also if you're talking about jimmy mcnulty, give me a fucking break.
― horseshoe, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:03 (seventeen years ago)
that herc is a model citizen.
― horseshoe, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:05 (seventeen years ago)
shakey i sort of wonder if your own proclivity--based on some things youve said on this thread--would be to naturally "side" with the drug dealers in some way, and that youre just sort of assuming that the detectives are thought of as loveable working class stiffs (instead of arrogant power-tripping drunks) because youve never been in a position to like the police in a given show?
does that make sense as a question? i just mean its like--i like cop shows, and i dont usually have a problem rooting for the cops, but the cops in the wire are among the least sympathetic on television, more or less across the board. i wonder if the assumption youre making about the shows sympathies has more to do w/ yr own blind spots than the mechanics of the show and its audience
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:07 (seventeen years ago)
i mean clearly you dont think of them as cute and fun, and i dont know that anyone on this thread has ever claimed to think of them that way--so why assume that the show does?
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:08 (seventeen years ago)
yeah I guess we just view this differently (and maybe my perception is altered by later seasons), cuz this --
by and large the individual detectives are hard-working, morally driven, good humored guys
-- only seems true if "by and large" means ... Kima, Daniels, Bunk, and Freamon? Maybe McNulty? And then leaves out higher-level alcoholics, dudes coasting toward retirement, dudes pulling injury scams, idiotic forays into public housing and kid-face-smashing, evidence theft, general covering up for one another's criminal wrongdoing, etc. ... also, apart from some things you haven't gotten to yet, there's never much sense that any of them are acting largely on behalf of any public good; aren't there some explicit conversations about how their main drive is just to win, to be smarter than the criminals, to not have their power be skirted or undermined?
Whereas the drug dealers are also hard-working and good-humored and driven by ... not a code you'd call "moral," but kind of moral system nonetheless. I guess what I mean is that it always seemed to me that part of the point of this show was to portray both sides of this from similar perspectives, and to show how an individual in a gang navigates the gang's institutional concerns on the same plane that a policeman navigates his department's concerns -- and one result (for me, anyway, and most people I talk to) is that while you start the 1st season with the expectation that the police will "win," you gradually come to a point of just watching the workings and politics of both sides, rooting for whoever/whatever you like in either system to come out ahead, in the knowledge that neither one is just going to "win" anyway.
NB this is part of why there's a benefit to hanging on until the next couple seasons, because there comes a point where both worlds have changed entirely and you're looking at, e.g., low-level drug dealers from the beginning kind of growing and moving through their system, and it becomes ... different and interesting. The response is definitely not that they're just bad.
― nabisco, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:11 (seventeen years ago)
kima, daniels, lester and bunk, i guess, but they're no saints. mcnulty's moral impulses are so entangled with his asshole-ness i just don't think they should count.
― horseshoe, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:13 (seventeen years ago)
daniels is crooked, kimas a cheater, bunk is fat
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:19 (seventeen years ago)
bunk's a cheater, too; i feel like they basically all are.
― horseshoe, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:26 (seventeen years ago)
kima's also a lesbian! Immoral City!
― Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:26 (seventeen years ago)
daniels is too in shape
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:27 (seventeen years ago)
daniels has a weird looking body
― Mr. Que, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:29 (seventeen years ago)
^^ weird or not, I would not mind being that fit
That is something Shakey needs to hold out for, the moment where suddenly Daniels has no shirt on and you're like "OMG I THOUGHT HE WAS JUST SKINNY," and then there is a shirtless Daniels every few episodes from then on
― nabisco, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:30 (seventeen years ago)
ha ha serious--it's so weird
― Mr. Que, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:33 (seventeen years ago)
i mean how often he is suddenly shirtless
― Mr. Que, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:34 (seventeen years ago)
i think stringer bell's beauty should count toward his good points or whatever.
― horseshoe, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:34 (seventeen years ago)
Daniels' physique freaked me the fuck out by the time I watched Season Five. Those stills of him plowing Pearlman made me worry about her breaking in twenty pieces.
― Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:37 (seventeen years ago)
i sort of doubt she was worried
― reo teabaggin (goole), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:38 (seventeen years ago)
dude--you're giving stuff away
― Mr. Que, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:38 (seventeen years ago)
daniels is so built that when his shirt is off he looks like he's got all his muscles tensed but really it's just that he's way jacked.
― languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:41 (seventeen years ago)
you should not be on this thread if you're worried about spoilers for either show wtf?
― Subtlest Fart Joke (Oilyrags), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:42 (seventeen years ago)
spoiler > Pearlman remains intact.
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:42 (seventeen years ago)
i was just kind of kidding wtf
― Mr. Que, Monday, 8 June 2009 18:42 (seventeen years ago)
well, there was a lot of 'wait until future seasons but I don't want to ruin it for shakey' stuff going on upthread, too.
― Subtlest Fart Joke (Oilyrags), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:44 (seventeen years ago)
i dont want to ruin it for shakey but daniels is fuckin diesel
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:45 (seventeen years ago)
You want a cop who's a just plain fucked up dude, Shakey? Wait til you spend some time with Colecchio.
― Subtlest Fart Joke (Oilyrags), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:48 (seventeen years ago)
shakey will come back all like, 'daniels is a twig wtf'
― gangsta hug (omar little), Monday, 8 June 2009 18:48 (seventeen years ago)
i think shakey probably ruined it for himself when he decided to compare every minute of the show to the Sopranos, because of this thread, or being sick of the word-of-mouth hype, or whatever. i'm glad i started watching this show when nobody i knew had heard of it.
btw if prop joe isn't the most likeable drug dealer in any movie/show ever, and more likeable than 75% of the cops in this show, i am a monkey's uncle!
― slugbaiting (rockapads), Monday, 8 June 2009 19:02 (seventeen years ago)
otm!
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Monday, 8 June 2009 19:05 (seventeen years ago)
(otm about Prop Joe - not the monkey thing)
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Monday, 8 June 2009 19:06 (seventeen years ago)
like, the ostensible PURPOSE of the institution of drug-dealing is never portrayed as being positive.
lol really?
― Lamp, Monday, 8 June 2009 19:24 (seventeen years ago)
hahah
― s1ocki, Monday, 8 June 2009 19:26 (seventeen years ago)
i was gonna say
― s1ocki, Monday, 8 June 2009 19:27 (seventeen years ago)
drug dealing is to set your mom up in a sick pad and then get your boys awesome aquarium fish.
― ian, Monday, 8 June 2009 19:30 (seventeen years ago)
it's the only real option
― slugbaiting (rockapads), Monday, 8 June 2009 20:03 (seventeen years ago)
thx for the lolz while I was away at lunch (fwiw, in general I am not the type to worry about spoilers - if a piece of work is good, it'll be good whether you know what's coming or not)
― Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 8 June 2009 20:30 (seventeen years ago)
i think shakey probably ruined it for himself when he decided to compare every minute of the show to the Sopranos, because of this thread, or being sick of the word-of-mouth hype, or whatever.
this is entirely possible - this poll had closed and I'd read this whole thread before even starting the show. (Although I can say the same thing about the Sopranos - I followed threads on that show before I ever saw any of it and was not really disappointed when I eventually watched it)
I do like the Prop Joe character a lot.
― Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 8 June 2009 20:31 (seventeen years ago)
drug dealing is to set your mom up in a sick pad and then get your boys awesome aquarium fish
On the serious side, though ... in seasons 4 and 5 you do get a pretty heavy real-world example of how the wealth- and job-creation aspect of drug dealing can help people, like it or not!
(On a related tip, one thing that's interesting about this show is that your attention is mostly called to drug users who are impoverished city junkies, which I guess has some ring of truth in terms of real-world accuracy; less examined, though sometimes shown, are slightly wealthier people coming into the city specifically for drugs, who would kinda constitute a significant wealth-transfer mechanism in terms of bringing money from elsewhere into the inner city)
― nabisco, Monday, 8 June 2009 20:38 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i always wanted to know more about the girls (in a jetta, even?) who come into Hamsterdam to buy
― reo teabaggin (goole), Monday, 8 June 2009 20:41 (seventeen years ago)
Unrelated note: I've been racking my brain all morning and only just now remembered what eventually became of Poot. For some reason I was always captivated by what was up with Poot.
― nabisco, Monday, 8 June 2009 20:42 (seventeen years ago)
was it he who ended up at
*spoilers*
foot locker?
― Ømår Littel (Jordan), Monday, 8 June 2009 20:44 (seventeen years ago)
YES -- fucking blase Poot just coasts along through thick and thin with that dopey look on his face and then winds up with a normal job
NB I think I said "Wesley" up there, meaning Wallace -- I always think "Wesley" first and then consider that that really doesn't sound right
― nabisco, Monday, 8 June 2009 20:45 (seventeen years ago)
^^ i don't know if this makes sense w/r/t the timing of wire-hype season to season but that always played to me like a shout out to sudhir whatsisface, the "drug dealing is less renumerative than minimum-wage work for most ppl ps i love the wire" guy
xp
― reo teabaggin (goole), Monday, 8 June 2009 20:46 (seventeen years ago)
poot locker
― s1ocki, Monday, 8 June 2009 20:48 (seventeen years ago)
One thing I enjoy about this show is how much, by the end, you get to have annoyed reactions to characters as if they're actually in your social space or something, so there will be mundane scenes of Cheese being an asshole or Poot being Poot and your reaction is just that "this fuckin' guy" head-shaking -- true of lots of long shows, obv., but especially for me with this one
I guess there's also the admiring "this fuckin' guy" response, e.g. when Clay Davis responds to hardship by being Clay Davis
― nabisco, Monday, 8 June 2009 20:55 (seventeen years ago)
athlete's poot
― am0n, Monday, 8 June 2009 21:11 (seventeen years ago)
Sudhir Venkatesh, is who i meant
― reo teabaggin (goole), Monday, 8 June 2009 21:15 (seventeen years ago)
he's paid tribute to by the college guy who helps out Bunny right?
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 8 June 2009 21:25 (seventeen years ago)
less examined, though sometimes shown, are slightly wealthier people coming into the city specifically for drugs, who would kinda constitute a significant wealth-transfer mechanism in terms of bringing money from elsewhere into the inner city
white-clients-listening-to-Dead-Meadow scene in season 2 (or 3) to thread!
maybe it's just a given to me, but anyone who has ever bought drugs in America knows that you can go to the nearest "bad" neighborhood (across the tracks!), or housing project, to buy drugs. also never known as the ideal way to get them...
i was reading an article about the Robert Taylor homes and Cabrini Green and a key reason those places became so infamous was because each were conveniently located near major highways and rich neighborhoods (respectively) which made it easy for wealthier people to use them as drive-thrus. Clockers goes more into it, too. great book for any fan of The Wire, btw. i agree that it could have been interesting to explore this redistribution though.
― slugbaiting (rockapads), Monday, 8 June 2009 21:40 (seventeen years ago)
i wonder if they were concerned about it being too similar to 'traffic'
― autogucci cru (deej), Monday, 8 June 2009 21:42 (seventeen years ago)
the original 'traffik' is classic shit.
i wish that channel 4 had had the resources of hbo and had really gone with it, coz that had the potential to be the wire of the late 80s.
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Monday, 8 June 2009 21:47 (seventeen years ago)