2008 Primaries Thread 3: The Rejecting and Denouncening

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6022 of them)

wow if bloomie were to actually wrangle a vp nod from all his faux water-testing media-grandstanding well then play on player

jhøshea, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:17 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.drudgesiren.com/siren.gif

any concern about my grandmother not voting for Obama has been assuaged, apparently

-- gabbneb, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:14 (25 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

http://www.drudgesiren.com/siren.gif

Ed, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:18 (eighteen years ago)

i really don't see obama picking bloomberg.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

haha, yes i post only the important stuff, Ed

gabbneb, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:22 (eighteen years ago)

Some kind of bloomberg announcement would help shift the conversation back to the New politics, bi-partisan, work with anyone to get the job done schtick that Obama started this year with. I don't think it'll be a veep announce though.

Ed, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

agreed, bloomberg doesn't have much chance for the VP nod but an endorsement could definitely boost obama's cred on economic issues as far as public perception goes

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:26 (eighteen years ago)

yea definitely

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

I think that Obama-Bloomberg would be an interesting ticket. Bloomie would add to the independent-appeal, which would be sorely needed against McCain.

o. nate, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

yah veep sounds like a stretch but adding bloomie to his team would help build credibility w/what will be the prime issue of the g.e.

jhøshea, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:28 (eighteen years ago)

...not sleeping with hookers?

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:28 (eighteen years ago)

wow, an all-sucking-up-to-Zionists ticket!

lol theres a reason why this lady is speaker of the house

Actually, given the last 15 months o' nuthin I need this explained to me again.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:29 (eighteen years ago)

jesus christ at "zionists". israel fucking happened, get over it, this isn't 1905.

banriquit, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:30 (eighteen years ago)

also where the fuck is john edwards these days, and can his endorsement yet be relevant this late in the primary?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:31 (eighteen years ago)

I guess the main drawback with Bloomie is that he's from a safe Democratic state - though maybe his appeal could transcend regional lines and reach out to Western and Midwestern libertarians.

o. nate, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:31 (eighteen years ago)

Actually, given the last 15 months o' nuthin I need this explained to me again.

-- Dr Morbius, Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:29 AM (8 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

its because she knows how to play the game - totally not saying it helps where shit actually matters morbs - just that she did claw her way to the top of the democratic heap is all

jhøshea, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:32 (eighteen years ago)

yeah I getcha.

how about radical racist Zionists, nrq?

also, Bloomie would cover the repressing civil liberties flank after his lockups at the RNC '04.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:33 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.drudgesiren.com/siren.gifwhite guy with dreadlockshttp://www.drudgesiren.com/siren.gif

and what, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:33 (eighteen years ago)

Hello?

Ed, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

bloomies appeal (like giulianis before him) is mostly a media construction - once people actually get a look at this guy they will not like him - even people who admire him here in nyc kinda do it through gritted teeth

jhøshea, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

Bloomberg's out-of-state appeal is in FL (and CA), as Morbs said in code

gabbneb, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:37 (eighteen years ago)

he doesn't help in the midwest, but hagel - for whom one could argue he is a proxy of sorts - might

gabbneb, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:38 (eighteen years ago)

i mean the plains variety of 'midwest' there

gabbneb, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:38 (eighteen years ago)

bloomies appeal (like giulianis before him) is mostly a media construction

yea exactly

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:38 (eighteen years ago)

i do think bloomie could be a nationwide plus for obama playing a less than vp type of role - conomic adviser or whatnot - that way they get to rub the media shine w/o anyone actually scrutinizing the weird guy

jhøshea, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:40 (eighteen years ago)

colonic adviser

G00blar, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:42 (eighteen years ago)

I don't think Rudy's appeal was a media construction - people responded positively to what he did on 9/11. He had a bit of understandable fame from that episode. People liked what they had heard about him. That wasn't a media construction - and least not any more so than any other candidate's appeal. It's just that there was more to Rudy that people didn't know about - such as the unsavory details of the personal life, and the rough edges of the personality. I don't think Bloomberg has the seamy underside that Giuliani did, but he doesn't have the celebrity either.

o. nate, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:42 (eighteen years ago)

Bloomberg's out-of-state appeal is in FL (and CA), as Morbs said in code

Yeah, FL could be key. A lot of votes there. I also agree that it probably doesn't translate to the Midwest though.

o. nate, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

people responded positively to what he did on 9/11.

as reported by a utterly credulous media - rudys 9/11 story was completely fabricated bullshit that the media swallowed whole.

jhøshea, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:45 (eighteen years ago)

because hey who doesnt luv a OMG STRONG LEADER !!!!!!

jhøshea, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

And if Bloomberg could help Obama land a Hagel endorsement, that would be huge (though also unlikely, I guess).

o. nate, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

as reported by a utterly credulous media - rudys 9/11 story was completely fabricated bullshit that the media swallowed whole

What did they fabricate? They just showed the footage of his news conference.

o. nate, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

He had a bit of understandable fame from that episode.

Turning firefighters' wives into widows?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

o. nate, i think jhoshea is referring to pre-9/11 rudy, such as when he made the run for senate from which he ultimately withdrew. america at large had vaguely positive perceptions of him due to "cleaning up time square," making nyc "safe" again

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

as reported by a utterly credulous media - rudys 9/11 story was completely fabricated magnified bullshit that the media swallowed whole.

Obviously the media played a part in creating 'the legend of rudy' on 9/11. But initially dude did 'handle' things remarkably well in those first few days/speeches. Not in a 'getting things done' way, but purely in nailing the tone of a leader's communication.

G00blar, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

"sending cops to sodomize black people with broom handles"

(xpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

guys i miss having mitt and rudy and huck to kick around, john mccain is the most boringest republican nominee ever

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

^^^just wait

G00blar, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

o.nate im really wondering whether i should explain this simple ass shit to you or just tell you to fuck off

but youre not american are you? so yr ignorance is forgivable.

jhøshea, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

You seem intent on denying that there was anything genuine in the public response to the way Giuliani spoke and carried himself in the aftermath of the tragedy. I don't agree.

o. nate, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:51 (eighteen years ago)

as reported by a utterly credulous media - rudys 9/11 story was completely fabricated bullshit that the media swallowed whole.

^^^^ding ding ding. Rudy should be in jail for his colossal fuck-up of 9/11 and willful endangerment of the population of NY.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:52 (eighteen years ago)

Rudy made a few nice speeches for a week after Sept 11. The stuff "that people didn't know about" (besides the genius move of putting the emergency command post at the World Trade Center) was that most of NYC had soured on his petty, autocratic, vindictive style by Sept 10.

At least a politically ambiguous, whiny-voiced Jewish veep helped Gore win Florida.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

ie "speaking and carrying himself" not as important as actually protecting the health of the people of NY, or letting the EPA do its job, or coordinating emergency services properly, or telling people the air actually wasn't safe to breathe or or or... seriously the list is endless. There's a reason the NY Firefighers Union was actually following him around on the campaign trail specifically to dispel the myth of how well he "handled" 9/11.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

o. nate, rudy blew up 7wtc, do keep up

gershy, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

^^^^No one's disagreeing with this^^^^ xposts dammit

But there *was* something that people (people who were and probably still are ignorant of all of Rudy's evil deeds) picked up on in his communication in the week that followed 9/11.

G00blar, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

I still can't believe gore picked lieberman.

G00blar, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:55 (eighteen years ago)

Check this out. And that's from one of the most non-partisan/non-political magazines you'll ever see.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:55 (eighteen years ago)

o.nate, you may well know this, but jhoshea is referring to the fact that, contrary to video appearances and talking head narratives, other than his (self-?)reassuring speechifying, and (dangerous? white house-directed?) quick comeback effort, rudy arguably had no idea what was going on on 9/11 (hampered by bad prior decisions), and ran from danger. not that one should necessarily blame him aside from his office.

jhoshea, you may well know this, but o.nate is not a furriner

gabbneb, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:57 (eighteen years ago)

But there *was* something that people (people who were and probably still are ignorant of all of Rudy's evil deeds) picked up on in his communication in the week that followed 9/

He carried himself as a leader more effectively than W.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:57 (eighteen years ago)

It wasn't so much credulous media as media desperate for some kind of narrative to stick on the story and 'plucky mayor' worked even though that story's relationship with any kind of objective truth was tenuous at best.

Michael White, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:58 (eighteen years ago)

i.e. projected "decisiveness."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:58 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.