I don't think no 2 is at all true.
Someone comment on no 1?
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:22 (six years ago)
Yeah, I don't think Labour can refuse an election for point 2 because that *would* be just saying they're scared.
I think they can for point 1 because it's negligent to allow Johnson his No Deal when they can prevent it.
― stet, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:23 (six years ago)
who is this please
In no way is it in @UKLabour’s - or the UK’s - interest to vote for a #GE. BJ will use it as cover for a Brexit that’ll kill off the last of our industry & provide all the excuses the hard right need to introduce the low tax, low wage, unregulated economy they’ve always wanted.— Owen Smith (@OwenSmith_MP) September 2, 2019
― самокритика me, daddy (||||||||), Monday, 2 September 2019 14:25 (six years ago)
the other hydra
― mark s, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:25 (six years ago)
But a pre Brexit election is saying:Put exit day preparations on holdIf Corbyn gets in, he has two weeks or less to negotiate with EU?If Boris gets in, welp, we’re out of time lol???We’re all going to dieAlthough I expect Corbyn getting in would be on the back of a platform to extend and 2nd ref
― gyac, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:26 (six years ago)
It would be stupid to have an election after no deal because you might have a lot of chaos under that situation xps to stet
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:26 (six years ago)
But if labour can plausibly refuse an election, Boris can sit on his hand til the 31st, knowing that the default is crashing out and assuming he thinks the EU will blink and try to avoid a no deal. Meanwhile you’ll have people panic buying and stress about perishables and medication, and who’ll thank Labour for avoiding a GE then?
― gyac, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:28 (six years ago)
I agree (with yez, not Blair) on point 2 - my desire for Corbyn to win a pre-deadline election can be seen from space.
― Andrew Farrell, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:30 (six years ago)
That's the thing -- you can't have an election without a proper extension: by the time the new parliament is all sworn in and has held its Queen's Speech there would barely even be time for a new government to legislate May's withdrawal agreement before the 31st, I'm not even sure there is enough.
And yes it would be stupid to have an election immediately post No Deal unless you actually believe it will be OK, which I think only Rees-Mogg thinks now. And the Tories know that. That's why Boris can't just sit on his hands and wait for No Deal: we know the EU won't blink, and then he'll be really fucked trying to fit in an election amid actual chaos.
So they want the only election they have a decent hope of winning: one before the 31st, where No Deal is still an option. Labour shouldn't give it to them: it should demand either a healthy extension or ruling out No Deal (or both) before agreeing to it.
― stet, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:33 (six years ago)
xp If Corbyn gets in, he immediately applies for an extension, surely?
The real danger is the high likelihood that no-one will 'get in' to a clear majority - you would hope under the circumstances that some sort of coalition would for to at least ask for an extension, but, well..
― Andrew Farrell, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:34 (six years ago)
Also I apologise for the inadvertent image of BoJo giving himself the stranger’s handshake
― gyac, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:37 (six years ago)
But I don't see the Tories winning a pre-crash out election outright majority if they put No deal on their manifesto. The Brexit Party would go away on the one hand, but they would lose Tory moderates and Scotland xp to Stet
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:39 (six years ago)
gonna take the heat off farrell by suggesting that a) labour do take the election but b) organise a non-aggression pact with the lib dems, snp etc whereby they won't fight one another's existing seats or con marginals
have at me alphie, i just saved the country
― imago, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:39 (six years ago)
I think it would be dangerous to overstate either of how much the Tories know No Deal will be a disaster or how much Boris knows the EU won't blink.
― Andrew Farrell, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:39 (six years ago)
Save yourself first imago.
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:40 (six years ago)
would you really argue with a strategy whose focused aim is the destruction of the tories
― imago, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:42 (six years ago)
Another misgiving doing the rounds is that MPs having voted for GE before the 31st, Johnson has the power to switch the date to after that date.
― coup de twat (suzy), Monday, 2 September 2019 14:42 (six years ago)
I don't get how anyone would think the EU would blink. It's so weird. Macron almost got the EU to throw out UK in March. Tories are so weird.
― Frederik B, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:49 (six years ago)
imago you are too free and pure for us. Shine on you crazy diamond etc.
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:49 (six years ago)
I don't really see the Tories winning either, but what are they supposed to do? They need a majority -- they can't do any kind of governing with a majority of 1. They must have an election. Which one do they choose?
1. One before Oct 31st, with exit day unchanged/where they can still talk tough about No Deal, and with the Brexit Party stood down.
2. One before Oct 31st, with exit day changed/where they rule out No Deal and have the Brexit Party standing against them.
3. One after Oct 31st, post-No Deal, with people eating dogs and cats.
If they choose 1, they lose Scotland and LD seats. If they choose 2, they lose all the headbangers in all the seats. If they choose 3 they lose with fireworks. I think they're banking on 1 as their best hope. Labour should deny them that.
xp Suzy: he theoretically does have that ability, but it'd be crazy to do.
― stet, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:53 (six years ago)
Thanks Stet I do get what you are saying. For 2) it Would need good communication to make sure it doesn't look like we are running off.
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:58 (six years ago)
meanwhile in the actual cabinet:
Analysis of leak of blueprint for the 5pm meeting, key points are:1. Johnson gvt thinks that Pt must be deprived of ability to do extension/2ref/revocation2. Only then will they talk. And they believe Commisison willing to look at backstop alternatives3. Draft legal text ready https://t.co/Y66ExGHdNe— Sam Coates Sky (@SamCoatesSky) September 2, 2019
― mark s, Monday, 2 September 2019 14:58 (six years ago)
wtf does 1 even mean? "Johnson thinks executive should have unlimted powerz"?
― stet, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:00 (six years ago)
maybe he's going to seize the mace
― mark s, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:02 (six years ago)
Yeah those Scottish seats are gone and you wouldn’t bet against them beating the LDs in every marginal they go head to head. So they need more Labour seats to get to a majority, but are there that many in the country to make up for the losses?
― gyac, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:07 (six years ago)
What's it like in East Anglia and Mids? I would rather have The Brexit Party squeezing the Tories up there.
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:09 (six years ago)
Not with the Lexit vote going south there aren't enough Labour marginals going Tory. (Wasn't there a poll showing a sizable not-totally-racist chunk of that bote was about Sovereignty and other things that recent Tory antics don't go down well with?)
That whole Cabinet thread, fuck. I think this is the unintentionally revealing one:
As just told @KayBurley on @SkyNews we understand the cabinet to be told at 5pm that: - the concern is the EU "are not under any real pressure to engage on solutions until they know the process is not going to be taken over by Parliament."- until then EU say Brits not serious— Sam Coates Sky (@SamCoatesSky) September 2, 2019
It's almost like it's starting to dawn, three years in, that they don't hold all the cards and the EU doesn't have to negotiate with them. But rather than admit their era-defining error, they say "well we would hold all the cards if we were allowed to threaten suicide."
― stet, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:10 (six years ago)
can't wait to see ruthie annihilated at next election
― самокритика me, daddy (||||||||), Monday, 2 September 2019 15:12 (six years ago)
oh she's actually stood down - I thought she'd hold until after next GE. oh well... jackson it is
― самокритика me, daddy (||||||||), Monday, 2 September 2019 15:15 (six years ago)
not been following any of this shit closely recently... evidently
― самокритика me, daddy (||||||||), Monday, 2 September 2019 15:16 (six years ago)
I thought the whole point of being regional party leader without actually holding a seat is that you get to avoid that consequence.
― nashwan, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:17 (six years ago)
yeah almost certainly losing most of those 13 seats in Scotland means toryscum might want a 20 pt lead if they are entertaining ideas of a working majority.
― calzino, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:19 (six years ago)
NEWCabinet ministers to be told draft legal text on Northern Ireland plan has been drawn up and ready to be introduced BUT😱A source says draft legal text is just the existing protocol with the relevant articles on the backstop crossed out - not exactly a worked up plan😱— Sam Coates Sky (@SamCoatesSky) September 2, 2019
― mark s, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:20 (six years ago)
and SUCKS TO BE YOU written at the top in brown crayon
― mark s, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:21 (six years ago)
Draft legal text is just the Ts & Cs copied from just-eat.com
― nashwan, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:22 (six years ago)
Are they going to be eating dogs and cats on day one of post no-deal? If not, it could be a very good time for Boris to call a GE
― anvil, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:22 (six years ago)
actual lols at that tweet from mark s. This is some sub-Baldrick shit now.
― stet, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:24 (six years ago)
So that's why he bought a dog.
― nashwan, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:24 (six years ago)
and yeah, I think the days following No Deal get election-rout bad fast -- look at what a bit of snow does to the country.
― stet, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:25 (six years ago)
"Well no one said it would be easy, bound to be a couple of teething problems, but the main thing is we did it!" "Macron, Zidane, your boys took one hell of a beating", Farage isn't standing hmm
― anvil, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:29 (six years ago)
still unclear what extent the tories are just trolling as the clock ticks down or whether its all stupidity
a lack of exposure to consequences is a hell of a drug
― theRZA the JZA and the NDB (darraghmac), Monday, 2 September 2019 15:32 (six years ago)
Sorry to link to Spectator but Ivan Rogers mainly otm https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/09/ivan-rogers-the-realities-of-a-no-deal-brexit/
― stet, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:34 (six years ago)
"Please do not waste this time."
NEW: I’ve been sent the transcript of Monday’s closed-door briefing from the UK prime minister’s official spokesperson. With the government in a deep crisis, guess what the country’s top political journalists focused on?This is not a parody.https://t.co/QaIdsOQlcD pic.twitter.com/C7gxlHtnzz— Mark Di Stefano 🤙🏻 (@MarkDiStef) September 2, 2019
― nashwan, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:35 (six years ago)
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/8ba0a6aed0c5608688adca0f9f22d235477b6c0a/0_133_3500_2100/master/3500.jpghttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnxVHFeUkAAKVIx.jpg
― mfktz (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Monday, 2 September 2019 15:38 (six years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/oCQopgG.jpg
― mfktz (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Monday, 2 September 2019 15:39 (six years ago)
boris’ pupper stratagem is paying off nicely
― don’t bore us, get to the aeon of horus (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 2 September 2019 15:41 (six years ago)
So that's why he bought a dog.― nashwan, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:24 (eighteen minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
― nashwan, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:24 (eighteen minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
irl lol
― britain's secret sauce (seandalai), Monday, 2 September 2019 15:43 (six years ago)
A source says draft legal text is just the existing protocol with the relevant articles on the backstop crossed out
1. lol2. NI has been without its Assembly for 2.5 years and every month for the last 6 months there has been at least one bomb discovered or exploded there; perhaps our govt would like to take NI a little bit more seriously? just a thought3. oh no, never mind that, there's a cute puppy, never mind people's actual lives. lol Boris, legernd, check out the puppy!
*clenches fists and grimaces at work desk, hopes nobody notices*
― a passing spacecadet, Monday, 2 September 2019 15:58 (six years ago)
If anything its prorogation and fevered election talk that's distracting from Johnson's feel-good pupper gambit
― Aston "Family Court" Barrett (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 2 September 2019 16:08 (six years ago)
― stet, Monday, September 2, 2019 5:34 PM (thirteen minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
Good piece. Rogers rightfully laments the 'political elite' still not being serious about this, ie. being completely clueless. And it is otm. It just feels so 'Groundhog Day' doesn't it? I'm willing to bet the same piece could more or less be written three years from now.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 2 September 2019 16:08 (six years ago)