"Will you shut up, man?" US Politics October 2020

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7061 of them)

not pubicly of course, but to themeselves

nice to think they might, but I guess we'd never know.

the unappreciated charisma of cows (Aimless), Friday, 30 October 2020 18:32 (five years ago)

we don't really need to know so long as they get the fuck out of the way

error prone wolf syndicate (Hadrian VIII), Friday, 30 October 2020 18:33 (five years ago)

Perhaps some of them will just say "fuck it, why am I busting my ass for this out-of-touch loser maniac?"

Well, unless they can invalidate enough votes in their state to flip a Senate race to the Republican candidate and thereby keep control of the Senate...

thousand-yard spiral stairs (f. hazel), Friday, 30 October 2020 18:39 (five years ago)

AZ doesn't notify you if ballot was accepted but I just checked some website and mine was accepted, phew. I'm sure that fucker Gosar will be reelected to the House but if AZ goes for Biden I'll be ecstatic.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Friday, 30 October 2020 18:41 (five years ago)

Like, there's no way the Texas GOP doesn't fuck with the Harris County votes as much as possible if Hegar beats Cornyn by a slim margin.

thousand-yard spiral stairs (f. hazel), Friday, 30 October 2020 18:41 (five years ago)

lmao if the GOP court decisions end up fucking over GOP voters

Patriotic Goiter (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 October 2020 18:44 (five years ago)

not pubicly of course, but to themeselves

Pubic shame isn't what it was

Alba, Friday, 30 October 2020 18:45 (five years ago)

They are already trying to throw out 100,000 votes in Harris County

Mr. Cacciatore (Moodles), Friday, 30 October 2020 18:45 (five years ago)

Xxp I did have a brief freakout cause it said it didn't have my ballot. But then I removed the space in my last name (eg vandyke not van dyke). Obv I'm pretty used to that being an issue with my name.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Friday, 30 October 2020 18:47 (five years ago)

Texas messes with itself.

the unappreciated charisma of cows (Aimless), Friday, 30 October 2020 18:48 (five years ago)

Nancy Pelosi sent me this grift

I am incredibly concerned.

I was just informed we’ve fallen behind Republicans in the early vote count.

AND that I’m facing a dangerous $97,891 budget gap to fix it.

Hear me, Robert: We’ve worked too hard and shattered too many expectations to lose this election now.

If we’re going to win, I have no choice but to fill this budget gap before tomorrow’s End of Month Deadline.

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:00 (five years ago)

so shameless

real muthaphuckkin jeez (crüt), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:01 (five years ago)

New national Opinium poll has Biden even leading with white voters:

Going into the weekend, Biden held a comfortable, nine-point national lead in polling averages, and multiple recent polls have depicted an even larger lead in the popular vote for Biden. In the latest Opinium Research/Guardian poll, released on Friday, Biden led Trump by 14 points, 55-41.

The poll, which surveyed 2,009 US adults online from 26-29 October, found severe deterioration for Trump among some of his most reliable supporters, including white voters, a group he won by 15 points in 2016, and which no Republican presidential candidate has lost for 50 years. Biden holds a narrow, 49-47 lead among white voters, the poll found.

The poll additionally found that a 57% majority of likely 2020 voters who did not vote in 2016 supported Biden.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/30/us-election-roundup-trump-biden-battleground-states-pandemic

Alba, Friday, 30 October 2020 19:02 (five years ago)

joe biden: he sucks so bad even white people will vote for him

it bangs for thee (Simon H.), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:04 (five years ago)

yeah my gut won't listen to anything since 2016 but my brain is screaming "Biden landslide incoming"

thousand-yard spiral stairs (f. hazel), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:08 (five years ago)

New national Opinium poll has Biden even leading with white voters:


I believe the result but the argument for ignoring individual polls is particularly strong if they come from British pollsters (same goes for yougov), and extra strong if the claim in the headline comes from a subsample of the sample.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:11 (five years ago)

This cannot POSSIBLY be good news for Republicans. New voters and previous non-voters just don't turn out to show how much they love Big Daddy Incumbent. They just fucking don't. This is a "please get this motherfucker out of our lives" election. Period.

We have exceeded 20M voters who didn't cast a ballot in '16 having already voted in this election - 20,357,512 to be exact.

That's 27.2% of all ballots cast, and more people than live in any one US state other than CA, TX, and FL.

— Tom Bonier (@tbonier) October 30, 2020

but also fuck you (unperson), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:12 (five years ago)

The poll additionally found that a 57% majority of likely 2020 voters who did not vote in 2016 supported Biden

guessing there are a lot of ‘Covington Kids’ who’ve turned 18 over the last 4 years but ngl I would have thought this particular number would be higher

A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Chooglin (will), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:13 (five years ago)

You know what correlates with Democratic turnout? Republican turnout. You know how close these elections are going to be? Close. Ignore the early voting counts.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:16 (five years ago)

Ignore the early voting counts.

This.

Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:19 (five years ago)

You know how close these elections are going to be? Close.

the possible results range from "Trump wins by a hair" to "Biden wins in a landslide."

real muthaphuckkin jeez (crüt), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:19 (five years ago)

You know what correlates with Democratic turnout? Republican turnout.

OTMFM

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:20 (five years ago)

didn't seem to be the case in 2018

frogbs, Friday, 30 October 2020 19:21 (five years ago)

Eh. I'm not Mr. Hope and Change, never have been, but no one here's telling themselves or voters to kick it through Tuesday night. Letting people feel good about data is salutary and necessary, especially during COVID.

Patriotic Goiter (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:22 (five years ago)

and people forget about uh 2018

Patriotic Goiter (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:22 (five years ago)

lol frogbs beat me

Patriotic Goiter (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:22 (five years ago)

didn't seem to be the case in 2018


Exactly. No one knows the correlation accurately enough to predict close elections.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:23 (five years ago)

No offense, but to insist on reminding people REMEMBER 2016 is tiresome at this point. Adding caveats to Joe Biden's chances on the Friday before Election Day is like having to salute the flag before criticizing America.

Patriotic Goiter (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:23 (five years ago)

I mean by all means have fun hitting refresh. And these numbers are good for civil society. And if I had to guess then I’d say they were good news for democrats. But I don’t understand why you’d use them to tell you what was going to happen in the election when we have actual polls where people say who they’re voting for.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:25 (five years ago)

No offense, but to insist on reminding people REMEMBER 2016 is tiresome at this point.


1000% missing the point.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:25 (five years ago)

Then I didn't understand your point.

Patriotic Goiter (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:26 (five years ago)

We have a ton of information that makes us confident biden is going to win. Early vote counts are not part of that.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:26 (five years ago)

otm re: optimism (not that I think caek is saying Remember 2016 - I get good value out of caek's posts).

I'm just tired of showing any optimism before having a friend put their fingers on my lips and launch into a Neil Simon-esque monologue about how I dare not utter a positive statement about Tuesday or Biden will be smote by Yahweh in retaliation.

also the 700th smug utterance of "the polls were wrong in 2016" as if that's a) a correct way of looking at what happened or b) an astute observation in 2020

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:26 (five years ago)

i think some of my friends are literally in the Twilight Zone ep where they're going to see results that Biden won but be convinced that he lost and isn't President for 4 years

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:27 (five years ago)

We have a ton of information that makes us confident biden is going to win. Early vote counts are not part of that.

― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, October 30, 2020

If that's your point, sure. I haven't followed early voting other than MDC's because local media needs a horse race.

Patriotic Goiter (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:27 (five years ago)

I’m not advancing a minority review here. Everyone who predicts elections says the same thing except a bunch of people who are like the Democratic version of unskewers who have glommed onto a dataset that has no precedent in history to make claims about the future.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:28 (five years ago)

i feel like obsessive notation of early voting numbers, which may or may not be happening itt i can't say for sure, is basically just anxiety management

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:28 (five years ago)

I think biden is going to win btw.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:28 (five years ago)

we did do a lot of the EV analysis in 2016 too which did kind of prove why it was pointless to hyperfocus on it, yes.

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:29 (five years ago)

it actually turned into a thing where lots of locals in Orlando were yelling in 2018 at Democrats to "hurry up and vote" when the early voting totals in FL looked a bit weaker for Democrats, and several responded "why? does my vote count less since I'm waiting for Election Day? the fuck does it matter when I vote?"

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:30 (five years ago)

The CW on this race race is going to end up being "Biden was consistently above 50% in swing state polls. Why did anyone think Trump had a chance?"

Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:31 (five years ago)

Uh, anyway, FWIW

Missed this, but @StPetePolls this week found Biden leading 54%-43% in #FL13, a senior-heavy St. Pete/Clearwater seat that voted for Clinton 49.6% to 46.4% in 2016. https://t.co/aVabcyyaut

— Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) October 30, 2020

P.S. 56% of their sample was age 50+ and 74% had already voted.

— Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) October 30, 2020

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 October 2020 19:34 (five years ago)

Agree with everyone here, I think there is only one correct view to rationally hold which is

probability of Biden winning decisively is quite high

probability of Trump winning or election close enough to get mired in court review is quite low but is such a bad outcome it would be inhuman not to worry about it a lot

people are probably overfocusing on "pollsters missed big in 2016" (actually in just a few states which turned to be decisive) and not "pollsters, having learned something from 2016, were pretty much right on in 2018."

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:34 (five years ago)

Pollsters 2016 in the opposite direction to 2012 is another good thing to remember

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:35 (five years ago)

*missed

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:35 (five years ago)

that's the analogy I usually use. same thing coulda happened to Obama if the error was in Romney's direction.

and just imagine the President Romney years

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:36 (five years ago)

This is a good tweet about early voting

A Democratic upset in a 2018 race for "Harris County judge" just might deliver Texas to Biden. Meanwhile, recent Dem wins in PA State Supreme Court races could thwart voter suppression in that tipping-point state.

Downballot elections, they matter folks!https://t.co/nCT5VfUuC5 pic.twitter.com/tJDcY1bkXV

— Eric Levitz (@EricLevitz) October 30, 2020

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:37 (five years ago)

Optimistic fundraising email of the day is from Meraz Ben-David, Democratic Senate candidate in -- well, I'll just let you read it

Joe Biden has started advertising heavily in Wyoming, which means two things: Democrats are starting to realize that Wyoming is winnable (!!), and advertising has just gotten twice as expensive. That makes it hard to stay on the air.

Will you help us keep our ads on the air in these last few days?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:40 (five years ago)

"A Democratic upset in a 2018 race for "Harris County judge" just might deliver Texas to Biden."

I hate this phrasing. If Biden wins Texas it's the voters in Texas who delivered those electoral votes to Biden. All the judge is doing is refraining from standing in their way.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:41 (five years ago)

Yeah there’s been a tendency to report court decisions that favor voting as wins for democrats rather than ... voters

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 30 October 2020 19:42 (five years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.