Impeach Trump Y/N

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1786 of them)

I never really understood how it was possible to successfully impeach in the first place

anvil, Tuesday, 12 March 2019 02:40 (five years ago) link

only 20 months till he can be voted out anyway. Seems a more reliable method of removal (though at this point I've lost all track of what is up and what is down)

anvil, Saturday, 23 March 2019 20:38 (five years ago) link

As I get older & lose faith in the world, I wouldn't be surprised if he gets re-elected.

D. Joe, Saturday, 23 March 2019 22:24 (five years ago) link

three weeks pass...

Pareene: "Democrats who preemptively declare impeachment off the table are mistakenly (or intentionally) conflating one possible end result of the impeachment process for the process itself."

https://newrepublic.com/article/153629/democrats-hoping-dont-understand-impeachment-entails

jaymc, Friday, 19 April 2019 17:38 (five years ago) link

...House intelligence committee chairman Adam Schiff, who among Democrats has the best handle on the details of the Russia scandal, nevertheless echoed Hoyer Thursday saying he learned as a prosecutor, “you don’t bring a case if you don’t think you’re going to be successful just to try the case,” and thus “barring a bipartisan consensus” impeachment should be off the table. This argument has been an inducement to Republican lawlessness since Schiff first offered it last year, and it is fatally misguided. It presupposes that if press releases and headline writers don’t move public opinion on their own, then all options are exhausted. That if Republicans refuse to support the impeachment of a president who needs to be impeached, Democrats are out of options and must throw up their hands.

In reality, the job of persuading the public that the president needs to be impeached falls to the leaders of the House of Representatives themselves. Unlike prosecutors, they don’t infringe on anyone’s liberties by trying a case they think they might lose. Unlike prosecutors, their decision to decline warranted charges can create lasting precedents and perverse incentives. Unlike prosecutors, their trials aren’t zero-sum affairs, because trying a case well and losing can have salutary benefits for their party and the country. Going down swinging can be good politics, and set important precedents. Unlike prosecutors they can’t select their jurors, but also unlike prosecutors, they are not discouraged from trying the case in public. To the contrary, it is their obligation. And if the Mueller report makes one thing clear it’s that if Democrats fail to meet that obligation, Trump won’t be chastened—to the contrary, he will be more emboldened in his abuses of power, and the country will be in even greater danger.

these are not all of the possible side effects (Karl Malone), Friday, 19 April 2019 23:02 (five years ago) link

Yes Adam, cases as a prosecutor and Congressional Impeachment work exactly the same way.

Got your butt drank (Neanderthal), Friday, 19 April 2019 23:07 (five years ago) link

Look, can we all just agree that when another irredeemable piece of shit inevitably decides to follow Trump's wildly successful 'President Supervillain' template, we will discuss with an even greater degree of seriousness all of the reasons why we cannot and should not impeach him/her? That's all I want, really. Grave pronouncements, thoughts, prayers.

thoughts and prayers is what they do best

pippin drives a lambo through the gates of isengard (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 19 April 2019 23:30 (five years ago) link

Just like Daddy Mueller, there is no Congress Ex Machina to save us. Give it up. Hasn't anyone read any Pynchon? The machine always wins. Gotta beat him in 2020.

Mazzy Tsar (PBKR), Friday, 19 April 2019 23:38 (five years ago) link

If my non-voting rep fails to impeach this bastard, I will flail about in the most impassioned manner possible to recruit and elect an alternative candidate in the next race.

El Tomboto, Friday, 19 April 2019 23:48 (five years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqbEsS5kFb8

the theme song for this and every day

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Friday, 19 April 2019 23:50 (five years ago) link

let's get on with this shit already !

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 15:39 (five years ago) link

someone draft the papers and get them over to Nancy ASAP

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 15:40 (five years ago) link

The now officially documented fact that his subordinates regularly refuse to carry out his orders mean we don’t really have a functioning executive. No one voted for these aides. Isn’g that a reason to impeach?

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 24 April 2019 15:54 (five years ago) link

Reason 853 but still

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 24 April 2019 15:57 (five years ago) link

what is this fucking fear of backfiring or political misstep shit ? Like what they are going to make some imaginary fence sitting assholes vote Trump again if impeachment fails? fuck'em who cares ? if we are counting on those dipshits then we are fucked anyways.

(•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 15:59 (five years ago) link

"the more you say he's unfit to lead, the more i wanna vote for him."

Got your butt drank (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:13 (five years ago) link

“Everyone says he’s dumb and unfit to lead - the same things they say about me and my friends! That’s why I’m voting trump”

these are not all of the possible side effects (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:34 (five years ago) link

what is this fucking fear of backfiring or political misstep shit

like it or not, impeachment is a deeply, intensely political process and only minimally and peripherally a vehicle for delivering 'justice'. it was designed that way. it cannot be any other way. and if you examine your feelings, I think you'll find your vehemence is almost certainly born of your intensely felt political beliefs and desires, not some abstract desire for truth and calm reasoning about the functioning of the executive branch.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:42 (five years ago) link

what's weird to me is that anti-impeachment Dems seem to be unafraid of the more likely 'backfiring' scenario: Trump gets reelected in 2020 at which point impeaching him would be basically impossible.

rob, Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:44 (five years ago) link

impeachment is a deeply, intensely political process

this seems a perfectly valid reason to pursue it

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:45 (five years ago) link

I mean it's *all* a deeply, intensely political processs, what is the advantage to pretending otherwise when your opponent is going there whether you like it or not

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:47 (five years ago) link

what's weird to me is that anti-impeachment Dems seem to be unafraid of the more likely 'backfiring' scenario: Trump gets reelected in 2020 at which point impeaching him would be basically impossible.

heh, yeah, reminds me of that lovely time when a lot of people (including me, for a while) were hoping trump would win the 2016 GOP nomination because he would be so much easier to defeat in the election than establishment faves jeb! or the moral beacon ted cruz

these are not all of the possible side effects (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:47 (five years ago) link

Even if they dont move immediately into impeachment, they need to get way more aggressive ASAP. Their oversight is being challenged at every step and they are doing little to hit back.

Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:48 (five years ago) link

yeah putting the president on trial is not going to *gain* him any votes, his base will be sufficiently demagogued into turning out no matter what congress does

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:49 (five years ago) link

i think Trump is really cornered and isolated this time for certain

omar little, Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:50 (five years ago) link

this seems a perfectly valid reason to pursue it

not quite. it is perfectly valid reason to analyze the likely political consequences, and if your analysis is on balance neutral-to-favorable, that is when you pursue it. politics sometimes honors noble failures, but it punishes them just the same.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:51 (five years ago) link

well of course I don't mean politics for the sake of politics. I mean impeachment has political advantages above and apart from "justice"

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 16:59 (five years ago) link

how is it not a good political move to get every single Republican Congressman on the record saying "I support this traitorous criminal idiot. I think he rocks, actually."

frogbs, Wednesday, 24 April 2019 17:34 (five years ago) link

it is a good political move

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 17:36 (five years ago) link

Democratic politicians like to imagine there's a significant portion of the electorate that's turned off by any action not done in the spirit of bipartisan hand holding

Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 17:37 (five years ago) link

Trump's behaviour just seems to be getting even worse daily despite theissue of this being brought up and presumably being prevalent at least as a pursuable possibility.
I'm hearing that there is inevitably going to be a period of further investigation since taht's what hearings would amount to so starting the process seems to be necessary.

But on the other hand some possibility of him being reelected would only mean he would feel absolutely justified in any further action he took. Just hoping also that any further exposure of his crimes might make that reelection unlikely.
& at what point doe she cease to be a useful asset because he's shown himself up so badly. Would think that even Putin might pull the plug once he'd outlived usefullness. So he'd be alone trying to get reelected and only have a dimished GOP supporting him.

Stevolende, Wednesday, 24 April 2019 17:41 (five years ago) link

on the record saying "I support this traitorous criminal idiot. I think he rocks, actually."

Good luck with that. What they will say irl is how "troubled" they were, but that the evidence blah blah blah. Do you honestly believe these people got where they are not knowing how to spin their vote to match the leanings of their constituency?

Voting to impeach and to convict is GREAT politics for winning your vote, because you already are sold on Trump being a "traitorous criminal idiot". But in order for the politics to align with you, a majority of voters need to be sold on that conviction. If they aren't, then going gung-ho, all-in for impeachment is playing with fire, politically. Like I said, a noble failure still fails and will be punished, not rewarded, leaving you worse off, not better.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 18:01 (five years ago) link

HRC has spoken! "caution"

and she's an expert

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 18:25 (five years ago) link

this is a politics thread morbs

american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 18:28 (five years ago) link

Morbs, we all know caution is not in your emotional vocabulary.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 18:30 (five years ago) link

Morbs you made it, like, three days

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 18:53 (five years ago) link

that was a driveby

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 18:55 (five years ago) link

It was a voluntary, impromptu, and self-imposed restriction, so there was never a reason to think it would last any longer than the reaction that prompted it.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 18:55 (five years ago) link

join me in the Tootsie thread

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 18:56 (five years ago) link

I am boycotting all the Dabney Coleman theads

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 19:02 (five years ago) link

a strange game

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 24 April 2019 19:02 (five years ago) link

at some point enough is enough

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 19:02 (five years ago) link

let's all talk about Santino Fontana in here now that Morbs is gone

blokes you can't rust (sic), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 19:17 (five years ago) link

a strange game

― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, April 24, 2019 12:02 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lmao

american bradass (BradNelson), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 20:20 (five years ago) link

Investigative hearings should proceed, so that there is a constant dribble of damning news on Trump. I'd prefer that it focus on the violations of the emoluments clause, as I think corruption will hit much harder with the electorate than

I would much rather see the Democratic caucus pass sweeping Medicare for all and climate legislation, and have this be the central theme of the remainder of this Congress. Give the Democratic presidential and Senate candidates something to run on.

Insert bad pun (Sanpaku), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 21:06 (five years ago) link

^ corruption will hit much harder with the electorate than the clear obstruction of justice in the Russia investigation.

Insert bad pun (Sanpaku), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 21:07 (five years ago) link

are we discussing impeachment in the Tootsie thread or

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 April 2019 21:12 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.