Kinda, yeah. That one's pretty batshit, but not too bad, compared to what comes next.
I love that he is a huge fan of "A.I.".
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 13 July 2019 14:21 (five years ago) link
i mean minus the gig economy and sister stuff but it’s about a psychic teen who accidentally killed her father who’s being gaslighted by her mother and her psychiatrist, and she accidentally resurrects jason while she’s having an emotional breakdown, and it’s pretty easy to read the film as: jason murdering everyone in her life who sucks is the unleashed expression of her own unconscious
― american bradass (BradNelson), Saturday, 13 July 2019 14:22 (five years ago) link
I feel like we might be divided among the line of those who identify w Dani at some level and those who (subconsciously or consciously) wish to protect her.
― weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Saturday, 13 July 2019 14:30 (five years ago) link
That vid is the interview I’ve been talking about, it’s on the film comment podcast - def recommend. As well as AI he goes on at length about 45 years, which I still need to see
― shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Saturday, 13 July 2019 14:35 (five years ago) link
it makes so much sense to me that he loves ai, one of the most ruthlessly emotionally cruel films i've ever seen
― american bradass (BradNelson), Saturday, 13 July 2019 14:38 (five years ago) link
I agree, but a lot of it hinges on whether as an AI robot David can feel or how he feels or does it matter that he's a robot that can feel, or even what it means to "feel." Juggling those aspects of "A.I." I find wrenching, but I think it's based on the inherent complexity and nuance of the scenario. This one maybe lacked that for me, and the more I think about it, yeah, the more I think the early murder-suicide stuff is an extraneous distraction.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 13 July 2019 14:49 (five years ago) link
i went in wanting to like this, but unfortunately it's terrible lazy smug indulgent horseshit filmmaking.
― call all destroyer, Sunday, 14 July 2019 03:48 (five years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiwMICAVwGo
― despondently sipping tomato soup (Sanpaku), Sunday, 14 July 2019 05:22 (five years ago) link
The group screaming scene had real emotional weight, but ultimately I think the horror movie got in the way. Maybe I was rooting for the cult; I wanted them to be more legitimately sympathetic and mysterious, as in that scene. Human sacrifice just seems a bit predictable.
― jmm, Sunday, 14 July 2019 13:16 (five years ago) link
are you people still here?
― TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 14 July 2019 13:31 (five years ago) link
Nine days, iirc
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 14 July 2019 14:35 (five years ago) link
josh you love this movie
― flappy bird, Sunday, 14 July 2019 16:05 (five years ago) link
Saw it last night. Loved it. Much more so than Hereditary
― frame casual (dog latin), Monday, 15 July 2019 09:59 (five years ago) link
Things I especially liked:
- Maybe the most true-to-life depiction of the psilocybin experience I've seen on film - Speaking of which, Will Poulter provided some excellent light relief and his character was really well realised, right down to the vape - Florence Pugh's stressed/agonised/anxiety-ridden facial expressions were spot-on - Pelle and his calm/creepy Swedish brother were also great - Soundtrack was incredible - Such a pretty film. A cool idea to set a horror movie outdoors in the sunshine with very few night time scenes
― frame casual (dog latin), Monday, 15 July 2019 10:50 (five years ago) link
i really loved this movie
― na (NA), Monday, 15 July 2019 17:22 (five years ago) link
I also think he lied to her about losing his family now that I think about it. The trauma/“what else do I have to lose” feeling Dani has that leads her to the communal experience was the best through-line of the film for me. What Emil.y said about hiding in the latrine/screaming it out w the community is the key to understanding why she went there. If you remove that/rewrite the movie to minimize her loss there’s not much left. Her loss and total aloneness in the world is another character in the movie imo.
― weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Tuesday, July 9, 2019 5:50 PM (six days ago) bookmarkflaglink
sorry if this has already been addressed (not reading this whole thread) but pelle says his parents burned up in a fire, implying after the fact that they sacrificed themselves like ingmar and that other dude who are alive in the burning temple
― na (NA), Monday, 15 July 2019 17:27 (five years ago) link
I liked this a lot, but feel like its structure didn't lend itself well to the themes it was ostensibly trying to explore. You could arguably have gotten rid of all the ancillary characters who get picked off and it wouldn't have had that much impact on the core story.
re: Pelle's parents, I feel like they were trying to make that implication, but it doesn't line up with the "every 90 years" timescale. The film's never totally clear on which parts of the festival take place every year and which are only once in 90 years. That's a minor quibble, but it bugged me.
― Auld Drink of Misery (zchyrs), Monday, 15 July 2019 17:40 (five years ago) link
― na (NA), Monday, July 15, 2019
that was my conclusion too
― TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 15 July 2019 17:40 (five years ago) link
I haven't seen the movie yet (and probably never will because I am a big wuss) but maybe there's an implication that the cult ages unnaturally as a result of their rituals that makes the timeline work and Pelle not a liar?
I will now go back to lurking since I haven't seen the movie
― brigadier pudding (DJP), Monday, 15 July 2019 17:45 (five years ago) link
There's actually a detailed breakdown at one point of how the cult treats different ages like seasons, but they're all measured in normal years afaict
― Auld Drink of Misery (zchyrs), Monday, 15 July 2019 17:47 (five years ago) link
Most chilling moment was at the opening of the festival when the elder suddenly screams in Swedish (something like): "Spirits, go back!"
― jmm, Monday, 15 July 2019 17:58 (five years ago) link
re: the 90 years thing, if everyone has to die at 72, then that part of the festival happens whenever someone reaches that age. the may queen happens every year. the burning of the temple/sacrifice - who knows, but if it's every 90 years then no one alive would have ever participated in the previous one... not that that matters so much.
― the public eating of beans (Sparkle Motion), Monday, 15 July 2019 18:03 (five years ago) link
my fav part of this was the title credits
― johnny crunch, Monday, 15 July 2019 22:16 (five years ago) link
pic.twitter.com/YWodhIDBLw— Liv (@LivvyFanon) July 15, 2019
― Simon H., Tuesday, 16 July 2019 01:15 (five years ago) link
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 01:25 (five years ago) link
A24 absolutely knew that this movie would enjoy a second life in meme format but I'm not mad about it
― Simon H., Tuesday, 16 July 2019 01:31 (five years ago) link
This is easily one of the best films I’ve ever seen.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a perfect representation of the experience of trauma, the feeling of being an unbearable burden to everyone, the very real feeling in ine’s peer group that the needs of a trauma survivor are being felt as manipulative—
This wasn’t, to me, a horror movie, except for the first twenty minutes, that was the scary part—
That people who are traumatized are at first self-centred (Dani) and then deeply empathetic (Pelle), that so many of the rituals of a cult mirror similar methods of dealing with trauma both professionally and spiritually—
The contrast of tears being shed in private versus tears shed communally—
The contrast of murder-suicide being responded to with grief versus being responded to with joy—
Even the sex scene, which I knew was supposed to be “awkward” didn’t feel that way at all to me, this is how everyone should have sex, really—
I genuinely felt goosebumps everywhere in the crying scene and positively thrilled at the ending. I’ve read elsewhere about how Christian is a dick and Dani’s choice to burn him was a response to his infidelity and his emotional distance. I didn’t get that at all. Dani didn’t need a boyfriend, Dani needed family and empathy, she burned Christian in my opinion to sever her last connection to her trauma.
I didn’t love the deformed character and his function, and although I loved the music, the way they attempted to make the music sound diagetic was clumsily mixed to my ears.
I can’t read the thread ‘cause I’m walking home and typing on my phone but I think e.mily likely already typed everything I just typed and more succinctly lol
― flamboyant goon tie included, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 04:53 (five years ago) link
Ok, read the thread, agree with karl and wins and emil.y.
My one caveat is that I don’t think that Christian is a bad boyfriend, so much as an accurate representation of a partner who doesn’t understand/is exhausted by/doesn’t know how to deal with a severely traumatized partner (who likely, as indicated by her tearful initial phone call and subsequent call-to-a-friend, and the Ativan, has already some mental health issues before the opening tragedy)
― flamboyant goon tie included, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 05:22 (five years ago) link
i feel like that's true but that the movie also went out of its way to make him a coward and an asshole anyway
Dani didn’t need a boyfriend, Dani needed family and empathy, she burned Christian in my opinion to sever her last connection to her trauma.
i find this v otm
― american bradass (BradNelson), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 07:57 (five years ago) link
Good call. Dani and Christian are both at fault for following the path of least resistance, rather than questioning whether the relationship is worth saving.
― Anne Hedonia (j.lu), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 12:37 (five years ago) link
yes, i like that. i mean he was not a great boyfriend but not to the degree where he deserved to be burned alive inside a bear.
― na (NA), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 14:30 (five years ago) link
Yea, at least put him in a wolf suit ffs
― Fuck Trump, cops, and the CBP (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 14:36 (five years ago) link
Avoided this thread until seeing the film last night, didn't realize we'd gotten to the spoilery bits already!
Although, unlike Hereditary's twists, you pretty much know where Midsommar is going as soon as they head for the commune. Like Texas Chainsaw, noted upthread, this sets up the family vs. the interlopers and you just wait for the inevitable to happen. The over-ther-topness of some of this also reminded me of Ken Russell's The Devils, a film I haven't seen in 40 years but whose atmosphere still lingers.
I didn't like this nearly as much as Hereditary. The ending, especially, felt to me like trying to outdo Hereditary by upping the crazy.
Still processing it, but somewhere betweenI went in wanting to like this, but unfortunately it's terrible lazy smug indulgent horseshit filmmaking and This is easily one of the best films I’ve ever seen.
― confusementalism (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 14:37 (five years ago) link
My experience in dealing with different kinds of therapy can be summarized as follows. When I was first doing Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, I felt as if the basis tenet of it is "nothing is wrong, your mind is distorting things". All problems you might be facing are just "distortions"-- your work anxiety, your relationship anxiety, your social anxiety. It's not a bad theory, but there's a major roadblock. I was reading "Feeling Good" and one of the problems put forth by a CBT patient was, "I don't want to die alone, gay and abandoned and depressed." The doctor's response was, literally, "that's just ridiculous". I was appalled. It's not ridiculous, and there is no distortion in thinking you're going to die alone, gay and abandoned and depressed. That is literally what is going to happen.
And I started to think CBT wasn't solving actual problems. It was helping with the anxiety, but not helping with dealing with real-life. It was trying to convince me that "nothing is wrong" but everything was wrong. CBT wasn't making my boyfriend love me again, wasn't improving my financial or social situation. It was after I turned to mindfulness that I started to find ways of actually dealing with actual problems.
Mindfulness, in contrast, doesn't teach you that "nothing is wrong", but that "everything is wrong, and you can be OK with that". The most succinct and extreme statement that I've read in this field of discourse is Pema Chodron's famous quote: "Only to the extent that we expose ourselves over and over to annihilation can that which is indestructible in us be found." The inevitability of aging and death and so on must be accepted and, possibly, even celebrated. Hopelessness should be seen as an ideal state, as hope only brings suffering.
The dichotomy of these two methods of psychological treatment were, I felt, represented at the core of this movie. I don't think it was a coincidence that the movie began and ended with three deaths. Dani's sister's murder-suicide was represented as brutal, terrifying, painlessly achieved and yet still gruesome and terrible. Christian's death at the end was painful, beautiful, simultaneously grieved and celebrated by the Hårgas. Cars and piping and duct tape, compared to bear sewing and house burning? It's not just the murders, either: Dani is taking the Western drug-of-choice Ativan at the beginning of the movie, and at the end of the movie is meditating, dancing, reflecting, and taking natural drugs.
I first got that Pema Chodron quote in my head in the Ättestupa scene. The Hårgas had accepted their position in the Earth's cycle so fully that even dying didn't scare them. Simon and Connie flip out and just see gore, but Dani, as revolted as she may have been, seemed to pick up on the logic of what was happening. The extreme commitment of the Hårgas to "exposing themselves to annihilation" included enacting extremely gory ritual deaths upon the visitors and burning themselves alive. Viewers of the movie who don't vibe with the logic of Hårgan psychology won't find the movie rewarding, but like I said, I found the ending to be exhilarating (and the opening, the murder-suicide scene, to be the only legitimately terrifying scene in the movie).
In short, I think this movie fails as horror because it's trying to do the opposite of what horror movies try to do. Horror wishes to shock you, but Ari Aster has this "Irreversible" style of filmmaking, beginning with the most gruesome sequence, and then wearing you down until, by the end, the formality of the house-burning is meant to be seen as comforting. It bears more commonality to my mind to historical religious rituals of "purification", death metal, etc.
― flamboyant goon tie included, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 14:42 (five years ago) link
great post. although i think if you're ambivalent about the cult's ideology, which most viewers likely are, the horror still works. i felt a sense of dread from dani's slide into paganism, the upending of her conventional morality is underway without her realizing it and there's no going back, like how you can't start untripping once the psychedelic experience starts, no matter how you now feel about it.
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Tuesday, 16 July 2019 14:59 (five years ago) link
In short, I think this movie fails as horror because it's trying to do the opposite of what horror movies try to do. Horror wishes to shock you
i disagree with this definition of horror, so it doesn't "fail" for me as a horror movie. it shares a ton of themes with horror
― american bradass (BradNelson), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 15:13 (five years ago) link
i also don't really understand this criticism, which i've seen elsewhere so i'm possibly just wrong! but the ending felt way calmer and less crazy to me than hereditary, with way fewer ideas being thrown around in the final twenty minutes
― american bradass (BradNelson), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 15:16 (five years ago) link
I mean, some of the criticisms I’ve read about Midsommar seem to hinge upon its success in “scaring” the audience, which I feel is missing the point of the film. It also occurred to me that this film has much in common with “Possession”
― flamboyant goon tie included, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 15:33 (five years ago) link
it does!!!! and yeah, it is not a "scary" movie, but i sort of think of this like "not all effective comedy makes you laugh" etc.
― american bradass (BradNelson), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 15:38 (five years ago) link
seeing this tomorrow (wedding anniversary date night lol)
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 15:45 (five years ago) link
godspeed
― american bradass (BradNelson), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 15:46 (five years ago) link
fantastic posts, fgti
― jmm, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 16:23 (five years ago) link
Still haven't seen this and am avoiding all thread conversation till then BUT thought you might be interested
Film Society of Lincoln Center - Saturday, August 17, 6:45pm (Q&A with Ari Aster)Midsommar (Director's Cut)Ari Aster, USA, 2019 - World PremiereScary Movies is excited to premiere the official, nearly three-hour director’s cut of the acclaimed sophomore feature from Ari Aster (Hereditary) in a special Saturday night screening. American grad student Dani (Florence Pugh), grieving after a shocking loss, accompanies her boyfriend and his buddies on their vacation to a tight-knit farming commune in the sunny Swedish countryside. They’ve timed their trip to participate in an extravagant nine-day festival celebrating the summer solstice, with hallucinogenic drugs in abundance and a Nordic sun that hardly seems to set, but things quickly take a dark turn in this singular, unflinching, utterly contemporary entry in the fish-out-of-water folk-horror canon. An A24 release.
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 19:51 (five years ago) link
this movie does not need to be three hours long but i'm curious
― american bradass (BradNelson), Tuesday, 16 July 2019 20:06 (five years ago) link
"It's just a three hour movie, can't be too weird.*
*Lincoln Center blood rites, Brad burned in a bear suit*
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 20:09 (five years ago) link
Great posts, fgti.
This wasn’t, to me, a horror movie, except for the first twenty minutes, that was the scary part
The beginning being the scary part of the film was one of the first things I said when coming out of it - that aloneness is so terrifying. On the other hand, though, I do think this is very much a horror film! I think a lot of times when the "not really horror" tag is applied to a film it's based on a misunderstanding or underestimation of what horror is, what it's for and what it can do. Not accusing you of not understanding horror, mind you, just... I feel like the attitude so often stems from a place of disdain of the genre.
My one caveat is that I don’t think that Christian is a bad boyfriend, so much as an accurate representation of a partner who doesn’t understand/is exhausted by/doesn’t know how to deal with a severely traumatized partner
I really like the reading of his death as her severing her connection to her trauma rather than a revenge ritual, though I didn't read it that way myself and I do think he's a bad boyfriend. While I might have over-egged the BURN THE BAD BOYFRIEND upthread, I think the film definitely provides this intentionally, along with his friends being dickheads, as a "romp" element that provides a base layer for the exploration of Dani's trauma.
― emil.y, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 20:13 (five years ago) link
I glanced at the script, and there's at least one important-seeming scene involving animal sacrifice which isn't in the film.
https://www.docdroid.net/39EggEN/midsommar.pdf
― jmm, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 20:14 (five years ago) link
Great posts from both fgti and Emily.
Not accusing you of not understanding horror, mind you, just... I feel like the attitude so often stems from a place of disdain of the genre.
I think, like Emily said so succinctly, this movie is a proper Horror movie. "Not really horror" applied to films usually is, indeed, disdain of the genre, but also not understanding the genre is more than blood and gore and triggering screams (not in this thread, but it's a commonplace). "Not really horror" represents a very narrowly defined, 2D definition of horror which I don't ascribe to. The first 25 minutes of this are acute, terrible (=great) horror to me. Best I've seen in years.
I really like the reading of his death as her severing her connection to her trauma rather than a revenge ritual
Same here, this was an enlightening take.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 16 July 2019 20:28 (five years ago) link
just saw this, wondering how a remake with saorse ronan and chris pratt would do. also wondering if there are secret swedish jokes that were not translated.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 17 July 2019 04:05 (five years ago) link
I'm curious about the 3 hour cut
― flappy bird, Wednesday, 17 July 2019 17:19 (five years ago) link