was hoping for Ginger Spice as Fergie.
― Grandpont Genie, Monday, 16 November 2020 08:23 (five years ago)
The flying paedo or piss-boy - choose your fighter!
― calzino, Monday, 16 November 2020 08:30 (five years ago)
the too on the nose to be true segment with Diane/Camilla going for a meal together at a restaurant called Ménage à Trois is actually 100% true - believe it or not.
― calzino, Monday, 16 November 2020 08:56 (five years ago)
It was really popular with Sloanes of a certain type because iirc it only served starters and puddings!
― scampopo (suzy), Monday, 16 November 2020 09:08 (five years ago)
just absolutely ideal for people with eating disorders obv!
― calzino, Monday, 16 November 2020 09:19 (five years ago)
Between Diana moping about the place and Margaret's days stretching out like an empty void, you wonder why nobody in the royal family can read a book.
― trishyb, Monday, 16 November 2020 15:14 (five years ago)
going in on this tonight STOKED FOR THE MAJNESS
― mark s, Monday, 16 November 2020 15:17 (five years ago)
tbh I thought the best ep in ages was the one about Fagan the palace intruder.
― calzino, Monday, 16 November 2020 15:21 (five years ago)
Me too. Hoping for a corgi orgy
― coupvfefe (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 16 November 2020 16:10 (five years ago)
watching a couple of eps of ANCIENT ALIENS in studious preparation
― mark s, Monday, 16 November 2020 16:14 (five years ago)
xxpost yeah the Fagan episode was really good! and quite moving
― terminators of endearment (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 16 November 2020 16:26 (five years ago)
also it contains on my fave kind of job-centre nostalgia, looking back to the days when you could still be a rude wiseacre to job centre staff without getting sanctioned!
― calzino, Monday, 16 November 2020 16:38 (five years ago)
only through episode 5 so far, but Scully as Thatcher is brutal, IMO.
― akm, Monday, 16 November 2020 16:48 (five years ago)
Looking forward to Mountbatten getting blown up.
― Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Friday, 27 October 2017 11:45 (three years ago) bookmarkflaglink
I hope they have someone tell the popular joke of the time, "Q: How do we know Mountbatten had dandruff? A: They found his Head & Shoulders washed up on the shore".
― 'Skills' Wallace (Tom D.), Monday, 25 November 2019 07:46 (eleven months ago) bookmarkflaglink
Scriptwriters better have included the Lord Mountbatten shampoo joke or gtf.
― Boring blighters bloaters (Tom D.), Monday, 16 November 2020 00:28 (sixteen hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
― mark s, Monday, 16 November 2020 18:17 (five years ago)
:D
― mark s, Monday, 16 November 2020 18:18 (five years ago)
Only one episode in so far, but holy shit. While I've known, at least on a surface level, almost all of the historical events that have popped up in this show, I genuinely had no idea about Mountbatten's demise AT ALL. So that was genuinely shocking and not what I expected from the first episode.
In my defense I'm American and I hadn't yet turned three when he was assassinated.
― soaring skrrrtpeggios (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 16 November 2020 18:22 (five years ago)
first ep: early scene (backdrop = an ira speech intensifying the bloodshed) all the main characters in uniform as literal wizened puppet-monsters
enter scully's hair
― mark s, Monday, 16 November 2020 18:44 (five years ago)
Lord Mountbatten had a boatEe i ee i o
― Politically homely (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 November 2020 18:52 (five years ago)
https://s30886.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/9-22.jpg
this was the puppet i was put in mind of (not stupid spitting image garbage, fuck that)
― mark s, Monday, 16 November 2020 18:58 (five years ago)
my wife watches this so I caught a wee bit last night. thatcher being a class warrior at balmoral and in her cabinet shuffle: this all seems very ahistorical and wrong. thatcher, like heath, obviously petit-bourgeois, and this was a change for the tories who always had an inbred toff patrician at their helm before this period, but I don't really ever remember hearing anything about thatcher railing against the aristos, though I'm sure Dennis made an arsenal of himself in front of the royals
― Politically homely (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 November 2020 18:59 (five years ago)
yeah when she was quoting chartist poetry at the Queen I was lolling. This represents a calming in me because a few years back I'd have been swearing and yelling blue murder at the tv.
― calzino, Monday, 16 November 2020 19:07 (five years ago)
Instead of some 19 year old squaddie from Castlemilk or some some guy on his way home from painting a fence at a British Army base, this was a rare instance of the IRA blowing up the right people
― Boring blighters bloaters (Tom D.), Monday, 16 November 2020 19:09 (five years ago)
phil with enaged bared teeth in every scene now, charles turning into a woebegone goblin sculpted from a collapsing rotten pumpkin
― mark s, Monday, 16 November 2020 19:09 (five years ago)
enraged tho engaged also works
― mark s, Monday, 16 November 2020 19:13 (five years ago)
Now look here, this revisionist take on Thatcher has already given rise to several Oscar/BAFTA winning performances, so it must be true.
― Boring blighters bloaters (Tom D.), Monday, 16 November 2020 19:15 (five years ago)
it would have been news to Viscount "Everybody PM needs a Willie" Whitelaw that Thatcher's first cabinet bloodbath of wets was class warfare!
― calzino, Monday, 16 November 2020 19:48 (five years ago)
don't know if it has any historical sanction at all but i'm enjoying margaret's instant appalled dislike of -- and targeting of -- thatch, presumably partly to wind up her big sister
― mark s, Monday, 16 November 2020 19:57 (five years ago)
she digs up some interesting skeletons in the family closet in ep 7, which was quite unexpected.
― calzino, Monday, 16 November 2020 20:02 (five years ago)
if there was any doubt that the Queen Mother isn't Hitler, it all gets sorted in ep 7.
― calzino, Monday, 16 November 2020 20:07 (five years ago)
turns out the poem abt it being good to have enemies is indeed one she liked -- apparrently this was mentioned in a bbc dcumentary a while back? -- and that the poet, charles mackay, was indeed a chartist!
(i highly doubt she quoted it at the queen or that she wd have glossed him as a chartist as well as a poem)
also discovered while factcheck-googling: samuel smiles, who she was often compared to (i re his version of victorian values) was also a chartist at one point
― mark s, Monday, 16 November 2020 21:13 (five years ago)
as well as a poet, i mean
I stopped last season right before Philip's mother comes on the scene and it kind of seems like she'd make a better biopic subject than her kid or daughter-in-law.
― onlyfans.com/hunterb (milo z), Tuesday, 17 November 2020 04:34 (five years ago)
her episodes were my favorites of s3, really beautiful & poignant
― terminators of endearment (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 17 November 2020 04:36 (five years ago)
Diana Fashion sidebar - good thread showing side by sides of some of the excellent wardrobe recreations (lol at one hilar typo: gingham mispelled/autocorrected as gangam)
So I took the time to match some of the outfits inspired by Princess Diana that The Crown recreated (a thread). Starting with the yellow overalls. Also, please give that department all of the awards it deserves. #TheCrown #TheCrownSeason4 #TheCrownNetflix pic.twitter.com/9R49jqu7fH— Simona (@simona_ka) November 17, 2020
― terminators of endearment (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 17 November 2020 06:58 (five years ago)
lol the CROWN version of the visible outfit is like a PLAYSCHOOL presenter just abt to introduce charlws to big ted and little ted
― mark s, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 11:32 (five years ago)
I can remember wearing dungarees in the 80's. But of course I wanted to look like oor wullie!
― calzino, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 11:48 (five years ago)
Lots of tories have been moaning this show is so beastly to thatch. One of the BBC Royal correspondents was moaning it was beastly to the Saxe Coburgs. You just can't win in this game!
― calzino, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 11:55 (five years ago)
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YNU-12joiVk/WwO27g5dOAI/AAAAAAAAHV4/kuFQh-E9Q6gzhiGPj1OWT5jCbchUjgQsgCLcBGAs/s1600/FB_IMG_1447965984555.jpg
― Boring blighters bloaters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 17 November 2020 11:55 (five years ago)
very much loving the far-right freak-out at the (it says here) insulting and inaccurate portrayal of thatch lol: good! cry more u contemptible fvcks
even tho i also think this rendering of thatch is very much out of key with the project and not actually particularly good except as a weird impressionist's sore-thumb stunt-turn for GA
A: bcz MT's dialogue is all tell-not-show text-not-subtext in a way that no one else's isB: the reading of the early thatcherite project as the final clear-out of a specific narrow upperclass layer (one-nation poshos aka wets) is not wrong! BUT i: i doubt MT wd have conflated this layer with the royal family (very different layer, interconnected but different political role) ii: she wd never have expressed it with such e.p.thompsonite clarity lol (she didn't have a marxist self-analysis of her "alderman's" perspective)iii: she is known to have been somewhat dramatically obsequious to eiir, this is just chilly plastic performance of that as fakery iv: which (as of e2) magnifies super-rude margo as the extremely unlikely hero of the piece lol (i mean i enjoyed this but it's bullshit) C: there is indeed an extreme formal clash between herself's reading of the needful politics in divided times (a unified people! through the monarch's performance and intercession!) and MT's (it's time to go to war on the enemy within) D: use the "enemies" poem out loud by all means, to dramatise C -- it absolutely states MT's approach to politics and nullifies eiir's (eiir's in this reading blah blah) -- but don't have her announce let alone justify her attraction to it by saying mackay was a chartist (even oddly enuf tho he was)
way way way upthread i was arguing w/tuomas abt why it's good not bad that this show hasn't - as part of its explicative structure -- appointed a figure who stands for our modern critique of the monarchy as an institution. well tbh i think it just did appoint one -- turns out it was thatch all along.
and i was right (and tuomas was wrong lol): this move immediately massively sentimentalises both sides (which is to say distorts them). the point of the project so far has been to explore what it was like inside the disorted reality field, what the values are that enable the distortion, what the distortion turns you into. the idea that maggie and di between them signal with their simultaneous arrival the beginning of the quiet wreckage of eiir's doggedly dutiful conception of her role* is shrewd enough -- and as ever the writing is good at creating seemingly balanced effects while subtly tweaking them in unexpected directions (di's seeming acceptance of the world she's entering and its acceptance of her being the SPOILER ticking time bomb lol)** -- ………
BUT they don't find a way for magz to express her underlying possibly even unconscious role (as achieved via the unfettering of the city, the banks, let management manage etc -- her known intent -- and the shattering of all institutions and movements that stood to contain these forces) except as a bluntly out-out marvel-villain personalised statement of intentions, and a highly anachronistic war on "privilege" that likely existed only as pullulating unexpressed baffled resentment as she actually confronted it when at balmoral
*i'm guessing (as of e2) that this is how s4 as a whole unfolds **also im imagine di is the spirit of margo's revenge on her sister for decisions made in s1-3
― mark s, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 12:08 (five years ago)
"out-out" = "out-loud" tho works as is also
― mark s, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 12:18 (five years ago)
It's all building towards the 1:48 ep where the issue of sanctions against SA and Magz disdain for these "beastly savages in funny headwear" that is the commonwealth makes her and Bess political enemies ready to go one on one - no blades! Lots of artistic licence taken no doubt, after the excellent Fagan ep and the also moving hereditary one, it felt like a damp squib to me.
― calzino, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 12:28 (five years ago)
a weird impressionist's sore-thumb stunt-turn for GA
Thatcher was a weird impressionist's sore-thumb stunt-turn though.
― Boring blighters bloaters (Tom D.), Tuesday, 17 November 2020 12:33 (five years ago)
starting e3 tonight i guess (i have always doubted it could arrive at the recognisable present w/o coming to pieces a bit)
(i don't have high hopes of the project in the medium term, i think it's bitten off more than it's likely to be able to chew, but so far i've been surprised and impressed)― mark s, Thursday, 15 December 2016 17:14 (three years ago) bookmarkflaglink
― mark s, Thursday, 15 December 2016 17:14 (three years ago) bookmarkflaglink
incidentally i am tending to read anything peter morgan is quoted as saying as more a sly masking of what he's up to than any kind of reliable or open admission
this sudden rage from the downton-unbothered set isn't bcz of PM's belated leftie heel-turn, it's bcz ppl hasn't been watching remotely carefully since the outset: the smash of forces was always ready immanent from the outset sorry if this offends
― mark s, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 12:36 (five years ago)
xp yes which creates a "behind the mask" issue which neither script nor GA's performance solve in themselves, as well as (only semi-related) a clash of dramatic schools or approaches, which undermine one another
how do you solve a problem like thatchia
― mark s, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 12:41 (five years ago)
I'm three episodes from finishing Season 2 and hope to see y'all in a couple days.
― Patriotic Goiter (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 November 2020 12:42 (five years ago)
actually come to think of it the behind-the-mask issue is presumably why ALL the portrayals of the various prime ministers have seemed slightly off: successful politician = successful at wearing a mask (to paper over divisions)! but we only get see behind eiir's mask and the other mask-worlds just flash by w/o deep (or any) exploration of similar contradictions
― mark s, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 12:52 (five years ago)
My fave two fictional pms on this have been the two Harolds. And Supermac as a domestic doormat and a cuck was good entertainment.
― calzino, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 13:03 (five years ago)
Churchill was the usual dross.
churchill is simply unplayable now i suspect but choosing a US actor for the role wasn't a terrible idea -- establishes "mask" upfront w/o having to do a lifetime's work giving it backstory -- and it was also fun seeing him repeatedly bested by the child-queen as his mind went lol
― mark s, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 13:14 (five years ago)
tbf it wasn't half as bad as the Oldman vanity project in a Churchill mask, but that is a low bar!
― calzino, Tuesday, 17 November 2020 13:18 (five years ago)