2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7160 of them)

the dems have been in a sort of freefall since the 50s, more or less, when conservatism was declared 'dead'

-- deej

I don't know that I buy this, not entirely. The aspects of 60s style countercultural thinking that the Republican party use to so effectively to foment anti-liberal hysteria really are part of the heart and soul of the modern Democratic party, at least as far as the electorate goes. City folk, pro-choice, pro homosexual marriage, pro relaxation of drug laws, worried about militarism, big on gun control, suspicious of country folk and people who wear religion on their sleeves. Those factors are arguably as key to the Democrats appeal as any representation of labor interests.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:11 (eighteen years ago)

I support boogieboarding.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:11 (eighteen years ago)

uh yeah carter reagan bush clinton all real tough guys

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

http://southdakotapolitics.blogs.com/south_dakota_politics/images/reagan-thumb.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:15 (eighteen years ago)

check out the Gipper's chub.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

the dems have been in a sort of freefall since the 50s, more or less, when conservatism was declared 'dead'

-- deej

I don't know that I buy this, not entirely. The aspects of 60s style countercultural thinking that the Republican party use to so effectively to foment anti-liberal hysteria really are part of the heart and soul of the modern Democratic party, at least as far as the electorate goes. City folk, pro-choice, pro homosexual marriage, pro relaxation of drug laws, worried about militarism, big on gun control, suspicious of country folk and people who wear religion on their sleeves. Those factors are arguably as key to the Democrats appeal as any representation of labor interests.

-- contenderizer, Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:11 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

yeah sorry that should have read 60s, obv civil rights etc. were huge successes from the dem side

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

unbelievable

fuck time magazine

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

Bob Dole is a tough guy. BOB DOLE.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

primary victory of goldwater in '64 the first signal that 'real conservatism' had returned. Repubs today prob see Ike as an even milder Clinton-esque moderate figur

the FDR remaking of the party had so demoralized the GOP that Nixon was considered the "true" conservative when he campaigned for Ike's VP seat; all they had to run against Stevenson the first time was a return to a "cleaner" Washington.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:18 (eighteen years ago)

why do you hate reagan/freedom so much and what?

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:19 (eighteen years ago)

i hate reagan, too, and time magazine kind of sucks, but to their defense, don't they generally make the presidential winner the "man of the year?" i don't know. i thought GWB got it both times he won

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:19 (eighteen years ago)

i dont think weve had a major candidate w/mccains sort of bad angry vibes since nixon

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

Reagan was also a cover boy during the "Lady Liberty" hoohah of July '86.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

"man of the year" just means "newsmaker of the year" you guys - i mean i even won it a couple years ago

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1986/1101860707_400.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

okay, so it looks as though both the SEIU and the UFCW are both set to back Obama. that's a big chunk of union support.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

http://i.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/2004/1101041227_400.jpg

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

loooooooooooooool

max, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

uh yeah carter reagan bush clinton all real tough guys

Uh, except for Carter, yeah. Maybe not real tough guys, but perceived tough guys, and certainly perceived to be the toughest guy in the GE in that election cycle. And yes, Bill Clinton was considered more of your tough guy "Daddy" than Bob Dole.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:24 (eighteen years ago)

Whereas Barack is like your cool uncle who lets you crash on his couch whenever your Dad is being, like, a total toolbag.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

i dunno man, ross perot was pretty tough

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

In their own ways, I think both HRC and Obama are exceptions to that rule, btw. Obama can win without being the toughest guy in the GE (tho I think he'll lose to McCain). HRC can lose while being the perceived toughest gal in the GE (and I think she'll lose to McCain.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

http://earthhopenetwork.net/bush%20art/time_cover_bush.jpg

is this real?

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

yes

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

yah i feel yr pain clinton and that wouldnt be prudent ghwb were considered tough WHAAAATEVEEEER try again la times

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

old ass shining city on the hill reagan and im a uniter not a divider gwb can be added to the list

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:29 (eighteen years ago)

daniel from whence the mccain boner

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

it's the portrait of bush on the cover of time up there that i can't believe is real -- it is really really bad!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.hermeswashere.com/images/TimeCover_BushResigns.jpg

i dont remember this happening

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:31 (eighteen years ago)

OK romney endorsing live now.

gr8080, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:31 (eighteen years ago)

i like that he's an "american" revolutionary, too, it helps all those absent-minded people with american flags on their front porches who find it difficult to remember what country they live in

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

A-W-K-W-A-R-D

gr8080, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

live?? the last thing they did was some pre-game concert in milwaukee!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

that would be so awz if bush resigned and gave the big thumbs up on the way out

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:33 (eighteen years ago)

like "i know guys, i fucked up! good times ahead!"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

"no hard feelins, right stretch?"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

The "tough guy" thing makes a certain amount of sense. Except that it's wrong. Might be more accurate to say that America picks the father figure that it wants - or thinks it needs (I'm speaking historically and don't intend to slight Hillary, who could change this dynamic). So victory does entail winning a masculinity contest, but you'd have to be an idiot to say that masculinity = nothing more than toughness.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:36 (eighteen years ago)

daniel from whence the mccain boner

I don't like McCain at all. But I think he will be the favorite (slightly, perhaps) to win the GE once the conventions are over.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:37 (eighteen years ago)

why? cause he's a rootin tootin tough dude + the press loves him? he doesn't have much else going for him

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:38 (eighteen years ago)

none of us has the slightest idea what politically suicidal things Hillary's desperation, McCain's bluster, or Obama's Jesusness might cause them to say in the next 8 months.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:40 (eighteen years ago)

Obama's Jesusness

lol

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:40 (eighteen years ago)

both dem candidates are more charismatic than john kerry, people have largely turned against the iraq conflict since '04, mccain is HELLA old, republican base is pretty shaky on mccain's qualities, huge dem voter turnout in primaries, republicans routed in midterm elections ... bad bad signs for mccain dude

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:41 (eighteen years ago)

im scared of a mccain presidency and i dont rule it out but the balls not really in his court right now

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:41 (eighteen years ago)

cause he's a rootin tootin tough dude + the press loves him

Yes.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:43 (eighteen years ago)

Deej OTM. It's a mistake to discount McCain (appeals well outside trad Republican base, well-respected, comes across tough, sharp and honorable, war record, white guy, etc.), but he's got a very tough fite ahead of him.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:44 (eighteen years ago)

That and that McCain has the "straight-talking maverick" label going for him (which may be a canard in reality, but voters love the image). Also, he'll peel off independents and Democratic moderates (especially those who are a bit hawkish).

I'm not saying McCain is a heavy favorite, but I think he's smart money.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:50 (eighteen years ago)

I'm not so sure that voters love the "straight talk" image, like Joe Scarborough said it didn't exactly work for him in Michigan.

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:52 (eighteen years ago)

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/021408dailyupdategraph1.gif

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:54 (eighteen years ago)

Like I've said, McCain's problem has always been getting to the GE (because he's hated by lots of the GOP's core constituency, precisely because he hasn't always followed the party line), but he's in much better shape -- for exactly the same reasons -- once he gets to a GE.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:55 (eighteen years ago)

Daniel, what do you think of the line "John McCain has sold out his principles in exchange for his party's nomination," or the notion that he's a respected figure fronting an effort to smuggle the GOP party line back into the White House? It's a strong charge, sure, but there's some support for that argument to be had.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:56 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.