhardt (Billy Dods), Sunday, 2 August 2009 10:38 (sixteen years ago)
So this thing about bookmarks highlighting where you've unread messages... If I do this, it won't be perfect, in that I don't store on the database where a user last read a thread to, I just store it in memory - the last 200 threads you read and of course this'll all disappear when I restart the server. However, this should be good enough for most purposes.
It's not that, that I think about, but that there are basically three states you can be in:
Any thoughts?
― Keith, Sunday, 2 August 2009 13:43 (sixteen years ago)
well it seems more useful to think of the first two as something you're not interested in, so just the third would be highlighted. like most american posters wouldn't want a dis ting/soccer thread highlighted along with threads they've clicked on (and taken interest in) that have new answers. no offense to "football" but you know. another example would be the 500 cable news threads we have
― blobfish russian (harbl), Sunday, 2 August 2009 14:01 (sixteen years ago)
It probably moves into a slightly different area this, but there are threads I've not read at all because they're newly bumped or I've just missed them, and threads I've not read because I'm never going to (eg football).
I'd like the former to have a highlight and the latter not, but that'd mean effectively a killfile for threads, so you could distinguish.
― stet, Sunday, 2 August 2009 14:01 (sixteen years ago)
Xp haha fuk football and skips in general
we're on dis ting kicking a ball into a skip from quite far away
― blobfish russian (harbl), Sunday, 2 August 2009 14:03 (sixteen years ago)
Yes, this is why I think it's tricky. Killfile isn't really a practical option, with 170,000 and growing threads out there.
― Keith, Sunday, 2 August 2009 14:07 (sixteen years ago)
OK so thinking about it, yes I think it should only highlight threads that you've actually read and that have since been updated.
― Keith, Sunday, 2 August 2009 15:06 (sixteen years ago)
Would it be possible to search by user AND text? Like if I'm searching for a post where Ned Raggett mentioned Radiohead, and I don't remember the date, it's virtually impossible to find by searching either "Ned Raggett" or "Radiohead" separately.
― jaymc, Sunday, 2 August 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
Jay, you can kind of do this now, though it's certainly not obvious... If you use the text search, and enter something like:
radiohead AND displayName:"Ned Raggett"
It should work - remember to change to posts (if that's what you're looking for).
― Keith, Sunday, 2 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)
ignore lists
http://www.b3tards.com/u/c2d08cf4e23cfbd9a0c0/duck_hunt_dog.gif
― galumphing lummox (bug), Saturday, August 1, 2009 3:48 PM (Yesterday)
Bug, yes I was thinking that would be something I should do.
― Keith, Saturday, August 1, 2009 3:49 PM (Yesterday)
An idea from the missus: could this be made thread-specific? Like, ignore (User X) on this thread but not that thread?
― Beanbag the Gardener (WmC), Sunday, 2 August 2009 16:23 (sixteen years ago)
RSS feeds for a specific user's posts would be nice.
― Jeff, Sunday, 2 August 2009 16:24 (sixteen years ago)
and crepey
― stet, Sunday, 2 August 2009 16:26 (sixteen years ago)
Surm, 1,209
― Keith, Saturday, August 1, 2009 10:26 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
oh wow thank you for this btw
― I love rainbow cookies (surm), Sunday, 2 August 2009 16:28 (sixteen years ago)