yeah good point. given that would mean doing that in every constituency where the Brexit Party had a chance. how many other Labour/Brexit Party contested constituencies like Peterborough are there?
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 27 August 2019 16:58 (six years ago)
Peterborough, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Keighley, Crewe and Nantwich, Canterbury and Glasgow North East (according to the express)
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 27 August 2019 16:59 (six years ago)
how would that work in practice?
Lord Farage. Richard Tice, UK Ambassador to the United States of America... und so weiter.
― Boulez, vous couchez avec moi? (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 August 2019 17:16 (six years ago)
ein reich for *you*, and ein reich for *you* and let me see yes there's ein reich for *you at the back* ok who else
― theRZA the JZA and the NDB (darraghmac), Tuesday, 27 August 2019 17:17 (six years ago)
jfc
The Archbishop of Canterbury has said he could consider chairing a proposed citizens' forum on Brexit.He was asked to take on the role by a group of senior MPs who said a forum would "consider how to heal the divisions in our country since the Brexit referendum".He also said that he wanted the "will of the people to happen" but that his "personal inner likes or dislikes" were "irrelevant".
He was asked to take on the role by a group of senior MPs who said a forum would "consider how to heal the divisions in our country since the Brexit referendum".
He also said that he wanted the "will of the people to happen" but that his "personal inner likes or dislikes" were "irrelevant".
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49486371
The very idea that Brexit can be fixed by more fucking "have your say"! Why is this cunt in charge of anything?
― mfktz (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Tuesday, 27 August 2019 17:56 (six years ago)
to be fair he was invited to do this (by idiots)
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/08/even-god-cant-save-mps-having-make-decision-brexit
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 27 August 2019 17:58 (six years ago)
and also he very much didn’t say he would consider it. he said he would consider it *if* [insert impossible demands here]. ie polite way of saying “this is bullshit and we all know it”. the deliberate credulity and neutering of thought by reporters for advancement of the narrative is almost too embarrassing to watch these days.
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:10 (six years ago)
“very much” was too strong there. he did say it but clearly didn’t mean it. any reporter could have said “these demands are unlikely to be met”.
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:11 (six years ago)
any reporter of these times wise to hedge bets tbh
― theRZA the JZA and the NDB (darraghmac), Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:22 (six years ago)
Very much not here for scorning at the idea of a citizen’s assembly in that absolute shit of a piece - this was done successfully in Ireland for equal marriage and abortion. The Yes % in the latter actually matched the decision of the Assembly almost dead on to the % point and their recommendation for what the government should legislate for meant there was a huge mandate after the vote because people knew what they were voting for and turned out in numbers for it. But shure what would we know about running referendums?
― gyac, Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:25 (six years ago)
That said, the citizens assembly is way too late in the game for this and if Cameron wasn’t a gigantic ham-headed prick he might have done this a couple of years in advance of the vote.
― gyac, Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:26 (six years ago)
not scorning the idea of citizens assemblies in general, but the idea of doing it *now* and making it '52% leavers" and stating from the get-go that it wasn't intended to go against "the will of the people"?
― mfktz (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:40 (six years ago)
I was talking about this:
The idea, if you want to dignify it by calling it an idea, is as follows: a representative jury of members of the public, overseen by Welby, would listen to evidence – and, heartwarmingly, each other! – before making a series of recommendations on Brexit.
― gyac, Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:42 (six years ago)
i think the scorn there is directed at the timing, not the principle.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:48 (six years ago)
re: boris electioneering bullshit on teachers using "reasonable force" on children. I went to a school where nuns would throw blackboard wooden blackboard dusters at heads and punches were sometimes rained down on unruly kids heads. Loads of my contemporaries grew up to be damaged, violent people or drug addicts or in one case (my old pal Nashy) doing life in Dublin prison and on record as the Republic Of Ireland's most prolific peacetime serial killer.
― calzino, Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:52 (six years ago)
xp my second comment about this exists, and also this is not an uncommon attitude in the British press
― gyac, Tuesday, 27 August 2019 19:07 (six years ago)
can’t fault nashy’s work ethic tho tbfttl, would he have that kind of self-starting spirit without the education
― lowkey goatsed on the styx (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 27 August 2019 19:24 (six years ago)
it was very considerate of the ROI to take on this burden, but please keep him banged up forever!
― calzino, Tuesday, 27 August 2019 19:41 (six years ago)
Maverick man of principle Rory Stewart: I won't vote to bring down the government
― Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 07:41 (six years ago)
he's still got that walking about the streets and talking to homeless heroin addicts part of his game going, but yeah still a typical tory cunt.
― calzino, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 07:53 (six years ago)
Here we fuckin' go.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49493632
― Boulez, vous couchez avec moi? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:16 (six years ago)
lol we’re all gonna die
― lowkey goatsed on the styx (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:19 (six years ago)
IDS was on the bbc at 8:30 THIS MORNING saying that this wasn't going to happen.
― koogs, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:30 (six years ago)
it's nearing the point where i'm not going to trust another word he says...
― koogs, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:33 (six years ago)
The Quiet Man strikes again.
Who would have guessed that the Brexit project would end up as a coup d'etat by shady right wing forces?
― Captain ACAB (Neil S), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:33 (six years ago)
So can Lizzie tell them to fuck off or is it more of a fait accompli? Pardon my ignorance of due process towards installing a dictatorship.
― michael schenker group is no laughing matter (Matt #2), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:34 (six years ago)
i think technically she could?no fuckin chance she will tho
― lowkey goatsed on the styx (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:35 (six years ago)
If she told them to fuck off, would the press scream that she was a traitor?
― The Pingularity (ledge), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:35 (six years ago)
splitting their readers mind
― theRZA the JZA and the NDB (darraghmac), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:36 (six years ago)
Mail/Sun readers would happily lynch anyone getting in the way of their cliff-jump, including the Queen.
― michael schenker group is no laughing matter (Matt #2), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:37 (six years ago)
Still, you have to understand people's legitimate concerns
― michael schenker group is no laughing matter (Matt #2), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:38 (six years ago)
the queen only has one option here, she needs to commit suicide to preserve the politically unbiased integrity of her old constitutional monarchy business.
― calzino, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:39 (six years ago)
Perhaps if she died the period of mourning would help?
― Bidh boladh a' mhairbh de 'n láimh fhalaimh (dowd), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:40 (six years ago)
Would they menace her with stuff about her most decadent and stupid failson?
― suzy, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:46 (six years ago)
By presenting it as a ho-hum Queen’s Speech (which we are badly overdue for anyway) they make it harder for the Palace to do anything (not that it would have done anything).
― stet, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:47 (six years ago)
So if Option A to stop this idiocy (constitutional means) is out, is it VONC time?
― michael schenker group is no laughing matter (Matt #2), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:48 (six years ago)
Don't believe the propaganda, the GBP would turn on the Saxe-Coburgs in a heartbeat.
― Boulez, vous couchez avec moi? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:50 (six years ago)
I think that’s a grey area, isn’t it? A challenged VONC takes 14 days and they’d only have 7 before prorogation. Legislation falls on the floor when parliament prorogued so idk what happens there
― stet, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:52 (six years ago)
Unless you're Rory Stewart, it's VONC or die
― Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:54 (six years ago)
A VONC would at least create the excuse to delay a proragation I would imagine
― Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:55 (six years ago)
Of course what will happen is the shady coalition of Tories and Tories in other parties and Tories currently without a party will probably still prefer No Deal + showboating to an actual election
― Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:56 (six years ago)
So you think they don’t really want this but are doing it to force Remain MPs to act more strongly than “having meetings” so they can be blamed for blocking Brexit/causing election? 5D-chess sets seen entering Downing St. Xp
― stet, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 08:58 (six years ago)
I think if they can bluff and bluster their way to No Deal they'd happily forgo an election until after the fact, I'm sure they consider that the preferable scenario but aren't afraid of going to the polls if by some miracle the professed anti No Deal camp gets its shit together
― Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 09:01 (six years ago)
I think that’s right but can’t understand how they think they’ll possibly win a post-No Deal election with pigeons coming home all over the shop. “Look what the EU have done to us!” only gets you so far
― stet, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 09:13 (six years ago)
You call the election before the pigeons arrive, obviously.
― Boulez, vous couchez avec moi? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 09:14 (six years ago)
xp Because Blitz Spirit, because Project Fear, because the EU won't seriously take the side of Ireland over the UK once the chips are down, will they?
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 09:14 (six years ago)
... Confucius says. (xp)
― Boulez, vous couchez avec moi? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 August 2019 09:15 (six years ago)
(IE they don't think the pigeons will come home in any significant way)
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 09:15 (six years ago)
What are the odds they have the numbers for a successful VONC?
― Simon H., Wednesday, 28 August 2019 09:15 (six years ago)
This is not awful as long as the left can organise around coordinated strike action and the likes of Corbyn can get some rallies going.
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 28 August 2019 09:16 (six years ago)