A New Thread fot the Current Israel/Palestine/Lebanon mess

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1021 of them)
Oh, and the US has exercised it's veto power in the UN Security Council over 35 times to protect Israel from condemnation, according to that article.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Thursday, 13 July 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)

Actually the UN hasn't officially condemned Israel over Gaza yet because the vote is stalled.

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=1fe460c8-896b-4305-9e22-5687da508fff&k=69689

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 13 July 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

Immediately afterward, Hamas pulled their weekly "we're going to open the gates of hell upon Israel ... no wait, me might want to call a truce" routine. Of course they made sure to coordinate the back end of the flip-flop with the UN announcement so that the world would understand how sane and reasonable they are.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 13 July 2006 19:06 (nineteen years ago)

I feel really sad for the Lebanese people in all of this. All of the civilian comments I've read have this attitude of "We don't want any trouble, and here goes history shitting on us again."

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)

Stratfor's thoughts (or rather their conclusion for today):

It will take several days to mount a full invasion of Lebanon. We would not expect major operations before the weekend at the earliest. If the rocket attacks are taking place, however, Israel might send several brigades to the Litani River almost immediately in order to move the rockets out of range of Haifa. Therefore, we would expect a rapid operation in the next 24-48 hours followed by a larger force later.

At this point, the only thing that can prevent this would be a major intervention by Syria with real guarantees that it would restrain Hezbollah and indications such operations are under way. Syria is the key to a peaceful resolution. Syria must calculate the relative risks, and we expect them to be unwilling to act decisively.

Therefore:

1. Israel cannot tolerate an insurgency on its northern frontier; if there is one, it wants it farther north.

2. It cannot tolerate attacks on Haifa.

3. It cannot endure a crisis of confidence in its military

4. Hezbollah cannot back off of its engagement with Israel.

5. Syria can stop this, but the cost to it stopping it is higher than the cost of letting it go on.

It would appear Israel will invade Lebanon. The global response will be noisy. There will be no substantial international action against Israel. Beirut's tourism and transportation industry, as well as its financial sectors, are very much at risk.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 July 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)

And to hell with Juan Cole. I wonder if he'll write something about collective punishment of the Israeli population now that people in northern Israel (incl. Haifa and Safed) have been ordered into shelters due to the rocket attacks (which have injured more than 100 people so far). I wonder if there will be world peace tomorrow.

there's no justification for the rocket attacks, but again unless there's something i'm missing, why would anyone in their right mind settle in this part of israel knowing the history?

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 13 July 2006 20:40 (nineteen years ago)

Is syria going to use this as an excuse to walk back into the Lebanaon?

It's more that if anything it will push the Lebanese government back towards the Syrians.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 13 July 2006 20:44 (nineteen years ago)

The Daily Star is back online: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/home2.asp

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 13 July 2006 20:45 (nineteen years ago)

Well, that's a little like asking why anyone in their right mind chose to live in New Orleans, innit? I mean it's not like living in a settlement in Hebron, and there happen to be cities and jobs there. Also, from my personal experience there, Israel is kind of a bustling, crowded country and living in the North, much of which is quiet and strikingly beautiful, is a way to escape that (carrying the common New Jersey comparison a step further, think Sussex County).

xpost

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 20:47 (nineteen years ago)

xpost to firs t DV post

or the Lebanese people back to the pro-syrian parties.

Another thought is that syria starts bussing over veterans of Iraq if it (or Assad) feels threatened). Israel should be very reticent about invading southern lebanon it's going to be a lot worse than last time. Terrorist/Geurilla tactics have been taken to another level since the IDF last marched through Lebanon.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 13 July 2006 20:59 (nineteen years ago)

Well, that's a little like asking why anyone in their right mind chose to live in New Orleans, innit?

no, it isn't.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

Wait sorry, I guess I don't understand your question. Are you asking why anyone in their right mind would live in the entire Northern part of Israel?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:13 (nineteen years ago)

I mean Haifa ain't exactly right on the border, and it's a decent-sized city:

ihttp://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/maps/is-map.gif

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:14 (nineteen years ago)

i mean like golan heights or other "disputed areas" or even northern israel real fucking close to lebanon and subsequent 30+ year chaos, yeah!

israel is a young country, despite the thousands of years of oppression of the jewish people. i don't see it being quite comparable to the hundreds of years and years of institutional racism and slavery that conjured up the new orleans' milieu. people choose to move to israel. and yeah some people choose to move to new orleans, but a lot of the victims of katrina were people who had never been anywhere else in their lives, and had no way to escape - not to mention a government that would actually evacuate them like the israelis did with gaza.

xpost - i'm not talking about haifa, since afaik that's a new development with the hezbollah's new missle.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)

New Orleans is a bad example -- I didn't really mean the comparison in the way you're taking it. Pick any area where people choose to live somewhere knowing it has a high disaster risk and substitute (there are plenty)

Hezbollah having the Katyusha rocket is not a new development at all though. Is there some other *new* missile that I missed in the reports?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:26 (nineteen years ago)

Sorry, I stand corrected:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunder_1

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

Oh and also apparently Hezbollah is denying the attack on Haifa.

The fog of war begins to set in, I guess.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:30 (nineteen years ago)

"... despite the thousands of years of oppression of the jewish people."

most of which, to be fair, did not take place in the Middle East nor was it instigated by Muslims. Prior to this whole horrible-misapplication-of-a-colonialist/zionist-fuckup Jews had it pretty good in the Middle East, at least compared to how they were treated in Europe.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:30 (nineteen years ago)

(not that that's really relevant its just one more thing about this situation that depresses me. there is no solution - the fighting will go on until everybody is dead)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)

As an Iraqi Jew by blood, I'm calling bullshit on that.

starke (starke), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:50 (nineteen years ago)

Not to be redundant here, but Haaretz's coverage has been downright fantastic so far - it's the only place I can seem to get more than the most skeletal outline of what's going on.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:52 (nineteen years ago)

Permanent second class citizens by law...I guess southern blacks had it "pretty good" post-civil war?

starke (starke), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:52 (nineteen years ago)

COMPARED TO EUROPE is the key phrase in my statement. Was there an Iraqi Jewish Holocaust I don't know about?

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

btw hurting according to everything i've read so far the attack on haifa caused not a single injury.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 13 July 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

the fact is prior to Israel's creation all the major hostilities against Jews - I'm talkin mass murders, forced migrations, torture/forced conversions, etc. - were at the hands of European Christians and not Middle Eastern Muslims. Being a second-class citizen is no picnic, I'm sure, but compared to being constantly butchered/expelled I think it counts as being "better off".

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:00 (nineteen years ago)

the attack on haifa caused not a single injury.

Not for want of trying.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:01 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/images/300/desperation_man.jpg

gear (gear), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)

there is no solution - the fighting will go on until everybody is dead
-- Shakey Mo Collier (audiobo...), July 13th, 2006.

the epic of human history in one sentence!!!

the fuckablity of late picasso (vahid), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)

No holocaust, but European Jews as a whole progressed *significantly* further in society. So either Ashkenazis have a magic genetic superiority which allowed them to flourish in a worse situation, or they actually had way more opportunities available to them in Europe.

starke (starke), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

slightly more context, hurting:

Hezbollah's rocket attack on the port city of Haifa was its deepest such strike into northern Israel yet. No injuries were reported in Haifa, home to 270,000 residents and a major oil refinery 30 miles south of the border. Still, the Israeli ambassador to the United States, Daniel Ayalon, called the attack "a major, major escalation."

"Those who fire into such a densely populated area will pay a heavy price," said David Baker, an official in the Israeli prime minister's office.

and how is beirut not densely populated again?!??

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't read any reports of Israel striking Beirut. (airports aren't usually smack in the middle of downtowns).

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:05 (nineteen years ago)

"No holocaust, but European Jews as a whole progressed *significantly* further in society"

being Prime Minister of England vs. 6 million dead

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

One thing I will say against Lebanon (admittedly not knowing all the details of how exactly it happened) - it's hard to understand why a nation would want to allow a party into its government that maintains an active and belligerent armed wing. But I'd imagine Syria has something to do with that.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:09 (nineteen years ago)

ever heard of suburbs, hurting?

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:09 (nineteen years ago)

If European Jews had all been poor and lower class instead of above average successful, they likely wouldn't have been such wonderful scapegoats for Hitler etc.

starke (starke), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:10 (nineteen years ago)

i mean there's something like 3 mn + in beirut right? even if the israelis ONLY blew up the airport (which i doubt since yesterday was reportedly the largest air strike in israeli military history), then it's still not even comparable to haifa which has less than 300k!

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:11 (nineteen years ago)

I don't really want to argue this point, since I generally agree that Israel's response to this is completely out of proportion and uncalled for.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)

This is like the British Army bombing Derry City if it had some soldiers kidnapped, then decided, ah fuck it, bomb Dundalk, then maybe also Dublin Airport.

What's the endgame for the Israeli government? Because it sure look like they want to create the next generation of suicide bombers, hezbollah recruits and generally a whole lot of people who think they're cunts. Cos they're acting like them.

Hurting - is there anything where you might conceivably concede that the Israeli government have acted in a slightly regrettable way?

x- post - Letting in party with armed wing vs having entire government as political wing of army in a militarised state C/D?

Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)

Hurting - is there anything where you might conceivably concede that the Israeli government have acted in a slightly regrettable way?

Uh, try reading like half my fucking posts on this thread.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)

yeah dave, don't get on hurting. actually i'd like to commend everyone on this thread so far, for keeping it civil.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:18 (nineteen years ago)

having entire government as political wing of army in a militarised state

Do you mean to suggest that that's how Israel's government operates? I suggest some basic reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel#Government

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

the highway from beirut to damascus was bombed by the idf, apparently. that's what the headline on cnn.com says.

gear (gear), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)

BTW, in case I haven't made myself clear, I'm really fucking upset about Israel's response! I'm against it, and so is my fiance, who, as I said, is Israeli.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

I heard George Soros in an interview today say something along the lines of "Sometimes, when faced with an insoluble problem, we gravitate toward actions that make the problem worse." I keep reading the sentiment on the Israeli side of "See look, restraint doesn't work. They attack us, we do nothing, they attack us again." So how exactly is a regional war going to "work"?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 22:35 (nineteen years ago)

Shakey, from what I've read (and I know this topic is tangential to what we're really talking about), Starke is right. The Holocaust is near-incomparable as a single event, of course. It's also an easy argument-winner. The fact is, my wife's extended Jewish family lived handsomely in Europe (mostly Germany) between the 18th and 20th century. Even in the 20th century, most well-to-do Jewish germans got out. Not saying "getting out" was at all desirable, but Jewish people, on the whole, in a subcultural-never-quite-assimilated-way, did live well. I've never heard anyone say the same thing about the pre-Israel Middle East.

paulhw (paulhw), Thursday, 13 July 2006 23:05 (nineteen years ago)

Seems kind of pointless to argue whether Jews were better off pre-WWII in *Europe* or *The Middle East* - you're talking about many different kinds of people in many different times in many different places. A successful Jewish trader in Iraq was probably better off than a poor Polish Shtetl Jew and vice versa.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 23:26 (nineteen years ago)

That's true to a certain extent. But I still think you can still kinda average it out. On average a European Jew in 1800 had more freedoms, a higher standard of living, and most importantly, far more opportunity to better himself.

starke (starke), Thursday, 13 July 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)

Seems like a major tangent anyway

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 13 July 2006 23:50 (nineteen years ago)

No definitely, the Lebanon stuff is way more important at the moment. Personally Shakey's comment was a little offensive. The Middle East was totally not some equal rights paradise before Israel arrived.

starke (starke), Thursday, 13 July 2006 23:57 (nineteen years ago)

We Jews tend to get a little obsessive about our history of opression. I wonder if Armenians are the same way?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Friday, 14 July 2006 00:02 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.