all that travolta sperm? it's travolta's fault. But the one sperm that wins the race in the beginning of look who's talking? travolta can't be liable. that sperm had its own ideas.
― latin hypercube in shitspace (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:49 (six years ago)
This is just the beginning.
xp
― romanesque architect (pomenitul), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:50 (six years ago)
listen, I'm an idiot who hasn't read enough books, I'm getting to the end of my rhetorical rope here, all I want is for parents to accept that they've inflicted a potentially grievous harm on their children by having them
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:50 (six years ago)
"getting"
― "heels over head" makes way more sense (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:50 (six years ago)
oh eat a dick
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:52 (six years ago)
fine i accept and i’m okay with it
― Homegrown Georgia speedster Ladd McConkey (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:52 (six years ago)
existing is the most unpleasant thing I've ever had to do
all I want is for parents to accept that they've inflicted a potentially grievous harm on their children by having them
That 'potentially' has been doing quite a bit of work throughout.
― romanesque architect (pomenitul), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:53 (six years ago)
all that travolta sperm?
― Homegrown Georgia speedster Ladd McConkey (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:53 (six years ago)
So, if one requires parents to guarantee their children will evade every ill turn of fortune before procreating
I'd assumed silby was saying even that wouldn't be enough.
― kinder, Friday, 14 February 2020 18:53 (six years ago)
it's remarkable that you can't grasp what's wrong with this sentence - logically, gramatically, rhetorically
― Οὖτις, Friday, 14 February 2020 18:54 (six years ago)
existing is literally the ONLY thing you have ever done. no existence = no you = neither pleasant/nor unpleasant. You cannot transpose the qualities of existence onto non-existence or vice versa, they are mutually exclusive.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 14 February 2020 18:55 (six years ago)
I miss the lex.
― El Tomboto, Friday, 14 February 2020 18:56 (six years ago)
all I want is for parents to accept that they've inflicted a potentially grievous harm on their children
Okay sure if it cools your incandescent rage for a moment. As long as you accept that we've also provided our children with unmatched opportunities for immense joy, such as orgasms and bacon and Mozart. None of these joys will ever be experienced by the non-extant. That potential for pleasure and happiness has to appear in the calculation or else your argument makes no sense.
We all have the potential to inflict harm on other beings in myriad ways. That's not an argument for never leaving the apartment - it's a calculated risk, as was noted upthread.
― "heels over head" makes way more sense (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:56 (six years ago)
And once they have given this proposition the fleeting consideration it deserves and discovered that it provides them with zero useful instruction about parenthood or the advisability of having children, they will promptly move on to more germane considerations. But your desire will be satisfied. So there's that to be glad for.
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:58 (six years ago)
I mean if I didn’t exist I wouldn’t be complaining about it certainly.
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 18:58 (six years ago)
if you didn't exist, but had the option to, would you want to? or would you decide "nah, too risky"
― lukas, Friday, 14 February 2020 18:59 (six years ago)
lol I think that's the one thing he's been clear on
― kinder, Friday, 14 February 2020 18:59 (six years ago)
silby, at which point did you realize that you were just trolling everyone, but you were going to do it anyway?
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:00 (six years ago)
being a parent has been really fun so far 🙂
― Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:01 (six years ago)
fun for who?
― "heels over head" makes way more sense (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:02 (six years ago)
(jk)
just doing stuff like going to the movies or the zoo or we read in bed every night and snuggle, reading the Narnia books
― Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:04 (six years ago)
that should be 'for whom?'
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:04 (six years ago)
for who the board lols
― latin hypercube in shitspace (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:05 (six years ago)
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, February 14, 2020 11:00 AM (four minutes ago)
I'm too mad to be trolling
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:05 (six years ago)
let us be the judge of that
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:06 (six years ago)
it's a criterion of trolling that the troll isn't mad but everyone else is
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:06 (six years ago)
if you want babby's soulyou gotta pay the troll toll
― bold caucasian eroticism (Simon H.), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:07 (six years ago)
Roses are red, violets are bluetrollz do it for the lulz, what about you?
― "heels over head" makes way more sense (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:09 (six years ago)
seriously do you guys not remember when ronan and the lex discussed children
― El Tomboto, Friday, 14 February 2020 19:09 (six years ago)
fwiw I think children are wonderful people and all the positive qualities parents in this thread have rhapsodized about are otm
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:10 (six years ago)
El Tomboto at 1:09 14 Feb 20seriously do you guys not remember when ronan and the lex discussed childrenI do not! but I bet it was good.I do remember tuomas thinking it was ok to jackoff with a baby in the room
― Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:12 (six years ago)
nah he hasn't
i mean yes plenty of parents are irresponsible in their attitudes here, but i think the general human belief that life is a good thing to have and a good thing to gift is a silly thing to sniff at. like you need to work harder than "what if it's bad tho". not even Buddhists believe that. and being mad at people for having that general human belief is ... not the high moral ground he thinks it is.
― lukas, Friday, 14 February 2020 19:13 (six years ago)
being alive is my best option but on balance I don't care for it
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:14 (six years ago)
at least, not today I don't
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:15 (six years ago)
I should really be doing my job but I've completely forgotten what it is at this point
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:17 (six years ago)
don't care for it
your attitude toward life is unusual and parents can be forgiven for not reasoning based on it
― lukas, Friday, 14 February 2020 19:18 (six years ago)
can they?????
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:19 (six years ago)
why should I, personally, forgive my parents
whom I love and have been almost exclusively good to me
and yet had me
half expecting silby to shortly be confronted by an angry magical whirlwind lecturing him on being such an ingrate
― Οὖτις, Friday, 14 February 2020 19:20 (six years ago)
I’m grateful for most everything my parents did for me after I was born, but I’m furious I’m alive
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:21 (six years ago)
OK, my dear silby. I will accept your premise that it should be vitally important for each potential parent to accept that the outcome of having a child includes a potential for that child to experience grievous harm, which same potential cannot be fulfilled if no child is forthcoming.
I have a couple of questions for you. Because the decision to bring a child into existence is binary and can only result in two positions, child or no child, how do you envision this vital acceptance as directing their ultimate decision? What philosophical guidance does it lend or practical application might it have to their decision?
Do not feel you must be brief in your answer. Be as comprehensive in your answer as you feel you require for us to understand your position.
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:21 (six years ago)
different question based on unique circumstances
― lukas, Friday, 14 February 2020 19:21 (six years ago)
I mean ,most parents of our age group kind of just had kids on autopilot. I don't think decisions were really consciously made.
― Yerac, Friday, 14 February 2020 19:22 (six years ago)
Aimless no fair telling me to post longer you're retired
― Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:24 (six years ago)
No, I think a bumbling but good-hearted angel needs to take him on a tour of how his idyllic home town would look had he not been born.
― "heels over head" makes way more sense (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:24 (six years ago)
Waah sometimes I feel bad, and my body needs calories waah
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Friday, 14 February 2020 19:27 (six years ago)