ILX TOP 50 FILMS OF 2000-2004 BALLOTS/VOTING - ends Jan. 3

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (354 of them)
You hear that, Franky?
I'm talking to you.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 15 December 2005 15:29 (eighteen years ago) link

You only get 15, Ribcracker!

Ocean's 11, sweet Jesus. Come to some non-Hitler furrin films with me this weekend, hon!

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2005 15:31 (eighteen years ago) link

Brotherhood of the Wolf was really awful, but unfortunately not in a so-bad-that-it's-funny way. I went to see it expecting a campy laughfest, but for a film with 18th century kung-fu indians, cyborg werewolves and papal prostitute assasins it was surprsisingly dull.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 15 December 2005 15:34 (eighteen years ago) link

So disappointed was I with it, that I wrote an IMDB review.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 15 December 2005 15:39 (eighteen years ago) link

I forgot about Son Frere, fuck fuck fuck.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2005 16:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Amelie isn't intentionally racist, just sort of subconsciously racist, like Jeunet never encountered a minority in his life and therefore doesn't even think about them. actually, Black Hawk Down is a sort of iffy film, because while it's a really tense and well-done story, it doesn't even really talk about the context of the anger towards the americans and manages to neatly sidestep the issues by nominally just being about the soldiers' experiences. which results in a whole lot of angry somalians being gunned down with no more weight than a bunch of thugs from a john woo film. i still liked in, to a point.

gear (gear), Thursday, 15 December 2005 16:57 (eighteen years ago) link

There are two sequences in BHD in which the context is pretty well discussed by Aidid's business partner and later by his lieutenant, with the American troops. It's less well explained in presumably less offensive modern war films like BEL or WWSOAY, but you could probably write a decent 25-pager on the recurring theme of "mind your own fucking business" inherent in antagonists' motivation in recent war cinema

TOMBOT, Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:18 (eighteen years ago) link

Amelie isn't intentionally racist, just sort of subconsciously racist, like Jeunet never encountered a minority in his life and therefore doesn't even think about them.

Well, he did include two of them in the film, didn't he? Though maybe the problem is that he didn't treat them as representatives of a minority rather than characters in story, whose ethnicity has no relevance, only their personality, which is why people don't think of the as "ethnic". Which I think should be seen as a positive thing.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:36 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah since race doesnt matter in france

zzzz, Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:37 (eighteen years ago) link

The bigger problem seems to be that there aren't any more "ethnic" characters in Amélie, so the film isn't seen as representing "true" Montmartre. Which is a valid criticism, I guess, but kinda stretching it. Do films like Amélie need to be representative? Should we start looking at the extras, counting how many of them are non-white?

(x-post)

Race does matter in France, but should race matter in every French movie, even in such a non-realist flick as Amélie?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:41 (eighteen years ago) link

I like how you say "flick."

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:42 (eighteen years ago) link

you put words in quotes when you dont want to take shit for misusing them but dont actually care about using the correct term

zzzzzz, Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:44 (eighteen years ago) link

anyway good job using republican talking points to defend twee indie bullshit - 2 stones, 1 bird

zzzzzz, Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:45 (eighteen years ago) link

maybe take the amelie discussion to this thread? examples of mainstream culture that white nationalists can safely enjoy

zzzzzzz, Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:46 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't remember having racial objections, I just wanted Amelie hanged by the third reel.

I also didn't nominate L'Esquive, one of my fave films that debuted in NYC this year, about Muslim kids in a Paris project (won a buncha Cesars):

http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/film_review.asp?ID=1506

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:50 (eighteen years ago) link

maybe take the amelie discussion to this thread? examples of mainstream culture that white nationalists can safely enjoy
-- zzzzzzz (zzzz...), December 15th, 2005. (tracklink)

Or maybe not if, like me, you think that's a gross exaggeration.

hobart paving (hobart paving), Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:54 (eighteen years ago) link

what about amelie would offend a white nationalist?

zzzzzz, Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:55 (eighteen years ago) link

you put words in quotes when you dont want to take shit for misusing them but dont actually care about using the correct term


What are the correct terms, then? I guess the two characters in Amélie could be described as North African, but in the film's world they're quite French and their ethnicity is never discussed. I put "ethnic" in quotes because it is often used as a shorthand for "non-white", even though white people are obviously "ethnic" as well.

Of course terms like "white", "black" and "race" are problematic too, since there's no essential grounds for their usage - they can't be avoided, however, as long as people are being classified according to them.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:56 (eighteen years ago) link

anyway good job using republican talking points to defend twee indie bullshit - 2 stones, 1 bird

Good job in mixing my point with a totally different discussion to make it sound suspicious.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:58 (eighteen years ago) link

As I'm well known to be one of the biggest right-wingers on ILE.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:59 (eighteen years ago) link

so you misused a word but put it in quotes because you didnt want to catch shit for it

zzzzzzzz, Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:00 (eighteen years ago) link

maybe instead of saying north africans are ethnic you couldve said they were north africans

zzzzzzz, Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:01 (eighteen years ago) link

man I've been avoiding Amelie for years just because I couldn't stand the thought of another visually bonkers bit of twee nonsense (esp from france, yeeha) but now i've got me a REAL trump card I can pull out if I want to be a self-righteous asshole about it.

'Twan (miccio), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:01 (eighteen years ago) link

handy guide to republican talking points - ethnicity has no relevance, only their personality, which is why people don't think of the as "ethnic". Which I think should be seen as a positive thing.

zzzzzz, Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:02 (eighteen years ago) link

I accidentally nominated a 2005 film.

[jailhouse tattoo] (nordicskilla), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:03 (eighteen years ago) link

do you think inventing & promoting a twee all-white version of an ethnically diverse city already ruled by a right-wing white racist overclass who wishes non-whites would disappear (and make everything look like in the film) has no political connotations?

zzzzzz, Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:05 (eighteen years ago) link

maybe take the amelie discussion to this thread? examples of mainstream culture that white nationalists can safely enjoy
-- zzzzzzz (zzzz...), December 15th, 2005. (tracklink)

Granted, there isn't an in-depth discourse on the nature of race and nationalist hegemony running through Amelie, but since its a slightly twee, nostalgic love story (of sorts) that's not too surprising. My main problem with what you're saying is that you could aim that claim at SO MANY films - most Hollywood love stories, for example. If your sole objection is lack of non-white characters, why select this film in particular?

Also, in your point above, you seem to be suggesting that all characters who are not white should have storylines that make a point of this. Surely this would be a step backwards?

hobart paving (hobart paving), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:06 (eighteen years ago) link

What is a North African then? If Lucien is a second or third generation immigrant, is he North African? Besides, I was talking about the lack of non-white characters in Amélie, so I used the word "ethnic" because there other minorities than North Africans in Paris.

handy guide to republican talking points - ethnicity has no relevance, only their personality, which is why people don't think of the as "ethnic". Which I think should be seen as a positive thing.

In this fucking film, not neceessarily in every film, or in general!!! This is getting tedious, I'm off.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:07 (eighteen years ago) link

i think a lot of francophiles simply don't know shit aside from what they see in movies.

x-post to ethan

'Twan (miccio), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:07 (eighteen years ago) link

What's your argument here? You could only love France if you don't know very much about it? Seems like a very strange argument to me.

hobart paving (hobart paving), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:10 (eighteen years ago) link

i'm kind of disappointed that evidently all my friends & relatives who dig the movie are only approving a film that offensively misrepresents a region they know little about rather than a film with obvious-to-anyone-who-glances-at-it racism. It's been a while since I've gotten to browbeat them without any sense of hypocrisy.

x-post i'm saying that evidently the racism of the film requires knowledge of more than some Louis Malle.

'Twan (miccio), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:11 (eighteen years ago) link

evidently to catch the racism, rather.

'Twan (miccio), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:12 (eighteen years ago) link

I had no idea Amelie was this controversial. I thought people just hated it for being twee.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:13 (eighteen years ago) link

do you think inventing & promoting a twee all-white version of an ethnically diverse city already ruled by a right-wing white racist overclass who wishes non-whites would disappear (and make everything look like in the film) has no political connotations?
-- zzzzzz (zzz...), December 15th, 2005.

Do you think the Socialist mayor running Paris is particularly racist? I'm sure there are worse options.

I don't think Paris is an outrageously racist place, at least no more than the rest of the world. I saw more overt racism in, say New York. And far more in Florida.

hobart paving (hobart paving), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:17 (eighteen years ago) link

This thread seems to have morphed into a Francophobe thread. Which is a shame.

hobart paving (hobart paving), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:18 (eighteen years ago) link

*stops liking Seinfeld and Friends*

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:20 (eighteen years ago) link

You like Friends? That's so RACIST!!!


hobart paving (hobart paving), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:22 (eighteen years ago) link

just a little bit

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:23 (eighteen years ago) link

you don't even want to think about Woody Allen

'Twan (miccio), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:24 (eighteen years ago) link

i mean obv you don't have to agree with a film's politix to enjoy it or admire it but the whole 'it's morning in manhattan' whitewash (literally) rightwing jizzing and such really got under my skin. plus that fucking tony roberts - guhhhhh.

'Twan (miccio), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:27 (eighteen years ago) link

My, terribly American, ballot:

1. 25th Hour (Lee, 2002)
2. Mulholland Dr. (Lynch, 2001)
3. Before Sunset (Linklater, 2004)
4. Morvern Callar (Ramsay, 2002)
5. Twilight Samurai (Yamada, 2002)
6. Jackass: The Movie (Tremaine, 2002)
7. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Gondry, 2004)
8. Dirty Pretty Things (Frears, 2002)
9. crazy/beautiful (Stockwell, 2001)
10. City Of God (Meirelles, Lund, 2002)
11. Gosford Park (Altman, 2002)
12. Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (Tarantino, 2003)
13. The Good Thief (Jordan, 2002)
14. Wonder Boys (Hanson, 2000)
15. Traffic (Soderbergh, 2000)

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:31 (eighteen years ago) link

France is horribly racist in a lot of ways - I was appalled by the amount of blatant and hateful racist graffiti the first time I visited Paris. I don't much want to defend Amelie, but simply underrepresenting ethnic minorities is a crime committed by a substantial majority of American and British film and TV, so it seems odd to single it out only for that. I'm not clear in what ways it is proposing this much-whiter Paris as preferable - I thought Amelie the character was presented as a ray of sunshine in a pretty lousy world, and don't recall any sense of being encouraged to see that Paris as a better one.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:32 (eighteen years ago) link

i could get down to about 20 pretty easily, but cutting 5 was tough.

01. George Washington (Green, 2000)
02. Time of the Wolf (Haneke, 2003)
03. The Return (Zvyagintsev, 2003)
04. 25th Hour (Lee, 2002)
05. La Cienaga (Martel, 2001)
06. Bright Leaves (McElwee, 2003)
07. Crimson Gold (Panahi, 2003)
08. The Ninth Day (Schlondorff, 2004)
09. Los Angeles Plays Itself (Andersen, 2003)
10. Elephant (van Sant, 2003)
11. Million Dollar Baby (Eastwood, 2004)
12. Mulholland Dr. (Lynch, 2001)
13. What Time is It There? (Tsai, 2001)
14. Wisconsin Death Trip (Marsh, 1999)
15. Saddest Music in the World (Maddin, 2003)

least:

Dogville (von Trier, 2003)
Lost in Translation (Coppola, 2003)
The Dreamers (Bertolucci, 2003)

a spectator bird (a spectator bird), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:05 (eighteen years ago) link

oops, I forgot to vote for my least favorite:

Lost In Translation
The Dreamers
Ichi The Killer

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:11 (eighteen years ago) link

How is Wisconsin Death Trip eligible if it was released in 1999? Or did I miss something?

Matt #2 (Matt #2), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:18 (eighteen years ago) link

i wondered that too, but since it was on the list...

a spectator bird (a spectator bird), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:20 (eighteen years ago) link

My mistake, I missed that one when I deleted the other 1999 and 2005 nominations (which included Audition, The Beat That My Heart skipped and a few more).

If anyone who voted for it will send a correction, I'll change it.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:21 (eighteen years ago) link

ok, in that case, please put "sexy beast" in my #14 spot.

a spectator bird (a spectator bird), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:24 (eighteen years ago) link

1. Platform
2. Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance
3. Los Angeles Plays Itself
4. What Time is it There?
5. Unknown Pleasures
6. Cafe Lumiere
7. Russian Ark
8. Mullholland Drive
9. 2046
10.Elephant
11. Memories of Murder
12. Saddest Music in the World
13. Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle
14. Bring it On
15. The Agronomist

C0L1N B... (C0L1N B...), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:47 (eighteen years ago) link

What to do about blurbs, milo?

Obsessing over the unobtainable and nonexistent. (Leee), Thursday, 15 December 2005 20:05 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.