colly out
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:23 (seventeen years ago)
Noooo, should be maska anus in now, not foster.
― whatever, Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:24 (seventeen years ago)
i think it's pretty fair to say this game is over
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:25 (seventeen years ago)
yes but there's a morbid thrill holding me to the sofa
― whatever, Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:26 (seventeen years ago)
mindless
― whatever, Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:27 (seventeen years ago)
I think if I get back home during a summer I shall go and see an england womens game. Might be quite good.
― Prince of Persia (Ed), Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:27 (seventeen years ago)
at least they win
― whatever, Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:28 (seventeen years ago)
jesus
― whatever, Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
England will be lucky if they make 100 now. It's up to Shah to get England to a not quite as embarrassing score.
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:32 (seventeen years ago)
you called it...
― whatever, Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:34 (seventeen years ago)
broad the hero?
― whatever, Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:35 (seventeen years ago)
dying swann
― whatever, Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:39 (seventeen years ago)
SA will knock off the runs required in under 10 overs
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:40 (seventeen years ago)
oh dear. India and WI will be licking their lips.
― Achtung Blobby (Neil S), Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:50 (seventeen years ago)
Pathetic,England will not win any games.
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:59 (seventeen years ago)
almost made it through 20 overs at least.
― Prince of Persia (Ed), Thursday, 11 June 2009 17:59 (seventeen years ago)
I gotta say it was a good day.
― Posters that beg the Question: What the Hell were You THINKING? (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 14 June 2009 21:12 (seventeen years ago)
Pathetic,England will not win any games
This guy otm tho.
― Posters that beg the Question: What the Hell were You THINKING? (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 14 June 2009 21:13 (seventeen years ago)
bring the boys back home
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Sunday, 14 June 2009 21:28 (seventeen years ago)
D/L, damp, darkness and floodlights, truly this is the future of cricket.
― Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 15 June 2009 19:38 (seventeen years ago)
brilliant keeping again by foster
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Monday, 15 June 2009 19:51 (seventeen years ago)
bravo stumped!
need a few more wkts tho, still think WI will be favourites
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Monday, 15 June 2009 19:56 (seventeen years ago)
you know who is out there
18 needed from 14. WI gonna win
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Monday, 15 June 2009 19:59 (seventeen years ago)
i hate losing to the WI with their despicable attitude to cricket this year
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Monday, 15 June 2009 20:12 (seventeen years ago)
they have had a brilliant attitude to twenty20, give them their due
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Monday, 15 June 2009 20:16 (seventeen years ago)
It's unpatriotic and all, but I'd probably rather see WI in the semis than England. Sad to see Colly looking so gutted though.
― Achtung Blobby (Neil S), Monday, 15 June 2009 20:32 (seventeen years ago)
not enough batting by england from over 11 onwards. broad should have been in before swann and possibly also foster. i'd rather not see WI in the semis. england have been inconsistent in their play but proper in their attitude. SA to win.
― whatever, Monday, 15 June 2009 21:21 (seventeen years ago)
Who'd've thought South Africa would choke in the semis?
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 18 June 2009 22:00 (seventeen years ago)
Oh, not I
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Thursday, 18 June 2009 22:05 (seventeen years ago)
seriously, even if they lose the final, there is just one, ONE fucking choice for SPOTY team of the year
so proud of ya
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Friday, 19 June 2009 14:39 (seventeen years ago)
Australia done got PUNK'D
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Friday, 19 June 2009 14:49 (seventeen years ago)
This is the most enjoyable match of the T20 world cup so far. Why they dont take singles to give gayle the strike is beyond me.
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Friday, 19 June 2009 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
lol one man bestriding entire innings like colossus
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Friday, 19 June 2009 19:38 (seventeen years ago)
South Africa didn't really 'choke' - Pakistan has some great players. Their best form can beat anybody.
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 19 June 2009 20:02 (seventeen years ago)
This has been an absolutely terrific tournament, btw - brilliant fielding, lots of interesting maneuvering with bat and ball (not really seen a lot of 20/20 before this tournament so excuse my lack of experience with it).
Great to see a sport developing in interesting lines the way cricket has been and I'm curious to see how this will impact upon the way test cricket is played (if it doesn't kill it off first ho ho)
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 19 June 2009 20:06 (seventeen years ago)
people will be all scooping good-length swinging deliveries over their shoulder to fine-leg for a single
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Friday, 19 June 2009 20:08 (seventeen years ago)
i mean, he's the only man on the boundary, but a scoop's a scoop
― xyzzzz__, Friday, June 19, 2009 8:02 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
odds on that on their best form they can't beat sri lanka. SA choked big style against spin in the middle overs.
interesting points though about the development of T20 - when it started it was a batsman-friendly slog fest, but this has been a tournament of bowling. shame about SA as Parnell was the best bowler of the tournament (Gul and Aamir ran him close). yet england's failure was down to batting deficiencies - we are behind the times as ever.
― whatever, Friday, 19 June 2009 21:20 (seventeen years ago)
aamir? madness.
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Friday, 19 June 2009 21:21 (seventeen years ago)
best bowlers are in the best teams and he's 17. not as destructive as angelo tonight but still well in control, great rhythm and pace.
― whatever, Friday, 19 June 2009 21:27 (seventeen years ago)
aamir has been distinctly second-tier. gul, mendis, parnell, afridi have been the unquestionable bowling stars
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Friday, 19 June 2009 21:32 (seventeen years ago)
hell, even graeme swann's ahead of aamir
i kinda <3 swanny but still this is unbiased judgement
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Friday, 19 June 2009 21:36 (seventeen years ago)
Malinda's the best guy I've seen, though admittedly my access to the tournament has been limited. I've been very impressed with the format, much to my surprise. 40 or 50-over cricket is surely dead in the water, but test cricket looks even tastier to me because it requires basically the opposite qualities to 20/20.
(As an aside, how do we feel about a separate Ashes thread? This one's getting quite long, and on the off-chance that we get another classic I kind of feel that it should be properly documented for future generations)
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 19 June 2009 21:53 (seventeen years ago)
Malinga? Huh?
Also, there's a thread on COGH for the Ashes. With my name in it. :D
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Friday, 19 June 2009 21:56 (seventeen years ago)
aamir has been distinctly young for an international tourney. and while no major fireworks also no major embarrassment.
and please save me from the cantona-afridi axis of evil. it's a wankfest too far.
― whatever, Friday, 19 June 2009 22:13 (seventeen years ago)
malinga has been excellent
― whatever, Friday, 19 June 2009 22:14 (seventeen years ago)
Malinga has been good, if not quite up to the standard he set during the last 50-over WC. If he's the best guy you've seen, you've been ignoring large swathes of SL's bowling innings, especially the bits involving spinners.
Aamir has 'done well for a 17 year-old', sure, but this still doesn't justify the pedestal you put him on. I'd say quite a few decent 17 year-old bowlers would do ok if they had Afridi and Gul bowling alongside 'em.
― gosh I actually dig this shit (country matters), Friday, 19 June 2009 22:18 (seventeen years ago)
i watch lots of cricket. malinga has bowled well this tournament and SL are still in it.
it's not an aamir pedestal, but your argument that he's only as good as the bowlers around him misses the point that his captain was prepared to let him open the overs against the tournament favourites, before afridi/gul bowled. and ok he didn't take 4 wickets but nor did he fk his team up.
― whatever, Friday, 19 June 2009 22:24 (seventeen years ago)