He was really great. The whole thing was and I can't stop thinking about it. I hadn't thought of a couple things you just said. Think I need to watch it again tonight.
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 08:35 (seven years ago)
cant deny I was a little broken after watching the final episode.
― mark e, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 08:44 (seven years ago)
Do we still think Godmother is vile y/n?
― suzy, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 09:09 (seven years ago)
y
― Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 09:40 (seven years ago)
definitely
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 09:46 (seven years ago)
Horrible.
― chap, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 10:08 (seven years ago)
She's just profoundly selfish and not even humanised by the script, even Claire's husband came across better in the last episode.
Meanwhile
Is this a Pale Fire reference - gag about unreliable narrators - in Fleabag? pic.twitter.com/Dg1D2BAj9m— Henry Hitchings (@henryhitchings) April 2, 2019
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 10:23 (seven years ago)
Explain? What does the graffiti say?
― suzy, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 10:32 (seven years ago)
Charles Kinbote is the unreliable narrator in Vladimir Nabokov's novel Pale Fire.
― Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 10:54 (seven years ago)
God I haven’t read that in 20 years
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 10:54 (seven years ago)
xp They're saying it means "Kinbote" in ref to the character in "Pale Fire" but I'm not sure you'd pronounce that word "Kinbote" (I bear correction on that of course) - it may be that it's a double joke because it looks like Kinbote to people who read Roman script but doesn't actually spell it in Cyrillic?
― Tim, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 10:59 (seven years ago)
*eyeball roll* all narrators are unreliable.
― suzy, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 11:07 (seven years ago)
It say “stomach” in Russian fwiw
― ShariVari, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 11:08 (seven years ago)
Thank you, SV, I knew you’d be along to clarify matters.
― suzy, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 11:32 (seven years ago)
Gelman killed it in his last scene. That role was so perfectly suited to his talents.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 9 April 2019 11:55 (seven years ago)
I was so worried Claire was going to cave. Gelman is unbelievably odious in that part.
― Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 12:05 (seven years ago)
not going to link it here but his "iBrain" story from Comedy Bang Bang is one of my favorite pieces of comedy in the last ?? years
yknow I was going to be picky and say I could have done without the CGI fox, but now with the possible revelation of the Nabokov reference I'm wondering if it wasn't intentionally wobbly as a way to underline the "unreliable narrator" aspect? this is the level she's working at, that I even entertain this theory.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 9 April 2019 12:09 (seven years ago)
CGI, really? it didn't look like it to me.
― Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 12:22 (seven years ago)
certainly looked like it to me, and this Guardian sendoff agrees
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/apr/08/farewell-fleabag-the-most-electrifying-devastating-tv-in-years
― Simon H., Tuesday, 9 April 2019 12:25 (seven years ago)
It was definitely CGI
― Number None, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 12:35 (seven years ago)
damn Tories shot all the real ones I suppose
― Simon H., Tuesday, 9 April 2019 12:38 (seven years ago)
Apparently the graffiti also means 'life' in Bulgarian?
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 12:44 (seven years ago)
Which makes a bit more sense than 'stomach' in this context.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 12:45 (seven years ago)
it was cg. it would be kind of shitty (not to mention not that profitable) if people kept trained foxes for their rare appearances in tv shows
― findom haddie (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 16:10 (seven years ago)
very true
― Simon H., Tuesday, 9 April 2019 16:14 (seven years ago)
great show, great ending
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 17:13 (seven years ago)
A real fox perhaps, but just composited in? I mean, it wouldn't take me more than one night sitting in a sleeping bag outside my house to get that shot ;) Destination of 176 bus was a nod to their editor. Rather than, y'know, Penge.
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 17:19 (seven years ago)
not going to link it here but his "iBrain" story from Comedy Bang Bang is one of my favorite pieces of comedy in the last ?? yearsbcz I remember the house I was moving into while listening, I’m saying this is just over nine years old (the radio version - Gelman had apparently been doing it live for a while). and Li’l Gary was on the episode too
― blokes you can't rust (sic), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 17:47 (seven years ago)
omg I was just in Tesco thinking about this episode and I started tearing up again and a woman looked at me with some concern.
― Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Tuesday, 9 April 2019 20:41 (seven years ago)
Surprised to read the 'creepy' talk on here after seemingly endless tweets about how hot and steamy it all was.
But..
How You Feel About Fleabag And The Hot Priest Says A Lot About You
https://www.vogue.co.uk/article/fleabag-season-2-hot-priest-relationship
― piscesx, Tuesday, 9 April 2019 23:39 (seven years ago)
no thanks.
― Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 10 April 2019 00:48 (seven years ago)
just generally feel like sweary priests fit the same mould as down with the kids teachers; essentially suspicious. this didn’t generally affect the excellence of the show, and i felt it most in ep one, but I... can’t remember what i was going i say. i did think the “it’s God isn’t it” but was surprisingly powerful.
― Fizzles, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 04:19 (seven years ago)
There's something about the way in which this show invites us to cast judgement and is acutely aware it's doing that and actively playing with it, Claire's husbands - "I'm not a bad person, I just have a bad personality" speech underlined that. As does the fact that nearly everyone in her family considers Fleabag a selfish, narcissistic attention-seeker with only the viewer and the priest seeing different. I think that's probably why they went for a guy as creepy and unhinged looking rather than Sunday Evening BB2 Dreamy Priest 101.
There are hints of a contradictory and fucked up inner life going on with the priest that we never get to see, big red flags every time he mentions his brother for instance.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 07:30 (seven years ago)
Yes, and the battle with alcoholism. The alternative didn’t need to be “dreamy priest”, but the instability in his personality did introduce an element of danger to the uncertainty as to his motivations. that uncertainty most obviously coalesced around “kneel” - which because of that chaos had multiple possible meanings. that was brilliant.
― Fizzles, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 12:13 (seven years ago)
Last time I went to Italy there were sexy priest calendars onsale all over the place, it's a definite thing.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 12:19 (seven years ago)
indeed. i remember seeing them in Rome! Here we go.
― Fizzles, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 12:27 (seven years ago)
poor Father Albert has no stand-out qualities.
― koogs, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 13:02 (seven years ago)
he has a name!
― Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 10 April 2019 13:58 (seven years ago)
It's no Lovely Girls competition.
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Wednesday, 10 April 2019 15:31 (seven years ago)
#4 - Father Angelic - is the guy you see everywhere. He's the kind of sexy priest you could take home to meet your parents.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 16:10 (seven years ago)
https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2019/apr/10/how-should-we-feel-about-andrew-scott-priest-fleabag
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Wednesday, 10 April 2019 19:27 (seven years ago)
i think that's a misreading. i don't think PWB wants us to think the priest is a horrible man. he's clearly a flawed man, but the show wants you to care about their star-crossed love
― findom haddie (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 10 April 2019 19:33 (seven years ago)
yeah individual moments came across as potentially crossing over into dark territory but purposely never went all the way
― Simon H., Wednesday, 10 April 2019 19:34 (seven years ago)
yeah they're all flawed at times horrible people but all of them were shown as redeemable by the end other than the odious godmother.
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Wednesday, 10 April 2019 19:37 (seven years ago)
there's def a bit of cancel-culture mania in the air that means that any bit of tv featuring a cis het man behaving badly (angrily, lustily, controlling, sexually creepy) has the pop culture writers writing about how he's awful and the (fictional) woman and real female viewers should shun him, as if the majority of cis het men don't act like one of those types of things at least on occasion
― findom haddie (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 10 April 2019 19:38 (seven years ago)
I've enjoyed the series but that last episode stank of Richard Curtis to me.
― fetter, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 19:42 (seven years ago)
everyone on that show is kinda awful except for boo and the chatty guy at the cafe, the priest is by far the least awful of the crew
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Wednesday, 10 April 2019 19:42 (seven years ago)
the old chatty guy in the cafe used to be in Juliet Bravo! He was the social worker husband of Inspector Darbley.
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Wednesday, 10 April 2019 19:47 (seven years ago)
can we get a series next of just Tales Of Boo? Definitely some damage behind those big boo eyes.
― mick signals, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 21:26 (seven years ago)
i really didn't like boo. manic-pixie-dead-friend
― findom haddie (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 10 April 2019 21:31 (seven years ago)