Going To Law School

It really seems like a properly full time thing. I did law split with arts (you can do law at an undergraduate i.e. sort of college equivalent level here) and had on average about 12 hours a week of contact hours. I did paid work between 15 and 25 hours a week for my entire degree. From the sounds of it that wouldn't really be possible at the US law schools...?

How's work going for you cozen?

I'm almost qualified (3 days to go). I've disliked it for the most part but then I don't think it was ever for me.

However, it is good for choice quotes, especially from bosses. My boss just told a client that "Nigeria is a lawless country" (!!).

Any other plans?

I wish my work was good for choice quotes.

I have plans but I'm being guarded and sheepish about them for the most part, because I don't want to jinx them.

In the short term, I'm off on holiday round Scotland on my bike. In the mid-to-long term I have something promising lined up but am just waiting on a solid job offer.

but some of these students who go off on class make me never want to speak

If this is your first, gut-level instinct with regard to class participation, I would follow it. I tended to be one of the folks who spoke in class pretty regularly, but always tended to talk about the topic at hand - I've always been a person who learned best by asking questions. None of my classmates minded me (or so I was told), however, because I was asking questions about the material, as opposed to just talking to hear myself talk. There were others in my section, however, that had earned everyone's animosity by the second week in class.

"To me it seems like (rephrasing of point that was already made three different times when we were talking about the subject 10 minutes ago)"

Dude! Its like you were IN my first year section!

Part of me really doesn't want to hate these people - we all have our own learning processes, self-learned or otherwise, that we need to go through to get things learned. Paraphrasing in a forum that will either approve or disapprove of the paraphrase is one of these methods.

The problem is when this paraphrasing becomes burdensome on the rest of the class's learning - like "STFU, dude. We want to get to everything we read!"

In real law world, I was just given the following assignment: Here's what I think happened. Write me that story, but with facts to back it up. Awesome.

Torts and Civ Pro are way better, I just had my first classes - I can actually talk about my interpretations of the case that relate to the case. I guess my Elements class is a weird thing ... nobody really has a grasp about what it is, aside from a way to ease students into law school.

I'm also becoming a library rat. I know when I schlep back to my apartment there's no way in hell I'm going to do my assignments... well, at least.

I just read 22 pages of a Supreme Court opinion on the use of FRCP Rule 8(a)(2) and Rule 12(b)(6) regarding some complaint filed on telecom monopolies, and it was downright fascinating.

Ok, q for the vets:

A friend approached me and one other guy with a study idea. Basically there are three of us and three classes that use example cases (the other is legal writing). So he thought we could each take one and be responsible for a running *crib sheet* of all the principle and note cases for that class. I agreed, but just wondering if I'm making extra work for myself.

On the plus side, there's obviously the division of labor thing, and having all cases discussed in an easy format would be good.

On the minus side, maybe this winds up expending too much energy on note cases that, while they illustrate important exceptions and points, we don't have to know them by name or anything.

On the plus side again, just going over all those note cases thoroughly would probably help to remember important rules, variations and exceptions.

principal, rather

I am NOW a qualified solicitor.

I reiterate my warning - do the reading yourself! Do not depend on others to provide you with the essential understanding that will come from putting in the time.

That said, if you were to work to compile a rolling crib sheet for each other, and make regular times to meet/compare/tear each other's notes to shreds, that might be a good thing.

ON NOTE CASES:

The note cases become important once you understand the main thrust of the principal case(s). It is the note cases that show how different courts or different cases can take the same legal principles and manipulate them for different rulings.

COZ -

CONGRATULATIONS!!!!

Well done, sir. Well done.

:) thanks

Hey, I'm still in law school.

I don't have any real reason to bump other than to procrastinate the rest of my torts reading.

Civ Pro is an uphill run that keeps getting steeper, Torts is hard but fun, Crim is the most *philosophical* and hence easiest class. Legal Writing is kind of a joke.

Boring law students are all alike; every interesting law student is interesting in his or her own way. Most of them are boring.

Most fictional depictions are predictably over-dramatic, and I'm realizing that many non-fictional ones are too. There really isn't as much excitement or tension or competition in the air as I expected -- it's a relatively flat experience thus far.

Yeah, same here. Everyone's pretty friendly so far. Civ Pro is my favorite class. I'm going to get Rule 11(b)(2) tattooed on my scrotum. Torts has been a pain in the ass so far, but my professor is a philosophy junky. All we do is read Posner and relate everything to the economic theory of blingwads.

Example torts class question: "In what way does due care relate to the Hand formula, and is that in any way different than Posner's critique of Holmes's theory of fault?" Dead silence in the classroom.

Is your torts class like that, too?

well, probably since I'm sure we're using the same torts casebook.

No, my torts class consists of a large, old orthodox Jewish man who talks like George Carlin yelling "Where's the tort?! Where's the tort?! Are we punishing the kid because he intended for the lady to sit down?!"

I just read about the Hand formula and Posner's critique of Holmes's theory of fault about five minutes ago, by the way. Do you have the Tw3rski/Henderson casebook? Tw3rski is the orthodox jewish guy that teaches my class.

well, he wouldn't say "punishing," it being torts after all

Nah, it's Franklin and Rabin. All I hear in torts class is Posner this, Posner that. I get it, there's a modern theory of torts that has to do with economics.

Fuck a posner

Posner reminds me of the irritating Ivy-educated kid who sits behind me who raises his hand more than anyone else and makes ridiculous points in a hyper-articulate fashion.

Who knows, Posner could be our next SCROTUS

It will never happen

justice. Also, I'm reallllllly fucking stressed out now ... there's a lot of work, and it's doable, but the key is ... it takes a lot of time to both do the work and really do it well. like, really get everything that's going on and staying caught up. After 6 hours of class there's only so much time that can be spent on homework. Which I should probably be doing now.

law school is for people who don't have enough respect for their country to join the army.

In my case, that is wholly accurate.

After I pass the bar I'm going to set up a hipster boutique law firm where we all dress like Robert Downey Jr. from True Believer.

What the hell, there's embedding now?

i'm going to be embedding with you, burt

In a way I think law school is giving me an excuse not to commit suicide.

I just ate a sandwich so I'm feeling better. Law school good.

it takes a lot of time to both do the work and really do it well. like, really get everything that's going on and staying caught up.

This is a truism. Accept it, and move on. The earlier you realize that there are no short cuts, the better yo will do...I promise

burt may have a breakdown before 1st semester finals

I actually laughed out loud at the procedural posture of Owen v. Kroger. Does that mean I already had the breakdown?

I've got it together. What's annoying is that one of my classmates called me at 10:00 pm last night to ask about an assignment. That's not happening again.

Nah, Burt will be alright. Just one foot in front of the other, my brother.

does anyone know how hard it is to flunk out of law school? what % of people fail?

my impression is that people are more likely to drop out than fail, but I could be wrong

more than anything else while ilx was down i missed burt_stanton subtle-bragging about the girls at law school who want to sleep with him

They don't really, and I haven't had sex in about a year, so I wouldn't get too bent out of shape over it.

sounds like you already are

What's the best torts hornbook? My torts professor is totally amazing, but he's so good at coming up with weird hypos and poking holes in the law that I lose track of what the black letter rules are and I suppose I ought to know them for the exam

This is slightly harder than I thought it would be. I'm slightly tempted to just drop out and go back to writing.

Here's a dark secret I learned: 25% of the class is made up of part-time students, most of whom don't work ... they just have two classes a semester. Whether it's coincidence or not, almost all of the students on law review and top 10% are part-time students. What a scam. or should I say, scamola.

No, I think scam's right.

Wait, really? I haven't found that to be true at my school -- the only part-timers I've met are working, and the only law review/top-10% people I know so far are full-timers.

So far I find the endurance harder than the material itself. But I'm kind of enjoying the stoicism of it.

I mean if that's true (xpost) they really ought to have slots reserved for part-timers and full-timers -- it doesn't make sense to have the two competing on grades.

Yeah, it's pretty lame the way it works. I guess Carbozo does it so that they can keep their LSAT average up (it's only full-time), but they can collect tuition by the 25% of students who are part-time. I suppose they recognize people out there are too smart to go to that school if they get a 165 on the LSAT (which can get you into a lot of top 20-25 schools not in big city areas).

Also even kids on law review are having a tough time finding work, apparently.

Not sure I follow your reasoning here. Why would Cardozo want to give the allegedly less smart, lower LSAT part-time students an easier shot at making law review and top 10 percent?