DON'T THINK (pt. 2): Paste whatever is on your clipboard right now into the window and hit SUBMIT!

Let's start as friends
Seeking soulmate
Long-term relationship
Choose life
Soul sister
Hippy chick
The soul brother
Blues man
Genuine American
Frog seeks Princess

Someone is perfect for you
(When Mars meets Venus)
Do you wanna bet your life you're gonna be perfect for them too?
(Mars meets Venus)

New age man
Shake me up
Gay guy
Romantic
German
Indian
Long-term relationship
Beauty with brains
Mrs. Somethin' said...
Are you the one, are you the one, are you the one?

Someone is perfect for you
(When Mars meets Venus)
Do you wanna bet your life you're gonna be perfect for them too?
(Mars meets Venus)
Someone is perfect for you
(When Mars meets Venus)
Do you wanna bet your life you're gonna be perfect for them too?
(Mars meets Venus)

Here's lookin' at you

[note: lyrics meant to be transferred to a Notepad file]

He is also a little punk.

http://www.brightonbloggers.com/images/badge.gif

I am an English Major with a cumulative GPA of 3.749. I am available to work 6-10hrs per week. I have been awarded $3,000.00 in State Work Study funds for the 2003-2004 academic year. I will receive up to $1,500.00 for Fall Semester 2003.
I want this position because I have the essential qualifications. I have good typing skills with assured speed and accuracy and basic knowledge of Word, Excel. I also have an interest in psychology research. My current resume is attached.

Sincerely,

Melinda Irons

OH SHIT! That's my password to ALL my accounts!!!
Oh well, gotta obey the rules...

NASDAQ-Listed Companies receive special discount on seminars, publications and membership fees.

NASDAQ and the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) have formed an alliance to provide NASDAQ-listed companies with corporate governance educational services at a discount. NASDAQ Press Release (08/27/03)

Governance Education Programs for Directors and Boards

20% Discount for NASDAQ-Listed companies

NACD conducts progressive, interactive seminars and conferences designed for both executive management and directors.

Governance Publications and Benchmarking Data

20% Discount for NASDAQ-Listed companies

Periodicals, Blue Ribbon Commission Reports, Surveys and Benchmarking, Board Leadership Series, and more.

Membership in NACD

10% Discount for NASDAQ-Listed companies

Members share a commitment to conscientious corporate governance and a quest for excellence in the companies they serve.

For more information, click on the "GOVERNANCE" tab above, log in to the home page (if you would like access to NASDAQ-online, please call the NASDAQ Online help desk at 800-261-0148 to request an ID and password), or contact NASDAQ program director John Shipley at 212-401-8778.

oh! it's Ships!

To :xxxxx
RE: xxxx
FAX: 916-xxxxxxx

This is a statement of additional facts in the xxxxx case. I’ve attached the phone log for this case so you can see events as they unfolded.

We are concerned because the school:
• is out of the 15 day assessment plan timeline
• is out of the 50 day testing timeline
• does not reply for requests for records (test /assessment results)
• intentionally supplied parent with false information (saying testing had been done when it hadn’t; saying there was a problem with testing due to child not having glasses and not notifying parent of this until late August; leading the parent to believe they were coming for a meeting to do testing when in fact they were inviting them to an IEP)

late May 2003: The school does not respond to the parent’s request for an assessment. Advocate xxx leaves two voicemails for Principal Jxxx Wxxx notifying them that they are out of timeline in giving an Assessment Plan.

June 7th 2003 (date approximate) Parent returns signed Assessment Plan to school office, and does not receive the yellow “parent copy” from them. (on 8/28/03 parent left a voicemail for the principal and spoke with a secretary requesting a copy)

August 12th 2003 Parent calls advocate and says she hasn’t heard anything from the school about testing, and says that her son says he has not been tested.

August 12th 2003. Advocate Cxxx Sxxx informs IEP team that they are out of timeline for testing and was told by Jxxx Wxxx that the academic testing had already been done. (see phone log). Exxx Sxxx says maybe she can “get to testing him Thursday, he’s at the top of the list”. Advocate faxes release of information to IEP team.

August 18th, 2003. New Special Ed teacher Mr. Cxxx tells advocate that Ixxx has already been tested by Mr. Gxxx (former Special Ed teacher who was now Program Specialist).
Requested test results from Exxx Sxxx, who tells advocate she can’t complete testing because Ixxx doesn’t have his glasses. Advocate informs parent and parent makes sure child has glasses the next day.

August 18th, 2003. Advocate hears from mother than Rxxx Gxxx has called her, and wants her to bring her son to a meeting to talk about the testing. She signs the paper thinking it is a permission to test, but is really an IEP Conference Invitation. She informs advocate to cancel the meeting when it is explained to her what has happened. Advocate calls Dr. Lxxx Sxxx, Director of Special Education to explain the situation, and is called back by Mxxxx Cxxx, Secretary of Accountability, who tells advocate she will have Dr. Sxxx call and to date advocate has not received that call.

August 19th, 2003. Mr Cxxx informs advocate that Mr. Gxxx has completed testing, and says that he was substituting when Ixxx was pulled out for testing twice. He said Mr. Gxxx had told him to tell advocate to call only Gxxx and that Gxxx had to re-test because of the glasses. Mr. Gxxx however, had never informed the parent or the advocate that glasses were an issue in his testing. Mr. Cxxx gave the advocate a cell phone to reach Mr. Gxxx, however the cell phone did not have a voice mailbox set up on which to leave messages.

August 26th, 2003. Mr. Gxxx says he never received Authorization to Release Information and gave advocate a fax number that did not answer. Advocate faxed it to two different numbers at the District and left a voicemail at the Special Education office of the district alerting them that it has been sent. Mr. Gxxx tells advocate that he had already tested Isaac, and that Exxx Sxxxx had finished her testing.

August 27th, 2003. Jxxx Wxxx calls and tells advocate “Mr. Gxxx and Exxx Sxxx are here, and they are finishing up the testing as we speak. Can you re-fax the Authorization to Exchange Information for everyone to me? “ and indicated she would fax the test results. No results were sent as of the end of the day August 28th, and no communication was received by parent nor advocate from the IEP team. The mother requested a copy of the signed assessment form on the principal’s voicemail and asked the front office secretary for a copy.

This is a statement of facts based on my records.

Sincerely,

Cxxx Sxxx, Ph.D.
Parent Advocate