Sounds like shit might be getting real over there? Or maybe just Putin flexing further after Biden's presser.
― a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 15 February 2022 21:35 (four years ago)
The Russians have been avid students of secret police and espionage methods since the Czars. They'd be insulted to hear you say the FBI could teach them any new tricks.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 15 February 2022 23:28 (four years ago)
it's always good to learn new stuff, thanx aimless
― calzino, Tuesday, 15 February 2022 23:32 (four years ago)
tell milo
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 15 February 2022 23:33 (four years ago)
Russia bad. America good.
― concentrating on Rationality (the book) (will), Tuesday, 15 February 2022 23:36 (four years ago)
Half right.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 15 February 2022 23:53 (four years ago)
Yikes. Head of Zelensky’s Servant of the People party in parliament claims Western media “hysteria is now costing the country $2-3 billion every month,” calls CNN, Bloomberg, WSJ coverage “worse than Skabeeva and Solovyov, top Russian state propagandists. https://t.co/VjXrQLf55U pic.twitter.com/zH5bdrWM3e— Christopher Miller (@ChristopherJM) February 16, 2022
I don't know how reliable Arakhamia is but hard agree that so called respectable western media outlets who are uncritically reporting highly questionable Whitehouse briefings every day are presently no better or are even worse than the top Russian state propagandists.
― calzino, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 15:37 (four years ago)
At the same time, there is no way to know if the ott messaging/reporting from the west played any role in *preventing* a (further) Russian incursion (so far). Like, all that Russian military, blood banks, etc. weren't arrayed there for no reason at all.
All I know is it must be fun to be Putin.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 15:54 (four years ago)
At the same time, there is no way to know if the ott messaging/reporting from the west played any role in *preventing* a (further) Russian incursion (so far).
― mardheamac (gyac), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 16:05 (four years ago)
after being bombarded 24/7 with 🚨 BREAKING, PUTIN TO INVADE ANY MINUTE NOW 🚨 only for the situation to be gradually de-escalated is probably the clearest sign you'll get that the press are just stenographers for imperialist interests. add it to the chart next to WMDs— pez 🇬🇭 (@periuspb) February 16, 2022
― mardheamac (gyac), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 16:09 (four years ago)
gyac otm
― bad milk blood robot (sleeve), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 16:18 (four years ago)
de-escalated?
― bulb after bulb, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 16:19 (four years ago)
The press are drama/conflict junkies.
Add it to the chart next to "Clinton will resign within the week" and "Trump is going to be dropped from the ticket."
― Chappies banging dustbin lids together (President Keyes), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 16:40 (four years ago)
As much as I’d love to blame the press, this seems to have been a deliberate strategy from the US government. Either they had credible information they didn’t share with the Ukrainian government for some reason or they’re flooding the airwaves with rubbish as some kind of unconventional deterrent.
How the media feels about being used in that way remains to be seen.
― Scampo di tutti i Scampi (ShariVari), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 16:58 (four years ago)
I don't trust the gov or the news to necessarily give me the truth, but ... there *were* close to a 100K Russian troops, tanks and whatnot that had amassed at the border, right? Why? Or was that all made up?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:04 (four years ago)
Sabre rattling
― mardheamac (gyac), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:06 (four years ago)
How the media feels about being used in that way remains to be seen.― Scampo di tutti i Scampi (ShariVari), Wednesday, February 16, 2022 4:58 PM (one hour ago) bookmarkflaglink
― Scampo di tutti i Scampi (ShariVari), Wednesday, February 16, 2022 4:58 PM (one hour ago) bookmarkflaglink
lol after centuries of this i don't think it actually remains to be seen.
― Nedlene Grendel as Basenji Holmo (map), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:09 (four years ago)
xpost Which I believe! But isn't saber rattling only effective if the audience believes there's a chance there's more than saber rattling?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:10 (four years ago)
the truth is so much more complicated than all of this
it's so simple to be look at something so huge and incomprehensible and complicated and stand 100% on one side of it and talk about it
― snarl self own (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:23 (four years ago)
only effective if the audience believes there's a chance there's more than saber rattling?
if Putin's saber rattling was a bluff, his bluff had instant credibility in light of the Crimea in 2014. But it needn't have been a bluff. Putin had the advantage of the initiative, and could safely afford to wait and assess the situation before deciding to pull the trigger or stand down.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:33 (four years ago)
Just saying, the idea that there was not a real and credible threat of invasion is kind of huh, not least in light of Crimea, whether or not it was imminent to the day. So to say that the US or the west or Europe or the media or whoever blew it out of proportion is kinda equally weird, especially because Putin could do it all again tomorrow, next week, next months, or whenever he feels. The childish North Korean "any attention is good attention" model.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:45 (four years ago)
I think KM is otm, I don't think anyone can say for 100% whether or not anything will actually come of this or not. Apparently there have been some seemingly credible reports of field hospitals popping up on the Russian side of the border.
― a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:47 (four years ago)
Yeah, I heard some Russian reporter talking about how the west was getting it all wrong, and my first thought was "well, they might be wrong, but like I'd ever trust *you.*"
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:48 (four years ago)
Crimea is different for the current situation for all the reasons discussed earlier itt. The relationship between Ukraine and Russia is difficult and involved and war would disrupt trade between the two significantly, even before you look at relations between Russia and other countries.
― mardheamac (gyac), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:49 (four years ago)
100%, 0%
all the way to the left, all the way to the right, 10,000 foot view, blue checks, internet sleuths, bold predictions, running away and saying nothing when you're wrong, screaming into the loudhorn when you're right
― snarl self own (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:51 (four years ago)
delete the parts where you're wrong, promote the squares where you're right
― snarl self own (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:52 (four years ago)
logging off when you know you should log off when you know they should log off when they tell you to log off when they know you're wrong and you know they're right
this shit goes around eternally, i want to barf 100% into a trash can and fill the entire thing up
― snarl self own (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 18:53 (four years ago)
u ok karl?
― We don't talk about Giordano Bruno (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 19:10 (four years ago)
we're all drinking from a contaminated well
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 19:17 (four years ago)
i'm ok! i listen, i do log off, sometimes.
i think i'm just getting sick of negative voices everywhere, inside my head i try to silence them, but then everywhere else, my friends, here, the news, my family, even my dog whining - the world is full of negative voices, always being right, always predicting with 100% confidence and backing it up when they turn out to right, always conspicuously absent when they're completely wrong. it has nothing to do with the other, all these things, but so much of it just boils down to never backing down and always being right and having the correct opinion and predicting the big thing that on else saw coming, or telling the story of the thing that happened in a way that made it inevitable and easily predictable, such a long time coming, doing that with the news but also doing that with life and relationships and minor things and huge things, divorces and death but also the most petty fucking shit you have ever heard of, doing all the time, in our own heads, leaking out in excrement in the form of words. that's what i mean by wanting to barf and fill up a trash can, it's just this gross build-up in our bodies and minds
― snarl self own (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 19:23 (four years ago)
this is usually the part where someone who knows it all tells me to stop drinking, and then i think "but the problem is that i'm sober right now"
anyway, back to the normal and uncomplicated question of ruso-ukraine politics, a subject in which all of us as well as tens of millions of people on the internet possess expertise and which everything is clear
― snarl self own (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 19:26 (four years ago)
Just saying, the idea that there was not a real and credible threat of invasion is kind of huh
Again, perhaps there was but, if so, there is a difference between a general ‘credible threat’ and the kind of specifics being set out. The US strategy of providing information about coup plots, invasion dates and false flag attacks to the domestic press and not the Ukrainian government is, at least, very odd.
Probably true! I guess the difference with Iraq is that the press reports didn’t need months to be shown to be wrong. idk, when the press is facing historic levels of distrust, people are trying to argue a distinction between ‘the free press’ and state-sponsored media, etc, it will be interesting to see if there is any mild backlash.
― Scampo di tutti i Scampi (ShariVari), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 19:30 (four years ago)
fwiw, Karl, I am on team "by all means, keep drinking," because a bit of shock absorption may be precisely what is needed sometimes.
also I have no fucking clue what to do about Eastern Europe, or Eurasia as a whole - seems like a bigger mess than I can be expected to fix so I am not sure it reflects badly on me that I don't have a solution figured out yet
― Ye Mad Putin (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 19:35 (four years ago)
I'll still take US "free press", warts and all, over the Russian news media. In this case, I don't really know what else they could have done. Should they not have reported on the leaked intelligence reports? I think they were pretty upfront about the fact they had no way of independently verifying it.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 19:41 (four years ago)
That's why the news is always written as according to sources or The White House says or whatever.
― Ye Mad Putin (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 19:45 (four years ago)
when it comes to foreign policy the US media happily allows itself to be the conduit of government positions. because dissent has no harsh repercussions they are 'free' to dissent, which is a nice feature, but they rarely do.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 19:58 (four years ago)
wtf is going on? more of the same i guess
JUST IN: #Britain military intel chief says still no signs of #Russia|n pullback from #Ukraine's borders“We have not seen evidence" per LtGen Sir Jim Hockenhull "Contrary to their claims, Russia continues to build up military capabilities near Ukraine"— Jeff Seldin (@jseldin) February 16, 2022
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 21:28 (four years ago)
British military intelligence. Pick the oxymoron out of that.
― since dozzell was a fixture (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:25 (four years ago)
"I'll still take US "free press", warts and all, over the Russian news media"
I'm genuinely shocked by this admission, but perhaps there is a possibility they are both bad.
― calzino, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:30 (four years ago)
the statement you quoted said nothing about US "free press" being good, so I think the possibility they are both bad was inherent, it was even implied.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:35 (four years ago)
I hear that in Russia teachers can’t teach the truth about their country’s history. Good thing that doesn’t happen in America!
― Johnny Mathis der Maler (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:36 (four years ago)
Why make value judgments at all? Things happen. They are neither good nor bad. They just are.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:38 (four years ago)
Dude are you like 16 or something
― Johnny Mathis der Maler (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:39 (four years ago)
Lol, I wish.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:40 (four years ago)
ok I'll quote this bit instead. you fucking tool
― calzino, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:40 (four years ago)
Anyways, like many of us, I fear that Putin's normally sociable and agreeable nature has been adversely affected by covid-related isolation.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:43 (four years ago)
Cool, another thread devolving into sniping and point-scoring. No wonder the activity levels seem to have fallen over a cliff in recent weeks.
I read that as, "these both suck, but I think I kinda prefer our shitty press to that other shitty press" and I don't get at all why that would be a controversial statement.
― a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:43 (four years ago)
shut the fuck up
― calzino, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:45 (four years ago)
you wouldn't get it because it's a condition called American
― calzino, Wednesday, 16 February 2022 22:51 (four years ago)