― Merryweather (scarlet), Friday, 27 January 2006 18:25 (twenty years ago)
― chap who would dare to no longer work for the man (chap), Friday, 27 January 2006 19:19 (twenty years ago)
First episode of the IT crowd available on the channel 4 site.
― Ed (dali), Friday, 27 January 2006 21:31 (twenty years ago)
uh. yeah. And therein lies the rub.
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Friday, 27 January 2006 22:00 (twenty years ago)
I recognized the one SugaRAPE employee from Nathan Barley in there; is the Robert Pollard lookalike from something else?
Seemed like a watered down mish-mash of Rob Schneider's copy guy / Jimmy Fallon's IT guy (both from "SNL," and both - *shudder* - funnier that this), "Office Space," and any workplace sitcom since "WKRP in Cincinnati."
― T/S: Pinks/Oki Dog/Scoobys/Tail o' the Pup (Bent Over at the Arclight), Friday, 27 January 2006 22:16 (twenty years ago)
― T/S: Pinks/Oki Dog/Scoobys/Tail o' the Pup (Bent Over at the Arclight), Friday, 27 January 2006 22:17 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 27 January 2006 22:57 (twenty years ago)
Not canned laughter - a live studio audience. Y'know, like sitcoms used to be made before Larry Sanders.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 January 2006 22:57 (twenty years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 27 January 2006 22:58 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 27 January 2006 23:03 (twenty years ago)
― T/S: Pinks/Oki Dog/Scoobys/Tail o' the Pup (Bent Over at the Arclight), Friday, 27 January 2006 23:44 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 27 January 2006 23:47 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 27 January 2006 23:49 (twenty years ago)
Trend? One that lasted about 40 years (and doesn't look like disappearing from the mainstream anytime soon). I don't think the end of the live audience thing was a bad development at all - it's obviously allowed different sort of shows (less theatrical, more filmic) to prosper - but nor do I think that the absence of a studio audience is now a requirement for a decent show.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 January 2006 23:54 (twenty years ago)
i laffed.
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Saturday, 28 January 2006 00:48 (twenty years ago)
-- cutty (holle...), January 27th, 2006.
I was there, in the audience, and saw Morris do his scenes. And even fuck one bit up thrice!
It was grand.
― Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Saturday, 28 January 2006 01:56 (twenty years ago)
― Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Saturday, 28 January 2006 01:58 (twenty years ago)
As for whether or not a laugh track is irrelevant to the all around quality of a show, I would argue that the laugh track (recorded live OR pre-recorded or however you want it defined) is fundamentally condescending - does the audience really need to be told when a joke was told? Or is the laughter somehow supposed to be infectuous?
Of course it's a matter of opinion, but I AM begining to believe that the absence of a live audience (or sound designer's careful approximation of one) IS a requirement for a decent show.
― T/S: Pinks/Oki Dog/Scoobys/Tail o' the Pup (Bent Over at the Arclight), Saturday, 28 January 2006 02:02 (twenty years ago)
― T/S: Pinks/Oki Dog/Scoobys/Tail o' the Pup (Bent Over at the Arclight), Saturday, 28 January 2006 02:03 (twenty years ago)
MY BRAIN!
― Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Saturday, 28 January 2006 02:09 (twenty years ago)
And interesting that you as an 'industry vet' have heard loud an obnoxious laughter at 'almost every single live taping'. Whereas I've been to numerous tapings and not had this once.
Ditto the coughing, fidgeting. During takes this just doesn't happen.
― Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Saturday, 28 January 2006 02:10 (twenty years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 28 January 2006 02:12 (twenty years ago)
As for your "sound has to be mixed" comment, you seem to be colorfully dodging my point, which is that "canned" laughter is a very specific sound acheived by boosting an audience's actual reaction to suit the producers' needs, whatever they may be.
Again, whether or not you like this sort of thing is obviously a matter of opinion, but the facts remain that recording an audience's laughter is more complicated and loaded than you are saying it is.
― T/S: Pinks/Oki Dog/Scoobys/Tail o' the Pup (Bent Over at the Arclight), Saturday, 28 January 2006 02:28 (twenty years ago)
― Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Saturday, 28 January 2006 03:30 (twenty years ago)
I agree that not every take of studio audience laughter is a good take, and it would be foolish to re-shoot a scene because of that, so sound editors probably do overdubs of previous takes which have been better. I do think that having a studio audience gives more of a performance atmosphere, and is perhaps better for getting the best take because you can gauge reaction on the spot - last night I was at the taping for the pilot of 'That Mitchell and Webb Look' (peepshow boys) and often they tried out two or three punchlines and one of them got a big roar of laughter from the audience. I have no doubt that's the one they will use.
― Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Saturday, 28 January 2006 11:58 (twenty years ago)
The trouble comes when you cross the line (or are perceived to) from that to doing overdubs of previous jokes that have gone over better. And obviously it's not helped by the fact that an audience for a pilot for Teh New Graham Linehan/Chris Morris show are hardly unbiased, and will chortle away to lazy shite like that 'not answering the phone' scene.
(which is probably actually the problem, that laugh tracks make unfunny material much worse)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 28 January 2006 13:10 (twenty years ago)
― JimD (JimD), Saturday, 28 January 2006 13:50 (twenty years ago)
Whilst the final product may be something of a sham, I think the presence of an audience is important in establishing a sort of performance feedback loop. Red Dwarf - not a show I'm that fond of - is widely considered to have suffered in its penultimate series by going the high-production values route and so not having any scenes that could realistically be shot before an audience. The blooper reels for RD VII are weird - Barrie screws up, only the crew laugh.
It was something of a game back when I was subtitling a lot of 70s Brit sitcoms to spot the audience member with the really annoying laugh; if you watch Some Mothers, Summer Wine, etc from that period you'll often hear some ridiculous braying buffoon out on his own a good four or five seconds after everyone else has stopped wetting their pants.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Saturday, 28 January 2006 14:30 (twenty years ago)
― mei (mei), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 12:45 (twenty years ago)
― piscesboy, Tuesday, 31 January 2006 12:51 (twenty years ago)
you STALKER
― The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 12:54 (twenty years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 12:57 (twenty years ago)
― Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 13:24 (twenty years ago)
quantick's bit about clip shows made me laugh more than anything else this year.
― Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 07:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 31 July 2006 07:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 08:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 31 July 2006 08:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:49 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to start Raaatpackin (chap), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:19 (nineteen years ago)
this is the second series.
i love his show, it's almost as funny as Harry Hill's TV Burp, but i missed this week's episode.
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:38 (nineteen years ago)
TV Burp should be on all year round really.
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)
Internet debates would be far more efficient if everyone just sat at their keyboards hitting the "harrumph" key over and over again.
cf
http://chilled.cream.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13231&sid=b841d74308711a47858a1364c366e1b6
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Monday, 22 January 2007 10:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 22 January 2007 10:19 (nineteen years ago)
My god, what did Chris Morris do to deserve such miserable sods as fans?
― DavidM* (unreal), Monday, 22 January 2007 11:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 22 January 2007 11:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Johnney B English (stigoftdump), Monday, 22 January 2007 11:29 (nineteen years ago)