never mind the dystopia doesn't 2001 as story - which is probably the least of it as a movie anyway - belong to a Freudian "humanity the abandoned child looking for its daddy" strain of SF
I mean there's a big baby and everything
― Wyverns and gulls rule my world (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 January 2023 22:52 (three years ago)
See also AI, which is “in dialogue” with 2001 on this topic, as they say.
― Farewell to Evening in Paradise (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 10 January 2023 23:07 (three years ago)
This strangely neglected topic.
― Farewell to Evening in Paradise (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 10 January 2023 23:14 (three years ago)
Robot boy wants his mommy, waits aeons in suspended animation until finally he is granted his wish by more advanced aliens - or alien robots? - who deliver her to him in resurrected form, if only for 24 hours
― Farewell to Evening in Paradise (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 10 January 2023 23:20 (three years ago)
It’s almost like good art can bear a multitude of interpretations.
― circa1916, Tuesday, 10 January 2023 23:42 (three years ago)
But I suspect xyzzz is being a bit troll-y and “ain’t I stinker” about this whole thing so I’m not sure it’s worth engaging with said poster on this topic.
― circa1916, Tuesday, 10 January 2023 23:49 (three years ago)
2001 elides questions of ownership - who's funding all this?
it's v clear the answer is "the state, in partnership w pan am"-- that is, the good ol mil-ind-com
Kubrick, if not Clarke, might have better anticipated the rise of the despotic billionaire spaceship owner/controller
would this movie really be better if they had howard hughes onboard
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 10 January 2023 23:57 (three years ago)
should benoit blanc have come too
Ahm sorrih Dave. Ahm afraid ah can't doo that,
― fentanyl young (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 00:03 (three years ago)
Ah say, ah say, ah say Dave
― Wyverns and gulls rule my world (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 00:04 (three years ago)
i do p much agree w alphie that the movie's suggestion that specieswide transformation and victory in our historic confrontation with the hal-thing is something we need to go to jupiter for is an opiate, and that in this way the movie's a reflection of the values of the v age it is critiquing. (i mean that's kinda what things... do, tho.) still i enjoy thinking abt that confrontation i guess, and usually do say yes when someone asks if i'd enjoy something i already enjoy but in space.
― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 00:12 (three years ago)
Don’t think he likes to be called that.
― Farewell to Evening in Paradise (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 00:13 (three years ago)
apologies if so! a hollow voice says doh.
― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 00:15 (three years ago)
wait who are we talking about/to
― Malevolent Arugula (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 00:30 (three years ago)
my last was in response to xyzzz re: exploration, space travel, palpitating the pebbles of an alien world etc
― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 00:32 (three years ago)
Morbs’ take that 2001 is an optimistic film because it looks forward to something beyond humanity is a characteristic and correct take
― عباس کیارستمی (Eric H.), Tuesday, January 10
Agree with this. I also like its imagining a more advanced civilization guiding our evolution
― Dan S, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 01:41 (three years ago)
Hmm, not a correct take, sorry.
LOL
OK, then.
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 01:56 (three years ago)
It seems to me that Clarke's vision--and it comes through more clearly in the book than it does in the film--is that the "star child" is the next step in human evolution, prompted (again) by the monolith and whatever mysterious force is behind it. As a vision of the human future, it's quite optimistic, if a bit chilly.
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 01:58 (three years ago)
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, January 10, 2023 4:09 PM (three hours ago)
Well, you should know
― عباس کیارستمی (Eric H.), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:03 (three years ago)
I've traced the post ... the starchild is coming from inside the thread!
― Farewell to Evening in Paradise (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:08 (three years ago)
This is your moderator etc.
― Farewell to Evening in Paradise (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:20 (three years ago)
Do not attempt to adjust your television set.
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:25 (three years ago)
Have you all spent the entire day talking about 2001?
― clemenza, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:45 (three years ago)
Worth it
― عباس کیارستمی (Eric H.), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:46 (three years ago)
touché
― Dan S, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:47 (three years ago)
Just wait until we talk about Andrei Rublev.
― Farewell to Evening in Paradise (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:49 (three years ago)
There's like 15 more of these to get through - someone post something snotty about Cléo
― jmm, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:50 (three years ago)
Starchild grew up to be a Starman iirc. Then fell to earth.
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:57 (three years ago)
And started a war
― circa1916, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 02:58 (three years ago)
lol clem
― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 03:13 (three years ago)
The never-made Madonna remake would have owned.
― an icon of a worried-looking, long-haired, bespectacled man (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 03:45 (three years ago)
xyzzz, there'a way to have a conversation without constantly using variations on "You're wrong" and "Not correct." I'm sure I'm the only one who agrees -- and I don't even like 2001.
― Malevolent Arugula (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2023 bookmarkflaglink
That's a bit weird. I gave my take on why I thought it wasn't doing it for me. I don't really like art that says "there is something better out there than this".
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 08:21 (three years ago)
― عباس کیارستمی (Eric H.), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 bookmarkflaglink
You haven't watched The Last Samurai. Please.
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 08:22 (three years ago)
Never mind the seven of them.
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 08:26 (three years ago)
someone post something snotty about Cléo
The silent film pastiche is poorly observed and executed - Godard never did anything else half as embarrassing. Vagabond rules much harder.
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 08:37 (three years ago)
the thought of anyone trying to adapt HdW's The Last Samurai fills me with both intense joy and despair, don't think anyone could pull it off
― imago, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 09:15 (three years ago)
set it in space. Ludo is the real starchild
― imago, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 09:16 (three years ago)
DeWitt would sue that stupid idea, it would never get off the ground.
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 10:35 (three years ago)
Rewatched La règle for something like the fifteenth time. It is insane how good it is. Just wonderful acting on every level, even the smallest roles.
― jmm, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 14:30 (three years ago)
I was introduced to it in possibly the worst way, in an aesthetics class where we only watched a snippet of the costume party sequence alongside a reading from Bazin - basically just focusing on formal aspects, the way the camera moves, depth of field. I don't think the magic of it exactly came through. The film does so much to build up this crazy world of love and secrecy and shifting alliances. You watch the whole thing and it's like... a battle as intricate as Seven Samurai.
― jmm, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:02 (three years ago)
Yes indeed
― Farewell to Evening in Paradise (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:13 (three years ago)
gotta rewatch that one
― ryan, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:16 (three years ago)
The way Renoir begins with Jurieu, seemingly forgets about him, then re-centers the film around his dumb clueless presence for the denouement are examples of good screenwriting (despite how much he said he and the cast improvised) and choreography. The one most committed to obsolete class prerogatives has to die to snap everyone back to reality.
― Malevolent Arugula (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:16 (three years ago)
There’s only 4 of these that I have any specific memory of how they go. Probably 2 or 3 others that I believe I’ve seen but have no memory of. I guess I shouldn’t be allowed to vote, but voting anyway, for SitR which is the only one I’ve rewatched recently and which I thoroughly enjoyed.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 16:31 (three years ago)
I'm not gonna poll the directors' list because too much overlap but might be nice to have it here:
1) 2001 2) Citizen Kane 3) The Godfather =4) Jeanne Dielman =4) Tokyo Story =6) Vertigo =6) 8 1/2 8) Mirror =9) In the Mood for Love =9) Close-up =9) Persona=12) Taxi Driver=12) Barry Lyndon=14) Beau Travail=14) Seven Samurai=14) Breathless=14) Stalker 18) Apocalypse Now 19) A Woman Under the Influence=20) Bicycle Thieves=20) Rashomon
― ryan, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 17:58 (three years ago)
Big outlier here is the Cassavetes, I think?
― ryan, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 17:59 (three years ago)
SiTR would be an extremely sensible pick for the greatest movie ever made, imo.
― ryan, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 18:00 (three years ago)
2001 kind of a perfect choice for directors since it probably represents their greatest dream: full control over a big studio budget, major cultural impact, personal/ambitious/uncompromising.
― ryan, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 18:06 (three years ago)
Yes, that's interesting. It's almost surely the least scripted film on the list. I suppose it's because he was able to get such stellar performances from Rowlands and Falk.
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Wednesday, 11 January 2023 18:13 (three years ago)
Nora Gregor's terrible!
― Halfway there but for you, Wednesday, 11 January 2023 18:49 (three years ago)