US Politics, November 2019: These people are truly sick.

do any of you have any idea how delightful it is to discuss vaping with the President

Schiff is all like
https://farsightedblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/billy-madison.jpg

the GOP are right about one thing: they're going to impeach, so this is more or less all for show

wait wasn't it the GOP that demanded these hearings??

I'm surprised they're not demanding these hearing be "secret" again. I could sworn one of them tried that the other day.

shiff's speeches are fucking tiresome too TBF

Schiff right now reminding me a lot more of this guy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0

a couple of weeks ago they demanded a House floor vote to 'officially' open an impeachment inquiry, but only because the House was in adjournment and such a vote couldn't be taken at the time they were clamoring for it.

god I wish I could be as clueless and incompetent as a Republican Congressman and still keep my job

sorry for late but

BEARD CRUZ AKA the Soupcatcher

A group of Republican senators and senior White House officials met privately Thursday to map out a strategy for a potential impeachment trial of President Trump, including proceedings in the Senate that could be limited to about two weeks, according to multiple officials familiar with the talks.

huh surprised they aren't settled about fucking up the Dem primaries

Schiff nails it: "The difference between [Watergate] and now is not the difference between Nixon and Trump. It's the difference between that Congress and this one."

Precisely.

— Kevin M. Kruse (@KevinMKruse) November 21, 2019

idk how illuminating it is to point out that Democrats controlled the Senate under Nixon

Seven of the 17 Republicans on the Judiciary Committee in 1974 voted for at least one article of impeachment.

(House Judiciary Committee, that is.)

yeah, i was about to say, republicans of that era used to do things like support the founding of the EPA, and there was still appeared to be some sort of dignity and capability of feeling shame back then. that is not the case today of course

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanhatesthis/republican-conspiracy-theory-counterprogramming

And the Republicans’ strategy, as confusing and bizarre as it may seem to those on the outside, is working.

I highly doubt it's working on a single person who isn't already a die-hard Trumper

thank you for posting that. i'm so glad i quit facebook.

xp

"idiotic conspiracy theory works on idiot conspiracy theorists, film at 11"

I highly doubt it's working on a single person who isn't already a die-hard Trumper

you'd think, but put yourself in the shoes of an extremely uninformed person who isn't a die-hard Trumper and sees the headlines described in the article on their feed but doesn't bother clicking them

full disclosure: I've never used facebook so I really can't do that

just seems a stretch to say their "strategy" is "working"

if having their bullshit be reported on is sufficient proof their strategy is working, how exactly would it NOT have worked?

you ever see a movie where the hero is forced to traverse some sort of haunted swampy zone with ghosts and other spirits moaning nonsense and trying to drag the hero down into the foggy deadness? that's what going on facebook is like

the strategy is to overwhelm the uninformed with contrary information, so that have trouble figuring out which news they can and cannot trust. that way, when someone does something very bad (say, the president commits crimes for years on end while republicans do jack shit), a whole bunch of people shrug and say "welp, i heard that the whole thing is a hoax", when really, all they "heard" was some dumbass breitbart article headline that they scrolled past

it works

yup

The GOP hasn't done a competent job yet, but I'm not the voter they need to persuade.

buzzfeed article is illuminating. thank you evan.

xp

true it is absolutely embarrassing how many people legitimately believe the "Mueller thing" was some grand hoax to take down Trump. even from people who didn't vote for him. the GOP is absolutely winning the messaging war but then again Facebook is super friendly to them so it's not really a surprise

mueller didn't do himself any favors with that ridiculous conclusion. "if we could say the president did not commit a crime, we would have done so" like come on.

xp

the strategy is to overwhelm the uninformed with contrary information, so that have trouble figuring out which news they can and cannot trust.

Nailed it. This is what folks have been saying specifically about Russian disinformation tactics for a while. Here a main source of news is Yahoo for me.

Apart from the incredible fact that "centrist" in the USA does indeed now mean giving credence to Breitbart-style bs in addition to all the Fox News falsehoods, what is remarkable is that Democratic candidates like Mayor Pete are treated much more favorably than Sanders and particularly Warren lately. This is coming from Bloomberg, USA Today etc.

Yeah I get their whole post truth schtick. But don't get how their tactics with this hearing can be said to be working. I'm gonna need at least 5 old guys in bibbers at a rural diner to be interviewed about it before conclusion can be made.

Tbh I can see how people in the middle who aren't too invested in the whole spectacle so far might expect a smoking gun to sort it all out. What I wonder now is whether Nixon could have gotten away with it, if he hadn't made the tapes.

Working refers to its ability to persuade people but it doesn't speak to the level in which it's working.

I accept that their consistent on-message rhetoric persuades people. Even lots of them.

But, the impeachment polls have sharply broken in the opposite direction. Remember when it seemed like having a plurality of people supporting an inquiry seemed like a pipe dream? A recent poll had 51% that believed he should be *impeached AND removed*.

That movement, yes, some of it is coming from previously on-the-fence Democrats, but it's also coming from independent voters, many of them likely low info voters.

GOP's disinformation campaign is holding the levee from breaching, and we probably will get no smoking gun larger than Sondland or Hill's testimony. But I would argue that they aren't winning.

Some of the people they are swaying are the type that come Election Day....might not even vote.

Admittedly, there is wild, wild variance in said polls. Emerson for example has Independents swinging six percent back towards opposing, yet have 22% of Republicans supporting it, which frankly, seems like a ridiculously high outlier.

Interested to see them a week or two from now

Dems otoh need to repeat "Trump is a criminal and he will keep breaking the law" type soundbytes ad nauseum for the next year

what happens if he is impeached, not removed, and inevitably does something wrong again? can he be impeached twice? and if there is no further punishment beyond impeachment, what's to stop him from doing something even more egregious?

Then they can Superimpeach him

The biggest impeachment you've ever seen

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/AhuTongariki.JPG/330px-AhuTongariki.JPG

At first glance, this moment in Fiona Hill's testimony seems like she's immunizing Trump.

She's actually damning him. pic.twitter.com/9hYAql7v4b

— Vox (@voxdotcom) November 21, 2019

Ok i didnt get a chance to see this before. She fucking rules.

can he be impeached twice?

yes. ofc he can be impeached as often as he commits crimes. nothing in the constitution limits this possibility. the only limit is what is viewed as meriting impeachment by the members of the House - who will assuredly take the politics of it into consideration, as they did with the results of the Mueller investigation.

what is remarkable is that Democratic candidates like Mayor Pete are treated much more favorably than Sanders and particularly Warren lately. This is coming from Bloomberg, USA Today etc

This is STANDARD. The only lib the Dems have nominated in the last 43 years was Mondale, and he was a sacrificial lamb. (Maybe Dukakis if you grade on a curve and allow for being put to sleep.) Jimmy Carter's unlikely victory was both post-Dick "moral" appeal and that he was a centrist at best. Bootyjudge is like the worst elements of Carter, Clinton and Obama put together. Journalists in the "liberal media" are provably to the base of the Dem Party. They loved McCain!

There isn't going to be an emoluments-related Article of Impeachment bcz Dems think that phone zombies can't understand the POTUS literally fleecing the public.

*Journalists in the "liberal media" are provably to the right of the base of the Dem Party.

Bernie is probably personally leftist, but his policies are merely centrist. This reads as radical in post-Nixon America.

Bootyjudge is like the worst elements of Carter, Clinton and Obama put together.

are you talking about Bill Clinton here? because I don't think Buttigieg's lows are quite that low.

he might surprise you if he were president, cuz the job almost always makes em worse

"Bernie is probably personally leftist, but his policies are merely centrist." That's nonsense. Maybe in some other scale, but on the scale of politics in the US, he is not centrist. The only people who have this view have a very skewed idea of where much of the country lies. And I say that as a liberal who lives in Berkeley.