New Yorker magazine alert thread

he seems to have a gap in the very few online reviews (right around after the article came out) and I could see subtle things of where he looks like he may have stopped the shadier business practices. I don't know. I watched some interviews with him and he is definitely odd.

My main annoyance with something like that is that it's so hard to run a successful and lucrative restaurant that this supper club that only does a handful of seatings a month... I wish reviewers would stop putting him on restaurant lists and giving free publicity when it could go to a restaurant that serves more than 4 people in a week.

the new jill lepore book about nationalism is very good. it's a brisk 160 pages. purely as a prose stylist, i like her very much btw: "Writing national history creates plenty of problems, but not writing national history creates more problems, and those problems are worse."

her audiobooks are great. she reads them, and she does "pompous ass" voices when she quotes people she doesn't like.

lol heroic

The new one about the rich guy bankrolling a bespoke submersible so he could be the first person to dive to the deepest point in all five oceans was some fantastic old-school, David Grann-esque NY-er escapism. So many ridiculous details.

yeah, i don't have tons of time for nyer Adventurer pieces, but this one was fun

Yeah, that was a great read, one of my recent favorites.

^^^agree.

I like imagining that pieces like this are actually fiction. Well what I really want is fiction written to be a dead ringer for a NYer article.

can someone post a link? i can't find it easily

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/05/18/thirty-six-thousand-feet-under-the-sea

thanks

some interesting stuff in the fiction issue, emma cline fictionalizes harvey weinstein's don delillo delusion & an unpublished hemingway work

Boy ... my wife had left a stack of New Yorker's for me to sort and discard, and wow, what a (sad) trip that was. As old as 2015, right up to the last few weeks, in random order. I would just flip through the table of contents and think, ok, this is pre-Trump, this is post-Covid, and so on. And one after the other I could just not bring myself to be interested in reading any of them, not even the stuff that was interesting. Just really underscored how absolutely exhausting, enervating the last few years have been, hurtling forward so fast that focusing on even the most recent past seems almost impossible.

if i had that stack i'd probably just read the classical music-related bits.

I specifically scanned the movie reviews in the table of contents (tables of content?) to help date each issue, and it felt like stumbling across a time capsule. I just skimmed an article about the Apatow/Feig casting director, and it talks about casting the "Ghostbusters" reboot, which, per another thread, I forgot existed, but which it's still hard to believe was only four years ago.

I read more of the fiction issue than I have in awhile

i'm perpetually 6 months behind with the NYRB and i get the same feeling with their politics articles. someone spent weeks of their life on this article and with the benefit of hindsight it was based on totally faulty premises about what would happen. every single time.

(Ugh, just noticed I put an apostrophe in "New Yorker's." I'm not sure I've ever done that before, and it's super ironic that I should do it when writing the name of that particular magazine. I blame the beer, a delicious hazy DIPA from Revolution which is perfect for the weather.)

I changed my approach in 2004. I read *so many* NYer articles about Kerry and the election, all (retrospectively) total wastes of time.

reporting the news is just a mistake all around

especially that "what will happen in a month" type feature-writing reporting. We'll find out! Relax!

caek you could just save time by not reading tomasky in the first place

I skip them all! I only read the reviews of academic press books I will never read

I only read it for the European Beret advert.

zoom dick incident

https://www.vice.com/en/article/epdgm4/new-yorker-suspends-jeffrey-toobin-for-zoom-dick-incident

Wait did he just whip it out? Like, phew, now that I'm off that important zoom call I'm just going to whip out my dick?

That's what it sounds like?

omg haaaa

this guy wtf

let those who have not ended their zoom calls this way throw the first stone

why do people think the call was over?

if he ever writes a thinkpiece about this we're pretending he didn't

Zoom = the new Chatroulette

Toobin also once hit on a female media figure, repeatedly, offering to fist her. He even followed her back to her hotel room to do this. https://t.co/pThhATxDgM https://t.co/8AirF17p90

— foster kamer. (@weareyourfek) October 19, 2020

wtf man

yeahhh sorry - feel free to delete or spoiler tag

not super into the humorous zoom content on twitter right now given this appears to have been sexual assault

Wait so he intentionally flashed a coworker? On a work Zoom call? What?

yeah, i'm waiting to hear the details. i think a lot of people had first reactions and just assumed they knew what happened - masturbating? having sex with someone? using the restroom/showering? there's all sorts of ways to show your dick during a zoom call

the vice article is not written in the way you would expect if it were obviously an accident

Toobin’s Conde Nast email has been disabled and he has not tweeted since October 13. He did, however, appear on CNN, where he is the network’s chief legal analyst, on Saturday. “Jeff Toobin has asked for some time off while he deals with a personal issue, which we have granted,” CNN said in a statement.

this is not someone changing their clothes while they think the camera is off.

sure, but it could also be...toobin sleeping with someone that isn't his wife?

on zoom?

Toobin should have confirmed the camera was off before he whipped out his personal issue.

beats me! i don't know, i read the vice article in a different way. it seemed purposefully vague, but not in a way that hinted at a malicious act. just an embarrassing one.

i'm sure someone on that haunted zoom call will leak the details. hopefully they're just embarrassing.

beats me!

Well, as Toobin would probably tell you, it ain't gonna beat itself.

ok, so that puts josh in the "he was masturbating" camp

that might be the most likely thing!

given he has history, no one is saying anything, and he's been put on leave, i'm not sure i agree with that.

okay, so!
- heard several name-y staffers were on the call
- hearing the call was recorded
- hearing that everyone had taken a break during a long call, and that *gestures* THAT is what they came back to
and:
- hearing remnick had to be the one to alert him.

— foster kamer. (@weareyourfek) October 19, 2020

Can I just say that I am puzzled by describing repeatedly asking someone if you can fist them as "hitting on them"?

I mean, I guess in a very specific way