the priest felt v close to home for me which is what made me so angry with him. you could see it all coming a mile off, and while she clearly wanted him to Be A Naughty Priest for her, he could tell she was vulnerable and acted irresponsibly & selfishly while using all the trappings and glamour of his supposedly v responsible & selfless position. it's how he let himself be turned into her fantasy that was seedy. he and fleabag were similar & equal enough personally, & while its understandable for her to blur that connection with his pastoral, even divine role, using that role to get what he wanted was a betrayal of himself as a priest. she gets to play a helpless lost soul (which you could see as a kind of dishonest betrayal of herself) seeking his guidance, offering herself up to him (vulnerability is hot, sure). he has to dirty the distinction, if it ever really existed, between his personal desires and his religious calling; he has to corrupt himself (which is arguably hot in a fallen angel way but much darker). it goes some way to pointing towards an inherent problem with the notion of the clergy. if it were just hot it wldn't be so good: it's also deeply compromised & dishonest & unstable
― ogmor, Wednesday, 5 June 2019 13:36 (seven years ago)
yes, otm
― american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 16:11 (seven years ago)
am i wrong to think that in the finale a few of the characters were picking up that they were trapped in a fictional structure? ex. the godmother's "i always just call you darling," martin's speech about being born with a shitty personality
― american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 16:14 (seven years ago)
if you were so inclined you could also fold the resistance to and ultimate embrace of the "running to the airport" cliche into that I think
― Simon H., Wednesday, 5 June 2019 16:27 (seven years ago)
yes i was absolutely thinking that too
― american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 16:28 (seven years ago)
also every use of the statue throughout both seasons was exquisite, it's kind of a delayed payoff machine
― american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 16:31 (seven years ago)
They made the statue bigger in series 2.
― Shite New Answers (jed_), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 16:41 (seven years ago)
ogmor i dont disagree but it was still v v hot, fuckedup-ness and all (and i wonder why i am single?)
― homosexual II, Wednesday, 5 June 2019 16:48 (seven years ago)
it was v hot, it was a v recognizable portrayal of two people falling in love with each other but which circumstance and individual weakness inevitably subvert
― american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 16:54 (seven years ago)
which, hey, gotta say that resembles... all of my relationships
i continue to read the mugging to the camera, the priest's recognition of that and additional moments of existential clarity and terror as an awareness of audience/author as god
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 17:03 (seven years ago)
the priest interfering with the fourth wall breaking was a really great way of depicting the intensity and intimacy of their connection too
― american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 17:07 (seven years ago)
I concluded she looks like Bran Stark warging to other characters when she does it. everyone else was too polite to mention it.
― kinder, Wednesday, 5 June 2019 18:27 (seven years ago)
no one in this show is polite
― american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 18:28 (seven years ago)
Everyone is too self-involved to notice! Priest is more open & perceptive & genuinely interested in Fleabag
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 21:09 (seven years ago)
I fully expected a hookup with the priest as soon as he was introduced but the way it happened had me mumbling "oh noooo"
The character was real enough to me that I wanted him to both be able to be a good priest and have this fling, but somehow compartmentalize the two aspects of their relationship. That it felt like a real violation.. that's good storytelling!
I haven't heard anyone say much about the story arc with the banker, but it might be my favorite subplot. Started as kind of a cheap set-up, and ends with something that wasn't telegraphed from the start.
― mh, Thursday, 6 June 2019 14:31 (seven years ago)
The evolution between the two series was really well done, in a way I haven't seen in many shows. When you think of Fleabag as the point of view character, the shallower characterization of nearly everyone else in the first season echoes her own perceptions as she's stuck at a higher level of, let's say fucked-upness, and season two immediately sets a different baseline. As viewers we're seeing things about people that she's noticing, and she's operating at a more functional level than her family in a lot of ways.
― mh, Thursday, 6 June 2019 14:38 (seven years ago)
i couldn't watch s1 cos the other characters were so completely stupid. i just had to stop.
― FernandoHierro, Thursday, 6 June 2019 14:39 (seven years ago)
started a rewatch of s1 cuz id forgotten it -- the dude who plays harry's performance when she "surprises" him in the shower in ep2 is fucking amazing
― johnny crunch, Thursday, 6 June 2019 17:59 (seven years ago)
harry genuinely one of my favorite characters
― american bradass (BradNelson), Thursday, 6 June 2019 17:59 (seven years ago)
a lot of it is in that performance
― american bradass (BradNelson), Thursday, 6 June 2019 18:00 (seven years ago)
the shower surprise scene was so good
it made me wonder what else she'd done to harry any time he started to get too close
― mh, Thursday, 6 June 2019 18:32 (seven years ago)
he plays a similarly sweet, baffled character in W1A
the sex scene w/them where she ends up just masturbating and flinching when he touches her is amazing
― Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 6 June 2019 19:17 (seven years ago)
There's lots of stuff, characters, situations in S1 that just are not believable even within the world she's created (I know this is a bugbear of mine, as Tracer might remember with regard to Motherland) but the guy with the teeth, the extremely handsome boyfriend, for example, are barely characters and are not believable. The worst example was at the Sexhibition where the stepmother makes her be a waitress with a tray full of glasses of champagne. Just not believable as a situation. That could never happen.
In S2 the outrageous elements were things you could believe could happen. That's only a minor reason why it worked but it did help.
― Shite New Answers (jed_), Thursday, 6 June 2019 21:49 (seven years ago)
Ha I do and I agree with all that but doesn't she again get pressed into service at a party in a similar way in S2? Sorry brain = sieve, I'm struggling to remember exactly. The church fair?
― Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 6 June 2019 22:25 (seven years ago)
The stepmother making her serve drinks at the exhibit seemed totally believable! She was already a "server" at her cafe and it's one of those jobs that people assume you do for free for friends and family.
― Yerac, Thursday, 6 June 2019 22:34 (seven years ago)
s2 i think she was volunteering at the church fair and she caters and serves at her sister's company event.
― Yerac, Thursday, 6 June 2019 22:35 (seven years ago)
yeah i mean i don't care for realism too much, a drama that has a world with its own internal logic is fine, but s1 was so deeply stupid and underwritten in almost every character/plot except a few fleabag monologues. ultimately she suffered as a character without any other meaningful characters to bounce off or be realised through, just felt a waste of time. i can see why this show is popular and i suspect i might like s2 more based on speaking to friends but a huge amount of s1 seemed to be people cheering for an easy lunge at a zeitgeist that tells them things they already believed beforehand via a couple of stick figures and gif memes posing as television.
― FernandoHierro, Thursday, 6 June 2019 22:36 (seven years ago)
Godmother was a totally believable bitchy aspirant stepmother. I could imagine her doing the same thing my grandfather’s second wife did when we lost him two weeks before the family Christmas he always meticulously planned: sneakily taking all the presents he’d bought for his kids and grandkids back to the shops.
― suzy, Thursday, 6 June 2019 22:46 (seven years ago)
I found her character totally delightful and believable.
― Yerac, Thursday, 6 June 2019 22:48 (seven years ago)
I need to rewatch the first season, I didn't realize it's been almost 3 years since it came out.
― Yerac, Thursday, 6 June 2019 22:50 (seven years ago)
Teeth guy was the only thing I ever found to be a bit much
― Simon H., Thursday, 6 June 2019 23:07 (seven years ago)
holy shit suzy that’s dreadful
― an incoherent crustacean (MatthewK), Thursday, 6 June 2019 23:33 (seven years ago)
the announcement, staging & reveal of the portrait she painted of Fleabag & her sister for the wedding was *chef’s kiss*
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 7 June 2019 00:31 (seven years ago)
yup. I've accidentally taken some photos of my sons like that last weekend which has been cracking me up
― kinder, Friday, 7 June 2019 07:15 (seven years ago)
Teeth guy was great, and asking for him (or the hot sex guy) to be more of a character might be the dumbest criticism of this show
― abcfsk, Friday, 7 June 2019 07:17 (seven years ago)
Actually that's changed my mind. I hadn't realised it was great.
― FernandoHierro, Friday, 7 June 2019 07:36 (seven years ago)
The dumbest criticism of the show is surely mine: in 10 years time we’re going to be faintly embarrassed to look back and have read so much into what’s regarded as a quaint, but entertaining, curio.
― Luna Schlosser, Friday, 7 June 2019 09:36 (seven years ago)
My cousin (who has inoperable cancer) loved both series and asked me ‘will there be a third?’
I was just about to hit send on a reply along the lines of ‘PWB says no but in a few years, if the right idea presents itself, maybe?’ but stopped myself for obvious reasons.
― suzy, Friday, 7 June 2019 10:10 (seven years ago)
right?
― Shite New Answers (jed_), Friday, 7 June 2019 13:58 (seven years ago)
― abcfsk, Friday, June 7, 2019 12:17 AM (six hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yep, i agree, i think he's mostly justified by his final scene in the show, where he betrays the slightest self-awareness and then immediately tries to kill her guinea pig
the hot sex guy totally exists in reality imo
― american bradass (BradNelson), Friday, 7 June 2019 14:08 (seven years ago)
also realism is boring etc
― american bradass (BradNelson), Friday, 7 June 2019 14:09 (seven years ago)
― FernandoHierro, Thursday, June 6, 2019 3:36 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
feels like this is a criticism of thinkpieces about the show and not the show itself but there's so much distance in this post it's hard to tell
― american bradass (BradNelson), Friday, 7 June 2019 14:10 (seven years ago)
hard to have coherent, strong opinions about a show you didn't watch.
― Yerac, Friday, 7 June 2019 14:58 (seven years ago)
i watched maybe four episodes of s1. it is possible for someone to not like something you like. possible and okay. i expected to like the show but i didn't. isn't that why we're here?
― FernandoHierro, Friday, 7 June 2019 15:07 (seven years ago)
the last ep of season one is p crucial
― american bradass (BradNelson), Friday, 7 June 2019 15:11 (seven years ago)
i mean i generally agree that season two blows season one away but i like the way season one gradually reveals itself as a feedback loop of grief
― american bradass (BradNelson), Friday, 7 June 2019 15:12 (seven years ago)
realism is not what I'm asking for, plausibility is.
― Shite New Answers (jed_), Friday, 7 June 2019 15:14 (seven years ago)
my only serious gripe, albeit a small one, is the total absence of Boo from the finale
― Simon H., Friday, 7 June 2019 15:53 (seven years ago)
reiterating my own point here, but I think the shallow characterization in the first season seems more intentional when you think of the point of view character being an unreliable narrator
at no point does she really take notice of anything other than surface impressions of most people and some characters are ridiculous because it's her version of them -- the hamster teeth guy is a dead giveaway because she's thinking of him as "that guy with the ridiculous teeth" so it's portrayed exactly that way
also the bit about him being a documentarian takes on a new dimension when you realize PWB's now-ex-husband makes documentaries
― mh, Friday, 7 June 2019 16:37 (seven years ago)