― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 17 May 2007 11:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― ledge, Thursday, 17 May 2007 12:03 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eyeball Kicks, Thursday, 17 May 2007 12:12 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eyeball Kicks, Thursday, 17 May 2007 12:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 17 May 2007 12:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― Madchen, Thursday, 17 May 2007 15:37 (seventeen years ago) link
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 May 2007 15:54 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eyeball Kicks, Thursday, 17 May 2007 16:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eyeball Kicks, Thursday, 17 May 2007 16:39 (seventeen years ago) link
― Not the real Village People, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:25 (seventeen years ago) link
― Laurel, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 May 2007 20:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 17 May 2007 21:59 (seventeen years ago) link
― Not the real Village People, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:16 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:39 (seventeen years ago) link
― Not the real Village People, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― the next grozart, Thursday, 17 May 2007 22:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― Madchen, Friday, 18 May 2007 11:33 (seventeen years ago) link
― Madchen, Friday, 18 May 2007 11:36 (seventeen years ago) link
― Nasty, Brutish & Short, Friday, 18 May 2007 11:40 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 18 May 2007 11:41 (seventeen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― Madchen, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:28 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― ledge, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:44 (seventeen years ago) link
― ledge, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:47 (seventeen years ago) link
― Madchen, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:50 (seventeen years ago) link
― ledge, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:55 (seventeen years ago) link
― ledge, Friday, 18 May 2007 13:05 (seventeen years ago) link
― grimly fiendish, Friday, 18 May 2007 13:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― CharlieNo4, Friday, 18 May 2007 13:19 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jamie T Smith, Friday, 18 May 2007 14:37 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jamie T Smith, Friday, 18 May 2007 14:54 (seventeen years ago) link
― nabisco, Friday, 18 May 2007 16:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― nabisco, Friday, 18 May 2007 16:46 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jamie T Smith, Friday, 18 May 2007 16:57 (seventeen years ago) link
― nabisco, Friday, 18 May 2007 17:57 (seventeen years ago) link
― Laurel, Friday, 18 May 2007 17:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― nabisco, Friday, 18 May 2007 18:00 (seventeen years ago) link
lol at maths panic on this thread.
― Alba, Friday, 18 May 2007 19:26 (seventeen years ago) link
xpost It's a misplaced (or dangling) modifier.
― jaymc, Friday, 18 May 2007 19:30 (seventeen years ago) link
Should sentence starting with "Surely" end with a question mark?
― Alba, Saturday, 19 May 2007 11:29 (seventeen years ago) link
not unless it's a question or you want to use a question mark
― RJG, Saturday, 19 May 2007 11:57 (seventeen years ago) link
Surely sentences of this type usually act as rhetorical questions?
― Alba, Saturday, 19 May 2007 12:40 (seventeen years ago) link
Surely they do.
― Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 19 May 2007 14:38 (seventeen years ago) link
Surely (ha) that depends on whether you mean "surely" as "certainly" or as "it should certainly be the case that..."?
― ailsa, Saturday, 19 May 2007 15:24 (seventeen years ago) link
Sorry, that last one should be "it should certainly be the case that...shouldn't it?", shouldn't it?
― ailsa, Saturday, 19 May 2007 15:27 (seventeen years ago) link
Yes, indeed. The latter is far more common, though. It's just that sometimes the sentence is long and by the time you get to the end, the question mark might surprise the reader.
― Alba, Saturday, 19 May 2007 15:36 (seventeen years ago) link