I think you're probably OTM, actually, and this is what's really telling about Richards' outburst -- the fact that he seized on their blackness, that he located his antipathy towards them, and attack on them, in it. What I get from watching the tape isn't a sense of hatred per se, but of resentment that suddenly explodes out of nowhere -- of someone who got their buttons pushed and totally, irrationally detonates, for reasons even they don't fully understand. And who then tries to backpedal by knitting it into some sub-Kaufman thing.
― lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:08 (nineteen years ago)
Do tell us which!
― roc u like a ยง (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
i don't think we should reject that approach if it happens to be true (which it probably is). but i'm not sure whether publicly playing up that approach is an effective way of addressing the issue (does the self-examination sufficiently outweigh the backlash?).
there's a huuuuge spectrum of white folks who are just ACHING for a chance to show how marginalized they are by the blax
sure, but i don't think richards is one of these people or that that was what he was saying
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
it's tempting to ponder whether this one incident makes him 'more of a racist' than someone who harboured bad thoughts about a race of people for years and years without actually speaking out about it or acting on it in any significant way...but trying to establish specific parameters and the marker points on a sliding scale can only remain in the speculative and theoretical so there seems little point in the end.
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
ffs
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:12 (nineteen years ago)
spreads straight from the fridge!
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:15 (nineteen years ago)
So basically "fuck it, he's a racist"?
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:16 (nineteen years ago)
I don't think it's even necessarily "marginalized" (though there's LOTS of that sentiment), but just this sense that...that black people think of themselves as entitled, somehow. I remember someone telling me that "the black people at my workplace screw around and don't work as hard as the rest of us, but they get away with it because the boss is afraid that he'll be charged with racism if he fires them". Stuff like that.
xpost Yeah, but Tracer, this is something very distinct from, say, the "blacks-are-innately-inferior" type of racism, or even the "all blacks are thugs and welfare queens" style. It's a distinction worth making and naming, I think -- if only because it's a subtler, more widespread, and more socially acceptable form of racism.
xxpost LOL!
― lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:16 (nineteen years ago)
― SCOTTIE PIPPEN'S WEDDING (Adrian Langston), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:17 (nineteen years ago)
Whereas white American paranoia about black privilege is based on complete irrational psychosis, deliberate idiocy, convenient ignorance, self-serving lies, self-serving ahistorical thinking, stupid cultural fetishization, general ass-backward insanity, and just plain douchebaggery.
At what point does his racism transcend everyday racism far enough for him to acquire the label "racist"? The point has to exist, otherwise the term is largely meaningless.
Hey J, do you think a nice non-meaningless place to locate that point might be just this side of standing in public yelling about lynching niggers? I mean, c'mon, we don't spend this much time stressing out on every thread, being all like "well he fixes cars, but I don't know if that makes him a mechanic" -- it's pointless and distracting to respond to stuff like this by getting all metaphysical about racist actions versus racist people, and all it tends to accomplish is to act as a rhetorical smokescreen for the asshole in question to hide behind. Cf Richards' apology! "The insane thing about this is that I'm not a racist -- it just so happens that when I get annoyed with black people, the first thing I remind them of is this nation's long history of brutal disregard for their lives."
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:19 (nineteen years ago)
From : Uri Frendimein Sent : Tuesday, November 21, 2006 12:19 PMTo : [email protected]Subject : BLACK PEOPLE NEVER THINK THIS. AT ALL. Go to previous message | Go to next message | Delete | Inbox
Wow, guess you've never heard of macho insecurity??? Please stop with the bullshit conjecture already.
Like, general info for white people: NO BLACK PEOPLE EVER THINK THIS. AT ALL. Given the whole history of this country, I'd say black people are by and large going to tend to think the opposite -- that people will single them out for criticism and mistreatment because they're black.
― SCOTTIE PIPPEN'S WEDDING (Adrian Langston), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:21 (nineteen years ago)
no jaymc i just think it ends up in a tail-chasing merry-go-round. i'm a cynic.
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:22 (nineteen years ago)
"The insane thing about this is that I'm not a racist", yeah, that made me cringe to say the least. "And check out my website, www.blackpeopleloveus.com!"
― lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:22 (nineteen years ago)
― VALLEY OF BLIZZARDZ (Mr.Que), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:23 (nineteen years ago)
― lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:24 (nineteen years ago)
― VALLEY OF BLIZZARDZ (Mr.Que), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:26 (nineteen years ago)
THAT'S WHAT YOU THINK
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:27 (nineteen years ago)
xpost
― lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:27 (nineteen years ago)
And for all of those saying that anyone can say a patently offensive word over and over again and NOT be a racist, then I hope you petition the moderators to unban Jay Blanchard. He only used a bad word once.
And I don't think you can be a Jewish Mason. Unless you're Jackie Mason.
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)
That's Nude Spock and he's emailing you because he got banned from posting. He thinks you're Nabisco because he's not very bright.
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)
WTF, lurker, people's aren't just "conflating," they're offering one fairly basic answer to the question:
"where this outburst came from" = "Richards' racism""what it reflects" = "Richards' racism"
That's a very simplistic, straightforward answer, but that doesn't mean it isn't accurate.
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:30 (nineteen years ago)
If he was a beloved member of the community, you can bet that people would have petitioned the moderators a long time ago. But no, he was always kind of annoying.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:30 (nineteen years ago)
― SCOTTIE PIPPEN'S WEDDING (Adrian Langston), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:36 (nineteen years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:37 (nineteen years ago)
I mean, c'mon, we don't spend this much time stressing out on every thread, being all like "well he fixes cars, but I don't know if that makes him a mechanic"
-- makes it sound like you're conflating "let's think about this and figure out what's going on here" with "let's find a way to excuse Richards' behavior". Like you're pissed off that people aren't just posting "OMG what an asshole I hope he never works again".
And I hope that's not the case, because what you brought up about white resentment and fantasies of black privilege was probably useful to more than one person here.
xpost the problem with this perspective --
white people don't want to say "I'm irredeemable," right
-- is that it guarantees that racial harmony and peace and blahblahblah will never, ever, ever happen. Generally speaking if you accuse someone of an indelible original sin, a guilt they can never extirpate except through self-negation, they have nothing to gain from playing along...so they tend to respond with hatred, violence, and rage.
― lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:38 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:40 (nineteen years ago)
SO WAS KRAMER.
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:41 (nineteen years ago)
is that it guarantees that racial harmony and peace and blahblahblah will never, ever, ever happen.
no, in fact the opposite is true: you can't make any progress until you own up to the problem and tell the truth about it
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:41 (nineteen years ago)
Who's worse? Michael Richards 68% Mel Gibson 32% Total Votes: 145,939
― Good-Time Slim, Uncle Doobie, and the Great 'Frisco Freak-Out (sixteen sergeants, Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)
Perhaps then you didn't mean to use the word "irredeemable".
― lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:44 (nineteen years ago)
― lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)
I do think there's something to this. For me, it's not about excusing what Richards did -- it's obv. inexcusable -- but my whole goal on this thread to downplay the usage of the term "racist" as a noun is probably partly due to the way that that term implies irredeemability, esp. since I don't want to think that whatever hurtful things I'm capable of make me irredeemable.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:50 (nineteen years ago)
― lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:51 (nineteen years ago)
too late, lurker
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:53 (nineteen years ago)
Eppy and Jaymc OTM, though
― lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:58 (nineteen years ago)
First of all, behavior is all we can go by. Second, the goal in identifying racism isn't to slap a label on somebody -- as in the witch hunts. The goal IS to curtail certain types of behavior, and to hopefully reflect on ourselves as well. The obsession of some people to affirm that someone IS a racist or ISN'T misses the point. The point being that many of us have a shitload of racist material floating around at various levels, more or less conscious, of our psyches. And that episodes such as the Richards one show, if anything, how that material will spew up to wound others when the surface cracks.
― Collardio Gelatinous (collardio), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)
So I dunno, when someone gets pissed off in public and starts yelling about lynching the niggers and it appears that he both (a) kind of dug that one up earnestly and (b) thinks there's anything funny or interesting about it and (c) intends it to hurt and show power over people -- the guy was trying to put down and shut up people by using racial slurs and reminders of racial oppression! -- I think it's probably fair to just go "hey, look at the racist," and not get our panties in a knot like we're on some sort of racial linguistics panel.
Sorry, xpost
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:00 (nineteen years ago)
Dude, my roommate says you're not funny.
And I responded with:
50 years ago, you'd be hanging upside down with a fork in your ass! He's a n***er! He's a n***er! He's a n***er!
To which he responded:
That was uncalled for. Seriously, STFU, white boy.
And then a third poster wrote:
Hey what's the big deal? Why are you rushing to judge him? I bet nobody's going to criticize the black man for his racism. The white guy was just giving vent to a common frustration that white people feel about black privilege.
I mean, seriously, you'd think that last response was pretty fucked up, wouldn't you? Maybe Let's say somebody on this board, who I know to be black, criticized me thusly:
I mean, seriously, you'd think that last response was pretty fucked up, wouldn't you?Let's say somebody on this board, who I know to be black, criticized me thusly:
Hey what's the big deal? Why are you rushing to judge him? Is he really a racist? I bet nobody's going to criticise the black guy for his racist comment. Why can blacks get away with it and not whites? The white guy was just giving vent to common frustration that white people feel about black privilege.
I mean, seriously, you'd think that last response was pretty fucked up, wouldn't you?
― Fleischhutliebe! like a warm, furry meatloaf (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:03 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)