like the queen this thread will never die: in which we ALL resign (ourselves to disgusting miseries to post-boris politics 2022)

Posting one good thing.

is this the only good thing a Horny Man has ever done? 🤔 https://t.co/UvWouIZxxI

— josie sparrow (@ofthesparrows) October 3, 2022

Has Labour thought to go on the attack? Truss does not make sense. The Bank of England does not agree with her government's fiscal policies.

I am not sure anyone in the U.S. thinks of Bernie Sanders as an American flag-waving type if that was the implication.

fully costed strong & stable austerity is Labour's brand, the BoE will approve.

LAB: 52% (+6)
CON: 24% (-5)
LDEM: 10% (-3)
GRN: 5% (+1)

via
@RedfieldWilton
, 02 Oct
Chgs. w/ 29 Sep

they'll just keep taking it for granted that this will last until the next GE for now.

might just be my mood but it just occurred to me that the old Labour Party is dead, and it's the left in its broad sense that hasn't taken this on board yet. this deserves elaboration i think but not by me, today. the 1945 government is nothing but an empty symbol for this new party to invoke when it needs to rally useful idiots.

if i'm right, i don't think it's any great loss

i think the left has taken it on board but in FPTP there is no other vehicle for parliamentary solutions to the massive fucking problems staring us in the face so we’re fucking stuck with it sorry for the language

i mean i did quit the labour party for reasons i have detailed exhaustively but nevertheless

is why i said the broadest sense, obviously most genuine leftists have given it up, but until trade unions and others take action to disengage it'll continue to have the veneer of legitimacy

I really didn't like that Spirit of '45 doc by Loach, well lol just saw the trailer which made it look like an uncritical sepia tinted homage to the Attlee govt rather than anything worth watching. It's very annoying when Labour politicians invoke any of the good stuff the party has historically achieved when it has absolutely zero connection with where they are at now. Even a posh lefty lawyer like Stafford Cripps would probably get the whip removed in Starmer Labour, saying that he got expelled from the party in '39 and then let back in again after the war.

My ideal Green Party would be knowledgeable in economic and civic planning as well as environmental issues, would appeal to youth, and would distract the younger generation and their elders from war.

(I had assumed that the Conservatives represent the establishment and would be aligned with the Bank of England in supporting stability to everyone's overall benefit, but I don't think that the Conservatives are so aligned, and I leave open larger questions about economic policy.)

I was listening to a program about the history of money laundering yesterday and it was covering the Eurodollar market in 50's - 60's London yesterday. I thought it was interesting that the Bank of England was loving it that some banks were making a killing by breaking financial regs and the Tory govt at the time didn't even have a clue it was going on for the first few years.

any other leader would be 100 points ahead

Sterling is recovering (though the pound has been losing value for the last few months anyway).

I can see the cuts (or no increase in line with inflation) to benefits going through unopposed. Wonder if Lab will abstain, just wouldn't surprise me.

Mortgages rates have been put up in anticipation of Nov rate rise though. Housing has become an issue.

It's always surprising to see Tories oppose benefit cuts but I'm thinking, if anything, it's more about hating Truss than compassion for benefits claimants

a lot of things will go up a couple of percent - benefits, NHS funding - far behind inflation, and because of the way math works the tories will tout it as “the largest ever increase in benefits spending, helping you get through these tough times”

if Labour abstained on another welfare cuts bill it wouldn't be that surprising. But I think they might vote against this one, if they are still running scared of that 2010-15 "soft on benefits" rhetoric after the last few weeks then they are literally barely any use to anyone who isn't rich or well off.

there's enough Tories making disgruntled noises to make it safe to oppose cuts if they happen, more likely to be a below-inflation rise in benefits tho which Reeves will reluctantly support while pulling a serious face and talking shit about her rules

Chris Kaba shot to death by a police officer update: New IOPC statement ‘The officers did not activate their lights or sirens while following the vehicle. The intention was to use an ‘enforced stop extraction’ on the Audi’ It suggest Mr Kaba was not in a police chase @itvlondon pic.twitter.com/TlSdC46hOJ

— Antoine Allen (@AntoineSpeaker) October 4, 2022

Search me what an "enforced stop extraction" is.

The shooter did not even leave the patrol car. Schmucks.

BREAKING: King Charles has been allowed to vet and potentially lobby for changes to emergency legislation to freeze rents in Scotland pic.twitter.com/sTpJZuMGPv

— The National (@ScotNational) October 4, 2022

Carrying on his mummy's good work of enriching themselves at all costs

'This is a problem made under their watch'

Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves MP says that illegal immigration has been on the increase whilst Conservatives have been in government and calls the lack of deportations "12 years of Tory failure"

👉 https://t.co/xZtjki2Yiq

📺 Sky 501 pic.twitter.com/O6urjKZlqU

— Sky News (@SkyNews) October 4, 2022

GTTO!

reeves is incredible. every time I hear from her she comes out with yet another new reason not to vote Labour. she's way more effective than any Saatchi and Saatchi ad could ever be in suppressing the Labour vote.

What's happening in Thurrock deserves more attention. A council recklessly borrowed £1bn from other (apathetic) local authorities and then risked it all on secretive and ultimately disastrous money-spinning deals. Now there's no choice but to give it hundreds of millions more https://t.co/uW2Mm8fcv7

— Gareth Davies (@Gareth_Davies09) October 4, 2022

"I'm a firestarter, twisted firestarter..."

A 25 minute speech later from the Prime Minister I’m told. And she’ll arrive on stage to ‘a 90s classic.’ https://t.co/0xP4gDOrN2

— Chris Mason (@ChrisMasonBBC) October 5, 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ivt_N2Zcts

Billions wasted in corruption like this. The poorest pay.

What's happening in Thurrock deserves more attention. A council recklessly borrowed £1bn from other (apathetic) local authorities and then risked it all on secretive and ultimately disastrous money-spinning deals. Now there's no choice but to give it hundreds of millions more https://t.co/uW2Mm8fcv7

— Gareth Davies (@Gareth_Davies09) October 4, 2022

"90s classic"?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYL75KrWIAY_bx0.jpg

Oh no

ABSOLUTE SCENES pic.twitter.com/0UuWVpEKUL

— mark emlyn evans (@marcooth) October 5, 2022

the real baller move would be Things Can Only Get Better

Mind Playin' Tricks On Me

the real real baller move but wrong decade

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbGkxcY7YFU

Kidding himself. Starmer won't need you.

Labour are going to win the next election by default, and then we are going to fight them when they do some terrible things. https://t.co/QzVTzJlWUS

— Owen Jones (@OwenJones84) October 4, 2022

I have a soft spot for Owen but yeah he's just clinging to his own grift here

🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨
🧵@RMTunion are proud to announce a hugely exciting collaboration with Primal Scream’s Bobby Gillespie and Andrew Innes together with Dexys’ Kevin Rowland & Sean Read, plus Jesus and Mary Chain bassist Douglas Hart to produce a song and video in support of RMT

— RMT (@RMTunion) October 5, 2022

Video would be fine as long as none of those wrinkly old fuckers appear in it.

Accredited photojournalist @TolgaAkmen aggressively removed from @Conservatives conference. Absolutely disgusting. @CCHQPress @NUJofficial https://t.co/0s4teCqWqN

— Peter Manning (@PeteManningFoto) October 5, 2022

Look I want to be optimistic about growth opportunities as the next guy, but as a physicist working in policymaking, its my responsibility to tell you that this technology simply does not exist⚛️ https://t.co/MviRShm0Sj

— George Dibb (@GeorgeDibb) October 4, 2022

just squeezed past jrm in a birningham petrol station shop as he was choosing a chocolate bar to go with his sandwich. mumbled 'thanks' as he moved to let me past, couldn't even bring myself to add 'you wanker'.

Surely what Owen Jones is saying is just descriptively correct - Labour will win, and "we", ie the left on twitter/youtube will fight them, he's not saying they will have any influence on the leadership or even the party in general. Maybe he means that but it's not what his words said.

I'm sure Jones is not deluded enough to think the left will have any purchase and power in the party organs and bureaucracy after a Starmer/Reeves victory

“You've done me wrong, your time is up
You took a sip from the devil's cup
You broke my heart, there's no way back
Move right out of here, baby, go on pack your bags”

And they say she lacks self-knowledge.

xp

but he'll still ultimately tell people to vote for them, racism and all

Indeed, his follow up tweet says he will vote for them.

I'd rather be fighting Labour too which is why I'm voting for the lesser of two evils but I think you're being a bit naive - looking back at New Labour's term in office - about how bad these people can be

— Owen Jones (@OwenJones84) October 4, 2022

This is somewhat of a new situation though, because just 6 weeks ago I would have said that the Tories would get back in. Starmer seemed utterly useless to everyone (and still does to us, I think). Now a Labour gov seems a certainty. Based on that, the left does need to reorient its strategy, such as it is

agreed. i don't think it's viable to do this through the Labour Party tho

Agree with poster glumdalclitch!

Except I'm not sure a Labour government is a certainty. Long way to go.

I'm sure Jones is not deluded enough to think the left will have any purchase and power in the party organs and bureaucracy after a Starmer/Reeves victory

― glumdalclitch, Wednesday, 5 October 2022 bookmarkflaglink

So what does it mean to say they will fight them? Starmer is an authoritarian and will throw the police and the law at protestors. Why does he think he is better than Braverman?

This lesser of two evils stuff is weak and doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

Yes. How he thinks he will fight them I can't really say. Through Guardian articles I guess _shrug_

I haven't yet seen/heard him say that he will recommend others to vote for them, just that he will.

As far as "lesser of two evils" goes, I have to very grudgingly admit that that is an exact description of Starmer's Labour. For 5 bad policies there might be 1 half good one. That doesn't mean I will vote for them, Im not deluded enough to think they will [Paul Mason voice] advance the class struggle

It's academic though, the homeowning and mortgage paying voters have decided that Labour is where their vote is going, and soon the Sun and Times might well decide that

lol it's pretty grim times when you are thinking an outright Labour majority could actually be dangerous and being propped up by the LibDems might curb Starmer's authoritarianism. That is literally the definition of "there are no good outcomes, abandon all hope"

"For 5 bad policies there might be 1 half good one. That doesn't mean I will vote for them, Im not deluded enough to think they will [Paul Mason voice] advance the class struggle"

Corbyn's Lab wasn't about advancing the class struggle. This is not what this is about. And one thing they don't do is announce policy. Till the conference, where what they came up with was inadequate.

"It's academic though, the homeowning and mortgage paying voters have decided that Labour is where their vote is going, and soon the Sun and Times might well decide that"

Ok so now we are on the vote of people is purely academic because mortgages so it doesn't matter. Fine, just say that. Don't pretend they are better.