Chapo Trap House and the rise of the dirtbag left

Yeah, a lot of it seems like leftover pathology of powerlessness stuff, where you have a bunch of folks who survived in their subculture for so long they can’t switch it from just being a subculture.

It’s like hardcore punk kids freaking out about keeping the scene pure, not trying to build a mass movement to actually change things

"thought crime" fuck you

ha

basically the message is misogyny is ok as long as you support (reformist, imperialist, US-nationalist) socialism

remember when i brought up the russell brand thing a while back, it was because this is the same shit that keeps happening. the idea that certain people are just too important to be called out on their bullshit. it's SWP logic

these reactions are just standard right wing anti-PC bullshit

ok dude

this language is *routinely* used to defend rapists on the left

fuck you

Tangential to yesterday's discussion, one of the problems with twitter is that you are expected to have the entire history/feed of every twitter personality memorized and engrained. So often you see someone engage, typically in earnest, with a specific tweet and they subsequently get minorly dragged with, "how could you respond to this person abt your favorite movie, don't you know they tweeted something transphobic three years ago?". Which isn't to say that it's a bad thing that people keep receipts and remember awful things people tweet, but it can be exhausting having to know that you aren't just replying to a tweet, you are replying the whole "persona".

the better response to that would be "thank you for telling me" or "sorry i didn't know about that" not "oh yeah so where's the evidence" or "you wreckers are destroying our movement" or "woke thought police" or

asking for evidence is bad?

asking for evidence is bad?

fuck you

it's obvious if someone really wants to know or if they just want to dissemble

certain keys on your keyboard are getting a lot of use today

I didn't suggest a response? Just saying there is a lot of weight in interactions on twitter and sometimes it's just an earnest reply and not a wholehearted endorsement of everything a different person has ever tweeted. NB I'm not defending anyone specific in this thread, just something I've noticed about how fraught twitter interactions have become.

posting on ILX otoh

well this has become a pretty fraught thread tbh

this is how social media works it's how you respond to being informed about who you're interacting with

when i used twitter i was sometimes informed of shitty things said or done by people or orgs i'd retweeted or interacted with. i was not cancelled for having done that and i was grateful for the information

Never heard of 'post-left' but aren't NazBols leftists who think Tucker Carlson is based because he says negative things about corporations sometimes?

You are responding to things in my posts that I didn't say. I never said anyone was "cancelled", I never argued that it was a bad thing to get educated. I was simply saying that not every twitter user has an index of the tweeting history of everyone they may potentially interact with and maybe it's not the best look to automatically assume the worst possible intent behind every interaction.

But you are just looking to get aggro on everyone today, so I'm sorry I brought it up in the first place.

Never heard of 'post-left' but aren't NazBols leftists who think Tucker Carlson is based because he says negative things about corporations sometimes?

now-feudalism

neo-feudalism

Jimmy Dore has almost a million subscribers so there's more than a dozen! I feel their effect isn't insignificant, this is part of the nihilism thats designed to turn people away from AOC because she didn't do M4A yet

I mean tbh I’ve never listened to Jimmy Dore and I’m not sure what he stands for, but is he legitimately nazbol/ white nationalist?

There are a lot of the various kinds of asshole being discussed here (a lot in the sense they could sell out a MLB stadium) but they’re not doing anything. They aren’t even trying to do entryism to take over the (itself pretty irrelevant) DSA, much less unions or putting up primary candidates.

Liz B being anti-choice is “unacceptable” but she’s neither a politician nor an activist. She’s a token soft left NYT op-Ed writer. There’s no value in being mad at her for her shitty belief (not even plural!). As with Ezra Klein, you’ll never lose by completely ignoring Time op-ed writers (except for the guy who roasted Petey Butts).

I mean tbh I’ve never listened to Jimmy Dore and I’m not sure what he stands for, but is he legitimately nazbol/ white nationalist?

Him personally? More of a nihilist/narcissist than anything more strictly defined I think. But Greenwald, Dore, BJG, general Strasserite class reductionism. But none of this is an entryism of any kind, its more of a nihilst exitism (from broad progressivism)

you’ll never lose by completely ignoring Time op-ed writers

moved to The Atlantic as of today (lol)

Left's posting style not making any friends here per usual, but I disagree that we should shrug off anti-abortion rhetoric from someone with a decently prominent media profile who is perceived to be a voice of the left (however bullshit we all think that perception is). As I'm sure you all know, abortion rights & access are continually being eroded in the US, and the normalizing of "religious" objections to it is obvs a huge part of that. And personally, I have zero use for a non-feminist leftist opiner

she hasn't written any articles about being anti-abortion or posted about it on twitter iirc.

it's people mad that she holds a personal belief which she doesn't advocate for publicly.

which seems kind of nuts to me.

i do not care one iota for the bruenigs, don't read the nyt

ah sorry I assumed this was all based on some degree of public advocacy

she hasn't written any articles about being anti-abortion or posted about it on twitter iirc.

when i used twitter i was sometimes informed of shitty things said or done by people or orgs i'd retweeted or interacted with. i was not cancelled for having done that and i was grateful for the information

I see this happen too but sometimes I look into the situation and the sort of person who feels compelled to say “hey this person/org you’re interacting with did this shitty thing” isn’t always the most unbiased and accurate source of information. And there has to be a point at which an infraction is minor enough that you can view it as being outweighed by the things you were following the person/org for in the first place, right? Might be different for different people?

she is a well known leftish figure whose stance on reproductive autonomy is well known that's enough

this is not primarily about her though it's about who the left is for and how certain types of people are consistently seen as more disposable than others by its gatekeepers

xp how long is a piece of string

But Greenwald, Dore, BJG, general Strasserite class reductionism. But none of this is an entryism of any kind, its more of a nihilst exitism (from broad progressivism)

who the left is for

well you're certainly ruling out like half the people on earth

(and please note anvil I’m definitely not directing that at *you*; just my little mini diatribe about political standom in general)

so much of this is about trust and inference and tone and implicature and deniability and pattern recognition at a certain point the denial of what is really being said is just a way to condone it and reiterate it and marginalise those who recognise and oppose it xps

It's cool that you don't like Liz, but calling people rape apologists for defending her is bad form, mate

this isn't (just) about liz or matt or chapo it's about chomsky and zizek and parenti and corbyn and melenchon and assange and people you know of and people you don't, every fucking leader and celebrity who is elevated to stand in for a whole movement at the expense of those who are then framed as the movement's enemies for being on the wrong side of the lines that have been drawn

it's very familiar power dynamic and the accompanying rhetoric is also very familiar and it needs to stop

yeah but you're also equating someone's religious belief with someone's rapes which is weirdly fucked up

no i am describing a dynamic which is used to defend things up to and including rape

i think saying "this doesn't seem like that big a deal and shouldn't exclude them from the movement" is completely reasonable to say about certain deviations from orthodoxy even if it would be indefensible to say about rape.

People disagree with me and it needs to stop

chomsky and zizek and parenti and corbyn and melenchon and assange
Birthday party, cheesecake, jelly bean, boom

Thoughtcrime is the essential crime that contains all others in itself. Very hateful of all of you not to recognize this.