PMs change and lol we're all gonna die (but brexit will never end)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (11208 of them)

attention seeking right wing bigotry disguised as libertarianism is their usual mo.

calzino, Saturday, 12 October 2019 17:33 (six years ago)

they like to show their sponsors that they are good vfm and the bbc love them.

calzino, Saturday, 12 October 2019 17:35 (six years ago)

Claire Fox, Brendan O'Neill... if only more people vigorously scrutinised ideas like these great lads do!

calzino, Saturday, 12 October 2019 17:55 (six years ago)

They seem particularly delighted by Ella Whelan at the BBC.

coup de twat (suzy), Saturday, 12 October 2019 17:59 (six years ago)

Distill everything bad about the SWP and mix it with 'rivers of blood' types.

Bidh boladh a' mhairbh de 'n láimh fhalaimh (dowd), Saturday, 12 October 2019 18:03 (six years ago)

Reading up on the Spiked people and trying to make sense of their stances, are they accelerationists or just incoherent? Idgi

As far as I can tell, the Spiked/Quilette brand is about loudly proclaiming yrself left-wing while attacking every socially left-wing cause and just never commenting on anything relating to economics so people don't call yr bluff.

Daniel_Rf, Saturday, 12 October 2019 18:17 (six years ago)

has corbyn ever expressed support (or "adulation", as I've just seen claimed) for assad, putin or xi?

be goose, do crimes (||||||||), Saturday, 12 October 2019 18:58 (six years ago)

My favourite spiked appearances are when some second generation cunt like big head Brendan or Ella Whelab gets put on by someone more representative.

The classic:

We are all @andrewismaxwell pic.twitter.com/cdppxhsR18

— Naomi O'Leary (@NaomiOhReally) November 4, 2018



Longer version

“I don’t like this idea that the Irish are super fans of the EU… every time the Irish have been asked to vote on the expansion of the EU, they said: No thanks.” Brendan O’Neill of @spikedonline who hails from Irish ‘peasant stock’#Brexit #politicslive https://t.co/32y2XeRbQ7 pic.twitter.com/fSJ5rNP5JB

— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) November 2, 2018



And more recently:

We are all Peter Geoghegan. pic.twitter.com/2hchL5KioO

— Robert Of The Isles (@RobDunsmore) October 3, 2019



This’d be the same Good Friday Agreement accepted by 96% of Irish voters, ofc. The BBC are irresponsible cunts on this and many other matters.

gyac, Saturday, 12 October 2019 19:11 (six years ago)

hah! that "Irish peasant stock" one was a classic of its genre

calzino, Saturday, 12 October 2019 19:13 (six years ago)

Also, this is extremely good
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGraTgxXkAAmGGO?format=jpg&name=large

gyac, Saturday, 12 October 2019 19:19 (six years ago)

lol suck it squaddies, literally lower than cat shit

NEWS Giant penis frog didn’t have a giant penis after all (bizarro gazzara), Saturday, 12 October 2019 19:21 (six years ago)

That is extremely good!

Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 12 October 2019 19:24 (six years ago)

Sincerely hope this is true because there’s a decent chance mad Tories will vote down the queen’s speech because of it

gyac, Saturday, 12 October 2019 19:25 (six years ago)

Look it's a basic human rights issue, if you make it to 60 then your war crimes don't count any more

Xia Nu del Vague (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 12 October 2019 19:46 (six years ago)

They seem particularly delighted by Ella Whelan at the BBC.

I just turned on Sky News and guess who is reviewing the papers?

Michael Oliver of Penge Wins £5 (Tom D.), Sunday, 13 October 2019 00:44 (six years ago)

Poor Ella having to tiptoe round a smear story about Corbyn and the IRA because, of course, Claire Fox and her Revolutionary Communist Party chums actually were gungho bullet-not-ballot Provo cheerleaders.

Michael Oliver of Penge Wins £5 (Tom D.), Sunday, 13 October 2019 00:58 (six years ago)

This is simply voter suppression https://t.co/boJgCEIq5N https://t.co/2TU8lGmk6F

— Dawn Foster (@DawnHFoster) October 13, 2019

great, lets copy America and disenfranchise all the poor voters. I've only read the paywalled headline so it might not mean anything. but ftr I don't possess a driving license, nor a passport. Fuck off and die you moribund, dying party.

calzino, Sunday, 13 October 2019 01:34 (six years ago)

Voters across the country will have to show identification such as driving licences or passports before casting their ballot, under plans to be unveiled in the Queen's Speech.

Ministers are planning to introduce a legal requirement for voters to produce photographic ID, in order to safeguard against electoral fraud.

A new Electoral Integrity Bill will also limit the number of relatives for whom anyone can act as a proxy, and outlaw the "harvesting" of postal ballots by political parties and activists.

The proposed roll-out of a requirement for photo ID is likely to be opposed by Labour, which claimed that a series of pilot schemes resulted in some people being unable to vote and were a "blatant attempt" to "rig" elections.

However the Government will insist changes are needed to safeguard against fraud and corruption. The proposals draw on the recommendations of a major report by Sir Eric Pickles, the former Conservative Cabinet minister, in 2016, which said there was evidence of voter fraud “especially in communities of Pakistani and Bangladeshi background”. Sir Eric warned of concerns that cases had been ignored because of “over-sensitivities about ethnicity and religion”.

The number of swing voters has hit record levels at recent elections

The report said there was a risk of "significant abuse" of the electoral system if people were able to impersonate others at polling stations with little risk of detection. It also referred to "instances of campaigners asking people to hand over their postal votes" in areas such as Tower Hamlets, in East London.

The Electoral Integrity Bill is expected to roll out a national requirement for voters to produce photographic identification in order to cast their ballot, rather than simply stating their address. Similar measures have been in place in Northern Ireland since 2002.

It will also make it illegal to cast a proxy ballot on behalf of more than two voters, or for political parties to "harvest" postal ballot papers to deliver them to polling stations.

Brexit | The best comment and analysis

A Government source said: “A secure electoral system is vital. By changing the law to require voters to show some ID, as they do in many other daily activities, and taking steps to cut down proxy and postal voter fraud, we can ensure that everyone's vote counts and strengthen public trust in our democracy.”

Sources said voters without the required documentation would be able to apply for a free “electoral ID” from their local council.

plax (ico), Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:13 (six years ago)

When you can’t win the vote, suppress it. Feel like this Queen’s speech has a decent chance of being voted down though.

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:16 (six years ago)

Wait, you can vote without an ID in Britain? How does that work?

Asking for ID at the polling station is hardly a US-only practice btw:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_Identification_laws

pomenitul, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:19 (six years ago)

No shit but in most other countries having some sort of National ID is compulsory.

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:20 (six years ago)

I always take my passport with me& polling card even though you don’t need either, but that’s cos I started voting in Ireland. There will be loads of people in the UK without a passport or form of ID acceptable.

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:22 (six years ago)

turn up - say I'm ||||||||. they ask you your address, then score it out on the list. done

be goose, do crimes (||||||||), Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:22 (six years ago)

afaik in-person voter fraud is not really an issue, despite the lax approach to voter ID

be goose, do crimes (||||||||), Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:23 (six years ago)

Weird.

pomenitul, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:24 (six years ago)

Yeah exactly - this is 100% dog whistling to the crowd who think Labour are constantly doing electoral fraud.

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:24 (six years ago)

This is some evil shit

As gyac says, there is no compulsory national ID in the UK

I mean, it would still be evil even if there were obv

Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:27 (six years ago)

There is no compulsory national ID in Canada either.

pomenitul, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:28 (six years ago)

There are no "daily activities" where I ever need photo ID which is handy cos. I've only got a passport. Pretty sure there are millions who don't even have that

Xia Nu del Vague (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:28 (six years ago)

this has to be voted down, if they rush this through Parliament before a snap election the job is completely fucked, potentially hundreds of thousands of voters won't have photo ID. This is the type of (unnecessary) reform that would take years of planning to prepare people for an election, unless your plan is to stop them voting. Electoral fraud is a micro-problem in the 0.0 recurring %s.

calzino, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:29 (six years ago)

I've never had a fucking passport or driving license in my life

calzino, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:30 (six years ago)

A lot of times when people say 'this is an assault on democracy!' there's some kind of reach going on, or a kind of metaphor required, but this is quite literally an assault on democracy

Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:30 (six years ago)

There is no compulsory national ID in Canada either.


There is in a lot of continental Europe, which is a more relevant example than Canada.

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:31 (six years ago)

Commonwealth though.

pomenitul, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:31 (six years ago)

Anyway, in Quebec at least you can vote with your health card, but there appears to be no such thing here.

pomenitul, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:32 (six years ago)

100% racist bullshit from Eric Pickles.

nashwan, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:33 (six years ago)

Relevant tweet from Lammy

There was just one conviction for voter impersonation at the last election. 3.5 million citizens do not have a photo ID. Make no mistake. This is a blatant attempt to rig the system and disempower poor and marginalised groups. https://t.co/bHexuHoo3R

— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) October 13, 2019

Dan Worsley, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:33 (six years ago)

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/five-things-we-have-learnt-about-englands-voter-id-trials-in-the-2019-local-elections/

Piece on the voter ID pilots

Awareness of ID requirements also differs across demographic groups: those aged 18–34 were less likely to have heard about the pilots than those aged 55+; similarly, those from a BAME background were less likely than white respondents to be aware of the ID requirements.

Or Labour voters, you might say.

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:35 (six years ago)

@AdamBienkov
2h
Priti Patel smirking as Andrew Marr reads out warnings from manufacturers about the potential dire economic impact of a no-deal Brexit on their business.

Marr: “I’m not sure why you’re laughing.”

She really does have just the one setting.

nashwan, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:51 (six years ago)

As usual, there's a sense in which only the privileged have access to political discourse and/or action. Modern democracy is sadly intent on staying true to its Athenian roots, back when only 30% of the population (adult male citizens) could vote.

xp

pomenitul, Sunday, 13 October 2019 10:54 (six years ago)

Just asked a relative who actually works in polling stations at every election, and was told this is utter bollocks and no-one but no-one impersonates other people at the polling booths. Which we all knew anyway.

living in the heart of the beat (Matt #2), Sunday, 13 October 2019 11:07 (six years ago)

previous Queen's speeches to get voted down were in 1886, 1892 and 1923. i presume this voter ID thing is probably some 4d draughts move or something but I hope to fuck it gets voted down.

calzino, Sunday, 13 October 2019 11:48 (six years ago)

Even if the Queens speech gets passed, I’m not sure any of the individual bills will.

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 11:58 (six years ago)

so there will be separate votes on the bills? I thought it was all somehow weaved into the Queen's Speech - worst bullshit costume drama ever!

calzino, Sunday, 13 October 2019 12:03 (six years ago)

The queen’s speech is laying out their programme for government - we will introduce legislation on the following bills in this session, etc. The Queen’s speech being voted down used to be an automatic confidence vote because it failing means the house doesn’t support the programme for government being set out and none of the laws can pass (implicit).

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 12:08 (six years ago)

i think now QS being voted down leads immediately to a confidence vote? (probably i shd check this)

mark s, Sunday, 13 October 2019 12:09 (six years ago)

Dennis Skinner always heckles the speech as well

https://youtu.be/zIktNjgbf4s

https://youtu.be/4VK96xXFf3o

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 12:09 (six years ago)

i think now QS being voted down leads immediately to a confidence vote? (probably i shd check this)


Not under FTPA, previously the convention was that the PM would be expected to resign if their Queens speech was voted down.

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 12:13 (six years ago)

Roads tomorrow going to be hideous between this & XR, ugh

gyac, Sunday, 13 October 2019 12:13 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.