I am not Jordan Peterson
New board description.
― pomenitul, Saturday, 13 June 2020 02:14 (three years ago) link
the montreal pizza was in the basement of a building somewhere between university and parc circa prince-arthur
also this was 25 years ago lol sorry
i don't even remember the details other than it was grebt
― mookieproof, Saturday, 13 June 2020 02:15 (three years ago) link
During the summer, putting a slice of lime in a double IPA is a good idea and fine
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 13 June 2020 02:15 (three years ago) link
If you are accustomed to thinking about neurodiversity issues and have to juggle a lot of acronyms in your head on a daily basis, it’s OK if your “system 1” thinking (in kahneman-tversky nomenclature) frequently jumps from “BIPOC” to “bipolar indigenous people of color” and you have to practice the proper expansion to ensure you don’t fuck it up and look like a crazy asshole
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 13 June 2020 02:21 (three years ago) link
ok
― Dan S, Saturday, 13 June 2020 02:22 (three years ago) link
Should have made a new thread for “dumbass personal acronym problems” and put it there
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 13 June 2020 03:07 (three years ago) link
how many acronym problems do u have tombo
― all cats are beautiful (silby), Saturday, 13 June 2020 03:30 (three years ago) link
99 but a BIP ain't one
― Dig Dug the police (Neanderthal), Saturday, 13 June 2020 03:31 (three years ago) link
You can’t talk to me about acronym problems until you know how to pronounce “time phased force deployment data” in two syllables
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 13 June 2020 03:50 (three years ago) link
And/or help me with pronouncing “quality service management organization” in two syllables- it’s quiz-mo or kyu-smo, I think
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 13 June 2020 03:55 (three years ago) link
I have too many acronym opinions to contain here; a thread would barely do the topic justice.
Not least because I still observe the quaint distinction between an acronym (NATO, NASA) and an initialism (FBI, BLT)
― Tom Paine in the membrane (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 13 June 2020 11:32 (three years ago) link
xxp tipfud I'd guess
― assert (MatthewK), Saturday, 13 June 2020 13:10 (three years ago) link
tipfid
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 13 June 2020 17:27 (three years ago) link
seize all Catholic hospitals for the state
― all cats are beautiful (silby), Thursday, 30 July 2020 03:42 (three years ago) link
Seize the state for the catholic church
― Temporary Erogenous Zone (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 30 July 2020 07:27 (three years ago) link
If i lay down rat poison nad it turns out to be borrowers will i regret it?
― Stevolende, Thursday, 30 July 2020 07:37 (three years ago) link
all Catholic churches and property portfolios too
― Steppin' RZA (sic), Thursday, 30 July 2020 11:28 (three years ago) link
first we need a 'state' that will not immediately sell them to the highest bigger their besties.
― neith moon (ledge), Thursday, 30 July 2020 11:32 (three years ago) link
Trump’s not a russian asset, he is a CIA asset. From the outside his “money pit” businesses, like the golf courses, and mysterious loans suggest a money laundering operation. People have long speculated that he is cleaning money for russian oligarchs to finance his lifestyle. I think he was laundering money for the CIA that they use for their “off the books” operations. (cf Iran-Contra). This is why Mueller inexplicably didn’t look into Trump’s finances. It would expose the intelligence community, not just Trump; Trump knows it, which is why he taunted these people all the time from the start.
― treeship., Monday, 5 October 2020 22:18 (three years ago) link
good one
― Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Monday, 5 October 2020 22:24 (three years ago) link
it's def saudi arabian and russian mobsters though
― Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Monday, 5 October 2020 22:25 (three years ago) link
trump being a cia asset would explain why they haven't killed him yet
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 5 October 2020 22:39 (three years ago) link
treeship come back down the air is very thin up there
― error prone wolf syndicate (Hadrian VIII), Monday, 5 October 2020 22:57 (three years ago) link
Treeshiver Stone
― LaRusso Auto (Neanderthal), Monday, 5 October 2020 23:37 (three years ago) link
Just think about it.
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 00:18 (three years ago) link
I don’t think the intelligence community likes him at this point. I think there are just deep links there which is why he was so blase about dissing them early on—they held no mystique for him whatsoever.
Also, him being in bed with the cia doesn’t mean he isn’t also linked to saudi and russian oligarchs. The picture is muddy, not clear. But I don’t think he was ever in the pocket of a foreign power—it makes more sense to see him as, like epstein, some kind of cia asset that they formally keep at arm’s length.
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 00:24 (three years ago) link
interesting tbh
― Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Tuesday, 6 October 2020 00:48 (three years ago) link
treeship, this strikes me as kinda plausible -- have you read anything in particular that suggested connections between trump and the intelligence community?
i confess i'm a sucker for "cia did it" conspiracies because like 75 percent of the time there's *something* to them
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 6 October 2020 00:58 (three years ago) link
^^ i confess to silently wondering to myself "i wonder if the CIA will kill him"
― superdeep borehole (harbl), Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:01 (three years ago) link
j.d., i haven't read anything to that effect. just trying to fill in some gaps on my own. obviously this is just speculative, but a lot about trump doesn't add up.
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:13 (three years ago) link
I like this theory tbh
― the typo doer (Simon H.), Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:15 (three years ago) link
lol at this becoming the best trump thread suddenly
― Chip-vill-A (imago), Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:25 (three years ago) link
He disregards, or outright refuses, their work. He excludes them, undermines them, can't close his big fat mouth. For better or worse he's been working to replace the world order that gives them a purpose—strategic alliances and clear enemies in a state-based hegemony—with an intn'l network of personal business connections. They hate him.
― error prone wolf syndicate (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:27 (three years ago) link
he's just negging them
― superdeep borehole (harbl), Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:33 (three years ago) link
so not gonna happen
― error prone wolf syndicate (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:36 (three years ago) link
He disregards, or outright refuses, their work.
from the beginning, he seemed to know they were against his presidency. and why is that? just because they leaked the steele dossier? he seemed, right away, to know what that *meant*: he saw it as a first shot against him, but also seemed to know that they could never go against him for real. it was the casual way in which he dismissed the "deep state," before even taking office, that just seemed off to me and demanded an explanation.
i think he was familiar with this crowd and their tricks and knew that they too -- when it was convenient -- partook in the "international network of personal business connections." of all the different parts of the US empire, it was the intelligence community that he saw as the most hypocritical of all.
if trump was really as much of an outsider as he seemed, he would have seemed adrift when he got to washington, unsure of who his allies and enemies were. but he wasn't--he jumped right into it, antagonizing comey and all these other people.
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:42 (three years ago) link
my theory isn't that he is working hand in glove with the intelligence community today. it's more like, they have had a mutually beneficial business relationship for years, but one that is strained. and one outcome of it is that he feels he has leverage over them. it never made sense that he didn't try to fire mueller. the entire thing felt like a game of chicken, and then it was mueller at the end who blinked, basically.
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:44 (three years ago) link
Mueller’d FBI
― error prone wolf syndicate (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:49 (three years ago) link
‘s
i know he was fbi, but trump banked on the fact that he wouldn't blow up the cia's spot by uncovering the money laundering scheme. after the patriot act, don't the two agencies work together often anyway?
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:52 (three years ago) link
I think you’re reading logic and intentionality into Trump’s actions when there is no evidence of logic or intentionality ever driving him before.
― Boring, Maryland, Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:53 (three years ago) link
― Boring, Maryland, Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:54 (three years ago) link
that's what the cia bet when they tapped him as an asset--the desperate "billionaire" who would do anything to keep up his lifestyle at a time when he was completely underwater.
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 01:57 (three years ago) link
in any case, i don't think my theory requires trump to be logical and cunning. he just needs to be someone who was at one point desperate and willing to get his hands dirty. and also someone who would have already been knowledgeable about the connections between organized crime and US intelligence--you know, able to move between those worlds. and this very much was trump. his mentor was roy cohn.
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 02:02 (three years ago) link
Trump was a game show host.
― error prone wolf syndicate (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, 6 October 2020 02:03 (three years ago) link
true. alex trebek and regis philbin also declared net incomes in the negative hundreds of millions every year for decades. it's a game show thing.
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 02:05 (three years ago) link
there is *something there* which is why we were all riveted by the russia investigation. but for some reason mueller stopped short at uncovering what that was.
this is just my theory as to why that is. four years into his disastrous presidency, there is still a whole lot we just don't know about him, and it's hard for me to think that isn't in some way intentional.
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 02:06 (three years ago) link
― Boring, Maryland, Tuesday, 6 October 2020 02:07 (three years ago) link
maybe. but i don't understand why an investigation into whether trump was compromised by russia didn't include a look into who he owes money to. it seems like more than an oversight. there were some things about trump that mueller didn't want america to know about for whatever reason.
― treeship., Tuesday, 6 October 2020 02:13 (three years ago) link
― Boring, Maryland, Tuesday, 6 October 2020 02:15 (three years ago) link