What's the deal with Americans and nudity? [WORK-SAFE AGANE HURRAH]

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (371 of them)
dis away, we're beyond fucked on this issue.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Teeny otm.

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Seeing your mom naked if your a guy----eeeewwwwwww.

That's exactly my point: why is it eeewww? I know I'm talking at a very stereotypical level, but that doesn't change the fact there seems to be a general difference, and I was wondering why is it so?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Because we're Americans, for crying out loud!

Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)

In a perfect world, all nudity would lead to sex.

Also, said sex would create ice cream sundaes for post-coital noshing. There would also be cheerleaders during the act.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)

(x-post)

I mean, what are the roots of such an attitude? Does it have to do with Christianity? Puritanism? Does anyone know?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

(The serious answer is "What do you expect from a nation founded by Puritans?")

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

(haha xpost)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)

There would also be cheerleaders during the act.

Who are you, Charlie Sheen?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I note you don't have a problem with the ice cream sundaes...

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)

sex would create ice cream sundaes for post-coital noshing. There would also be cheerleaders during the act.

You wanna come up for some coffee, Dan?

Miggie (Miggie), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll have to check with the wife.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)

can't explain it. Too primal. I know it's different in Europe, I see entire families naked together in the Tiergarten in Berlin or at the beach. Of course, in Germany, beach=dirt next to a puddle where a fat naked man is trying to windsurf on 3 inches of water.

Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)

In a perfect world, all nudity would lead to sex.

Dude! sons & mums? eurgh!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Can you actually trace it back to Puritanism? Is it because Christianity has a stronger influence in the US than in Europe today? Are there any pro-nudity Christians?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)

dude, i have a problem with the "post-" part. Cannot ice cream sundaes be enjoyed in the midst of the act? what about becoming part of it?

in fact, what act WOULDN'T be improved with the addition of chocolate sauce, cherries, and sprinkled nutz?

Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll have to check with the wife.

You tease.

Miggie (Miggie), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Those damn Christians, they stole English mythology, and made Americans funny about nudity!

kate (kate), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

also, we originally had a superreligous culture, based in a religion known for its ascetic tenets.

Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I want someone to give me a good reason why sex wouldn't be instantly better if the end result was dessert rather than a baby (beyond obv the eventual extinction of the human race).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)

no, the puritans were actually pretty randy and open within religious rules (like no adultery, etc); it was the Victorians who fucked this all up.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)

In the programme about history of Men's magazines a couple of weeks ago Felix Dennis said that one of the reasons Maxim is so successful in the USA is that it won't offend advertisers. So despite it being chockful of eye candy, you'll never see an uncovered nipple, nevermind a pubic hair.

The middle ground i.e Penthouse/Playboy has withered as tastes have become polarised. Quite what that says about America I'm not too sure, though donut bitch (and Momus) will have something to add.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Also that's your private zone, and you shouldn't let anyone else see it.

Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Call me a modest American, but I don't ever want to see my dad's cock. It has nothing to do with religion or morality or whatever. It has everything to do with the fact that it's my DAD for chrissakes.

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:04 (twenty-two years ago)

cf new film "Calendar Girls." Apparently English boys don't want to see their mums naked either. It forces them to smoke dope in places where the police will catch them.

Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

beyond obv the eventual extinction of the human race

How is this not a good reason?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title_pages/2335.html

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

teeny and Nicolars and donut bitch otm. You can't show boobies on network TV, no matter what time of day or night. But you can have bodies getting ripped apart by machine-gun fire and twitching and burbling on the ground until they're dead, whenever you want!! And it's not some government thing or the FCC or whatever, like a lot people think. It's all down to the advertisers. I thought sex sells?? I guess that's a side issue though - Tuomas's real question is more "why does nudity automatically = sex" in America. I don't fucking know. In France there were lots of adolescent girls and boys naked on the beach. You would never see that in America. Somebody would call the police, people would be uncomfortable. Thinking about this stuff makes me hate everything. :( And I don't buy the Puritan argument, this country's always been more diverse than that. :(

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)

and you shouldn't let anyone else see it.

unless they pay you, of course, or you're really, really drunk.

Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Sex and nudity sell better when they're contraband.

Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)

But the idea that nudity is no big deal in Europe is a bit disingenuous. There's a lot of nudity in advertising. If people weren't titilated by it, advertisers wouldn't use it.

Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)

TITilated!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Call me a modest American, but I don't ever want to see my dad's cock. It has nothing to do with religion or morality or whatever. It has everything to do with the fact that it's my DAD for chrissakes.

But why do you feel this way? Such an attitude doesn't come from nowhere. I've seen my mom and dad naked several times, and I've never thought "it's my DAD" or "it's my MUM for chrissakes". So it has probably everything to do with religion and morality. It's a very Christian thought that nudity equals with sexuality. Even you calling your dad's penis a cock reveals something.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

A rooster fetish?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Call me a modest American, but I don't ever want to see my dad's cock. It has nothing to do with religion or morality or whatever. It has everything to do with the fact that it's my DAD for chrissakes.

Yeah, but you're only adding fuel to Tuomas's query there. you don't have to LIKE it! just that it is true... Americans (and probably people of many other countries) are very squeamish about the idea of seeing other family members naked.

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm just saying that sublimated sexual desire is the grease that lubricates the throbbing engine of our nation's large and tumescent economy.

Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:10 (twenty-two years ago)

(barring any personal reasons and not just religious reasons one may not be enthralled with his or her parents, of course)

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think it's particularly uncommon in America for children to see the parent of the same sex naked and vice versa.

Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

In America, everyone hopes that nudity will lead to sex.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

But the idea that nudity is no big deal in Europe is a bit disingenuous. There's a lot of nudity in advertising. If people weren't titilated by it, advertisers wouldn't use it.

As I said, the division is not that simple, I'm making generalisations here, but some sort of difference clearly exists. I'd say that in Europe nudity isn't necessarily titillating or dirty, but it can be that too.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)

read my link people! also in modern america we have no interest in representations of the human body that don't make you want to buy something.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)

It was a good link, Teeny.

Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Besides, by definition, a parent is old and fat and who wants to see that?

Skottie, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think it's particularly uncommon in America for children to see the parent of the same sex naked and vice versa.

What about the other parent? Or friends?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

The US gives Israel five billion dollars a year in aid.

Hollywood box office takings totalled 8 billion dollars in 2002.

Adult videos took 20 billion dollars in 2003.

Americans like Israel and Hollywood, but they like nudity more.

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

in the upheaval of the civil war there were certainly "pro-nudity" xtians, just as there were "free-love" xtians etc etc (brethren of the free spirit etc, ranters, early quakers maybe, antinomians generally)

the english puritans who seized power (ie not the above, who carried on being persecuted) were certainly anti PUBLIC nudity - and theatre and license and carnival generally, partly i suspect bcz (in the uk) - these were catholic-sanctioned social mechanisms for letting off steam, seemingly anti-authority but actually ultimately buttressing rather than challenging it (you approve of the boss who allows you holidays etc)

anti-private nudity though? this seems impractical and unlikely except for the fairly well-off (being clothed in bed; having separate beds etc etc)

the puritans who founded america were pretty much social radicals (in both directions) (ie radically anti-worldly/church authority and pro God'sd authority) even by the standards of commonwealth puritans: and MUCH less pragmatic about carnality than the catholic church had become

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)

America needs more saunas!

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)

not "saunas"!

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I think possibly that in America, there is a really wide range of people, and you want to respect their sensibilities. Nudity was/is no big deal in my house, but if I was having a friend sleep over, I would neither make her feel bad for undressing in front of me or undressing in the bathroom. Everybody defaults to the least risky behaviour, which equals not stripping down.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)

thus also few nude beaches in USA.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Tuomas, I think you're really lovely.

luna (luna.c), Thursday, 6 November 2003 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks. Although I thought I was just stating the obvious.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 6 November 2003 09:58 (twenty-two years ago)

two years pass...
Ah, the days of innocence!

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 10:17 (twenty years ago)

you're not real.

AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 14:07 (twenty years ago)

???

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 14:11 (twenty years ago)

nudity is real. americans aren't. Tuomas is a mix. Wayne is everything.

that said, it's true that in France, for instance, we have nudity here, there and everywhere... and somehow, we're not blasés !

AleXTC (AleXTC), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 15:23 (twenty years ago)

I do maintain that Tuomas left ILX a few months ago and that "lixnixn" is a parody-Tuomas.
-- jaymc (jmcunnin...) (webmail), January 31st, 2006 1:15 PM. (jaymc) (later) (link)

xpost

we should start a newsgroup...
alt.fan.thewayne

AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 15:44 (twenty years ago)

besides which, has anyone ever seen an american nude? ick, no thanks!

AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 15:44 (twenty years ago)

I don't really get this "parody-Tuomas" thing. As this thread should prove, I could get even more obnoxius in the past.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:08 (twenty years ago)

i don't really find your attitude obnoxious here, Tuomas (and concerning the "parody-Tuomas" thing, from what i understood, seems you've been surprised by something on the "SNOGH" thread which you'd already have known or something...i think you were surprised "hooters" existed while you'd already talked about it before... anyway, you should be flattered, there's a "paul is dead" thing about this !)

AleXTC (AleXTC), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:14 (twenty years ago)

we should start a newsgroup...
alt.fan.thewayne

and we should add a photoshoped Wayne into every thread... a godlike presence...

AleXTC (AleXTC), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:16 (twenty years ago)

To be fair, I think Ally is misremembering -- I looked it up and couldn't find Tuomas inquiring about Hooters prior to last week.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:18 (twenty years ago)

yeah, you're not obnoxious at all. i'm really fascinated actually. i think one of the best things you'd ever posted was some statement about how you lived in a commune with a bunch of liberated women, but then a couple posts later something like "but that's what we here in finland just call a shared apartment". that was awesome.

xpost: either that or kenC's mspaint wayne. in a sense, wayne IS every ilxor.

AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:18 (twenty years ago)

either that or kenC's mspaint wayne. in a sense, wayne IS every ilxor.

it's our molten calf !

AleXTC (AleXTC), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:40 (twenty years ago)

I didn't know that Hooters was a restaurant (and an airline, pparently) until that thread. I'd seen the name mentioned on some other ILE thread in the past, but I didn't know what it referred to (I guess I though it was a strip joint or something).

As for my obnoxiousness on this thread, I mean that back in the day I tended to emphasize a bit too much both my and my country's presumed liberality in contrast to, say, the US. The difference noticeable are interesting, but I don't want to give the picture that everything's so much better in here.


i think one of the best things you'd ever posted was some statement about how you lived in a commune with a bunch of liberated women, but then a couple posts later something like "but that's what we here in finland just call a shared apartment". that was awesome.

Hmm, what's so awesome about that? If I remember correctly several other ILXors live or have lived in a shared flat with members of the other gender.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:11 (twenty years ago)

"The difference is"

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:12 (twenty years ago)

someone's reaction at the time was "OH so that explains all of the pictures" and then when you said that it wasnt a commune in the hippie sense of the word, there was an ironythere which was awesome :D

again, im not sure what obnoxiousness you're reffering to.

AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 17:34 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...

you're not real.

-- AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 14:07 (1 year ago) Bookmark Link

Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 18:52 (nineteen years ago)

I though that joke had gone passe ages ago.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 07:51 (nineteen years ago)

/firends naked

I keep reading this as fire ends, like an ass on fire.

stevienixed, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 08:54 (nineteen years ago)

three years pass...

This is still the thing that is most strange to me about American family life. I've lived here for 9 years, do all the ritual holidays, enjoy the food, mostly, can live, laugh, and drive like am American. Then you get to the fact that many Americans have never, when living at home, seen their adult family members naked. WTF? Family vacations in swimsuits are fine, but you wear clothes into the bathroom and a towel out every time? There's an *ew* (as if you're judging it's aesthetic or sexual appeal) if you see a family member's penis or boob? Are you really judging its aesthetic or sexual appeal? Cos if so, oddest.

paulhw, Sunday, 19 December 2010 04:17 (fifteen years ago)

oddesty blaise

buzza, Sunday, 19 December 2010 05:04 (fifteen years ago)

I've seen all my siblings naked (shared baths when we were kids, etc.)

mauricio kagel exercise (corey), Sunday, 19 December 2010 05:26 (fifteen years ago)

Why do you want to see your relatives naked?

congratulations (n/a), Sunday, 19 December 2010 05:41 (fifteen years ago)

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100707030600AAjqcly

buzza, Sunday, 19 December 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

nine months pass...

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/26/us/san-francisco-nudity-restrictions-provoke-the-nakedly-ambitious.html?_r=1

Some of the nudists at the rally seemed to already be adhering to the sought-after decorum by sitting on newspapers. In fact, The San Francisco Bay Guardian, one of the city’s weeklies, explicitly advertised its usefulness for just that purpose, printing a special clip-out page in last week’s issue. The page pointed out that newsprint was a 100 percent recyclable seat guard, and in bold type it said: “If you go bare, put ’er there.”

some lady (La Lechera), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 02:46 (fourteen years ago)

I don't want it burned into my memory. But it's not a big deal if it happens accidentally. Siblings of the opposite sex, though - that's weird and gross.

โตเกียวเหมียวเหมียว aka Don Nots (Mount Cleaners), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 04:49 (fourteen years ago)

Do you ever think about what if your workplace got robbed, and the bad guys made all the employees take off all their clothes for some plot reason?

Zachary Taylor, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:06 (fourteen years ago)

europeans shocked and bewildered abt americans 'attitudes toward nudity and/or sex' is one of the phenomena reliably highest in poorly disguised self regard

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:13 (fourteen years ago)

one might ask 'why are europeans so weird abt americans being so weird abt nudity'

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:14 (fourteen years ago)

what is the deal with airplane food

yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:14 (fourteen years ago)

Unfortunately the nudity on display here is usually performed by the people you'd least want to see nude. Also, mostly tourists/suburbanites.

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:14 (fourteen years ago)

Re: robbers making people take their clothes off. Thankfully that sounds like some crazy shit from the seventies. Those sick fucks would have to have their eyeballs ripped out. That's all I have to say. I don't take losing well.

โตเกียวเหมียวเหมียว aka Don Nots (Mount Cleaners), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:15 (fourteen years ago)

its like ive had a number of germans for whatever reason over the years lecture me abt americans being sexually repressed and im all yeah well every country has their version of that i guess *rolls eyes*

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:16 (fourteen years ago)

like for instance in Europe they have violent Islamophobia

ilx user 'silby' (silby), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:24 (fourteen years ago)

Younger Americans are not conservative enough - skirts too high, pants too low! Kids go to school with their butt cheeks and underwear hanging out! In front of the elderly!

โตเกียวเหมียวเหมียว aka Don Nots (Mount Cleaners), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:29 (fourteen years ago)

mount wieners

― ☂ (max)

buzza, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:34 (fourteen years ago)

It would be my guess that the taboo against seeing family members naked in the USA (and Canada?) is probably connected withe the incest taboo - not that the two acts have any real similarity or remotely similar consequences - but that sexuality, and nakedness beyond the age of (roughly) toddlers are inextricably bound together in the US psyche.

Aimless, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:42 (fourteen years ago)

is there not an incest taboo in europe?

yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:48 (fourteen years ago)

i mean i know in central europe like 45% of fathers keep their daughters locked up as sex slaves for 33 years but

yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:49 (fourteen years ago)

Taboos manifest themselves differently in different societies. The prudishness of Americans has always far exceeded the general norms in Europe.

Aimless, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 05:50 (fourteen years ago)

Never discount the impact of bullying, kids can be so mean and they condition each other to disrespect your parents. You know, yer mama is fat and ugly and all of that.

โตเกียวเหมียวเหมียว aka Don Nots (Mount Cleaners), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 06:05 (fourteen years ago)

what is the deal with airplane food

― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 07:14 (2 hours ago) Bookmark

lol

A+ thread from top to bottom (see what I did dere)

Young Swell (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 07:41 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.