WTF?: "Seinfeld"'s Michael 'Kramer' Richards in Weird-o-Rama Onstage Meltdown

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1647 of them)
If he was a beloved member of the community, you can bet that people would have petitioned the moderators a long time ago. But no, he was always kind of annoying.

SO WAS KRAMER.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:41 (nineteen years ago)

thank you, "euai"


is that it guarantees that racial harmony and peace and blahblahblah will never, ever, ever happen.

no, in fact the opposite is true: you can't make any progress until you own up to the problem and tell the truth about it

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:41 (nineteen years ago)

in summary:

Who's worse?
Michael Richards 68%
Mel Gibson 32%
Total Votes: 145,939

Good-Time Slim, Uncle Doobie, and the Great 'Frisco Freak-Out (sixteen sergeants, Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:41 (nineteen years ago)

Racism is learned, assholism is performed.

Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)

no, in fact the opposite is true: you can't make any progress until you own up to the problem and tell the truth about it

Perhaps then you didn't mean to use the word "irredeemable".

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)

oh no, that's what I meant all right

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:44 (nineteen years ago)

I'll give you $20 if you call your next album "White People are Irredeemable".

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)

I mean it's an agency thing, right? Some people are being like "look how Richards is an example of the inexorable forces of history and society" and other are like, "Buh? You want to use Michael Richards to talk about this? OK." The question isn't whether what he said was racist, cause duh, or what broad social trends he represents, because who cares, but the degree to which he lost control. Was it a deliberate strategy badly applied, or a loss of control? The assumption was the latter, Richards seemed to sorta be arguing the former. And so is that accurate/valid, is the ensuing question. Could be racism or sexism or atheism, don't matter all that much.

Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)

So, white people don't want to say "I'm irredeemable," right; and want to excuse this sort of thing on some grounds in order to avoid the ick that they may themselves host.

I do think there's something to this. For me, it's not about excusing what Richards did -- it's obv. inexcusable -- but my whole goal on this thread to downplay the usage of the term "racist" as a noun is probably partly due to the way that that term implies irredeemability, esp. since I don't want to think that whatever hurtful things I'm capable of make me irredeemable.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:50 (nineteen years ago)

(I mean, Thomas, I like your motets and all, but you do realize that you're basically owning up to the fantasy of every rabid right-wing commentator and militia member -- that the Left's agenda is to see white males subjugated, writhing in the dirt, as punishment for their sins?)

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:51 (nineteen years ago)

aaaand scene.

too late, lurker

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

lol ade did i ever tell you that story about that graffiti in alabama?

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:53 (nineteen years ago)

Dammit, I'm always too late

Eppy and Jaymc OTM, though

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:54 (nineteen years ago)

Oh noes, what have I done

Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:55 (nineteen years ago)

People in the Letterman laughed because Richards used the word "Afro Americans" in the first line of his apology. His racial anachronism made him seem deadpan and therefore "funny." In his involvement with the Freemasons, I'm sure he's been continuously up to neck in weird, mystical shit from hundreds of years ago and surrounded by a sorts of alienated and powerful old-guy creeps to disassociate himself from contemporary reality. He probably believes in his conscious mind that he's doing cosmic "good works" and maybe there is some Masonic "conspiracy" to "help the Katrina victims" and counter racism, but the history of Freemasonry and slavery is too intertwined for him ignore. On some level, in his delusion, he's probably thinking, "Hey, we freed you fuckers, so us some respect." It's some paternalistic bullshit at best and illustrates the decadent shambles of his organization. He's bought a line his soul can't pay for.

Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:58 (nineteen years ago)

I was thinking about this thread a lot last night, and I realized that what it came down to was that my definition of racist (noun) was narrower than other people's, that I was didn't think that behavior alone was sufficient to slap a label on someone.

First of all, behavior is all we can go by. Second, the goal in identifying racism isn't to slap a label on somebody -- as in the witch hunts. The goal IS to curtail certain types of behavior, and to hopefully reflect on ourselves as well. The obsession of some people to affirm that someone IS a racist or ISN'T misses the point. The point being that many of us have a shitload of racist material floating around at various levels, more or less conscious, of our psyches. And that episodes such as the Richards one show, if anything, how that material will spew up to wound others when the surface cracks.

Collardio Gelatinous (collardio), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

No, my point re: mechanics is that in every other circumstance in the universe, we understand that there are small complicated differences between Doing Something and Being Something, but we don't spend an eternity stressing out over them. If I say something horrible, and Jaymc says "you're an asshole," we don't sit around worrying over whether I'm an actual asshole or whether I was just acting like an asshole. If a dude fixes my car, I say "he's a mechanic," and we don't feel a need to point out that he could quit and get a job at the phone company, and then he'd be a customer service agent, not a mechanic. That would be pointless obfuscation that only served to distract from the plain original fact that the dude fixed my car.

So I dunno, when someone gets pissed off in public and starts yelling about lynching the niggers and it appears that he both (a) kind of dug that one up earnestly and (b) thinks there's anything funny or interesting about it and (c) intends it to hurt and show power over people -- the guy was trying to put down and shut up people by using racial slurs and reminders of racial oppression! -- I think it's probably fair to just go "hey, look at the racist," and not get our panties in a knot like we're on some sort of racial linguistics panel.

Sorry, xpost

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:00 (nineteen years ago)

Let's say somebody on this board, who I know to be black, criticized me thusly:

Dude, my roommate says you're not funny.

And I responded with:

50 years ago, you'd be hanging upside down with a fork in your ass! He's a n***er! He's a n***er! He's a n***er!

To which he responded:

That was uncalled for. Seriously, STFU, white boy.

And then a third poster wrote:

Hey what's the big deal? Why are you rushing to judge him? I bet nobody's going to criticize the black man for his racism. The white guy was just giving vent to a common frustration that white people feel about black privilege.

I mean, seriously, you'd think that last response was pretty fucked up, wouldn't you? Maybe Let's say somebody on this board, who I know to be black, criticized me thusly:

Dude, my roommate says you're not funny.

And I responded with:

50 years ago, you'd be hanging upside down with a fork in your ass! He's a n***er! He's a n***er! He's a n***er!

To which he responded:

That was uncalled for. Seriously, STFU, white boy.

And then a third poster wrote:

Hey what's the big deal? Why are you rushing to judge him? I bet nobody's going to criticize the black man for his racism. The white guy was just giving vent to a common frustration that white people feel about black privilege.

I mean, seriously, you'd think that last response was pretty fucked up, wouldn't you?Let's say somebody on this board, who I know to be black, criticized me thusly:

Dude, my roommate says you're not funny.

And I responded with:

50 years ago, you'd be hanging upside down with a fork in your ass! He's a n***er! He's a n***er! He's a n***er!

To which he responded:

That was uncalled for. Seriously, STFU, white boy.

And then a third poster wrote:

Hey what's the big deal? Why are you rushing to judge him? Is he really a racist? I bet nobody's going to criticise the black guy for his racist comment. Why can blacks get away with it and not whites? The white guy was just giving vent to common frustration that white people feel about black privilege.

I mean, seriously, you'd think that last response was pretty fucked up, wouldn't you?

Fleischhutliebe! like a warm, furry meatloaf (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:03 (nineteen years ago)

P.S. also the term "racist" only implies being irredeemable if you happen to believe that, well, racists are irredeemable, or that people can't change -- but of course there are even neo-Nazis who change their minds and try to atone for things, and neo-Nazis seem to be the only people in America some people on this board are comfortable labeling "racist."

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)

Haha also yes, I think that last response to this thread got fucked up, somewhere along the line.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

No one would argue with that, Fluffy Bear.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

nabisco did i ever tell you about that graffiti in alabama? it's pertinent to discussion and amusing perhaps.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

YES YES I WOULD, OK ALREADY

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:07 (nineteen years ago)

i wanna hear about the graffiti

geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:08 (nineteen years ago)

you can be a Jewish mason, there are lots of Jewish masons. Only religious requirement is that you're monotheistic. There are muslim freemasons as well.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:08 (nineteen years ago)

Stop talking ABOUT talking about the graffiti and just tell us about it, already!

Laurel (Laurel), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:09 (nineteen years ago)

P.S. also the term "racist" only implies being irredeemable if you happen to believe that, well, racists are irredeemable, or that people can't change

I don't think that anyone's irredeemable, but the way that other people use the word "racist" makes me think that they do, which is why I hesitate to use it. A lot of the time, I *do* get a "witch hunt" vibe rather than a "helpful learning experience" vibe. This could all be a huge misunderstanding, though.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:10 (nineteen years ago)

he only wants to tell nabisco

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:10 (nineteen years ago)

And ade! And that's only this morning!

Laurel (Laurel), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

Whoah. That was fucked up. (xpost to me)

Fleischhutliebe! like a warm, furry meatloaf (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

Only religious requirement is that you're monotheistic.

You can't be a freemason if you're Catholic, since bead-fumblers adhere to the power of confession. That's how all those Knights of Columbus halls got started.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

xxxxxxxxxxpost
Whenever anyone says out loud "I'm not a racist" red flags red flags

Aren't we all racists to some extent? Don't we all harbour assumptions about groups of people? When someone says "SUV-driving Republican" they are in a sense being racist or classist or some kind of -ist.

I think what he did was really horrible and unforgiveable and I don't feel bad for him if he never gets work again.

I just think whether or not someone bears the label "racist" is irrelevant. Maybe he's a worse racist than many, although not as bad a racist as the people who beat people up or scare people away from polls.

His apology seemed sincere - and I appreciated that his answer to what he would do now was "personal work" cuz he does need to do some soul-searching -- maybe out of this will come something good. Maybe he'll set up a fund or some other good work.

I still think too that it was an act gone awry. He was doing improv - he got into the role of the white belittled man lashing out at the black guy, trying to grasp at the former power when he was "the man" - and he let it go too far. That's not to say there's an excuse for it.

Comedy clubs are where it's okay to touch nerves. Comedians are the ones who lay bare our discomfort. He started some kind of national dialogue, if not a race war, that is bigger than him and probably good to have - so in the end, I don't think it was such a bad thing.

Maria :D (Maria D.), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

i'm amazed that this story is still going. i'm also amazed that while it seems 50% of the country is talking about this, the other 50% is talking about o.j. simpson.

we've come a long way, baby.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

Not that it makes a blind bit of difference, but I would love to know what those guys said to him that made him absolutely flip out like that. I mean, I'm sure he was dying on his arse, and I'm sure that they were saying more or less the same things they were saying to him on their way out of the club, about him being a loser and being nothing after Kramer and so on, but I'd love to know if any one of them said anything that might give a clue as to why he went the race direction or if he really just pulled it out of the blue like that.

Please, please don't think I'm trying to excuse him. Even if they had said anything, it would not excuse what happened, but I would be curious to know.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

after seeing the letterman clip i'm changing my diagnosis from frustrated secret racist to disturbed narcissist w/racist tendencies.

jhoshea megafauna (scoopsnoodle), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

I think he was on a rage binge mixed with the weird sense of omnipotence only a person once famous can be deluded by and went batshit.

But like Gibson with his incident, the fact that his rage binge and batshittedness manifested in these remarks...well, shit like that doesn't come out of nowhere.

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:19 (nineteen years ago)

in other 'amerikkka eats its young' news...

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:23 (nineteen years ago)

the fact that his rage binge and batshittedness manifested in these remarks...well, shit like that doesn't come out of nowhere.

That's what strikes me about this. Maybe what the heckler said to him was so bad it made him blow off & go into some sort of mad tirade, but to come out with that? So fucked up.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

I was only IMing those boys because I was drunk.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:25 (nineteen years ago)

thx geoff!


(ok tying into weird white paranoia ade or nabisco - i get em confused - were mentioning above) there's this one highway exit near auburn alabama that pretty much from what i can tell all ga bulldogs fans are gonna hit anytime the auburn-ga game is there (context), one of the last exits before you're back in ga. i'm driving back thru alabama late one night and i stop at this exit for gas and to use the john and inside the restroom is just an insane amount of lengthy detailed like unabomber manifesto level stuff from different people or pens at least about how 1) blacks run alabama (different term than 'blacks' used obv) 2) blacks have it so easy in alabama and get away with stuff that liberals won't let whites get away 3) and this is why alabama isn't better off. it was damn near a detailed position paper on pro-segregation, anti-affirmative action, o if only whites had the same rights that blacks take for granted, and how come they get to use the n word btw. literally four walls covered with the stuff. and then, the saving grace that saved me from being merely repulsed/terrified by it and amplified how happy i was gonna be to be back in ga (where of course we don't have racism lol), written above this mess above the toilet oblivious of the surrounding white rage: "GO DAWGS!!!"

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

for the brits: blacks don't run alabama, not actually responsible for alabama not being better off

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

blount, i saw an almost-exact-same restroom treatise on black people in kingston, ontario of all places. y'know, where there's hardly any black people!

white people be fucked up and weird, film at 11.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

Did it say "GO DAWGS"?

Allyzay Eisenschefter (allyzay), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:29 (nineteen years ago)

Because that would be the weird bit, you see.

Allyzay Eisenschefter (allyzay), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:29 (nineteen years ago)

it's gonna be so weird if KRAMER provokes the 'open, honest national discussion about race' that katrina famously didn't. if bush or pelosi feel compelled to comment on this eventually i'm gonna lmao. this fucking country.


lol the ontario one said 'GO ARGONAUTS!!!'

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:30 (nineteen years ago)

naw it had some sort of hockey bullshit on there, i don't understand that crap.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:32 (nineteen years ago)

the biggest hockey fan i know is from alabama! admittedly 'biggest hockey fan i know' not a tough title to claim. not like 'biggest racist i know' lol.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

Quick omnibus post:

I mean, seriously, you'd think that last response was pretty fucked up, wouldn't you?

I would! It's a good thing, then, that no one made that argument. (Describing a phenomenon isn't the same as arguing on behalf of it, or making excuses for it.)

I don't think that anyone's irredeemable, but the way that other people use the word "racist" makes me think that they do, which is why I hesitate to use it. A lot of the time, I *do* get a "witch hunt" vibe rather than a "helpful learning experience" vibe. This could all be a huge misunderstanding, though.

No, I think you're OTM, and this is what troubles me about the word "racist" -- the witch-hunt, otherizing vibe of it (ironically enough). I don't know there's any way around it, though -- in other words, I don't know there's any way to make "racism" a strongly negative value, as it should be, without making "racists" a category of (in essence) non-persons, the Evil Other, people outside the social contract who Aren't Like Us who it's OK to hate. And I don't find that impulse trustworthy.

I would love to know what those guys said to him that made him absolutely flip out like that.

I think we all would, yeah.

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

(I have to say, though -- "the Evil Other, people outside the social contract who Aren't Like Us who it's OK to hate" -- it's white people who do this, almost as if determined to purge the thing that hits close to home.)

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:35 (nineteen years ago)

LOL, hockey, who cares.

Allyzay Eisenschefter (allyzay), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:35 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.