2020 Democratic presidential primary

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (14963 of them)

i almost registered as an independent once out of anger at the democratic party but then i realized that literally the only reason i registered democratic in the first place was to vote in primaries and that there would still be primaries in the future i'd want to vote in and that literally not a single human being alive gives a shit what party is listed on my voter id.

Mordy, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 16:40 (seven years ago)

who gives a fuck what party someone "identifies" as. they're not real platonic objects. they're ad hoc names that have developed over a century of political events.

― Mordy, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 16:37 (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

works both ways if there's political gains to be made

ɪmˈpəʊzɪŋ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 16:40 (seven years ago)

he's a frontrunner for the dem nomination afaic he's a democrat whatever he calls himself

Mordy, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 16:42 (seven years ago)

God, I am going to be so pissed if it ends up being two straight white men up for president again. FFS. Treading water down some rapids.

Yerac, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 16:44 (seven years ago)

xp i think thats fine, yknow everything is 'afaic' between the ditches and the primary and everyone here wpuld vote for him or Warren or whoever after thats done

anyone acting like theres an actual moral imperative on any nominee or potential nominee not to run or to run but softly or whatever is idk here id say they were talking shite but that might come across as overly aggressive to yanks so sub in a fond but disapproving phrase as you wish

ɪmˈpəʊzɪŋ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 16:46 (seven years ago)

multi-xps

Now, Mordy, all Sanders is doing with the 'democratic socialist' label is branding his positions as standing well to the left of the party mainstream, which they are. For at least the past five decades that was a label that required some courage to claim as one's unique selling point, even in Vermont, which may have been the only state where such a label would not instantly sink your candidacy. By sticking to it doggedly and laying out his progressive agenda clearly and proudly, he has rehabilitated the idea of socialism, which is a good thing, and probably of greater value than if he had simply identified himself as Yet Another Democrat and voted exactly the same on every bill.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 16:46 (seven years ago)

I won't be, if it means Orange Grifter loses. xxp

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 16:47 (seven years ago)

God, I am going to be so pissed if it ends up being two straight white men up for president again

Right there with you, but I'm equally dreading watching a quality female nominee get nitpicked to death.

Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:01 (seven years ago)

I think Bernie's an inspiring, nice guy who lives in a quiet state and he's had an average career prior to running; he has some hypocritical doodoo sharks in his voting record. And generally the role of president doesn't matter as much as local offices blah blah. But representation really, really, REALLY matters. I don't have kids but yikes, even I can see that.

Yerac, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:08 (seven years ago)

but again, I am also ok with a lot of dem candidates all running on very similar platforms so eventually it gets solidified as THE dem platform.

Yerac, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:14 (seven years ago)

i remember in 2006 taking my daughters into the voting booth with me to vote for hill and thinking about how amazing it would be that they'd grow up in a world where the most powerful person was a woman and i daydreamed a little bit about the difference that might've made and honestly i probably overstated it in my imagination but when she lost i think that's the disappointment that hurt the most (attenuated by the fact that the guy who beat her wasn't just some guy but in many ways represented the opposite - a world where the most powerful person in it was an abuser of women).

Mordy, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:14 (seven years ago)

2016 i meant but i think i really meant 2015?

Mordy, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:14 (seven years ago)

no i guess i meant 2016. we vote every 4 years - trump was inaugurated in 2017 right? so next voting day will be 2020 and next inaug will be 2021? sorry feeling kinda dopey atm.

Mordy, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:16 (seven years ago)

pendulum is likely to swing hard regardless of candidate which imo should be a grand blessing and a huge mountain to overcome.

Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:17 (seven years ago)

I was talking to someone recently about how much different my life would've been if I had been able to see more women and more women that were like me in certain positions. I mean my life is wonderful but even things like watching Crazy Rich Asians or seeing how little girls look at Michelle Obama with awe makes me cry.

Yerac, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:19 (seven years ago)

Well calling yourself socialist when most of his policies are run of the mill centrist stuff just north of border (look at Quebec) is also just marketing.

The Canadian parties that have implemented or most strongly advocated those policies have usually also identified as "democratic socialist" or "social democratic" tbf.

silent as a seashell Julia (Sund4r), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:25 (seven years ago)

Free tuition, an aggressive move away from fossil fuels, and the tax rates that Sanders and Warren are proposing are well to the left of the Canadian centre, and possibly to the left of the NDP, too.

silent as a seashell Julia (Sund4r), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:34 (seven years ago)

Some of those things might be in the NDP platform but you'd never know it from their talking points.

bhad bundy (Simon H.), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:38 (seven years ago)

They were def not in their 2015 platform, nor the legislation of the two NDP provincial governments afaict (and I like BC's).

silent as a seashell Julia (Sund4r), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:39 (seven years ago)

ugh yes how terribly silly of one of the few gay people of color on a thread dominated by white straight males to take exception to a maladroit statement by a Dem candidate, the way we all take exception to the hundreds of statements made by Harris, Booker, Clinton, Biden, etc.

Do carry on.

― a Stalin Stale Ale for me, please (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, February 19, 2019 10:03 PM (fifty-seven minutes ago

you're right, I'm sorry

― k3vin k., Tuesday, February 19, 2019 11:01 PM

No problem, kev. You're one of the good 'uns. This thread can be as painful as tetanus.

a Stalin Stale Ale for me, please (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:44 (seven years ago)

damm this thread sux

global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 17:51 (seven years ago)

ok

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:19 (seven years ago)

I care about representation too. Even as a not big fan of Hillary Clinton, I felt very happy telling my daughters I was voting for her in the general. Same with Cynthia Nixon, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Grace Meng, among others, in 2018 (as my then six year old said, "wow, there are a lot of girl presidents!").

But, you know, that doesn't mean I'd support Margaret Thatcher. Or Sarah Palin. Or Ben Carson. Obviously none of the current dem candidates are in the same universe as those people, but there's still a question for me of how much weight to give representation versus platform.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:25 (seven years ago)

Like, little girls feeling empowered by Michelle Obama is one thing. But that will not change whether they have access to the affordable healthcare and childcare they need to actually be successful later in life.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:26 (seven years ago)

someone else posted above something I never knew, that he ran for 2016 because he couldn't convince Elizabeth Warren? What's the point now?

He has an agenda, an organization, and an enthusiastic following; I like Warren a lot but it's not yet obvious to me that she would be the stronger advocate for the policies they hold in common.

silent as a seashell Julia (Sund4r), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:28 (seven years ago)

i hope i get to chose between those two -- it would be legitimately tough and for the right reasons.

i think one will fall out before new york and it will be bernie or warren vs. some lame-o ilxors like

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:30 (seven years ago)

I’m not sure who qualifies as “some lame-o ilxors like”.

Norm’s Superego (silby), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:32 (seven years ago)

Yeah seems Warren/Sanders will poll ahead of anyone else, Treesh.

Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:34 (seven years ago)

anyone else in the race

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:34 (seven years ago)

is a lame-o. you can quote me on this when i run for president in 2024.

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:34 (seven years ago)

xopst, re M. Obama, well yeah, these things are obvious. You should've just added in Ivanka and Park Geun-hye to make a full point.

Yerac, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:37 (seven years ago)

I am starting to suspect that Yerac might have a different perspective on representation than even the best-intentioned straight white dude!

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:44 (seven years ago)

because everyone had denied that

ɪmˈpəʊzɪŋ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:52 (seven years ago)

he is beginning to suspect he is woke.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 18:53 (seven years ago)

Is there any logistical/demographic reason Bernie and Warren couldn't team up down the line assuming both their polling numbers stayed strong?

bhad bundy (Simon H.), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 19:03 (seven years ago)

It matters very little who the running mate is, beyond a do-no-harm principle, so I suppose it could be so. But the consultants won’t like it. Two white senior citizens from New England?

Norm’s Superego (silby), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 19:10 (seven years ago)

A promised Cabinet position might be better than running mate status.

silent as a seashell Julia (Sund4r), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 19:14 (seven years ago)

Bernie/Beto 2020, they’ll both make your calves cramp

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 19:22 (seven years ago)

one of the main reasons I support Warren and Bernie above the rest is that I have a much better feeling about the potential makeup of their Cabinet than the other candidates, who I fear are far likelier to appoint a bunch of Obama retreads and other centrist nullities.

Evans on Hammond (evol j), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 19:35 (seven years ago)

I'm just looking forward to the prospect of ending our long national nightmare of winning.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 19:39 (seven years ago)

I’m not sure who qualifies as “some lame-o ilxors like”

enormous missed opportunity here for joke answers here imo

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 20:10 (seven years ago)

here

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 20:10 (seven years ago)

Sherrod Brown cozy with bankers?

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/20/sherrod-brown-wall-street-2020-1176016

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 20:18 (seven years ago)

The senator from Ohio should not give up his seat, not to be president, nor a cabinet member, nor anything. Not worth it.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 20:30 (seven years ago)

Moire Donegan: Why vote for Sanders when you can have Elizabeth Warren instead?

jaymc, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 20:33 (seven years ago)

Bankers! Yikes!! Totally want to fall for that outrage all over again!!!

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 20:50 (seven years ago)

xp. Progressives don’t have to choose between macho socialism and corporate feminism. Elizabeth Warren offers the best of both worlds

christ

( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 20:54 (seven years ago)

I personally prefer Warren to Sanders, but that's a terrible subhed.

jaymc, Wednesday, 20 February 2019 21:01 (seven years ago)

I'm not even going to read that piece to determine whether that's supposed to be satirical or what, I'm just going to admit my brain is fully broken.

Evans on Hammond (evol j), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 21:03 (seven years ago)

When I see Bernie's poor posture, unkempt hair and rumpled suit I can think of nothing but machismo.

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Wednesday, 20 February 2019 21:43 (seven years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.