Impeach Trump Y/N

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1786 of them)

you can't divert my momentary curiosity

mh, Friday, 4 October 2019 14:37 (six years ago)

the manhattan ratio depends on whether you count tourists as rats

mh, Friday, 4 October 2019 14:38 (six years ago)

wildebeests

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 October 2019 14:38 (six years ago)

I agree with you that things are certainly getting worse. I do believe, honestly, that we are seeing the collapse of liberal democracy, and speaking as someone who grew up believing in liberal democracy, believing that it was the least worst political system, that's scary.

But it's also liberating, there's also a lot of hope there, and that's part of the reason I don't pay attention to the polls because according to the polls basically nothing has changed. Ask me in 2016 how I felt about Trump and the response would be "strongly negative". Ask me now and the response would be "strongly negative".

I already had my doubts about liberalism, but after coming out as trans I can't any longer see a political ideology that's willing to compromise on the apparently complicated and challenging question of whether or not I deserve human rights as an ideology I need to defend at all costs.

The fear of civil war, at its root for me, is the fear that, oh my God, what if we don't all basically want the same things at heart? What if we can't compromise for the common good? What if the people on the other side actually hate me and want me dead?

Which I think is what I feel like I can relate to with the paranoid right. It's not a triumphalist ideology. It's built on twisted excuses for why it's necessary for them to violently oppress their opponents. Most of what they say seems to amount to "We have to kill them, because if we don't THEY'RE GOING TO KILL US FIRST."

The first episode of the podcast, I don't want to nitpick everything it gets wrong - there's a lot - but one of the things it gets wrong is the first American Civil War. The notion that it was some explosive conflict that magically erupted at Fort Sumter is ludicrous. The conflict was a slow build from the time Andrew Jackson got elected, from the time defenders of slavery started to posit it as a positive good. Over the twenty years before the civil war the nation truly split over slavery. Every facet of American life diverged over the issue - churches, businesses, political parties, were all torn apart, and not just on geographic lines. Decades of violent outbursts, praised as "justice" by the people on their side and denounced by the other side.

The point here is not to evoke how much those times are like ours, but to see what it actually took for what we call the "Civil War" to start. It took no less than a professional military insurrection before opponents of slavery were willing to take up arms. The Commander in Chief can call for armed insurrection to the fullest extent that Twitter will countenance (by the way, I would like to make one of my periodic requests that anybody who uses Twitter consider not doing so), but he's yet to inspire anyone more organized than the partisans of Bleeding Kansas were. It is not valid to assume that anybody who "supports the President" is on board with his calls for violence, or even if they are, if they will do anything more than follow the example of their virile leader and tweet about it (at which point, presumably, Twitter will suspend them because they're not the commander-in-chief of anybody).

All this shit is scary, sure, but I am very optimistic about the other alternatives. The choices are not liberal democracy or violent armed conflict. The choice I have asked myself over the past few years is, well, to what extent do I go along with this? And if I decide that I am not going to go along with this, then what?

I'm not suited to "defend my freedom" by force of arms, so that's out. What's changed for me is that I realize how much I've bent over backwards, how much of myself I've compromised or denied, in the service of the ideals of liberal democracy, and how much I've hurt myself by doing so. Am I going to respond in kind to people who request that I kill myself? No, but I'm also not going to view their opinions as valid, or them as worthy of consideration or discourse with. I believe in "going along to get along", I think it's a good principle, and here we have some 40% of the country who I absolutely fundamentally cannot get along with politically (I can get along with some of them fairly well personally, even though I will never be able to trust them or consider them friends.)

So I, and other people, we're trying to work around the problem. The Republicans can't govern, can't lead, can't _rule_. But shit's still got to be done. People still have problems, and we all still need to be valued and cared for and heard. I sure as hell need that, and the people around me are doing that for me, like I'm trying to do that for them. Now that I'm out, I necessarily live in fear, but it's a different sort. Instead of spending my days worrying about what could happen to me, I ask myself what I can do, what I need to do, and I let the fear push me forward instead of holding me back.

Calpico Girlfriend (rushomancy), Friday, 4 October 2019 14:48 (six years ago)

Magnificent response - thank you!

☮ (peace, man), Friday, 4 October 2019 14:54 (six years ago)

Now that I'm out, I necessarily live in fear, but it's a different sort. Instead of spending my days worrying about what could happen to me, I ask myself what I can do, what I need to do, and I let the fear push me forward instead of holding me back.

Now that is one hugely inspiring post! Thank you for being able to live that thought, let alone elucidate it so clearly to the rest of us.

A is for (Aimless), Friday, 4 October 2019 15:50 (six years ago)

jfc, just listen to him here:

Trump goes on rant about the UK, Australia and Italy plotting against him during the 2016 campaign. pic.twitter.com/8pDZxd6IKT

— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) October 4, 2019

his new theory is that "the UK", australia, and italy were all possibly plotting against him in the 2016 election.

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:06 (six years ago)

*over the roar of helicopter noise*

"I was investigated. I was investigated. ME. ME."

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:08 (six years ago)

"2016. I ran. I won. You probably won't say that."
Should be on his tombstone

Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:13 (six years ago)

hooked on a feeling

nashwan, Friday, 4 October 2019 16:15 (six years ago)

when will the very unfair and corrupt media report that donald j trump won the presidency in 2016

Is it true the star Beetle Juice is going to explode in 2012 (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:16 (six years ago)

"This morning, President Donald Trump claimed that the United Kingdom, Australia, and Italy possibly conspired with President Obama to sabotage Trump's chances of winning the 2016 election. Donald Trump ran in 2016, and won."

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:20 (six years ago)

this has been your "The world in 2019 is completely fucked, how is any of this real?" News Flash update

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:21 (six years ago)

fucking lunatic

The Ravishing of ROFL Stein (Hadrian VIII), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:30 (six years ago)

He's just maintaining the storied tradition of winners throughout history who have celebrated victory by accusing literally everyone of trying to compromise what they achieved. This is definitely the normal behavior of a normal human being.

Furter-Bursting Tater Squirter (Old Lunch), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:35 (six years ago)

He's the very rare sore winner.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 October 2019 16:41 (six years ago)

its pretty clear that the whole "losing the popular vote" thing still eats at him on a daily basis

frogbs, Friday, 4 October 2019 16:42 (six years ago)

"I hope that the press recognize that they have a right and a responsibility, if they're against a President, to give him the shaft, but also recognize if they give him the shaft, put one lonely reporter on the campaign who will report now and then that the President won the 2016 election."

Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:44 (six years ago)

mitt romney, paragon of courage:

By all appearances, the President’s brazen and unprecedented appeal to China and to Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden is wrong and appalling.

— Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) October 4, 2019

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:46 (six years ago)

gotta make fun of mitt at any chance, but sadly he's one of the most outspoken critics of trump in the republican senate these days

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:47 (six years ago)

Okay, my new suggestion for the press is to constantly ask him questions about what he wishes he'd done differently after losing the 2016 election, what he might've done if he'd been elected president in 2016 instead of losing so hard, etc.

Furter-Bursting Tater Squirter (Old Lunch), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:47 (six years ago)

By all appearances

treeship., Friday, 4 October 2019 16:48 (six years ago)

I mean fuckit, he's gonna call you a bunch of liars either way, might as well lean into it and see if you can get live footage of the blood vessel bursting his brain.

Furter-Bursting Tater Squirter (Old Lunch), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:49 (six years ago)

"president trump, how does it feel to have won the popular vote in 2016 by almost 3 million votes but to have lost the electoral college, 304 - 227?"

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:51 (six years ago)

When someone with power continually barks unreality, it's usually assumed he is a Grifter (as I call DJT) or "just a bullshitter" (as Obama was reported to call him). Is the general assessment now that this guy believes all or most of his bullshit? Because that makes him deranged rather than a con man.

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:52 (six years ago)

the whiniest alternative universe: imagine trump losing in 2016 in the same way that hilary clinton did, and how much whining would have come from trump for eternity

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:52 (six years ago)

xp i choose to believe in the deranged con man combo

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:53 (six years ago)

Yes, Morbs, he's legitimately deranged. He's a 'Nigerian prince' email-forwarding uncle getting super high on his own supply.

Furter-Bursting Tater Squirter (Old Lunch), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:54 (six years ago)

He thinks he can will whatever reality he wants into being just by insisting that it’s true, which helps make him a successful con man. Just a different way to approach reality than most people. Not better or worse.

treeship., Friday, 4 October 2019 16:54 (six years ago)

Re-forwarding the same chain emails to himself and becoming more convinced of their veracity every time he receives a new iteration. Lots of people are saying it! Lots of people with my name!

Furter-Bursting Tater Squirter (Old Lunch), Friday, 4 October 2019 16:55 (six years ago)

i think more than anything he's just sort of dumb and/or doesn't understand that nuance can be consequential

like, i have no doubt that all kinds of political ratfucking has happened over the years with the assistance of foreign governments, seems par for the course. but no one has been dumb enough to a) get caught b) brag about it and c) actually tie that assistance to fairly weighty matters of foreign policy.

trump sees all this as politics as usual---and it sorta is?---and simply cannot grasp how the "subtleties" of his particular case make it blatantly actionable

gbx, Friday, 4 October 2019 17:07 (six years ago)

And his defenders are just pure cynicism? is there anything he could say or do that would make his supporters turn on him? incl. those in office?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 October 2019 17:09 (six years ago)

HE was the subject of an investigation so why can't THE OTHER GUY be subject to an investigation?? and since he only thinks in deals and leverage, he explicitly asks for shit that you'd have expected a savvier person to broker through back channels

xp his actual office-holding defenders are pure cynics, imo

gbx, Friday, 4 October 2019 17:12 (six years ago)

so that's the end right? things will never get better?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 October 2019 17:14 (six years ago)

Pretty sad how much mileage he's managed to get out of the "I know you are but what am I" defense. When he pathetically used it on Hilary when he was accused of sexual abuse (pfft I don't do that stuff but your HUSBAND sure does!), I seriously thought ok the public will be repulsed by this and that'll be the end of Ol Donnie...

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Friday, 4 October 2019 17:17 (six years ago)

"Reality" is a malleable, constantly shifting concept for people like this. If it's momentarily convenient for him to believe that something's real he'll probably think it, then shift to something else when the next crisis comes along (and life's a constant series of crises in the world of the narcissist).

xpost

Stockhausen Serves Empirical Jism (Matt #2), Friday, 4 October 2019 17:17 (six years ago)

These people seem cool with Trump University and his habit of not paying contractors who worked for him. And they still think he is the guy who looks out for “ordinary Americans.” The situation is just weird. Hard to know what would make them change their minds.

treeship., Friday, 4 October 2019 17:18 (six years ago)

His supporters will always back him as they can never, ever admit to being wrong

Stockhausen Serves Empirical Jism (Matt #2), Friday, 4 October 2019 17:18 (six years ago)

They’re like 120 million people or something

treeship., Friday, 4 October 2019 17:21 (six years ago)

The most corrupt man in US is actually a fighter OF corruption! He can't stand corruption! If he so much as hears rumors of corruption, he springs into action, gets all his heads of state buddies to help him stamp out this evilness!

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Friday, 4 October 2019 17:21 (six years ago)

They’re like 120 million people or something

not quite that: about 63 million people voted for him in 2016. so don't worry, just 63 million completely deranged dumbasses to worry about

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 17:24 (six years ago)

at least a couple of those had to just be going on autopilot

j., Friday, 4 October 2019 17:36 (six years ago)

*fart*

When the only American citizen President Trump singles out for China’s investigation is his political opponent in the midst of the Democratic nomination process, it strains credulity to suggest that it is anything other than politically motivated.

— Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) October 4, 2019

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 October 2019 18:03 (six years ago)

One might almost begin to suspect that there could, if observed at just the right angle, the merest hint of possible impropriety originating from somewhere within the sphere of the president's influence. Allegedly, mind you. It's very concerning.

Furter-Bursting Tater Squirter (Old Lunch), Friday, 4 October 2019 18:08 (six years ago)

https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/5a86dc9ed030721c008b4837-750-375.jpg

such worried
very concern
wow

brigadier pudding (DJP), Friday, 4 October 2019 18:09 (six years ago)

breaking: credulity has been strained

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 18:11 (six years ago)

it is a mild strain, and credulity is expected to be back to normal in 1-2 weeks

It is my great honor to post on this messageboard! (Karl Malone), Friday, 4 October 2019 18:11 (six years ago)

I always forget, are you supposed to apply heat or ice to a credulity strain

brigadier pudding (DJP), Friday, 4 October 2019 18:13 (six years ago)

press hot spoon against the stye iirc

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 4 October 2019 18:14 (six years ago)

Club soda, or corn starch. Wait, that's a stain, not a strain.

Instant Carmax (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 4 October 2019 18:18 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.