once-common words people don’t use anymore

It is, but Icelandic is cooler. Besides, Frisian is also closest to modern English.

I buy suet once a year to make Christmas Pudding

if we're talking ilx, i would say RONG never gets used anymore

If you had searched for that, you would have found yourself to be incorrect.

nobody was capitalizing it tho!

The girl group song 'Terry' features the line 'we had a quarrel, I was untrue on the night he died' and every time I hear it I wonder when 'quarrel' and 'untrue' (in that context) fell out of their once-popular use.

Eh?

Tom D: I say 'cobblers' almost literally every day.

And I don't even work at an old-fashioned shoe repair shop.

(xp) Oh I get what you mean about the context for 'untrue', but I think it was old fashioned even then.

Using pop culture as a yardstick, 'untrue' as an analogue of 'unfaithful' seems to have been in fairly regular usage in the '60s. I hear it pop up quite a bit in songs, movies, shows, etc. from that era but not really much thereafter.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/64/BurialUntrue.jpg

Well, it's easy to rhyme, which can never be underestimated in song writing.

Varlet

if we're talking ilx, i would say RONG never gets used anymore

you aren't hearing "shan't" much in the US these days, and "shall" only got a stay of execution from Gandalf

xpost it makes you vintage

When I was six it was very common for kids my age to say "keen" to mean cool, great, awesome. And then it seemed as if overnight everyone stopped saying it. (Absolutely nobody said "awesome" when I was six but by the time I was 14 everyone said it). Granted kids often have their own words, but some older people said "keen" also, I'm pretty sure of it.

"Lumbago" was a pretty common term up to and throughout the 70's, to identify any sort of back pain. Archie Bunker and Fred G. Sanford were all over it! Seems like "sciatica" has taken its place.

The G. is for “grebt.”

does anybody say "kneeslapper" anymore

xp
a Canadianism I enjoy is "keener"

xp to myself

I think it was lumbago that had George Jefferson walking on Bentley's back.

"Lumbago" was a pretty common term up to and throughout the 70's, to identify any sort of back pain. Archie Bunker and Fred G. Sanford were all over it! Seems like "sciatica" has taken its place.

cf the Small Faces, "Lazy Sunday"

TIL that that line in "Lazy Sunday" is "How's old Bert's lumbago?"

Always thought it was "How's your bird's lumbago?"

there are words people used to say in the playground a lot that were conflating being silly/stupid with being mentally handicapped. I don't really want to even say what they were, but it always amazes me that these words were common enough to be learned by children. I'm glad I don't hear them any more.

xp to myself

I think it was lumbago that had George Jefferson walking on Bentley's back.

TIL that that line in "Lazy Sunday" is "How's old Bert's lumbago?"

Always thought it was "How's your bird's lumbago?"

"How's yer Bert's lumbago?" surely?

Hm it does sound slightly more like "your" than "old." I just went by some random lyric site... now I see there's another site that says it's "your old Bert's"!

lumbago was a final jeopardy answer a few years ago and nobody got it. the clue: "Adding “P” to a word for a chronic back condition gets you this synonym for graphite or pencil lead". one of the contestants was a latin teacher.

milliner / millinery

Never heard lumbago used in conversation but come across it all the time in medical coding.

you aren't hearing "shan't" much in the US these days, and "shall" only got a stay of execution from Gandalf

At school in the 80s I had a very old English teacher who insited it be spelled "sha'n't"

That’s the Lewis Carroll spelling right

Literally never seen it anywhere else

modals are a fun subject in English, there's been a big shift in their use over the last fifty or so years but as a rule nobody really notices it

(side note: shall as a first-person variant of will is both characteristically English fuckery and susceptible to falling into disuse... the Irish never fell for it, and probably consequently US English isn't super into it either)

Goolies

I imagine hashtag has more or less replaced pound sign except on automated telephone menus, though today I learned it’s actual name is an octothorpe.

goolies is such a Young Ones word

catarrh

actually, there are quite a few outmoded medical terms that once were in common use

All of l33t sp34k

Rascal? Rascal Flatts and Dizzee Rascal notwithstanding, I don't feel like it's a word anyone really uses in common parlance.

No, I still hear rascal used in a lighthearted way.

I still enjoy using 'druthers' but I fear that when I do others may mistake me for a grizzled prospector or somesuch.

was just reading a book where someone was turned down by the army for having flat feet. do people still have flat feet? why are they no longer a problem?

Orthotics are a big industry

And I think the condition is usually called fallen arches now, which at least sounds more poetic

Twitter says this

Studies analyzing the correlation between flat feet and physical injuries in soldiers have been inconclusive, but none suggest that flat feet are an impediment, at least in soldiers who reached the age of military recruitment without prior foot problems. Instead, in this population, there is a suggestion of more injury in high arched feet. A 2005 study of Royal Australian Air Force recruits that tracked the recruits over the course of their basic training found that neither flat feet nor high arched feet had any impact on physical functioning, injury rates or foot health. If anything, there was a tendency for those with flat feet to have fewer injuries. Another study of 295 Israel Defense Forces recruits found that those with high arches suffered almost four times as many stress fractures as those with the lowest arches. A later study of 449 U.S. Navy special warfare trainees found no significant difference in the incidence of stress fractures among sailors and Marines with different arch heights.

Not twitter, wikipedia

what is wrong with my brain this weekend?

I have flat feet. My mum took me to a chiropodist a few times and I had to wear arches in my shoes for a bit but they were fucking uncomfortable so I used to just take them out. It's still unclear to me what the actual problem is tbh, never caused me any issues in my life.

Having never applied to join the army I don't know if it's still a thing.

Me too!
But I never use it 'cos I'm never sure if other folks will recognize it or just think I mistyped...

Don't remember seeing &c, does look useful. Was it prevalent. In books or magazines or what?

Victorian novels

“&” originating as a ligature of “et” which makes it a literal equivalent

I recall an English teacher telling me to "show more spunk", as if this was a completely normal request. The class sniggered.

Admittedly, this was last century.

My coworker has chilblains and it made me think of this thread.

Everyone knows at least one thing about chilblains, right?

I didn't find out "tuchus" was Yiddish until recently. I'm pretty sure my Southern Baptist grandfather used that word.

I don't hear "corpulent" much anymore

in some 19th century novel I saw a character's paunch described as his "corporation," that one seems due for a revival

(my dad and all of his brothers have paunches, fwiw, and this is gentle joking amongst family— not meant to be shaming or anything)

To try to explain the Scottish word "gallus" the other day I used the word "cocksure", which I don't think I've heard in a while.

(it's not actually a very accurate equivalent anyway)

“gallant” used to mean you were a bit of a rascal with the ladies, is that closer to it?

Irish people use "bold" about people in a similar way to gallus I think. Obviously bold is used in England but more just as courageous and clear, not with the edge of cheekiness

It seems mad that the link isn't 'gall' (bold, impudent), but the etymologies appear different.

I think of Goofus and Gallant, the comic strip from Highlights magazine

"'gallant' used to mean you were a bit of a rascal with the ladies, is that closer to it?"

I was reading about obituaries a while back, and this reminds me of a chap called Hugh Massingberd, who used euphemisms so as not to speak too ill of the dead.

"Thus we have one dissolute old lord, widely acknowledged to be a borderline rapist, described, in homage to one of Massingberd's finest confections, as an 'uncompromisingly direct ladies' man'. ... 'He tended to become over-attached to certain ideas and theories' - fascist. 'Gave colourful accounts of his exploits' - liar. 'She did not suffer fools gladly' - foul-tempered shrew."

It also mentions Antony Moynihan, 3rd Baron Moynihan, who "provided, through his character and career, ample ammunition for critics of the hereditary principle. His chief occupations were bongo-drummer, confidence trickster, brothel-keeper, drug-smuggler and police informer".

i thought gallant was more towards courteous etc in dealing with the ladies of the court

Now it does

In fact “gallant” is one of the entries in this thread, proposed by me, many moons ago

The suggestion that it's from "gallows" as in "he's fit for the gallows, that one" is more entertaining.

I just think of suspenders (which makes sense as coming from gallows; they are literally for hanging).

Goofus and Gallows didn't test well

Gallant I think was borrowed from the French? Anyway, there was a mid-18th century substyle of Classical music in Germany they called “galant”, as it was smoother and more poised/less emotional than the high baroque which came before.

iirc, gallantry was a later manifestation of ye auld style chivalry

The suggestion that it's from "gallows" as in "he's fit for the gallows, that one" is more entertaining.

protestantism took a dim view of both chivalry and gallantry bcz they were both centered on the idea that women were to be greatly admired and female sexuality was incorporated into its ideals, rather than viewed as inherently foul and sinful

And Catholics don’t? What with Mary being a perpetual virgin and whatnot

Victorian Britain was both Protestant and enamored with Arthurian mythology.

Also simultaneously patriarchal and so dominated by a woman that I just referred to an entire time period using her name.

I don't have a point really (I usually don't, as a rule). I am musing idly.

protestantism took a dim view of both chivalry and gallantry bcz they were both centered on the idea that women were to be greatly admired and female sexuality was incorporated into its ideals, rather than viewed as inherently foul and sinful

It's really nothing to do with that though, it's about someone being cocky and with attitude and liable to end up in trouble as a result of it.

cybernetics