I'll admit, I suspect it isn't as bad as I feel it is now, so I guess it's worth watching. It was just one of those visceral, angry moments of disappointment in watching a director completely fumble.
It is possible that the source material is a significant part of the problem. It is at times a very visually stunning movie, and there are moments that do work, but it still ended up as a half-assed Lynch film with no underlying psychology, or a movie with such a private language that it feels intentionally and mean-spiritedly incomprehensible.
xpost, but probably an answer of sorts.
― John Justen, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 16:36 (nineteen years ago)
His cartoons on Monty Python are by far my least favorite part of the show. I always fast forward. Sorry to distract from filmic convo. I just had to get that off my chest.
― Abbott, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:39 (nineteen years ago)
Yeah in retrospect I can't quite fathom how a movie featuring a farting taxidermied dead The Dude wasn't at all funny.
― nickalicious, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:53 (nineteen years ago)
Peter Stormare was funny as shit in Brothers Grimm.
― nickalicious, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:58 (nineteen years ago)
Fuck it. I liked Tideland, even if no one else on ILX did.
I also think the animated Python bits are sometimes the best bits of the show.
― the next grozart, Thursday, 7 June 2007 23:44 (nineteen years ago)
Talking about the possibilities for a Terry Gilliam movie is almost always superior to watching a Terry Gilliam movie. Fear and Loathing is entertaining in small doses and 12 Monkeys is probably OK - but I can't think of anything else I've seen that was passable. (Have not seen Brazil.)
― milo z, Thursday, 7 June 2007 23:48 (nineteen years ago)
abbott u crazy
― max, Friday, 8 June 2007 00:12 (nineteen years ago)
12 Monkeys is wonderful, as is Brazil, although Brazil's wonder is completely overshadowed by the final shot, which obliterates more or less all that came before it in a devastating emotional smackdown. One of the finest endings in film history IMO.
― Just got offed, Friday, 8 June 2007 02:03 (nineteen years ago)
Brazil: absolute Classic!
Fear and Loathing in Las vegas: Absolute Dud!
very much polar extremes in terms of quality (Not that the latter is of low quality, it's made quite well, I just depsise it).
― mehlt, Saturday, 9 June 2007 04:08 (nineteen years ago)
Somebody besides me has seen The Reflecting Skin? Holy cow.
Best Amanda Plummer mini-performance: The Prophecy, being yanked around by Christopher Walken's Gabriel.
The Fisher King would be in my top 25 favorite films of all time. Also love 12 Monkeys, Brazil, Time Bandits. Just saw Brothers Grimm this week and eh. It had some good moments. Heath Ledger was surprisingly good.
― Hey Jude, Monday, 11 June 2007 03:37 (nineteen years ago)
No bad films, in my opinion. He is one of the greats.
― moley, Monday, 11 June 2007 07:42 (nineteen years ago)
MPython cartoons = CLASSIC
― Tom D., Monday, 11 June 2007 10:38 (nineteen years ago)
OMG. PROJECTSES!
The Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus starring Tom Waits and Heath Ledger! A Gorillaz movie! A GOOD OMENS adaptation!
If he makes even one of these movies my stokedness levels are through the roof.
― nickalicious, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 15:59 (eighteen years ago)
Oh I somehow skipped over the first pages of the interview, they talk about Tideland and still trying to make the Don Quixote movie too.
― nickalicious, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)
In fact that doesn't even mention Tom Waits as Dr Parnassus, does it? I guess wiki does.
― nickalicious, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)
Love Terry Gilliam with all my heart, this in spite of the fact that his work seems to have totally fallen apart in the last decade.
Brazil and Time Bandits = two of my favorite movies, with very little competition. Munchausen is a mess, but I love it anyway - at least 80% brilliant. If you cut out Robin Williams, it'd be damn near perfect. Fisher King and 12 Monkeys are both admirable, and I respect them a lot, but they're a bit too square for me to really love.
Fear and Loathing, The Brothers Grimm and Tideland are terrible movies. Tideland is far and away the worst thing he's ever done, but it's not an aberration. It fits right in with Fear & Loathing and Bros Grimm: incoherent, arbitrary, poorly thought-out, tedious.
― Bob Standard, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)
He says something at the end of the interview about how anything is possible if he keeps Johnny Depp on staff...if he makes a GOOD OMENS movie, will Depp play CRAWLEY? That would be good.
― nickalicious, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)
THAT WOULD BE AWESOME.
― John Justen, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)
Just saw Tideland - I loved it. The actress who pays Jeliza Rose puts in one of the best performances from a child actor I've seen, I'm a little amazed at some of the comments upthread but of course views differ on such things. For me, it was a deeply moving film, and brought me to tears several times. Just thought I'd stick my neck out for this one, because sometimes I wonder if the critics realise what a brilliant director walks among us. It's not just the way he handles the material, or the actors, but also the material he selects in the first place. I think history will cover him in glory, even if many find him a bit hard to take right now.
― moley, Sunday, 20 January 2008 02:53 (eighteen years ago)
Read some thing the other day saying he's still determined to finish Don Quixote.
― chap, Sunday, 20 January 2008 03:01 (eighteen years ago)
Everything he's ever made has elements of Quixote so he may as well.
moley otm. Deeply disturbing but I quite liked it. Grimm was shithouse.
― Autumn Almanac, Monday, 21 January 2008 00:29 (eighteen years ago)
Um, so The Imaginarium of Dr Parnasssus will be in slight turmoil then.
― Autumn Almanac, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 22:06 (eighteen years ago)
Doesn't have the best of luck, our Tel.
― chap, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 23:08 (eighteen years ago)
YES YES YES YES
Law, Depp and Farrell to replace Ledger in film
Jude Law will appear as Heath Ledger's character, along with Johnny Depp and Colin Farrell, in the unfinished film, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, Law's spokeswoman said today.
They will all play the role of Tony in the fantasy film Ledger had been filming before his death.
It was not immediately clear how the role will be reconstructed for three actors.
DUH IT'S A GILLIAM FILM, LIKE YOU COMMON PRESS TYPES EVER GOT HIS FILMS ANYWAY
― Autumn Almanac, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:41 (eighteen years ago)
COMMON PRESS TYPES OTM, Gilliam movies generally awful
― milo z, Monday, 18 February 2008 21:38 (eighteen years ago)
rong
― Autumn Almanac, Monday, 18 February 2008 21:50 (eighteen years ago)
brothers grimm was definitely a bit awful though
― Autumn Almanac, Monday, 18 February 2008 21:51 (eighteen years ago)
Masterpiece or horrible mess? Place your bets now.
http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=23237
― chap, Monday, 15 September 2008 13:53 (seventeen years ago)
Sorry, here's one that works:http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2008/sep/15/heathledger?gusrc=rss&feed=film
― chap, Monday, 15 September 2008 13:56 (seventeen years ago)
Watched both Brazil an Tideland this week, for the first time
Thought Brazil was great, another film I can't believe I've never seen before.
Tideland on the other hand, mm not really my sort of thing. It seemed very unsatisfying and no particular moment held any interest for me.
― Ant Attack.. (Ste), Thursday, 27 November 2008 10:55 (seventeen years ago)
Tideland is tough going, whether you're revolted by the more confronting moments or just bored. I liked it but I doubt I could sit through it again.
Brazil is the best film ever, and I really really wish Gilliam would just give up now.
― I'm Richard (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 27 November 2008 11:07 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, i could see how Tideland would appeal to some people rather than me just slandering it as a crap film which it certainly wasn't.
I just loved Brazil though, an extravanganza of gilliamness.
― Ant Attack.. (Ste), Thursday, 27 November 2008 11:14 (seventeen years ago)
Grimm Brothers, on the other hand, was balls.
― I'm Richard (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 27 November 2008 11:31 (seventeen years ago)
so is Tideland really NOT a crap film? because the consensus seems to be that it is actually even worse than that, that it's affront to cinema and sensibilities, among the worst movies ever made
― akm, Sunday, 21 June 2009 18:36 (seventeen years ago)
I liked it but I doubt I could sit through it again.Brazil is the best film ever― I'm Richard (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 27 November 2008 11:07
Brazil is the best film ever
― I'm Richard (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 27 November 2008 11:07
^I'll go with this.
― DavidM, Sunday, 21 June 2009 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
Brief bits on Heath Ledger and 'The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus' from Comic-Con.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 24 July 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)
Read somewhere that he's back at Don Quixote. Lost in La Mancha was so wtf with disorganization and mayhem I'm surprised anything survived of his first go.
― Jaq, Friday, 24 July 2009 17:28 (sixteen years ago)
was posted on the heath ledger thread and even though it does focus on ledger a bit, i thought this was a pretty good read on Gilliam and the film as well: http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/08/heath-ledger200908
can't help feeling sorry for the guy - has there ever been a more talented filmmaker with as much bad luck? seemed like him and ledger were really close too. :(
― Roz, Friday, 24 July 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)
i'm pretty excited about this film, I think having charles mckeown back is the clincher for me, gilliam is spotty to terrible without him.
― akm, Friday, 24 July 2009 17:54 (sixteen years ago)
Roz- Welles maybe? Though a lot of Welles' problems were (however indirectly) of his own making...
― Telephone thing, Friday, 24 July 2009 18:15 (sixteen years ago)
Depp quits Don Quixote (again):
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5gWqLREHQxBHCMhKCAdktrMpz_HFw
― akm, Thursday, 6 August 2009 23:23 (sixteen years ago)
"He added: "I wanted to shoot Don Quixote next spring. He said he's not available and we have both agreed that I'm going to die soon, so it would be nice to get this film under my belt.""
this statement doesn't really make sense to me?
― akm, Thursday, 6 August 2009 23:24 (sixteen years ago)
Trailer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw2lUp1Cqz4
― More Butty In Your Pants (Telephone thing), Sunday, 9 August 2009 01:28 (sixteen years ago)
holy fucking shit
― don't try to church it up (nickalicious), Sunday, 9 August 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)
Just realized where I'd seen the young Parnassus' costume before
http://cdn.idolator.com/assets/resources/2008/03/mungolian.jpg
― More Butty In Your Pants (Telephone thing), Sunday, 9 August 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)
that trailer was spellbinding
― Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 9 August 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)
i've watched it like 10 times now, i hate to type or even think something like this but heath ledger's death may have saved terry gilliam's career
― don't try to church it up (nickalicious), Sunday, 9 August 2009 23:46 (sixteen years ago)
I have to see that film.
― Nate Carson, Monday, 10 August 2009 03:05 (sixteen years ago)
Brief NYT blog thoughts on Parnassus:
The movie is Pythonesque but also Gilliam-y, with animated sequences involving giant unfurling tongues, cross-dressing troupes of singing men, burned-out landscapes and lavish dream worlds, and a storyline that hinges on the mystical/philosophical.“On every level, it’s tragical and magical at the same time,” Mr. Gilliam said, introducing it at the screening at the Crosby Hotel.“It’s not the film I set out to make,” he added later. “It might be better, it might not be better, but it’s different, and I actually love it.”Fair enough; the stretch of having four actors play the same part is actually not the biggest imaginative leap that the film asks viewers to make. Surrealness has always been Mr. Gilliam’s best medium.But “Parnassus” also includes several passages that seem eerie in light of the circumstances, including a parade of dead stars like James Dean and a speech about the virtues of dying young. Even weirder, those references were in the script from the beginning.
“On every level, it’s tragical and magical at the same time,” Mr. Gilliam said, introducing it at the screening at the Crosby Hotel.
“It’s not the film I set out to make,” he added later. “It might be better, it might not be better, but it’s different, and I actually love it.”
Fair enough; the stretch of having four actors play the same part is actually not the biggest imaginative leap that the film asks viewers to make. Surrealness has always been Mr. Gilliam’s best medium.
But “Parnassus” also includes several passages that seem eerie in light of the circumstances, including a parade of dead stars like James Dean and a speech about the virtues of dying young. Even weirder, those references were in the script from the beginning.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 21:36 (sixteen years ago)
the CGI stuff in the trailers looks kind of meh to me.
― akm, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 22:07 (sixteen years ago)