Avengers: Infinity War

I saw somewhere that the Black Widow movie was always intended to be a origin/prequal, and therefore it may or may not have ScarJo.

Since we're in spoilers, the highlights were Ruffalo Hulk (particularly when he's trying to blend in as the OG Hulk) and Lebowski Thor.

Also I can hear some of Captain America fandom setting shit on fire about the Straightwashing of Steve Rogers

"Straightwashing"?

The current state of Hulk was really bleak! The jokes about Thor got more laughs in the theater and his status was more fleshed out, but Hulk being a shadow of both his former selves acting like he’s a mascot.. sheesh

Thor’s apartment shack was a gift to everyone who liked the short film about his time in Australia with a roommate and I loved that

I've already heard the term "Thorbowski."

Re: Vision, I suppose Captain America could have just returned the stone to him, right? Anyway, like I said, lamp shading and hand waving at the same time seems like a good way to avoid these headaches, there's really no reason they need to be worked out logically.

I kind of consider that* to be a different level of nitpicking than the more 'practical' questions, like does this mean that half of Peter Parker's class is now college-aged? And is the next Spider-man film set in 2023?

Or as my girl, who is both smarter and grimmer than me, pointed out - unless the Earth was producing twice as much food as it needed 'just in case', Thanos is about to be proved right.

*but this distinction may only exist in my head

thanos wiped out half of all living things, which presumably includes crops and livestock, so it’ll all work out fine *cough*

i mean in that they all returned to life, one assumes

that was the implication of them looking out the window and seeing birds on the tree outside avengers hq where there were none

"Clark Gregg?"

isn't he dead? I can't keep any of that shit straight. I think he's dead on Agents of Shield, which I don't watch.

No one knows what the deal with the Black Widow movie is. I believe ScarJo is confirmed to be in it. So is someone named Florence Pugh who is a lot younger and looks an awful lot like her to me; what I read was that she was playing opposite her but I could see her playing a younger version.

I was sitting next to a bunch of teen super fans and one of them lost their fuckin mind when cap picked up mjolnir

Like, if you are going to do that at all in this movie, that's pretty much the time you are going to do it.

just got out of the movie. more thoughts later, but greatly amused that Thor is now full on Australian.

audience i saw it with clapped loudly at two bits: cap picking up mjolnir, and avengers assembling.

One of the trailers before was for Men in Black International, so I assume Hemsworth has not gone full Bale / Phoenix.

Had he not said the latter yet? It was a weird time to do it, because he waited until after they had assembled. Then again, he was staring at Thanos, so maybe he didn't notice them all lined up around and behind him. "Avengers! Asse ... oh, hey guys, didn't see you there. Let's get him!"

While I thought the Thor stuff was maaaaaybe not as funny as it thought it was, I do absolutely love how they kept him like that for the whole film. No magic "restore me to my former glory!" moment, the closest he gets is braiding his beard.

Just nuts:

https://deadline.com/2019/04/avengers-endgame-breakeven-profit-after-opening-weekend-box-office-marvel-1202603237/

With an estimated global opening weekend on course for $1.1 billion, Disney Avengers: Endgame will make what most successful superhero movies earn in a theatrical lifetime. At this level, film finance experts tell Deadline that the Anthony and Joe Russo-directed sequel will near cash breakeven tomorrow on Sunday, which is unheard of for a major studio tentpole during its opening weekend. Last year, the duo’s Avengers: Infinity War clicked into profitability after ten days.

yikes

i hope that means natalie portman is in line for a nice performance bonus

Impressive! What is the Avatar total at?

Answer: 2.88 billion USD.

Er, 2.788, to be accurate.

From three days ago:

A $1.132 billion global launch (more than the current $1.091 billion global cume of Captain Marvel), followed by a 2.4645x multiplier (with the obvious caveat that different territories will react to the film differently), will get the MCU finale to $2.789 billion worldwide, or just over the $2.7875 billion gross of Avatar. Yes, I’m rounding up a little for coherence, but that’s the gist of it. Either the fourth Avengers movie opens 36% higher around the world this weekend, or it opens pretty close to $1.1 billion and turns out to be a leggier blockbuster. Heck, it’ll need a similar multiplier and an $887 million-plus debut just to top Titanic’s unadjusted $2.1875 billion global cume.

So, is Avengers: Endgame on track to be the second-biggest global grosser of all time? Well, maybe, but it’ll still need something resembling legs to go along with a likely monstrous opening weekend. For the record, even a projected $950 million launch (yes, that’s optimistic) coupled by a similar multiplier would give the film “just” $2.341 billion, or nearly half-a-billion dollars behind Avatar. Heck, an $900 million launch followed by a 2.33x global multiplier (think Fate of the Furious) won’t even get it past $2.1 billion. None of this counts as a “bar for success,” but it just shows that not even Earth’s Mightiest Heroes may be a match for the self-proclaimed King of the World.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2019/04/24/avengers-endgame-titanic-avatar-james-cameron-star-wars-jurassic-world-box-office/#f3ab3435f093

global... cume, huh

jesus, so the cost w/ marketing of this thing was over a billion dollars

u gotta spend money to make money babey!

think of the caterers

I saw it reported that marketing was over $200 for this one, and I bet the film cost $400 to make. I really don't see how marketing and budget hits a billion unless they are talking about the cost for both IW and Endgame together, which is how I saw it reported at one point.

March 1, 2017:

Pinewood Atlanta Studios is currently hosting a film with the largest production budget ever, Chick-fil-A CEO and Pinewood Atlanta Studios co-owner Dan Cathy announced at an African American Film Critics Association luncheon Feb. 28.

"We now have on the lot down there now the largest film production ever with a $1 billion budget," Cathy said.

Due to studio agreements Cathy could not name the film, but Marvel's "Avengers: Infinity War" and its sequel are filming back-to-back at Pinewood.

Man, though, Disney in 2019: Captain Marvel tops a billion, this tops a billion, Star Wars will top a billion and god knows how much Frozen 2 will make.

Oh, and Toy Story 4!

And Lion King Redux.

I think the breakeven happens around $1.1 billion because that's when the studio's split reaches the cost of production and marketing. You have to subtract the theatres' split.

Ah. So even if the film only ("only") cost, say, $600 million to make and market, it has to make twice that before it starts pocketing pure profit, because a chunk is going to the theatres?

Yup. Thus that report etc. Linked article says the film cost around $350 million.

"Straightwashing"?

As in, The Man is clearly forcing an obviously gay character into a straight relationship.

Wait what ? There are jokes about his ass. From guys. And him.

Btw it wasn’t the mess I expected and I kinda liked it. Obviously plenty of ott and wtf moments but it’s part of the package !

Oh sorry I read the straightwasing argument too quickly!

While I thought the Thor stuff was maaaaaybe not as funny as it thought it was, I do absolutely love how they kept him like that for the whole film. No magic "restore me to my former glory!" moment, the closest he gets is braiding his beard.

Yeah Thor is the greatest one in this. Including the final scene !

I mesn HIS final scene

Just got back. I really wanted to like this more, but all of the time travel stuff was so confusing and inconsistent. Plus, they had multiple scenes where they were basically saying that OTHER time travel movies were bullshit, which was pretty funny considering how little this made sense. Like what was the whole conversation with the Ancient One about? Also, the rules around the infinity stones were incoherent.

As always, the dialogue was snappy, and the acting was great. Plenty of emotional scenes interspersed with good humor.

Think they were trying to posit that you can't go back in time and change the recent past (ie Back to the Future) as it's already happened and so what happens instead is that you just create a new multiverse timeline.

So 2014 Thanos getting snapped won't have altered the events of Infinity War

it seems the ancient one decided that since dr strange was 'meant to be the best of us', the mistake she realizes she herself might have made was something to do with not having done as the hulk asked, or in thinking that it would always be wrong to not protect the time stone (since she is told dr strange gave it up to the avengers) but i dunno, in the moment her sudden reversal seemed confusing.

dr strange insists to stark that it would be fatal to reveal his knowledge of their improbable future success, but he conspicuously tips him what to do during the final battle, so i figure the MCU writers would have no trouble invoking that or who knows what other technicalities to gin up all manner of endless narrative rebooting

Nerd sites that have thought about this more than I have posited that it's (no surprise) a complicated, contradictory mix of time travel BS. Changing the past won't change the future, because the future has already happened and is therefore the past (or something like that) so it instead branches off a different timeline that can at the very least be cut short (or something). But having 2014 Thanos head into the future sort of messes with that more than a bit, because if 2014 Thanos dies in the future, then he never would have gotten the stones, etc. And old Captain America means, if he stuck around, then he must have existed for a time in a world with two Captain Americas (maybe he did and that explains how he could just get married and live a life rather than fight evil) but then he'd be riding a totally different timeline back to the Endgame present, and what happened to that other Captain America. And ... yeah. There would still have to be a mess of a tangle of timelines. Best not to think about it. I took all the time travel movie references be self-aware gags, that it can never make sense, no matter how much you try to work it out.

Some talk about Fat Thor here: https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2019/04/avengers-endgame-fat-thor-ptsd-jokes-controversy

The only sudden reversal that I thought was handled poorly was, again, Hawkeye. Who went from member of the crew to broken dark murdering sword for hire for years and then right back to his old quipping self again. But, also again, I didn't want more Hawkeye, so I figured, fine.

xpost That was interesting. But I think if you introduce a character as sort of a platonic ideal of buff handsomeness - who wouldn't feel body shamed by that dude? - it's fair game to mine the opposite for jokes. If there was any tonal inconsistency it was in the idea that Thor (or Captain America or Hulk or whomever) really need to bother with the concept of too many or too few calories. If they did they'd have to be fed like animals at the zoo. I think they eat for the novelty or just to be social; Thor had a gut but he was no less Thor-y in strength and powers. Nor did he feel bad about being slovenly! That's why it's cool he stayed that way.

I enjoyed this movie