I just don’t understand why it must be ~universal.
I'm fine with the universal part (same w free college, healthcare) - any universal benefit is harder to remove once its out in the wild and in use. But this is why it works better as service rather than income, at point of need.
― anvil, Monday, 8 July 2019 06:05 (six years ago)
maybe I'm wrong on UBI, I don't really have a solid position on it, but I've definitely moved from a "sure, why not, give it a go" position to "hmm, I'm not so sure about this" over the last year or two.
― anvil, Monday, 8 July 2019 06:08 (six years ago)
it's exciting and useful as a way of reframing welfare/transfers and I can see why it's particularly appealing and charged in the US. as a side-effect of that some ppl have got overexcited and sometimes it's oversold. I also think there's a whiff off its hype in the tory govt's new 'universal credit' scheme which is currently further immiserating the most vulnerable ppl in the nation through bureaucracy. afaik the most successful transfer programmes have been targeted cf. brazil where they paid money to mothers of poor families and had v good results.
― ogmor, Monday, 8 July 2019 08:42 (six years ago)
One of the points of it being universal would be that it massively cuts down on the bureaucracy - as soon as there's an 'in-list' and an 'out-list', it's a target for the right in a way that, say Medicare for All isn't.
This is obviously UK-based, but I think it's of more than no relevance to the US:
https://www.thesocialreview.co.uk/2019/06/18/new-labours-lessons/
― Andrew Farrell, Monday, 8 July 2019 09:36 (six years ago)
my concerns are mostly about the limits of this individualist approach to welfare. all the non-cash-transfer parts of the welfare state are already getting fucked for funding, lots of ppl have needs that require more than whatever the basic income will be and it's not hard to see how they would get squeezed to protect a big inflexible expense. plus lots of vulnerable ppl aren't so hot at managing their money, and there's an argument that the bigger project for the left should be bolstering public/common ownership
― ogmor, Monday, 8 July 2019 09:56 (six years ago)
the rub is in the implementation -- SV venture capital/libertarian types are sold on it because the fine print in their proposals implies that the total expenditures would be less than the existing welfare programs
there's also strong interest in it being a federal program that includes a multiplier to adjust for differences in cost of living by location. so in california, and specifically the bay area, the amount of federal expenditures would be higher than in less populous/affluent areas
― untuned mass damper (mh), Monday, 8 July 2019 14:20 (six years ago)
the hunter biden riff was v funny
― in twelve parts (lamonti), Wednesday, 10 July 2019 22:21 (six years ago)
if I was that kid I’d probably be smoking crack, too :(
― untuned mass damper (mh), Thursday, 11 July 2019 03:01 (six years ago)
Felix really seems like the only one who's not a complete nightmare to deal with in real life.
― Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Thursday, 11 July 2019 03:08 (six years ago)
this from a jezebel takedown of red scare made me lol:
Audrey Gelman of The Wing tagged herself as a “longtime listener,” and her buddy Lena Dunham excitedly shared her fandom in a now-deleted tweet. This is despite the fact that both women have been ruthlessly mocked by Khachiyan and Nekrasova; Dunham announced that she enjoyed the show despite the pair calling her a “human beanbag.” (Gelman’s husband was also a co-host of a short-lived podcast of men recapping Red Scare, a kind of irony so circular it disappears immediately into its own collective ass.)
― flopson, Thursday, 11 July 2019 20:58 (six years ago)
Pitchforkreviewsreviews.com
― Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Thursday, 11 July 2019 21:04 (six years ago)
https://pettycartographyhome.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/img_8500.jpg
― flopson, Thursday, 11 July 2019 21:21 (six years ago)
the sex pistols and nazi symbolism, finally back together again
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 11 July 2019 21:25 (six years ago)
i was a teen who read vice in the early-mid 00s and they often referred to the 90s as this period that was stultifyingly pc which the mag was a reaction to; i wonder if in the '20s we'll see a similar alt-reactionnary 'correction' to '10s wokeness and red scare is just an early example
― flopson, Thursday, 11 July 2019 21:32 (six years ago)
it's inevitable
imagine Borat coming out today - or in 1991
― flappy bird, Thursday, 11 July 2019 21:58 (six years ago)
i was born in 1991 and actually have no idea whether the 90s were actually pc
― flopson, Thursday, 11 July 2019 22:25 (six years ago)
the 90s weren't pc
― bookmarkflaglink (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 11 July 2019 22:48 (six years ago)
whether or not an era was considered pc is more about whether assholes were butthurt about being exposed to the opinions of minorities. since they are butthurt about this all the time, EVERY era is pc
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 11 July 2019 22:56 (six years ago)
in the 90s there were lots of dramas where "the battle of the sexes" is a big thing and men bemoan women making them want to marry, and how they don't want to be "modern men" and all this crap and act super sexist but you're supposed to sympathize with them
― bookmarkflaglink (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 11 July 2019 22:57 (six years ago)
this is the kind of advert companies made in the 1990s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHP3V25pkNY
now they're making ads about stopping toxic masculinity
― bookmarkflaglink (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:00 (six years ago)
lol that ad kinda rules, no?
― flopson, Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:04 (six years ago)
it's kind of emblematic of the approach to male sexuality that was rife in the 90s, and which is not congruent at all with the current zeitgeist
― bookmarkflaglink (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:05 (six years ago)
A variation of every reactionary backlash happening today was happening in the '90s... and the '00s and the '80s and so on.
― Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:24 (six years ago)
feel like american culture was more conservative in 00s than 90soperative word here "feel"
― flappy bird, Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:26 (six years ago)
beer commercial music has improved at leasthttps://www.ispot.tv/ad/Aqfj/michelob-ultra-get-up-song-by-james-brown
― Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:28 (six years ago)
Its like you can’t even screech in a bagel shop that women won’t let short men smash without someone making a tweet about it anymore
― space invaders are smokin penises!!!! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:29 (six years ago)
I don't see a lot of difference in American culture between the '00s and the '90s. 1999 lasted until the iPhone came out, pretty much.
― Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:30 (six years ago)
feel like american culture was more conservative in 00s than 90s
Murphy Brown becoming a single mom and Ellen kissing a woman once were major national news stories (because the right flipped their shit).
― Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:32 (six years ago)
― space invaders are smokin penises!!!! (Whiney G. Weingarten)
lol
― Dan S, Thursday, 11 July 2019 23:56 (six years ago)
xp I know, and don't ask don't tell, DOMA, other celebrities that stayed (glass) closeted. what did the first/second wave of political correctness hit? just academia? sincerely asking. I read Roth's The Human Stain earlier this year, and now Sabbath's Theater, and it feels utterly of the moment despite being from 2000 and 1995 respectively.
the 90s ended on 9/11
― flappy bird, Friday, 12 July 2019 00:55 (six years ago)
People have been complaining about political correctness since the mid '80s and it was used before that in a different manner. It feels utterly of the moment because it's all been the same play over and over with different actors and slightly altered scenes.
The '90s didn't end (culturally) on 9/11 by any stretch. Even politically, the Bush era was just the fruition of the 1994 House election. 2008ish you get Obama/iPhone-Youtube-social media culture in ascendancy/Great Recession.
― Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Friday, 12 July 2019 01:12 (six years ago)
my formative years, turning 18 in ‘99, were the 90s
by our definitions now, it was not amazingly progressive. it’d be like asking someone in the 90s if the 70s were progressive and then showing them a tv show where some guy is like “wow, a broad in the office? and she’s my manager! gee, wiz!” and they all wink at the camera. the difference is the wink goes away and maybe no one calls her a broad
the 90s were “pc” in the way a lot of things were given lip service and token social changes happened but there was no follow-through. as always, maybe
― untuned mass damper (mh), Friday, 12 July 2019 04:10 (six years ago)
There was "PC" stuff on campuses in the 90s, but it kind of felt as much a a reaction against boomer permissiveness as against entrenched patriarchy etc. There was a lot of "Hey, superstar former hippie professor, stop grabbing students' breasts!" which caused a bunch of oldsters to believe the thought police were coming for them.
― Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Friday, 12 July 2019 13:36 (six years ago)
i'd had drinks and i'm not sure where i was going with that post
in any case, the 90s were notionally progressive in some ways, but you generally can judge the progressiveness of any particular era by the norms adopted that were, in the immediately prior era, pushing social boundaries. the norms didn't change a whole lot, and the things that seemed like they were really pushing boundaries seem pretty quaint by 2019 standards
― untuned mass damper (mh), Friday, 12 July 2019 14:32 (six years ago)
Matt, Virgil, and Brendan were at the Netroots Nation thing today and dropped on Majority Report, midway thru this clip:
https://youtu.be/jfjaxQrCdb8
― Glower, Disruption & Pies (kingfish), Friday, 12 July 2019 19:47 (six years ago)
the return of brendan would be sweet, always enjoyed his guest appearances/producer insights
― oiocha, Friday, 12 July 2019 20:26 (six years ago)
biggest get yet, no?
👑 CHAPO X Ilhan Omar 🤩 pic.twitter.com/RmzRpth1Lt— Chapo Trap House (@CHAPOTRAPHOUSE) July 14, 2019
― flappy bird, Sunday, 14 July 2019 05:17 (six years ago)
well it’s just bc they were all at netroots nation right?
― JoeStork, Sunday, 14 July 2019 05:53 (six years ago)
Why are you doing this to her— Member of D.S.A.—“Drinking Some Ale!” (@90sSlowJamz) July 14, 2019
― Simon H., Sunday, 14 July 2019 05:54 (six years ago)
The 90s version of PC was mocked the most for the phrase "vertically challenged" iirc
― billstevejim, Monday, 15 July 2019 02:37 (six years ago)
re: Ross Perot?
― flappy bird, Monday, 15 July 2019 04:08 (six years ago)
❤️ Brace Belden
― naus, Friday, 26 July 2019 07:04 (six years ago)
I find all their Epstein glee pretty distasteful but Belden is a unique kind of edgelord awful
― Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Sunday, 28 July 2019 01:28 (six years ago)
I'll take Epstein fever over electoral prognostication any day tbh
― Simon H., Sunday, 28 July 2019 04:55 (six years ago)
yeah i enjoyed that pod tbh. epstein stuff > virgil talking psephology
― bookmarkflaglink (jim in vancouver), Monday, 29 July 2019 17:39 (six years ago)
i then listened to the two episodes of true anon and enjoyed them too
― bookmarkflaglink (jim in vancouver), Monday, 29 July 2019 17:40 (six years ago)
lmao here I was thinking they were canny for keeping Greenwald at arm's length for the last while and then...
at least it's on the subject he's going to be the least annoying about
― Simon H., Monday, 29 July 2019 20:55 (six years ago)
glenn is actually good on brazilian politics imo
― bookmarkflaglink (jim in vancouver), Monday, 29 July 2019 21:02 (six years ago)
and good on brazilian doggies
This greenwald story is bananas. Honestly massive respect to him for this.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Wednesday, 31 July 2019 01:46 (six years ago)