2020 Democratic presidential primary

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (14963 of them)

I'm coming empty thinking of a veep nominee who has had star power

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:08 (seven years ago)

Palin

A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Chooglin (will), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:09 (seven years ago)

Agnew

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:10 (seven years ago)

Palin, nope. She became a star afterward. She came out of nowhere.

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:10 (seven years ago)

They picked her because she was everything McCain wasn't: "centrist," male, D.C., old

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:11 (seven years ago)

that’s fair.

A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Chooglin (will), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:12 (seven years ago)

er flip that: young, tea party, female, governor

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:12 (seven years ago)

but christ was it immediate. shit was ludicrous

A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Chooglin (will), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:12 (seven years ago)

almost literally overnight

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:15 (seven years ago)

veep nominee who has had star power

The Kennedy family loaned Sargent Shriver to McGovern to help paper over the Eagleton fiasco, but he barely registered in the public consciousness amid avalanche that fell on McGovern in that election. I suspect Shriver preferred that his nomination be forgotten as rapidly as possible.

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:23 (seven years ago)

Neither Bernie nor Warren make any sense as VPs, and even less so for one to be VP to the other!

anvil, Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:26 (seven years ago)

This is going back a ways, but the GOP consciously thought of star power when putting Teddy Roosevelt on the 1900 ticket.

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:27 (seven years ago)

ha yes it is

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:28 (seven years ago)

xxp and McGovern wanted Shriver in the first place!

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:28 (seven years ago)

Assuming he'll want someone with mostly simpatico politics, I honestly have no idea who Bernie could have as a running mate if NOT Warren tbh.

Simon H., Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:33 (seven years ago)

if he gets the nomination he'll want to win, first, and same for her

the vice president isn't making policy

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:37 (seven years ago)

I honestly have no idea who Bernie could have as a running mate if NOT Warren tbh.

I'm sure Sanders could reach into the House and find a few veep possibilities. I'm not sure if any governors would be a good fit. He could name Sen. Merkley, who'd be simpatico, but who is from another small state and is a middling fit for any of the ticket-balancing reasons why veeps usually get nominated.

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:41 (seven years ago)

how do either Bernie or Warren expand their vote by picking the other?

Warren is polling drastically back in the pack (yes polls etc etc), Bernie is extremely popular, Bernie also has a rump of deadshit supporters who would not vote for Warren on her own, QED

blokes you can't rust (sic), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:48 (seven years ago)

and one-noting on a pet topic is traditionally an acceptable pursuit for a veep

blokes you can't rust (sic), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:50 (seven years ago)

Assuming he'll want someone with mostly simpatico politics, I honestly have no idea who Bernie could have as a running mate if NOT Warren tbh.

― Simon H.,

Nina Turner? Ro Khanna? Got a feeling he might go with Tulsi though

anvil, Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:53 (seven years ago)

Bernie also has a rump of deadshit supporters who would not vote for Warren on her own

is this true? Where are you getting this?

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 19:57 (seven years ago)

Well all the candidates have a rump of shithead supporters!

anvil, Saturday, 20 April 2019 20:06 (seven years ago)

anyway Warren wld be daily defending against a barrage that "she is trying to take your money!" It will be 24/7 socialism socialism socialism

The person they pick to disabuse swing voters of this notion will not be...Bernie Sanders

or vice versa

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 20:17 (seven years ago)

is this true? Where are you getting this?

again, typical polls caveat, but

No. 3: 26% of current Bernie Sanders supporters said that they would rather vote for President Donald Trump over Senator Elizabeth Warren, if that were the eventual 2020 matchup.

blokes you can't rust (sic), Saturday, 20 April 2019 20:24 (seven years ago)

The person they pick to disabuse swing voters of this notion will not be...Bernie Sanders

just tell swing voters that socialism is cool actually

blokes you can't rust (sic), Saturday, 20 April 2019 20:26 (seven years ago)

This is a good thread

Why is the media so in love with Buttigieg? Because his resume—USSYP, elite college, Rhodes—is an exemplar of meritocratic success. He is the child and apparent savior of America’s meritocratic ruling class.

— Mike Gravel (@MikeGravel) April 19, 2019

Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Saturday, 20 April 2019 20:39 (seven years ago)

xp ok that is crazy

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 20:50 (seven years ago)

that EW is trailing both Beto and Buttigieg is maddening

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 20:51 (seven years ago)

swing voters aren't real. the name of the game is mobilizing nonvoters. the lefter the candidate, the easier that is. trying to "broaden" sanders or warren's appeal with some dopey moderate vp probably wouldn't be enough to torpedo the campaign, but it would be a really strange thing to do when you could nominate a safe leftist instead.

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:02 (seven years ago)

i agree that pulling both sanders+warren out of the senate at the same time is not ideal and for this reason i am open to other vp choices for either of them; but they are obviously a winning ticket.

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:08 (seven years ago)

xp Obama Republicans were real, Obama-Trump voters were real

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:14 (seven years ago)

there is no need to continue obsessing over demographic slices of the piddling subset of the american population everyone has gotten used to thinking of as the voting public. some obama-trump voters voted for a vague idea of change in 2008, a vaguer idea of change in 2016, and will therefore probably not be looking for the safe hands of the status quo in 2020. others are irrevocably in for trump now because white supremacy is a helluva drug and it's too late to detox them. that's okay. they are badly outnumbered.

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:19 (seven years ago)

nominate leftists and for every philadelphia suburbanite we lose we pick up literally thousands everywhere else.

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:23 (seven years ago)

This is a good thread

🐦[Why is the media so in love with Buttigieg? Because his resume—USSYP, elite college, Rhodes—is an exemplar of meritocratic success. He is the child and apparent savior of America’s meritocratic ruling class.
— Mike Gravel (@MikeGravel) April 19, 2019🕸]🐦


nuts to that. half the dem field sports some version of those credentials. to the extent that buttigieg is compelling, it’s because he has a tendency to not pound tables or cast himself (and his supporters) as a dragon-slaying hero.

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:25 (seven years ago)

but there are fucking dragons to slay tho

be the 2 chainz you want 2 see in the world (m bison), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:28 (seven years ago)

kind of a perverse idea of compelling there

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:30 (seven years ago)

xxp DLH this sounds like a great plan for after the electoral college is abolished

anyway I would love to see a Warren-Sanders ticket but professional obsessers of piddling subsets will make sure it doesn't happen

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:30 (seven years ago)

professional obsessers of piddling subsets will make sure it doesn't happen

now here my sanguinity vanishes and i fear i agree

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:31 (seven years ago)

Pete's the very model of a modern Mayor Buttigieg.

moist owlette (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:32 (seven years ago)

slay 'em with glibness

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:37 (seven years ago)

kind of a perverse idea of compelling there


and yet there are the numbers, and he keeps not pounding tables, and people start saying dumb things like “what is it with this guy? those foolish centrists must be beguiled by his two years as a junior analyst at McKinsey”

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:39 (seven years ago)

I'll start being concerned if he's still a favorite three months from now

Simon H., Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:43 (seven years ago)

but there are fucking dragons to slay tho


apocalyptic fantasy. “only I can save you.” these dragons need to be programmatically deprived of habitat and prey for at least a generation.

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:44 (seven years ago)

I'll start being concerned if he's still a favorite three months from now


lol for once I stand with Simon H in a politics thread

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:45 (seven years ago)

I suggest we watch The Ten Commandments on ABC tonight to get an idea of what dragons and leadership look like.

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:46 (seven years ago)

so it shall be written
so it shall be done

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Saturday, 20 April 2019 21:58 (seven years ago)

I think Stacey Abrams would be a dynamite veep for Sanders. Maybe she rejected Biden because he sucks and not necessarily because she’s off the table.

Evans on Hammond (evol j), Saturday, 20 April 2019 22:40 (seven years ago)

why on earth would she accept a nullity of a Constitutional position?

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 20 April 2019 22:47 (seven years ago)

I missed that Mayor Pete used "virtue signalling" a while back, I hope an aide told him to cut it out

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/27/politics/pete-buttigieg-opposes-boycotts-chickfila/index.html

Simon H., Saturday, 20 April 2019 22:58 (seven years ago)

No. 3: 26% of current Bernie Sanders supporters said that they would rather vote for President Donald Trump over Senator Elizabeth Warren, if that were the eventual 2020 matchup.

ugh. wonder how that 26% breaks down between trolls, accelerationists, and assholes who would like some socialism, but failing that, are happy to take the racism.

A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Chooglin (will), Saturday, 20 April 2019 23:01 (seven years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.