Gus Van Sant

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (210 of them)
Mala Noche was great, it was so more black than white, actually so depressive that it made you laugh, OTT 80s gloom. I never cared much for the rest, but I have to see Drugstore Cowboy yet.

erik, Friday, 20 December 2002 13:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Ooh I really want to see Mala Noche now; I think I read somewhere that it was coming out on dvd, or playing at a festival, or something...

Mary (Mary), Saturday, 21 December 2002 06:53 (twenty-three years ago)

THE SOUTH STILL MOURNS FOR GUS VAN SANT! FREE BIRD FOREVER!!1

Dan I., Saturday, 21 December 2002 07:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I really like 'To Die For', I'd say it's one of my favourites.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Saturday, 21 December 2002 13:06 (twenty-three years ago)

one year passes...
Mike Pitt to star in GVS's Niravana-inspired film

Mary (Mary), Sunday, 28 March 2004 20:36 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
so i caught good will hunting on tv last weekend. it was the first time i'd seen it since 1997, and to my great surprise, i enjoyed it tremendously. i'm curious as to ilx's opinion?

on paper there's lots to despise (ie. warm tones and elliott smith soundtrack predates/predicts fetal rock/emo boom, robin williams in maudlin mode, "how dya like them apples", its launching of the hydraheaded damon/affleck monster) but in practice i found it well-written, capably-acted and surprisingly engrossing. the funny thing is that i can't remember a single person disliking this film when it came out, and now i'd have a hard time finding anyone who rates it. has your relationship with it changed? and if so, why?

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 8 August 2005 18:12 (twenty years ago)

my predictions: adam will hate this now even more than he did in 2002, slocki will slag it, amateurist will be sympathetic to parts but ultimately disdainful.

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 8 August 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)

I liked it when it came out, haven't seen it since. I think people are likely to put it down because it's "feel-good" (though it really isn't) and because of what came of Ben Affleck. The Unabomber joke is hysteric, and it's also one of the few Hollywood films of recent years to directly deal with class issues.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 8 August 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)

For a mainstream film there are some unexpected subversive elements. The homosexual relationships are implied and subtle but THERE (Stellar Starsgaard's less-than-pedagogical interest in Damon; I like that shot of him patting Damon rather longingly on the shoulder) and the drunk bullshitting sections feel as lived-in as the best moments in Private Idaho and Cowboy.

In short, it's an honorable mainstream hit. I don't get some of the hate it inspires.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)

i didn't get any of the homosexual overtones, but i suppose i can see how someone would.

was this considered a mainstream film at the time of its release? williams aside, none of the actors were particularly well-known.

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 8 August 2005 18:43 (twenty years ago)

It's a so-so fraud. "It's not your fault, Will..."

mainstream = 2 Oscars

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 August 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)

I like GERRY!

Tripmaker (SDWitzm), Monday, 8 August 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

Me too! Matt had way more chemistry with Casey than Ben.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 August 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)

but morbius, surely something can become mainstream after the fact, or despite itself? i don't ever remember this being presented as van sant's play for mainstream attention. but then, i don't remember it getting nine academy award noms either (NINE), so what do i know.

how was the "it's not your fault" scene fraudulent?

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 8 August 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

I liked it when it came out, haven't seen it since.

Same here, kinda. I did see it again a few years ago and still liked it.


was this considered a mainstream film at the time of its release? williams aside, none of the actors were particularly well-known.

There was a bit of buzz. I specifically remember my mom was watching an Oprah that featured Matt and Ben (and maybe Williams?) talking about GWH around the time of the release and she called me into the room to watch it, because she thought I might find it interesting.

sleep (sleep), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)

The scene as written as fradulent. It imitates every psychoanalyst-patient relationship filmed by Hollywood: Ordinary People, Prince of Tides.

Now, if the performances move you, that's a matter of taste.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)

Van Sant undoubtedly saw this as the, er, least indie-geared film of his career. But even I was shocked by the $150 million domestic gross and all the Oscar nods.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

It was a big-studio movie with syrupy music poured over it, and it was regarded as GVS's first paycheck movie by many of his previous fans (tho I'd semi-argue for "To Die For").

Alfred OTM, my understanding is that psychotherapy doesn't have "one-moment cures" like that. (I'm an Irish Catholic who embraces his guilt, so I've never tried it.) It's the equivalent of the"A-HA!" moment in artist biopics, where he discovers his style.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I remember being very, very surprised at all of its Oscar nominations. It seemed like it was a vaguely indie movie that broke through to wider audiences because of word of mouth. In late 1997, Affleck was known as the guy who was in Chasing Amy a few months back.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:08 (twenty years ago)

Certainly there can be one moment where things break down, a tipping point, etc., right? There were several sessions leading up to that, so it's not like it was an instant "cure."

xp

sleep (sleep), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:08 (twenty years ago)

I just remembered that my budding socialist college film-geek friend, who was openly disdainful of "mainstream culture," saw this when it came out and confessed to being moved to tears.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

"It seemed like it was a vaguely indie movie that broke through to wider audiences because of word of mouth."

Quite so. I vividly remember during the Titanic box office lockdown that Good Will and As Good As It Gets were the top two and three films for many weeks.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)

"fraudulent" is a strong and damning word. i'm skeptical of your attempt to use it so authoritatively! especially when it precedes blanket statements like this:

It imitates every psychoanalyst-patient relationship filmed by Hollywood

every single one? even what about bob? an incredible achievement!

my understanding is that psychotherapy doesn't have "one-moment cures" like that.

you're right! but only because psychotherapy doesn't preach "cures", period. or at least not in my experience. a better suited term might be "breakthrough". these tend to happen very fraudulently, sometimes in single moments, thanks to generous forces of accumulated pressure and/or anguish.

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

i guess the point i'm trying to make, in a very roundabout way, is that i didn't mind the breakthrough scene. sometimes actual life is cheesy too!

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:25 (twenty years ago)

The context and form renders the scene fradulent. Remember the next scene? Damon finally decies to Wise Up, abandoning his buddy to Follow His Dreams.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:26 (twenty years ago)

alfred are you the guy that drives everybody bonkers over on i love film?

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:27 (twenty years ago)

Haha. I'm the guy who drives everyone bonkers whenever the discussion turns to film.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:28 (twenty years ago)

Movies are fraudulent; i.e., THEY AREN'T REAL.

n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:28 (twenty years ago)

I still think it was presented to the audience as a 'cure.'

Robin Williams doing Dr Judd Hirsch, genius janitor who looks great shirtless gets the girl ... the triumph of this movie is that it was well-crafted enough not to get laughed off the screen.

I've never seen "Bob?" but I certainly prefer my shrink movies to be comedies.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:29 (twenty years ago)

Williams' cardigan even resembles Hirsch's!

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)

The context and form renders the scene fradulent.

'fraudulent' in relation to what? your experience? or everyone's?

Remember the next scene? Damon finally decies to Wise Up, abandoning his buddy to Follow His Dreams.

you were expecting him to stay in boston... ? and if he were to leave, would you rather it were apropos of absolutely nothing? or is an action causing a reaction too 'hollywood'?

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)

(btw, I think it's my film posts that inspire rabid hatred, not Alfred's)

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)

No one's hating on Hollywood, for God's sake. And last I checked no one's criticized Van Sant's decision to film this script. But let's face facts: it's very much a script written by two men who know more about other movies than about life; nothing wrong with that, especially when the results are as lively as GWH. But in a scene full of at least two or three other more memorable and emotional elements, the scene you want to highlight strikes me as the least effective.

(xpost)

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)

*er, "in a MOVIE full of at least two or three other..."

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)

Much of the current hate centers on how annoying Minnie Driver is.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)

morbius originally brought that scene up, alfred! i'm intrigued because your criticisms of it are so strongly worded and at the same time very meandering! i'm just trying to understand where you're coming from here.

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 8 August 2005 19:51 (twenty years ago)

My last post sums up how I feel about that scene. Like I said already, I neither hate the movie nor Hollywood.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

it's not your fault.

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 8 August 2005 20:18 (twenty years ago)

OMIGOD here comes the FRADULENT SCENE! (weeps)

http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/miramax_films/good_will_hunting/_group_photos/matt_damon7.jpg

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 August 2005 20:31 (twenty years ago)

n/a is the rightest on this thread.

Remy (x Jeremy), Monday, 8 August 2005 20:34 (twenty years ago)

'good will hunting' was part of that general 'moment of miramax' c. 1997-8 aka the death of indie (in lots of ways An Good Thing). but i never saw the film.

it's funny, at the top of the thread it's all 'argh sell-out!' gvs has now 'gone back to his roots. does he now seem 'less fraudulent'?

N_RQ, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 12:09 (twenty years ago)

up til Last Days, yeah.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 14:55 (twenty years ago)

i do like how this movie inspired the only truly funny scene in jay and silent bob strike back.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)

That WAS a good scene, but not as funny as J&SB followed out of the lab by all the stampeding animals. That could've come out of a Hope-Crosby film, and there's no higher praise! (and yeah, the rest of the movie was Stoners Only)

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

ugh - Kevin Smith is an abomination.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

He can't direct traffic, but many of his films have two belly laughs each. Like GVS counting money while directing GWH2 (and Matt and Ben testily snarling about sharing hookers -- it's funny when confessions can be hidden in plain sight).

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)

"it's funny when confessions can be hidden in plain sight"

hahaha otm!

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 19:15 (twenty years ago)

I haven't been able to sit through an entire film of Smith's since I (unfortunately) saw Clerks in the theater in my college days. so if those laughs are in there, maybe I just missed them.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)

im not gonna go on a defend-smith tangent, because hes pretty inexcusable as a filmmaker, but he's got his moments, ill admit.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

it's horseshit. i hate "smart dude learns from not-so-smart dude about life, man" plots.

ryan (ryan), Wednesday, 10 August 2005 00:50 (twenty years ago)

Gira is really branching out.

Sassy Boutonnière (ledriver), Saturday, 3 February 2024 08:04 (two years ago)

love diane lane

Swen, Saturday, 3 February 2024 18:53 (two years ago)

and chloeeeeee my heart

Swen, Saturday, 3 February 2024 18:53 (two years ago)

Two episodes in. The performances are uniformly good, with so much opportunity for caricature. Enjoying the score, too--kind of new-agey classical. (Didn't get the Michael Gira joke above at first, so I checked to see if he'd done it...)

clemenza, Sunday, 4 February 2024 01:37 (two years ago)

Flashing back to the '66 ball for the third episode was a great idea. Like a lot of people it seems, my first question was whether or not this Maysles Brothers film exists. Yes, sort of:

http://mayslesfilms.com/film/with-love-from-truman/

There was a book a few years ago about the ball that I read; truly fascinating snapshot of a moment.

clemenza, Monday, 12 February 2024 02:08 (two years ago)

Watched the first ep and at least so far GVS is in for-hire mode here. Can't overcome the Ryan Murphy-ness of it all

Rich E. (Eric H.), Monday, 12 February 2024 15:12 (two years ago)

Didn't like E4 as much as the first three, but I think two great performances are emerging. I love Capote and PSH--almost a comfort movie for me--but I think Tom Hollander might be even better, or at the very least benefits from his comparative anonymity. (PSH is such a presence for me, I don't think I can ever stop being entirely aware it's him.) And Naomi Watts is someone for whom I've always had an arm's-length appreciation, but I think she's so good here.

clemenza, Thursday, 15 February 2024 17:50 (two years ago)

episode 3 was pretty great

the way GVS recreated the Maysles style was so good, esp since there never was Maysles footage of the ball or anything! the only thing they ever did together irl was just a very short reel of interview w Truman in long island apparently

the ball looked amazing, and the side by side scenes of truman dancing alone then w his mother was so good

havent seen ep4 yet

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 15 February 2024 18:02 (two years ago)

E3 was a classic self-contained episode--I think you could enjoy it without watching the rest of the series.

clemenza, Thursday, 15 February 2024 18:03 (two years ago)

Watts plays Babe Paley. The real-life version:

https://i.postimg.cc/vHYZfdXZ/babe.jpg

clemenza, Thursday, 15 February 2024 18:12 (two years ago)

two weeks pass...

Wasn't 100% sure whether this week's episode was the last--it could've worked as the finale, although they would have needed a written postscript. (Which I'm sure will be part of any finale.) Anyway, two more, next one directed by Jennifer Lynch. Thought E5 and E6 were both pretty good, although E3 is still the highlight so far. Getting "Last Night a DJ Saved My Life" in there was nice.

clemenza, Sunday, 3 March 2024 02:04 (two years ago)

Thought Capaote's drunken TV appearance in E7 was the series' worst scene--accurate, maybe, but overracted--but the Babe Paley stuff, especially their conversation on Truman's deathbed, was very good. Intrigued as to how they'll handle Dead Truman in E8; hope they don't get overly clever.

clemenza, Sunday, 10 March 2024 14:23 (two years ago)

yeah the babe/truman scenes were great & agree abt the drunk tv

i love this show but there’s also something about it that i find a little boring?
idk what it is

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 10 March 2024 15:46 (two years ago)

I guess it's that there's not really a lot of room for surprises. Truman drinks, Truman tries to finish the book, and that's about it (and we know the ending already). I loved the ending of E7, the way it led to the last line. Hope Tom Hollander and Naomi Watts win Emmys--I take it there's a separate category for this kind of show?

clemenza, Sunday, 10 March 2024 17:05 (two years ago)

Try as I might, I can't really find Truman Capote a particularly interesting historical figure

Rich E. (Eric H.), Sunday, 10 March 2024 17:12 (two years ago)

i think limited series? idk abt such things

but yeah Watts & Hollander are incredible. also like Sevigny too

not a fan of Ringwald in this tho? her performance feels very strained somehow

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 10 March 2024 17:13 (two years ago)

Agree--she just seems wrong. Weird to watch Treat Williams play the husband of a dying woman, knowing he died himself after making this.

clemenza, Sunday, 10 March 2024 17:31 (two years ago)

yeah it’s nice seeing him in this

oh you know who i love in this? Calista Flockhart - her Lee Radziwll is really good, very arch & shady

and Demi was excellent her small role

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 10 March 2024 18:01 (two years ago)

I like both of them. I'm a little on the fence with Sevigny, probably because her performance is so different from what I'm used to with her.

clemenza, Sunday, 10 March 2024 18:03 (two years ago)

Holly Golightly = Carol Matthau...I guess that's true? Hard to picture Walter Matthau married to the Holly Golightly of the movie.

clemenza, Sunday, 10 March 2024 18:05 (two years ago)

oh huh i didn’t know that!

matthau irl seems too curmudgeonly to tolerate a golightly but there you go
there’s someone for everyone i guess

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 10 March 2024 18:13 (two years ago)

Wait, what? I just came across her name elsewhere.

The Ginger Bakersfield Sound (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 10 March 2024 21:04 (two years ago)

Regarding Glenn Close's performance in Andrew Lloyd Webber's musical adaptation of Sunset Boulevard.

Close modeled Norma’s grotesque look on Walter Matthau’s wife, Carol. Close didn’t know her, but she’d heard that when Carol was young she had porcelain skin. As she got older, she applied white makeup to her face, which made her look odd, even a little frightening. “But I’m sure when she looked in the mirror she saw that porcelain skin,” Close said. “Norma’s makeup morphed into something grotesque. But she was seeing something different in the mirror. She was seeing what she looked like in the 1920s.”

Riedel, Michael. Singular Sensation: The Triumph of Broadway (pp. 20-21). Simon & Schuster

The Ginger Bakersfield Sound (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 10 March 2024 21:08 (two years ago)

You hope for a strong finale; thought this one meandered, so I'll knock the series down a notch overall. They should have ended with E7.

I did like the very ending though, the last five minutes and the final shot. I don't know if that young couple bidding had special significance--I thought something was going to be revealed about them, but no. Love that bit of music at the end, which played throughout the series.

The ending was of a piece with the Black and White Ball. I think I find that so interesting because it feels like the last time that glamour and celebrity still largely belonged to people over 40 (pick whatever number you want--50 maybe). From '67 forward, that changed.

I watched the whole thing thinking Answered Prayers was eventually published in more or less its finished form. I guess not, although the version published in 1986 is 180 pages long.

clemenza, Sunday, 17 March 2024 02:49 (two years ago)

three months pass...

Drugstore Cowboy is on Prime.

Did Lana Del Rey steal like 99% of her look from Kelly Lynch in this movie?

an icon of a worried-looking, long-haired, bespectacled man (C. Grisso/McCain), Sunday, 7 July 2024 00:40 (one year ago)

lol

Billion Year Polyphonic Spree (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 7 July 2024 00:49 (one year ago)

one year passes...

My two favourite Gus Van Sant films are at opposite ends of his one-for-me, one-for-them filmography: Elephant, which concedes nothing to the thousand obvious ways to tell that story (took me two or three viewings to realize how great it is), and The Promised Land, possibly my favourite old-fashioned mainstream film this century, and which may as well have been directed by Ron Howard.

Dead Man's Wire is tilted heavily in the one-for-them direction.* I liked it, though it looks like not as rapturously as the reviews (and not as much as The Promised Land). The trailer, which I'd seen a couple of times, made me think Michael Shannon was the lead actor. I wish he had been; I found Bill Skarsgård a little rote, or too earnest, or something. Thought Dacre Montgomery was very good as the kidnapped son, and while I flinched the first time Pacino spoke--big accent--he's good too. Van Sant clearly loves Dog Day Afternoon and The China Syndrome, and now he's made his own version.

Assuming I could look up a complete list of songs when I got home, I left when the last bit of real footage played. Nothing online yet, so I can't identify this one song I liked. Some good '70s stuff throughout. "Raindrops Keep Fallin' on My Head" fell a little flat for me--that one's owned by another film. (I'm probably the only person here who wants songs to be a surprise.)

*I don't know if directors like Van Sant still have the luxury of one-for-me, one-for-them.

clemenza, Monday, 19 January 2026 01:32 (four months ago)

it's his best since Milk, a solid mainstream film. The interpolation of photos and film -- a tic since Mala Noche -- felt like an imposition this time, a reminder of artier times.

Pacino's broadness would've oppressed me had his role been bigger; in his small doses he made he chuckle several times, especially when he maliciously relishes how his kid doesn't cry but Skarsgard toes.

The Luda of Suburbia (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 January 2026 01:35 (four months ago)

OTM

Eric Blore Is President (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 19 January 2026 01:45 (four months ago)

My impression is that every script Gus gets interested in directing gets shopped the same way, and certain of them get big budget greenlit, and other's get small budget greenlit, and the production and resultant film are adjusted accordingly toward expectations of the investors. I was adjacent to the pre-production of Milk, and at the time, many years having passed since Good Will Hunting (and Finding Forrester), it wasn't even clear to anyone involved in the early stages if the film was going to be a glossy one or an arty one. Then the money came through and the big names got hired.

ron zertnert (flamboyant goon tie included), Monday, 19 January 2026 02:39 (four months ago)

Interesting! Not as pre-determined as I thought. Follow the money...

clemenza, Monday, 19 January 2026 02:42 (four months ago)

Tbh thought Pacino was only in this as a nod to Dog Day Afternoon.

Eric Blore Is President (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 19 January 2026 02:59 (four months ago)

In any case it totally worked for me as a gritty seventies callback/throwback/wayback tribute with a groovy period soundtrack.

Eric Blore Is President (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 19 January 2026 03:02 (four months ago)

xp I don't think it's so much "follow the money" as Gus's place in the industry requires him, oftentimes, to "play ball"; his films typically don't make a tonne of money. It does perplex/frustrate me that Gus hasn't even come close to getting a $5m budget for any of his own scripts since "Even Cowgirls..."; in comparison, Woody Allen has consistently been getting between $20m and $40m this century, even recently, but... Allen's films tend to make money. God knows why.

ron zertnert (flamboyant goon tie included), Monday, 19 January 2026 03:19 (four months ago)

woody is coasting on his rep among those for whom his rep is positive. plus. he still attracts talented actors who think working with him will polish their own reps

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Monday, 19 January 2026 03:54 (four months ago)

xps Van Sant did a few Q&A's for this film and I attended one. He didn't start this film, the producers initiated it and originally had Werner Herzog set to direct, but at some point, Herzog dropped out and Elwes approached Van Sant (who he already knew) about taking his place. I'm not sure how much of the decision-making was already done, but they did tell him it was already set up to shoot in Louisville (even though it didn't take place there) which actually appealed to him because he was born there (though he didn't grow up there). Pacino was already cast by the producers with the stipulation that they had to shoot all his scenes in one day. But IIRC Dacre Montgomery was cast by Van Sant himself (I think he auditioned and Van Sant picked him on the basis of that). It sounded like he basically had to jump in and hit the ground running because they were going to shoot fairly soon, so it all had to come together very fast. At least some of the music was not chosen by him - "Raindrops" for example was a favorite song of one producer and he licensed it even before Van Sant was involved, so he basically had to use it for that reason. I thought the film was okay. It's far from his best work, but at least it wasn't terrible.

birdistheword, Monday, 19 January 2026 04:16 (four months ago)

FWIW, the ones I like best (i.e. absolutely love) are his early shorts, Mala Noche, Drugstore Cowboy, My Own Private Idaho, and Elephant. I’ve been meaning to revisit Paranoid Park and Last Days, I had reservations before but I may appreciate them more now. To Die For and Milk are fine, I enjoy them mostly for the performances. But everything I’ve seen by him from the last 17 years hasn’t done much for me. He had a hell of a run to start his career and it was a much better time for a filmmaker like him to get things made, so I don’t blame him if he doesn’t have it in him to do anything more than director-for-hire work. He’s 73 now and he’s earned his laurels.

birdistheword, Monday, 19 January 2026 05:33 (four months ago)

Look, Mala Noche, Drugstore Cowboy, My Own Private Idaho ? Stupendous run. MOPI is often my favorite film, period. But To Die For is a splendid comedy, especially when it concentrates on the kids; and Milk does something similar with Sean Penn, Emile Hirsch, and their crew as they strategize about politics. Elephant and Paranoid Park hold up.

The Luda of Suburbia (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 January 2026 10:25 (four months ago)

In addition to everything else it has going for it, MOPI has an excellent use of Udo Keir.

Eric Blore Is President (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 19 January 2026 14:21 (four months ago)

We should film club this guy— it’s been years since I watched that first run and he’s due

ron zertnert (flamboyant goon tie included), Monday, 19 January 2026 16:02 (four months ago)

In addition to everything else it has going for it, MOPI has an excellent use of Udo Keir.

Sorry, I meant Udo Kier.

Eric Blore Is President (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 19 January 2026 16:12 (four months ago)

One of the pleasures of those early films was how even the smaller roles were brilliantly conceived and cast. Kier's role is one example, but I especially loved Burroughs in Drugstore Cowboy. I first saw the movie as a pre-teen who wasn't that familiar with Burroughs, but with the benefit hindsight, it's really impressive how that was done with such confidence and ease from someone who was making only his second feature - still an indie production too albeit the first one that wasn't a microbudget DIY production.

All of those early shorts appear to be scattered across different releases. Could be a rights issue, but would be nice if someone properly restored them all and collected them in one release.

birdistheword, Monday, 19 January 2026 19:07 (four months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.