Your next 2020 Democratic presidential primary thread: Now we're serious

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8727 of them)

my rose-tinted take is that there are just more moderates in the race

A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Chooglin (will), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 19:57 (six years ago)

but i guess what i'm thinking is that if three of the four mods dropped out, would it essentially be one of them at 47% vs sanders at ~25%

But guess what? Nobody gives a toot!šŸ˜‚ (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 19:57 (six years ago)

Again thats similar to Trump’s initial primary numbers iirc

ĪŸį½–Ļ„Ī¹Ļ‚, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 19:58 (six years ago)

again? sorry if i missed conversation upthread, work has been a nightmare

But guess what? Nobody gives a toot!šŸ˜‚ (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 19:58 (six years ago)

fwiw i'm not responding to anything said upthread

But guess what? Nobody gives a toot!šŸ˜‚ (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 19:59 (six years ago)

i feel like if all the other candidates dropped out bar sanders and the mayor then bernie would lose

frederik b. godt (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:00 (six years ago)

he needs the centrist vote split

frederik b. godt (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:00 (six years ago)

the theory (one i also sorta buy) is that much like trump had the largest base in a highly divided field and the opponents didn't consolidate quickly enough to offer an alternative b4 the delegate lead got out of hand bernie is potentially benefiting from a similar set of circumstances

Mordy, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:01 (six years ago)

the mayor(s)?

brooklyn suicide cult (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:01 (six years ago)

is it concerning

Speaking purely as someone who has never seen his early first choice gain the presidential nomination of the Democratic Party, unless you count McGovern, who I couldn't vote for because I turned 18 the day after the 1972 election, I have given up on being 'concerned' by the nature of US national elections. They are as little under my control as acts of God or the forces of nature.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:02 (six years ago)

xp i agree with you on branding sund4r, but i think the difference in their hands-on experience with the interests of the right is different, and that warren—outside of academics and as legislator—has better nous regarding their methods practices, perhaps their impulses too. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/28/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-corporations.html

in a mellow, balmy way (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:04 (six years ago)

Hence whynthry hate her most.

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:05 (six years ago)

*why they

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:05 (six years ago)

I think it's a mistake to assume that the supporters of one moderate candidate will move en masse to another moderate once their favorite drops out. Moderates are largely pretty ideologically squishy, that's part of why they're moderates. I think a lot of them are supporting their chosen candidate because they like his/her personality or think he/she is "electable" or whatever. I bet a decent chunk of, e.g., Biden supporters end up moving toward Bernie when Biden drops out.

OneSecondBefore, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:11 (six years ago)

Does the average voter even know Warren is closer to Bernie than Pete policy-wise? Even the chapo boys, who make money doing this, treat her as a nemesis

treeship., Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:13 (six years ago)

xp Also that poll is only of Democratic voters. Sanders's argument is that he can more votes from outside that group (especially non-voters) than any of the others.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:14 (six years ago)

that he can *get* more votes

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:15 (six years ago)

In theory a good portion of those warren votes could go to a moderate. I think people’s problem with sanders is often more style than substance—like they are fine with raising taxes and shoring up the safety net, but resent ā€œdivisiveness.ā€ Warren is divisive among some top hat/long coat boomers I know but her brand is much different—championing working families rather than the international proletariat

treeship., Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:15 (six years ago)

xps - Sanders seems to pull best among the young and among the more ideologically leftist, neither of which describes the average Biden supporter. That's not to say you are wrong, non-ideological voters can make strange decisions, but only that I can't see much firm ground upon which to base that conclusion.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:16 (six years ago)

It's almost over for the Booty Judge.

but also fuck you (unperson), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:17 (six years ago)

I would like to see a poll breakdown of moderate voters' second choice. I have no empirical data to back it up but I think a non-negligible segment are ranking the most palatable moderate/the moderate they think most likely to beat Trump first and more progressive "this is how I really feel" candidate second; I think a good chunk of Warren's issue right now is that she is everyone's second-favorite candidate, which is the absolute worst place to be in a winner-take-all contest.

totally unnecessary bewbz of exploitation (DJP), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:17 (six years ago)

the theory (one i also sorta buy) is that much like trump had the largest base in a highly divided field and the opponents didn't consolidate quickly enough to offer an alternative b4 the delegate lead got out of hand bernie is potentially benefiting from a similar set of circumstances

don't Republicans do "winner take all" for most states? even though Bernie has won the popular vote he's still 2 behind in the delegate count. I don't really know the way the remaining states work.

frogbs, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:18 (six years ago)

re: unperson's Guardian link; this is the exact conversation happening among black/Asian friends of mine from college on Facebook today

totally unnecessary bewbz of exploitation (DJP), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:20 (six years ago)

I would like to see a poll breakdown of moderate voters' second choice. I have no empirical data to back it up but I think a non-negligible segment are ranking the most palatable moderate/the moderate they think most likely to beat Trump first and more progressive "this is how I really feel" candidate second; I think a good chunk of Warren's issue right now is that she is everyone's second-favorite candidate, which is the absolute worst place to be in a winner-take-all contest.

― totally unnecessary bewbz of exploitation (DJP), Wednesday, February 12, 2020 2:17 PM (two minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

I posted this on the Bernie thread earlier. It's from the Quinnipiac poll from the other day; I have to imagine NH results will move some of these numbers around. (Also, since it's a little confusing, the 1st-choice candidates are in the columns, and the 2nd-choice candidates are in the rows.)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EQi5wnnXUAIVEt5?format=jpg&name=medium

jaymc, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:23 (six years ago)

ha, I still got it *brushes imaginary dirt off shoulders*

totally unnecessary bewbz of exploitation (DJP), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:26 (six years ago)

also lol at "if not Buttigieg, then Gabbard"

like, wtf are you smoking

totally unnecessary bewbz of exploitation (DJP), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:28 (six years ago)

"If I can't have the gay candidate, I want the candidate who backed conversion therapy because no one should get to be attracted to their own gender if Pete can't be POTUS"

totally unnecessary bewbz of exploitation (DJP), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:29 (six years ago)

They want someone young presumably

treeship., Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:29 (six years ago)

Gabbard is the only other candidate under 40

treeship., Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:30 (six years ago)

Or they’re ex military, and don’t trust a commander in chief who isn’t a veteran.

treeship., Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:30 (six years ago)

I think the latter is more likely actually

treeship., Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:31 (six years ago)

I think a lot of them are supporting their chosen candidate because they like his/her personality or think he/she is "electable" or whatever

bingo

I have political conversations with a lot of people and it's amazing how many of them have basically no understanding of what each candidate stands for. they think of Bernie as the "free stuff" guy who looks like Larry David, Pete as a smart young upstart, Warren as *sigh* "Pocahontas", Biden & Bloomberg as they guys they know who they think have the best shot of beating Trump. the one argument I've heard in favor of Bloomberg is that "he's everything Trump wants to be and that will piss him off", and it's like...yeah...Trump does seem particularly bothered by Bloomberg, but man it must be nice to only care about politics on such a surface level

frogbs, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:31 (six years ago)

SMONE ELSE

mookieproof, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:50 (six years ago)

the theory (one i also sorta buy) is that much like trump had the largest base in a highly divided field and the opponents didn't consolidate quickly enough to offer an alternative b4 the delegate lead got out of hand bernie is potentially benefiting from a similar set of circumstances

^^^this is what I was getting at many posts ago

xps

ĪŸį½–Ļ„Ī¹Ļ‚, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 20:56 (six years ago)

Xp sure I think that is a factor. But also the narrative that Bernie isn’t actually winning, it’s just that the centrists haven’t settled on a candidate yet is a spin being used by people who wish to undermine his apparent support. We don’t know he would be performing in a one on race against Pete or Bloomberg or whoever.

That being said I wish his margin had been higher in NH. But i think he looks strong going into the next contests.

dsb, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:09 (six years ago)

the anti-union Bernie flyer is definitely a bad sign in NV

ĪŸį½–Ļ„Ī¹Ļ‚, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:10 (six years ago)

er anti-Bernie Union flyer!

sorry
big difference

ĪŸį½–Ļ„Ī¹Ļ‚, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:10 (six years ago)

https://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sanders-leads-all-democratic-candidates-support-non-white-voters-new-polls-show-1486807

But...but Pete has convinced me that Bernie is a divider!

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:14 (six years ago)

https://cdn.officestationery.co.uk/products/295179-500/5-Star-Office-A4-Subject-Dividers-Multipunched-Man.jpg

Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:18 (six years ago)

he's a trapper keeper

sorry for butt rockin (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:19 (six years ago)

so Romney has lots of binders full of Bernie? I'm confused

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:25 (six years ago)

Culinary’s refusal to help Biden, the major candidate most aligned with their healthcare concerns, tells everything about how his campaign is seen privately. Their mailers seem furious their position is left to such a weak candidate.

— Richard M. Nixon (@dick_nixon) February 11, 2020

brooklyn suicide cult (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:37 (six years ago)

remember when everybody was so sure he was the de facto candidate

sorry for butt rockin (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:38 (six years ago)

this is why it's pointless to grouse before you're even in the election year yet

sorry for butt rockin (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:39 (six years ago)

This thread today has been like Space Mountain

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:48 (six years ago)

Dark and rough on your back?

sorry for butt rockin (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:49 (six years ago)

certain to malfunction and result in 4 fatalities on March 13, 2020?

that's dark man

But guess what? Nobody gives a toot!šŸ˜‚ (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:54 (six years ago)

My nieces love Space Mountain, and they'll love this thread!

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 February 2020 21:56 (six years ago)

fun fact: space mountain actually only goes 28 miles per hour, tops

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 12 February 2020 22:27 (six years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.