the first one was an abject failure from a horror perspective
this one looks no different on the basis of that scene
― Number None, Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:01 (seven years ago)
How hard is it to make a legit horror movie derived from this source material, seriously. Get it together, Hollywood.
― Artisanal Personality Disorder (Old Lunch), Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:02 (seven years ago)
idk the big scares did nothing for me but the old lady sitting perfectly still actually did genuinely creep me out which almost never happens
― Simon H., Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:02 (seven years ago)
We should have a 'best/scariest horror movie scenes of all time' thread, that would be wicked. Lots of good ones in not-so-good movies.
― Artisanal Personality Disorder (Old Lunch), Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:05 (seven years ago)
I nominate the stabbed-hand-stab from the Crazies remake.
― Simon H., Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:08 (seven years ago)
― Artisanal Personality Disorder (Old Lunch), Thursday, May 9, 2019 12:05 PM (seventeen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
vulture did a ranking of this recently? it was a little too loose of an idea to work as a ranking tbh it would be a much better message board thread
― american bradass (BradNelson), Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:24 (seven years ago)
i recall the very not-good Darkness Falls having a good scary opening scene.
― omar little, Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:27 (seven years ago)
there's a pretty scary scene in the downright awful the houses october built but it's not worth the suffering
― american bradass (BradNelson), Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:28 (seven years ago)
Someone make this thread plz, it is a good idea
― circa1916, Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:29 (seven years ago)
do we want to restrict it to bad/mediocre movies? I like that idea.
― Simon H., Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:31 (seven years ago)
Here, we can stop shitting up this thread now: Best and/or Scariest and/or Creepiest Scenes Ever (from horror films or TV shows or whatever, I don't care)
― Artisanal Personality Disorder (Old Lunch), Thursday, 9 May 2019 19:32 (seven years ago)
i think a lot of king's creepiest and most unsettling scenes are basically unfilmable, because they either stem from some ineffable, nearly-symptomless ~~wrongness~~ about the mise-en-scene.... or really freaky elaborate distortions of reality (like idk the house caving in on the kid in the second or third dark tower book) which are just going to be realized as photorealistic-but-fakey CGI, missing the gauze of nightmare that our imaginations give to them.
― Good morning, how are you, I'm (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 9 May 2019 23:03 (seven years ago)
yes v well put
― deemsthelarker (darraghmac), Thursday, 9 May 2019 23:06 (seven years ago)
a v strange quality, possibly stemming specifically from manys the shonky tv/movie adaptation, where even *in my head* now, kings scare scenes look like crummy cheap and corny efforts. i really have to not visualize in order for it to be in any way scary, essentially
― deemsthelarker (darraghmac), Thursday, 9 May 2019 23:08 (seven years ago)
def agreed on cgi literalism but of course movies can do ineffable wrongness just fine if you have the talent for it (which is why you even said mise-en-scene). suspect the people who edited that old lady scene have seen inland empire.
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 9 May 2019 23:32 (seven years ago)
lynch is a good example, his reputation as an arthouse director often overshadows the fact that he's exceptional at creating unsettling or often deeply frightening moments and scenes, and has the ability to maintain an atmosphere of dread over long stretches. the most frightening thing i'd seen in my early years was maybe Twin Peaks, which captures in a very different way a small town full of unexplained terrors, and it's always made me think he could pull off an outstanding SK adaptation.
― omar little, Thursday, 9 May 2019 23:43 (seven years ago)
all true and obv the shining gets this in its own way, and probably others if i thought about it. just i feel like the powers that be with greenlighting a big horror film in the 2010s aren't going to grok a pitch that really leans into that stuff. so maybe it's not so much "unfilmable" as "not what decision-makers picture a 'stephen king movie' as being like."
― Good morning, how are you, I'm (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 9 May 2019 23:44 (seven years ago)
omar, you've just made me lament the Lynch/King collaboration we'll never see...
― Artisanal Personality Disorder (Old Lunch), Thursday, 9 May 2019 23:48 (seven years ago)
yeah twin peaks is great at the "there's something especially creepy and cold and evil about THIS stretch of 2-lane road through the woods on a pitch-black night" vibe
― Good morning, how are you, I'm (Doctor Casino), Friday, 10 May 2019 00:00 (seven years ago)
Lynch & king have a shared interest in certain archetypes & Americana and both independently arrived at the idea that the ultimate embodiment of evil is a goofball in a denim jacket, although only Lynch managed to make that actually terrifying. King attempting Lynch gives you daffy shit like his riget remake; I would love for Lynch to attempt king, if only to give ol Steve something to hate even more than kubrick’s shining
― milkshake chuk (wins), Friday, 10 May 2019 09:43 (seven years ago)
Lynch would do the house on nybolt street soooo well
― valet doberman (Jon not Jon), Friday, 10 May 2019 14:30 (seven years ago)
GIVE IT UP, STEPHEN
How about Netflix bringing back UNDER THE DOME, only starting from scratch and actually doing the book?— Stephen King (@StephenKing) June 13, 2019
― Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 14 June 2019 09:53 (six years ago)
lol yeah i read that and rolled my eyes all the way back.
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 14 June 2019 14:05 (six years ago)
It's like you folks have completely forgotten how he and Steven Weber labored to bring us the PROPER adaptation of The Shining we'd been clamoring for since that abomination dropped back in 1980. Never discount the King!
― Morrie Antoilette (Old Lunch), Friday, 14 June 2019 14:12 (six years ago)
I didn’t watch it but I don’t think the improper adaptation of under the dome is as well regarded as kubrick’s shining tbf
― shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Friday, 14 June 2019 14:14 (six years ago)
I kid, but I get it. He'd like to see others adapt his work with the degree of reverence he demonstrated when he brought 'Trucks' to the silver screen.
― Morrie Antoilette (Old Lunch), Friday, 14 June 2019 14:24 (six years ago)
Ha that one I have seen, it’s an outstanding piece of shit and all fun and games until the dp loses an eye
― shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Friday, 14 June 2019 14:28 (six years ago)
I still remember how incredibly excited I was for that Shining miniseries as a kid and huge fan of the book, the original film, all things King, etc. I think I ended up not even watching the last episode.
― One Eye Open, Friday, 14 June 2019 14:45 (six years ago)
King films are notoriously mostly dogshit, it’s interesting now we’re in this moment of ~respectable~ king films and the decent to dogshit ratio is exactly the same as before except that funless competence is now the peakThe new it and pet sematary are the most egregious, you can feel the cumulative hedging of 500 script iterations by committee creating a product that’s less compelling than the trashy 90s versions
― shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Friday, 14 June 2019 14:49 (six years ago)
The early King adaptations are still the best, obv. I mean when your work is being adapted by De Palma, Kubrick, and Cronenberg the results are gonna be okay! Gotta give a shout out to The Running Man and Stand By Me too but they are obv different from the usual when it comes to King.
His horror works much better on the page and anyone trying to directly translate it has to devote a lot of time to dialogue about shit weasels and so on.
― omar little, Friday, 14 June 2019 14:59 (six years ago)
Pet Sematary remake was the most pointless thing. The original was fine, nothing mindblowing but better than most King adaptations. I haven't heard anyone say anything complimentary about the new one. What's even the point. Remake the freakin' Lawnmower Man if you absolutely have to go down that road.
― Morrie Antoilette (Old Lunch), Friday, 14 June 2019 15:12 (six years ago)
Original ps is mainly bad but entertainingly so and features the single funniest scene in the history of cinema https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5So0SX24u0
― shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Friday, 14 June 2019 15:19 (six years ago)
that shd be on the sight and sound thread
― mark s, Friday, 14 June 2019 15:23 (six years ago)
tbh, as corny as that scene may be, it still fucks me up.
― ☮ (peace, man), Friday, 14 June 2019 15:31 (six years ago)
I must have watched it a hundred times and it never fails to crack me upPet sematary 2 quite obv the best watch of the bunch, the new remake even nicked a plot element from it
― shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Friday, 14 June 2019 15:40 (six years ago)
lol its a shame how he gets tripped up by that hidden invisible bear trap when he's just inches away from the kid, really hate to see that happen
― One Eye Open, Friday, 14 June 2019 16:35 (six years ago)
was really hoping he'd have a chance to GET THE BABY
GET THE BABY
― One Eye Open, Friday, 14 June 2019 16:38 (six years ago)
I haven't seen it since its initial airing obv, but apparently I am the only human being on the planet who liked the Shining miniseries?
― confusementalism (Dan Peterson), Friday, 14 June 2019 16:43 (six years ago)
Something about the way they film and perform the idiotic beatific laughter just before hilarious gross negligence reminds me of the zoolander petrol fight scene
― shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Friday, 14 June 2019 16:43 (six years ago)
(Xp)
― shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Friday, 14 June 2019 16:44 (six years ago)
yeah the way he laughs, does a complete 180 turn to his child, and then they cut back and hes still just laughing with his back turned is like a perfect comedy beat
― One Eye Open, Friday, 14 June 2019 16:52 (six years ago)
whereabouts is this film in the history of the "big no" trope?
(or did kubrick invent that also)
― mark s, Friday, 14 June 2019 16:58 (six years ago)
post-"Tough Guys Don't Dance", which probably deserves its own category.
― omar little, Friday, 14 June 2019 17:00 (six years ago)
idk if this is the originator but it must be the pinnacle, playing it 3 times for no reason just makes it perfect kitsch somehow
― shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Friday, 14 June 2019 17:01 (six years ago)
For those unaware, the Pet Sematary dad is also the actor responsible for this apex of filmed entertainment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhNC9VPBXXI
― Morrie Antoilette (Old Lunch), Friday, 14 June 2019 17:09 (six years ago)
holy shitGod bless him
― shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Friday, 14 June 2019 17:24 (six years ago)
i can found "10 hours of principal skinner shouting noooo" on youtube (i didn't watch it all) but no tropes-type history of what the simpsons had in mind when they first used it >:(
― mark s, Friday, 14 June 2019 17:27 (six years ago)
i saw PS at a drive-in and the entire place erupted in cheers at that scene
― orifex, Friday, 14 June 2019 18:42 (six years ago)
For those unaware, the Pet Sematary dad is also the actor responsible for this apex of filmed entertainment:― Morrie Antoilette (Old Lunch), Friday, June 14, 2019 5:09 PM (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Morrie Antoilette (Old Lunch), Friday, June 14, 2019 5:09 PM (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
OL, I had no idea this was missing from my life.
― ☮ (peace, man), Friday, 14 June 2019 20:59 (six years ago)
he plays a vicious pimp in Roger Corman's '80s classic Streetwalkin' starring Melissa Leo as a runaway(!) who becomes a prostitute who eventually has to FIGHT BACK
― omar little, Friday, 14 June 2019 21:07 (six years ago)