ok what the fuck is happening in ukraine

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5393 of them)

I know this is coming from the US press which are running dogs for the imperialist war machine, but it's hard to read this article without coming to the conclusion that Russia has some understandable grievances with the increasing US military presence in Eastern Europe, and reasons to be unhappy with the way the US unilaterally withdrew from the anti-ballistic missile treaty which was a cornerstone of nuclear detente:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/16/world/europe/poland-missile-base-russia-ukraine.html

o. nate, Thursday, 17 February 2022 03:25 (four years ago)

The best comparison I heard was that Ukraine joining NATO is the equivalent to the Russians of Russia putting missiles in Cuba.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 February 2022 06:21 (four years ago)

is this not obvious

would this not be an obvious thing to consider within one second

Ár an broc a mhic (darraghmac), Thursday, 17 February 2022 08:01 (four years ago)

which was like the US putting missiles in Turkey which was like

papal hotwife (milo z), Thursday, 17 February 2022 08:03 (four years ago)

JCOS working on a plan as we speak, though

https://www.denofgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/dr-strangelove-3.jpg

papal hotwife (milo z), Thursday, 17 February 2022 08:04 (four years ago)

It's OK 'cos we're the good guys.

since dozzell was a fixture (Tom D.), Thursday, 17 February 2022 09:17 (four years ago)

yep I've just read an Anne Applebum piece in the Atlantic and can confirm that

calzino, Thursday, 17 February 2022 09:55 (four years ago)

Hmm is it safe to assess western media coverage as anything less than pure garbage without getting carpeted with F-bombs?

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Thursday, 17 February 2022 10:43 (four years ago)

For anyone still asking “what’s it all about?” — that Time article posted up thread had a lot of pertinent info that I hadn’t seen in other coverage. (I didn’t make it past the paywall on o. Nate’s NYT piece but the point about the treaty also stands out.)

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Thursday, 17 February 2022 10:46 (four years ago)

As a citizen of a Russia-bordering country, from a Russian-speaking household, having travelled in Ukraine, Moldova, Russia and Georgia, it is pretty fucking offensive reading people describing Russian positions as «sabre rattling», but perhaps I shouldn’t be surprised

Mule, Thursday, 17 February 2022 10:50 (four years ago)

Care to elaborate?

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Thursday, 17 February 2022 10:57 (four years ago)

Just people upthread being totally dismissive of the experience of having Russian aggression as a constant presence, because NATO or whatever.

Mule, Thursday, 17 February 2022 11:13 (four years ago)

It’s good to know there’s someone else with a passport, not great when poster Mule pops up to aggressively condescend as they occasionally do (recall them tone policing calzino in the unhappiness of ilx) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I’m not going to apologise for describing obvious dick waving as such; that doesn’t mean it’s not unnerving or upsetting for people in the area though!

mardheamac (gyac), Thursday, 17 February 2022 11:19 (four years ago)

xpost

Oh cheers. Feel free to f-bomb me cause I assumed based on the Russian-speaking that it might be the opposite.

Full disclosure I did just read a Guardian article and a Russia Today article side by side and the RT article wasn’t as bad as I thought it would be. Heavy use of scare quotes tho. (Also remarkably hard to find on Google at all now.)

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Thursday, 17 February 2022 11:20 (four years ago)

And gyac your perspective is appreciated too, I didn’t recognize the name. I do also have a passport for what’s it worth. Ask me about China (my mom is a Tibetan Buddhist and my ex was Tibetan so I may be less than 100% unbiased.)

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Thursday, 17 February 2022 11:22 (four years ago)

The unfortunate nature of china’s role in the world means they’re never going to get held to account ito what they’ve been doing in Tibet/Xinjiang, Russia to a lesser extent has a position of power because of its role shipping gas to Europe and its location. It takes a lot for a war to kick off because of these realities I guess, so Putin et al can really act as they like with impunity because what’s going to happen to them? And does Western Europe even care beyond keeping the gas on? And if there’s no danger of military pushback then Russia doesn’t have to do anything besides move some troops around and make some verbal threats, so yeah, that’s really my thinking on “sabre rattling”, that and the only people really going hard for war are the only people who always are, ie Atlantic Council shitheads and dopes like AA.

mardheamac (gyac), Thursday, 17 February 2022 11:30 (four years ago)

Jus «obvious dick waving», right. But whatever, gyac. We’ll never see eye to eye.

To be clear: had no issue with what you wrote, viborg

Mule, Thursday, 17 February 2022 11:32 (four years ago)

All this ^ has been covered thread and in more detail by others previously, if you’d like to talk more about your opinion then I’d be interested to read it.

mardheamac (gyac), Thursday, 17 February 2022 11:34 (four years ago)

*upthread

mardheamac (gyac), Thursday, 17 February 2022 11:34 (four years ago)

You’re on the mark obv. Off topic but I was in HK during the ‘siege’ of HK Polytechnic U. I stayed at Chunking Mansions which is on Nathan Rd quite near there. The protests were ongoing all around there. I took some interesting pics that I never posted online.

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Thursday, 17 February 2022 12:03 (four years ago)

For anyone curious why someone might say that the state of journalism in Russia today is "not good", this piece from Deutsche Welle (the German public news organization) is a neat summary:

https://www.dw.com/en/critical-journalists-in-russia-fall-silent/a-60670100

Or I guess you could just google "Anna Politkovskaya".

o. nate, Thursday, 17 February 2022 14:06 (four years ago)

Who is arguing the state of Russian journalism is good?

Scampo di tutti i Scampi (ShariVari), Thursday, 17 February 2022 14:11 (four years ago)

No one, but some are equating it to state of journalism in western democracies, or implying that the differences are insignificant.

o. nate, Thursday, 17 February 2022 14:12 (four years ago)

Another good article from DW, on how Russian media have been laying the groundwork for possible hostilities with Ukraine. Seems the goal is not to get average Russians to actually support war, very few do, but to at least blame the West if hostilities do break out:

https://www.dw.com/en/how-russian-media-outlets-are-preparing-an-attack-on-ukraine/a-60801837

o. nate, Thursday, 17 February 2022 15:01 (four years ago)

lol

Note to Readers: Updated Post
Matt Taibbi
Feb 17

In the wake of new developments on the Ukraine-Russia story, I updated “Another All-Time Media Faceplant” this morning.

Chappies banging dustbin lids together (President Keyes), Thursday, 17 February 2022 16:26 (four years ago)

All this ^ has been covered thread and in more detail by others previously, if you’d like to talk more about your opinion then I’d be interested to read it.

― mardheamac (gyac), 17. februar 2022 12:34 (five hours ago) bookmarkflaglink

I don’t think my opinion is necessarily much different from what some have said upthread, really, or that I have any unique perspectives here. I agree with some of your analysis in the preceding post, particularly concerning Russia’s strategic upper hand. However, I disagree that Putin does not want or need «war» (although that may be different things), and I don’t read Russian positions as mere posturing (even notwithstanding that Russia have been fighting in Dombass for years). Crimea, Georgia, should be clear evidence that there is a willingness if considered necessary in order to reach strategic goals. Re Ukraine, strategic goals is more effectively secured through a level of territorial control over Ukraine (as NATO-guarantees regarding Ukrainian membership will clearly not be given), especially given that an attack will not be directly responded to by the US / NATO (regardless what the AC our AA may argue, thankfully).

In this light, «sabre rattling», «dick waving», seems off the mark and disrespectful in my view, but we don’t need to continue that discussion (I realise that I was the one picking the fight).

Mule, Thursday, 17 February 2022 17:21 (four years ago)

Psh, just like Putin.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 February 2022 17:29 (four years ago)

amassing FPs at the border

Chappies banging dustbin lids together (President Keyes), Thursday, 17 February 2022 17:34 (four years ago)

#BREAKING In a document to the UN, Russia is formally accusing #Ukraine of "exterminating the civilian population" of two largely Russian-speaking regions.

This is significant because US officials see accusations like this by Russia as a "pretext for war" on Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/KjCQSkJA6X

— Majeed Gly (@MajeedGly) February 17, 2022

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 17 February 2022 17:47 (four years ago)

US propaganda machine going into overdrive to push peace-loving Russia into a war they never wanted

Blinken to the UN: "Russia plans to manufacture a pretext for its attack. This could be a violent event that Russia will blame on Ukraine or outrageous accusations that Russia will level against the Ukraine government. We don't know exactly the form it will take." pic.twitter.com/W5TQwzgP3q

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 17, 2022

Muad'Doob (Moodles), Thursday, 17 February 2022 20:31 (four years ago)

I guess if anyone would know about that it would be America.

mardheamac (gyac), Thursday, 17 February 2022 20:41 (four years ago)

it's certainly a familiar situation, but I don't think the US holds a monopoly on ginning up reasons to invade countries

Muad'Doob (Moodles), Thursday, 17 February 2022 20:43 (four years ago)

Putin has already described the situation as a 'genocide' of Russian-speakers, so there's that

Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 17 February 2022 20:46 (four years ago)

This thread would run a lot easier if people didn’t waste their time replying to claims nobody made.

mardheamac (gyac), Thursday, 17 February 2022 20:47 (four years ago)

unlike some of you I am against genocide

Chappies banging dustbin lids together (President Keyes), Thursday, 17 February 2022 20:50 (four years ago)

luckily the anti-genocide forces are apparently ready to sweep in

Muad'Doob (Moodles), Thursday, 17 February 2022 20:52 (four years ago)

Starting to have difficulties parsing the irony in this irony.

lol

Note to Readers: Updated Post
Matt Taibbi
Feb 17

In the wake of new developments on the Ukraine-Russia story, I updated “Another All-Time Media Faceplant” this morning.


Is this “lol @“ or “lol w/“ Taibbi? I thought he was widely regarded as a joke in general these days.

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Thursday, 17 February 2022 21:00 (four years ago)

Can we just stipulate that everyone here understands the US has invaded other countries on flimsy or fictitious pretexts and has a long sordid history of disseminating lies as propaganda? Having this well-known and accepted fact pointed out repeatedly just sounds like the usual 'whataboutism' in service to absolving Russia from its own misdeeds. OK?

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 17 February 2022 21:00 (four years ago)

*irony in this dumpster fire of a thread

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Thursday, 17 February 2022 21:00 (four years ago)

yes lol at Taibbi rushing out his "WMDs all over again FACEPLANT" article in the same manner the establishment press rushes out their "Russia to Invade at Noon!" tweets

Chappies banging dustbin lids together (President Keyes), Thursday, 17 February 2022 21:07 (four years ago)

Right, right. I have a hard time as seeing Biden as thirsty for a bloodletting in general, but I do see him as possibly deluded enough to be swayed by the wrong perspectives if there’s a concerted effort in the defense community to gin up a conflict. With WMDs the motive was always pretty obvious even if there are incessant denials that it was chiefly in the best interests of Halliburton and The Carlyle Group.

recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Thursday, 17 February 2022 21:19 (four years ago)

Always a good time to have a reason to authorize a $700000000000000000000 billion rise in defense spending, while it’s clearly “too expensive” to fix bridges or build trains or do healthcare or college

concentrating on Rationality (the book) (will), Thursday, 17 February 2022 21:23 (four years ago)

I guess the biggest sticking point for me, even if we are to assume that Russia stands ready to kill a bunch of people over Ukraine, where the actual fuck do we get off thinking it’s our place to stop them?

Our judgment is clearly not to be trusted, and even if we’re in the “right” side, who can trust us to stop it? We haven’t won a single war in over 77 years. Please do fuck right off with pretending we’re the good, or in any possible way, the capable cops. ffs.

concentrating on Rationality (the book) (will), Thursday, 17 February 2022 21:29 (four years ago)

I strongly doubt anyone is going in there to stop them

Muad'Doob (Moodles), Thursday, 17 February 2022 21:33 (four years ago)

aimless using weasel words to downplay the US record for CIA sponsored genocide like in Indonesia for example, which shows that mere "disseminating lies" as he put it and other shit in this case resulted in the deaths of millions in a mass anti-Communist genocide action. Nobody is saying Putin is good, just that America is much worse and Americans that swallow western media narratives by Applebum and co are horrible fucking clueless myopic idiots.

calzino, Thursday, 17 February 2022 22:07 (four years ago)

US record for CIA sponsored genocide like in Indonesia

yes. they did this. it's in the rcord. do we need to tally everything back to the Algonquins before we've satisfied this need?

aimless using weasel words

fuck you

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 17 February 2022 22:25 (four years ago)

calzino, clearly you are engaged and passionate about this but maybe attacking everyone for things they aren't actually stating isn't the best approach?

a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 17 February 2022 22:27 (four years ago)

This thread is going into battle as the subject region is, which is weird.

Legalize Suburban Benches (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 17 February 2022 22:34 (four years ago)

Can we just stipulate that everyone here understands the US has invaded other countries on flimsy or fictitious pretexts and has a long sordid history of disseminating lies as propaganda? Having this well-known and accepted fact pointed out repeatedly just sounds like the usual 'whataboutism' in service to absolving Russia from its own misdeeds. OK?

I'd accept this if there wasn't any signs that the US plans to get involved in this conflict but since there is its track record is very much relevant. Also there's this tendency to handwave this history like "oh yeah they did that in the past but THIS TIME it's gonna be different" every time the US gets stuck into something.

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 17 February 2022 22:40 (four years ago)

go read a Applebum? calzino comin strong
go read a Applebum? i said calzino comin strong

Bixby in a Samsung I know it's Siri-esque (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 17 February 2022 22:50 (four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.