2020 Democratic presidential primary

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (14963 of them)

I was actually heyo-ing the previous post but I think Alfred is acknowledging “power vacuum” as something akin to a power bottom

mh, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:12 (six years ago)

Kind of hilarious that at this point the great hope of the major Dem donors is the mayor of the forth largest city in Indiana.

— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) November 2, 2019

o. nate, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:13 (six years ago)

xp oh yeah i didn't consider that connotation sorry. i was being serious!

esempio (crüt), Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:14 (six years ago)

I'm actually warming to Mayor Pete. If he still has a chance by the time the primary reaches my state, I might vote for him.

o. nate, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:14 (six years ago)

would mayor pete be polling higher or lower if he were straight

mookieproof, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:14 (six years ago)

I don't know. Honestly though I think the people who absolutely wouldn't vote for a gay man were never going to vote for anybody but Trump anyway.

o. nate, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:15 (six years ago)

liberal urban moneyed types, or people who fashion themselves as a combination of the above, like the guy

It feels like pure branding, and the people who see themselves as his base seem like socially/politically-striving types who feel identity is more important than policy

mh, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:16 (six years ago)

he’s a mckinsey type who took advice on which advisors to hire from facebook

having lived through many mckinsey and mckinsey-type corporate restructurings, none of which were saudi arabian (thankfully), don’t trust him

mh, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:18 (six years ago)

It's not that I don't care about policy. But at the end of the day, what any of these candidates is going to be able to accomplish in office is a lot different than the policies they would support in a vacuum.

o. nate, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:18 (six years ago)

Buttigieg was there to fill it.

Yes, he's very ambitious, but the Mayor of South Bend, Indiana does not embark on a national campaign for the presidency just because he woke up one morning and said to himself, "By god, the nation needs me and I'm going to do it!", then start cold-calling all the billionaires on his rolodex to pitch his innovative ideas about the Supreme Court.

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:19 (six years ago)

America’s fascination with ex-soldiers politicians will forever elude me.

Van Horn Street, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:20 (six years ago)

fwiw, I’m currently taking part in a corporate initiative prioritization process called “execute to win”

note that mckinsey was advising the saudis on image strategy *directly* before the khashoggi affair, and they still are selling a corporate strategy with that name

mh, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:20 (six years ago)

I get it, but Buttigieg was at McKinsey for like 3 years. I don't really see him as the candidate from McKinsey.

o. nate, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:21 (six years ago)

Yes, he's very ambitious, but the Mayor of South Bend, Indiana does not embark on a national campaign for the presidency just because he woke up one morning and said to himself, "By god, the nation needs me and I'm going to do it!", then start cold-calling all the billionaires on his rolodex to pitch his innovative ideas about the Supreme Court.

Feels to me that one thing does not exclude the other, it just seems interests have aligned. As it often happens.

Van Horn Street, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:21 (six years ago)

xxxp that’s fair, but the approach to policy and how people adapt to the election landscape is important, because it shows the compromise strategy that might happen in legislation

Clinton’s campaign and past policy basically stated “a good compromise is the best victory” and it gave us all kinds of bullshit because sometimes the best victory is just tabling things

mh, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:23 (six years ago)

America’s fascination with ex-soldiers politicians will forever elude me.

it's actually been quite a long time since a military 'hero' had any success in a presidential campaign

mookieproof, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:24 (six years ago)

Think I read somewhere that Pete has never gotten more than 8,000 people to vote for him in an election.

Evans on Hammond (evol j), Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:24 (six years ago)

I don't really see him as the candidate from McKinsey.

i absolutely do

mookieproof, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:25 (six years ago)

I love Warren's ambition when it comes to policy, but at this point, I feel like the deciding factor for me is who I think is most likely to be able to beat Trump. Not that I have any special insight into that, but that's really what I think most about.

o. nate, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:26 (six years ago)

it's actually been quite a long time since a military 'hero' had any success in a presidential campaign

― mookieproof, Friday, November 1, 2019 9:24 PM (twenty-eight seconds ago) bookmarkflaglink

I was thinking of McCain and Kerry who have been successful/are having successful political careers.

Van Horn Street, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:27 (six years ago)

Xpost I’m not crazy about Pete but he might be the most electable, he at least seems to have the least baggage, which is obviously mostly a function of being half the age of the other front runners

Evans on Hammond (evol j), Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:32 (six years ago)

Mayor Pete probably has the Dem 'anybody but a boomer' vote locked down.

a bevy of supermodels, musicians and Lena Dunham (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:35 (six years ago)

i'd obviously vote for pete over trump but it is astonishing to me that a cybernetically created and not even particularly successful mayor of a small city -- who is gay! -- is considered more 'electable' than various senators/governors/etc of various genders

mookieproof, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:39 (six years ago)

I’ll wait for him to be firmly in double digits in polling to call him the most electable. So far he is closer to Beto than he is to Biden.

Van Horn Street, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:40 (six years ago)

I kind of hate him tbh

Οὖτις, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:42 (six years ago)

The only reasons Buttigieg is more electable than Harris are racism and sexism.

brigadier pudding (DJP), Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:44 (six years ago)

I actually dont think being a young mayor of a small town is adequate preparation for being president

Οὖτις, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:44 (six years ago)

if bernie's major shortcoming is that he can't turn out the black vote, where in hell does that leave pete

mookieproof, Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:46 (six years ago)

Buttigieg moving into Morbs' Target Number 1 spot in the last week or two validates all of the above.

Pauline Male (Eric H.), Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:47 (six years ago)

It is a deep fundamental flaw with primary politics that the first two are in such ridiculously lily white states.

Evans on Hammond (evol j), Saturday, 2 November 2019 01:50 (six years ago)

3 years is a long time imho

Simon H., Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:01 (six years ago)

if bernie's major shortcoming is that he can't turn out the black vote, where in hell does that leave pete

Given supporter demos, I don't think this is a credible accusation against Bernie anymore (unless you're comparing him to Biden)

Simon H., Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:02 (six years ago)

I love Warren's ambition when it comes to policy, but at this point, I feel like the deciding factor for me is who I think is most likely to be able to beat Trump. Not that I have any special insight into that, but that's really what I think most about.

― o. nate, Friday, November 1, 2019 9

Reagan might iirc

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:08 (six years ago)

(i don't think that's a credible accusation against bernie either, just that's it's been going on for years)

mookieproof, Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:21 (six years ago)

liberal urban moneyed types, or people who fashion themselves as a combination of the above, like the guy

It feels like pure branding, and the people who see themselves as his base seem like socially/politically-striving types who feel identity is more important than policy

― mh, Friday, November 1, 2019 8:16 PM (fifty-nine minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

he’s a mckinsey type who took advice on which advisors to hire from facebook

having lived through many mckinsey and mckinsey-type corporate restructurings, none of which were saudi arabian (thankfully), don’t trust him

― mh, Friday, November 1, 2019 8:18 PM (fifty-seven minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

otm. the youngest candidate is basically running to be biden's grandson taking over the family business.

i'm not a government man; i'm a government, man. (m bison), Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:23 (six years ago)

Is he really a threat to the top 3 candidates?

Van Horn Street, Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:28 (six years ago)

Perhaps in a Kerry-in-November-2003 sort of way should Biden falter and Mindy Moderates need a white hero.

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:30 (six years ago)

he seems like a worst-case scenario in the general

i'm not a government man; i'm a government, man. (m bison), Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:32 (six years ago)

That's Biden.

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:33 (six years ago)

Look folks, here’s the deal. Ol’ Joe has failed everybsinhle time he’s run for president. Every. Single.Time. And if he is the Democratic nominee Trump will beat him like a drum. Like a DRUM!

Οὖτις, Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:50 (six years ago)

i think biden does much better with black voters than buttigieg

i'm not a government man; i'm a government, man. (m bison), Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:55 (six years ago)

The only reasons Buttigieg is more electable than Harris are racism and sexism.

There's a good case to be made that the only reasons Trump was more electable than Hillary were racism and sexism.

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:59 (six years ago)

watching buttigieg try to debate trump with smoothly delivered mckinsey wisdom sounds like living hell

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Saturday, 2 November 2019 02:59 (six years ago)

I would rather vote for Hunter Biden than Joe or Pete.

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Saturday, 2 November 2019 03:02 (six years ago)

What's Hunter Biden ever shown you?

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 2 November 2019 03:04 (six years ago)

People sure hate McKinsey here.

Van Horn Street, Saturday, 2 November 2019 03:07 (six years ago)

its bad

i'm not a government man; i'm a government, man. (m bison), Saturday, 2 November 2019 03:09 (six years ago)

last week, the buttigieg suggested its poor oerformance in south carolina was the result of black homophobia, a conclusion derived from a single 25-person focus group.

anyway, yeah, looking forward to the unity https://t.co/nZYjpHuf3M

— b-boy bouiebaisse (@jbouie) November 2, 2019

i'm not a government man; i'm a government, man. (m bison), Saturday, 2 November 2019 03:10 (six years ago)

given that he's shorter than trump, i'd like to think that buttigieg has been preparing lo these nearly 40 years to break out the jujitsu on the debate stage

what could possibly maga more than trial by combat

mookieproof, Saturday, 2 November 2019 03:10 (six years ago)

great idea! let's drive a wedge between gay men and blacks!

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 2 November 2019 03:11 (six years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.