US Politics, October 2019 — I guess statement you could say with thread. I made a thread. The thread was PERFECT.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2948 of them)

hahahaha shit

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 20:12 (six years ago)

While I certainly agree that "ride my seesaw" is silly, is this the thread for it?

and she could see an earmuff factory (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 20:12 (six years ago)

in other news, Senator Jeffy wants back into the Senate, by golly! He would probably win tbh.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/467971-jeff-sessions-calling-alabama-lawmakers-about-2020-senate-bid

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 20:30 (six years ago)

Neal Diamond 4 President

a bevy of supermodels, musicians and Lena Dunham (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 20:40 (six years ago)

senator burr is concerned that black people might make money

If college athletes are going to make money off their likenesses while in school, their scholarships should be treated like income. I’ll be introducing legislation that subjects scholarships given to athletes who choose to “cash in” to income taxes. https://t.co/H7jXC0dNls

— Richard Burr (@SenatorBurr) October 29, 2019

mookieproof, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 20:41 (six years ago)

who will stand up for the ncaa sports programs?!!?

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 20:49 (six years ago)

I am really mad that Shakey didn't end that post with "this, far and away"

brigadier pudding (DJP), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 21:26 (six years ago)

impeachment hearings can open with up to 90 minutes of questioning by staff counsel (45 per side)

This is actually also a good development. The five minutes back and forth BS has derailed too many other hearings. But while the Dems definitely have enough questions to go a full 45 minutes, the GOP flailing with nothing for 45 minutes a stretch won't be nearly as effective for them as throwing little fits every few minutes. Though I'm sure they'll do that, too.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 21:29 (six years ago)

house votes, a century later, to recognize the armenian genocide, 405 for, 11 republicans against, 3 present

ataturk is gonna be pissed

mookieproof, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 21:37 (six years ago)

Israel also gonna be pissed

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 21:38 (six years ago)

Turkey is going to be pissed. And that's the main point.

akm, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 21:47 (six years ago)

which is probably why they did it, since Erdogan and Trump are such buddies.

akm, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 21:47 (six years ago)

That's a big win for Schiff as well.

Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:10 (six years ago)

Of course Omar only voted present.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:14 (six years ago)

who voted against?

akm, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:29 (six years ago)

why would israel be pissed? The US Government recognizes the Holocaust.

akm, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:29 (six years ago)

house votes, a century later, to recognize the armenian genocide, 405 for, 11 republicans against, 3 present

― mookieproof, Tuesday, October 29, 2019 10:37 PM (fifty-eight minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

These numbers are huge tbf. Good on the house.

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:37 (six years ago)

"Of course Omar only voted present." why 'of course'? She should have voted yes, this was crappy of her.

akm, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:41 (six years ago)

There are lots of different viewpoints on genocide

Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:45 (six years ago)

Genocide: "the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation." That's just a definition.

akm, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:48 (six years ago)

xpost "Of course" as in I often get the sense she is vying for attention, leaning in to her "controversial" reputation, however tone deaf she sometimes comes across. In this case, her present vote can best be summed up as #allgenocidesmatter.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:50 (six years ago)

Omar's office has sent this statement to CNN explaining her present vote: pic.twitter.com/Gpj198jx0p

— Haley Byrd (@byrdinator) October 29, 2019

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:51 (six years ago)

meh. Yeah of course we should recognize all of them. But can start somewhere.

akm, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:52 (six years ago)

Here's a combination:

Two images for you. First shows nays/present on Armenian genocide vote, second shows nays on sanctioning Turkey over the Kurds. Omar and Mike Pence’s brother show up in both. pic.twitter.com/P9Jdj2A9B1

— Allahpundit (@allahpundit) October 29, 2019

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:53 (six years ago)

That's a terrible, and nagl, whataboutery reason to dodge the vote on this. She's a politician, she works in politics; votes like these are what politics are all about: gratuitous, opportunist etc. But you'd still want to vote on the just side of it, surely...

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:55 (six years ago)

everyone gets so precious about their genocide.

akm, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:00 (six years ago)

indeed

Yosef Shagal, an Azerbaijani Jew and now retired Israeli parliamentarian from Israel Our Home stated in an interview to Azerbaijan media (which officially denies the genocide): "I find it deeply offensive, and even blasphemous to compare the Holocaust of European Jewry during the Second World War with the mass extermination of the Armenian people during the First World War. Jews were killed because they were Jews, but Armenians provoked Turkey and should blame themselves."

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:02 (six years ago)

ugh...I am rooting for Omar but I've definitely heard some sideways talk from ppl in the activist comm. about her being not cool and not necessarily the person presented

Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:27 (six years ago)

guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIchPI1h2O_qO-B6bu05gGkl-f-6J8GONSV1cKpQvw_oYY1Ut3_PKdRRwltYEm1WOXaVaIW7lLfs9AjFwc5MPn2KPTwFitD3CotsEfjnrjZ6eujauzkPlMcFk-0KZeK1g6C2uF8M5GoGuvsh4ssbjeh4JYSUrs_A36H0V8kCB7-B

now let's play big lunch take little lunch (sic), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:29 (six years ago)

nope

and i approve this message (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:34 (six years ago)

I specifically object to "PKdRRwltYE"

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:40 (six years ago)

Democrats also plan to lay out due process rights for Mr. Trump and his lawyers once the process moves to the Judiciary panel. Those will also closely resemble the rules for the impeachment proceedings against Mr. Clinton, as well as Richard M. Nixon. They would allow lawyers for Mr. Trump to request additional testimony or evidence, attend all Judiciary Committee hearings, object to testimony given and cross-examine witnesses called by the committee.

The measure is designed to pave the way for more compelling and substantive hearings than the typical, often tedious sessions that are the norm in congressional committees, in which each lawmaker has a brief turn to question witnesses, and often uses the time to speechify or try to create a viral moment. Instead, under the proposed rules, the Intelligence Committee could convene public hearings in which the top Democrat and Republican — as well as staff aides — can question witnesses for extended, equal blocks of time, up to 45 minutes per side.

very thankful for this reduction in the excruciating pain that is going to be this process

please sir, i want some more

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:40 (six years ago)

I for one love sic's relentless, undying crusade against gclid and fbclid parameters.

On topic: Omar's "well, in my defense" statement isn't just bad, it's completely indefensible.

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:44 (six years ago)

yeah i mean isn't she in a way....using accountability and recognition of genocide as a cudgel in a political fight.

omar little, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:48 (six years ago)

I haven't read every post in the last hour, but that Omar "present" vote is....unexpected.

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:52 (six years ago)

yeah the 45-minutes-a-side questioning seems great, noth in terms of actual investigation and Josh's TV optics.


I specifically object to "PKdRRwltYE"

stands for "Philip K. Dick Rrolling" in his grave iirc

now let's play big lunch take little lunch (sic), Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:54 (six years ago)

it's lame and it's only going to lead to people launching Islamophobic shit against her since it looks like she doesn't want to upset a Muslim country. She's her own worst enemy half the time.

akm, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:55 (six years ago)

I haven't read every post in the last hour, but that Omar "present" vote is....unexpected.

― TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, October 30, 2019 12:52 AM (two minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

It's terrible, and her statement about it makes it even more terrible.... It's grim.

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 29 October 2019 23:56 (six years ago)

Omar was elected with 78% of the vote. Don't hold your breath waiting for her to get bounced out of office.

shared unit of analysis (unperson), Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:00 (six years ago)

Meanwhile, in "hilarious failure incoming" news, George Papadopoulos has filed to run for Katie Hill's seat.

shared unit of analysis (unperson), Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:02 (six years ago)

I Just wish Omar would stop saying dumb fucking shit. She’s hard to defend sometimes

akm, Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:36 (six years ago)

Looks like Omar is trying to defend herself, but even her supporters are (respectfully) not really buying it.

My issue was with the timing and context. I think we should demand accountability for human rights abuses consistently, not simply when it suits our political goals.

— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) October 29, 2019

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:38 (six years ago)

still seems mostly like bad political nous more than actual bad politics but I wouldn't be surprised if she takes a turn

gbx, Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:40 (six years ago)

Accountability for human rights abuses includes political goals. This isn't a binary.

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:48 (six years ago)

There's a fine line between thoughtful and over-thinking. Esp on the Left when being thoughtful (ie considerate, respectful) is a defining trait. Omar overthought this fer sure.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:53 (six years ago)

very well put, Alfred.

she carries a torch. two torches, actually (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Wednesday, 30 October 2019 01:05 (six years ago)

thank you

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 October 2019 01:24 (six years ago)

I suppose that Omar could as easily have voted 'yes' and issued the same statement regarding her position, but if she had voted 'yes' rather than 'present', would anyone have reported or read her statement? So from that perspective, her controversial 'present' vote was valuable in ways that yet another 'yes' would not have been.

However, some forms of courting attention through controversy are less strategically valuable than others. Her appearing to deliberately slight a group's recognition for the genocide it suffered could be considered as more hazardous than helpful to propagating her position. She took that chance. It may backfire on her.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 30 October 2019 02:38 (six years ago)

I still feel like a lot of the ire at Omar misses the point of having a big tent.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 30 October 2019 02:38 (six years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.