Elon Musk

But you can certainly reduce their ability to rub it in your face.

I mean it does sound like Musk buying was the last straw. Lots of ppl talking about quitting and alternatives.

Funnily enough a couple of Black/Asian posters I saw were like 'it's always been hell it will always be hell', or 'at least I can swear at a dumb blue tick again without getting banned' lol xp = sure, if you think so.

Did you not know the weird people who owned the platform before he came along?

sure but Dorsey seems like your standard issue libertarian techbro while Elon is more of a Trumpy figure whose ultimate goal is to make every single thing on Twitter about him. the idea of him moderating a giant online forum gives me Lowtax vibes...hopefully it ends the same way

ive got multiple paul pelosi conspiracies in my trends this morning

― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 bookmarkflaglink

Musk himself is pushing some of them lol.

fwiw Dorsey didn't own Twitter the way Musk does now (public v. private)

for my part it was the combination of already waning enthusiasm/enjoyment/utility plus now having to hear about twitter+musk constantly everywhere else on the internet. Also quitting social media platforms feels really good, I recommend it

ive never consciously quit a social media but twitter is the only one i still use

something that's occurred to me is that we're kind of past the era where people who were rich and/or had power had to be serious people; as in, they at least had decent instincts or knew how to listen to people who did. thanks to the way the media works, plus the general entropy of wealth, where random kids are inheriting vast sums of money, or investing in the right startup, or getting big into crypto at a lucky time, you now have a lot of unserious people with a lot of power. the whole appeal of Elon Musk is that he is that "if I had a billion dollars, I'd [something which sounds nice but is obviously stupid and impossible]" guy. very much an extension of the Trumpy "everything is actually easy" mentality. kinda scary but hey if a guy like that is gonna blow his fortune on something a dying social network is a pretty funny way to go

fwiw Dorsey didn't own Twitter the way Musk does now (public v. private)

for my part it was the combination of already waning enthusiasm/enjoyment/utility plus now having to hear about twitter+musk constantly everywhere else on the internet. Also quitting social media platforms feels really good, I recommend it

oh yeah another reason to quit is how funny it would be if this fails quickly

lol gyac, I am of course part of my own problem there, so maybe it's like cutting out wine while continuing to drink beer & liquor

I drink whiskey but not wine or beer, I see no problem with this.

me neither! that analogy was inspired by true events

oh yeah another reason to quit is how funny it would be if this fails quickly

― rob, Monday, October 31, 2022 9:52 AM (seven minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

quitting works but prob the best thing to contribute to musk twitter failing is for a lot of people to use any new freedom from moderation to to post wildly advertiser unfriendly things, also could be funny

chaotic evil is fun because lawful evil is so consistently against me.

Years back a friend of mine verified me as a prank. You could disable the verification in the settings. Maybe it’s no longer possible (e.g., I lost my verified status, rightfully, when Twitter did an audit of verified users back in 2016). But, assuming that option still exists, it’s funny to me when verified users complain about being verified.

I still think centralized verification is dumb and I think we’d be in a far better situation if, for individuals, publicly verifiable identity proofs were used. It’s embarrassing Reddit’s AMA subreddit does this better than Meta or Twitter! But I also understand this isn’t a mistake. Twitter doesn’t want to provide links to Meta services. Meta services don’t want to provide links to Twitter. Everyone knows but won’t admit that this shit is (or is potentially) valuable.

I apologize for the barrage of posts, but this story is enraging for so many reasons. Last point, Jack, whatever you think about him, is likely right about the need for decentralized authentication and authorization. Do I trust him or his proposed implementation? I haven’t looked at it closely but I’m obviously skeptical because of the source. Nevertheless, it’s an idea that I truly believe would make the web a little safer and nicer.

tangential since this is more about the mechanism of sign-in authentication and not authentication of real life identity:

lol remember when oauth was going to be the end-all, where people could bring their own auth wherever they wanted, only to be followed by oauth2 being kind of a corporate-led mess, to the extent one of the oauth creators quit the project after its release and spent the next year doing talks at conferences explaining how bad oauth2 is?

I remember a handful of sites very briefly allowing either a handful of providers or, kind of insanely, allowing you to plug in your own provider
the only vestige that remains is "sign in with google/facebook/twitter" which basically get dumped as soon as a service gets large enough they realize they're missing out on some data by not making people use their own auth

that isn't to say the two couldn't be linked, obviously. if you signed in with an identity provider explicitly linked to your organization (maybe something like the ACME mechanism LetsEncrypt uses to verify domain ownership) and that was flagged as legit by twitter, then verification of identity linked to that org could be streamlined

quitting works but prob the best thing to contribute to musk twitter failing is for a lot of people to use any new freedom from moderation to to post wildly advertiser unfriendly things, also could be funny

I don’t he has this one covered tbh

Jack, whatever you think about him, is likely right about the need for decentralized authentication and authorization. Do I trust him or his proposed implementation? I haven’t looked at it closely but I’m obviously skeptical because of the source. Nevertheless, it’s an idea that I truly believe would make the web a little safer and nicer.

― Allen (etaeoe), Monday, October 31, 2022 10:34 AM (thirteen minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

i found the developer page

https://atproto.com/guides/overview

I wonder how many fake accounts there are

Also its funny he wants to charge 20$ a month to be verified - so like if Beyonce doesn't pay she is going to lose her blue logo?

Why not make it more first of all or base the fee on how many followers you have

xp oh yeah I was looking at that last week but forgot it had anything to do with Dorsey

seems decent, probably won't get any traction

yeah

https://jaygraber.medium.com/web3-is-self-certifying-9dad77fd8d81

Then there is this type of thinking

the blockchain will solve this

lol blockchain

Seems like online identity verification is something the government could provide pretty easily. They verify people's identities all the time. (It would have the added advantage of right-wingers boycotting it becz govt). But like the digital equivalent of a passport, which could live in a secure place but you could link to from your social media bio or whatever.

phone number seems to be more important than physical address lately

Estonian solved this

Estonia*

estonianchain

https://preview.redd.it/5wle6aa325351.png?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=4c7b7f52ecfdab780639886f65fde6b894488330

speaking of Dorsey

I hate reading articles about blockchain because I am worried I am not understanding it
but then I wonder if there is actually anything worth understanding

funny I remember reading a story about Tesla where Elon would fire anyone who was discovered to have a second job or side hustle because he wanted their attention focused solely on their job at Tesla. well now Elon is the CEO of 3 separate, very different companies, plus he apparently has the time to shitpost & play video games all day, not to mention impregnating one of his subordinates every few months. is his involvement with these companies just "do this dumb idea or you're fired"??

I hate reading articles about blockchain because I am worried I am not understanding it
but then I wonder if there is actually anything worth understanding

― | (Latham Green), Monday, October 31, 2022 10:06 AM (forty-seven seconds ago) bookmarkflaglink

I dont think blockchain is that complex, it's just a large linked list which everyone on the network needs to have a copy of to verify new entries. or something like that anyway. I think there is an actual plausible use case involving authentication tokens that could in theory be used across multiple networks but, as always with blockchain stuff, there's already a much quicker and easier way to do it out there

heres a brief primer that pretty much covers it https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2022-the-crypto-story/

we're kind of past the era where people who were rich and/or had power had to be serious people;

I think you should probably look up the Habsburgs (or really any monarchy past a certain point)

Yeah I feel like ruling/elite classes have always been rife with buffoons, dunces, crooks and dipshits.

Didn't know about the Estonian system, it does seem like a good solution.

https://e-estonia.com/solutions/e-identity/id-card/

social media has exposed the fact that rich people arent serious, did away with the pr and professional media intermediaries

the only problem is that many of them love it and are thriving eg elon trump

I was reading something about using blockchain as "providence" (who owns or sold a work of art and who owned it before etc) but it seemed like it was full of pitfalls.

Seems like the whol blockchain idea is "we don't need governments anymore" like anarchy or something - like the programmers will solve everything but they dont know about how the world really works they just know how software works

amazing to watch genius in real time

Fun watching these complete dumbasses reply to mostly bad ideas from random accounts for how Twitter should now change. It really does show they have no clue what they’re doing. pic.twitter.com/3UJ485rEam

— Paris Marx (@parismarx) October 31, 2022

good lord

Longtime Musk associates David Sacks and Jason Calacanis appeared in a company directory over the weekend, according to photos obtained by The Washington Post. Both had official company emails and their titles were “staff software engineer.”

hahaha

love too c0de

If there's a silver lining to this debacle it's that Musk will be allowed to fail and make a fool of himself again and again, in public, for everyone to see. Unlike most CEOs, who tend to do this stuff in private.

these people are freaks (the bad kind)

Scary monsters (and super creeps).

I read an overheated/overstuffed piece about Sacks the other day: https://newrepublic.com/article/168125/david-sacks-elon-musk-peter-thiel

not sure there's much of a thesis in there, but his politics are bad (as in Desantis donor bad) in case you were wondering

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-fired-twitter-execs-for-cause-avoid-severance-report-2022-10

this is deranged and will 100% lead to lawsuits

also, popcorn.gif at this coming up in november: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-26/musk-defends-50-billion-pay-deal-as-justified-by-tesla-s-surge i don't have a view on the outcome but hope it will lead to lols.

interesting considering theyve owned a piece since the startup days iirc

Today I am requesting the Committee on Foreign Investment — which reviews acquisitions of U.S. businesses by foreign buyers — to conduct an investigation into the national security implications of Saudi Arabia's purchase of Twitter.https://t.co/IDwnKGaxt7

— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) October 31, 2022

articles a couple weeks old but first ive heard