not a fan of Mr Coffee, but isn't it possible he'd draw more votes from Yam a la Ross Perot?
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 16:07 (seven years ago)
Are there really a lot of Trump supporters out there dying to vote for someone who describes himself as "socially liberal?" The whole Trump phenomenon is in part a reaction *against* social liberalism!
― Plinka Trinka Banga Tink (Eliza D.), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 16:12 (seven years ago)
lmao this guy rules
I love telling this story:When Howard Shultz bought the Sonics, my friend worked there in sales. For Christmas, Shultz gave everyone a Starbucks gift card, for $3. Back then you couldn't buy a Sbx card for less than $5. He had those $3 cards custom made. Merry Christmas!— Chirping from the bench (@taterpie) January 28, 2019
― maxwell’s silver hang suite (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 16:13 (seven years ago)
yes, college educated suburban voters in VA
― Mordy, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 16:16 (seven years ago)
He doesn’t pay any fucking taxes. What’s his strategy? Open a Howard Schultz either side of Donald Trump to shut him down?
― suzy, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 16:16 (seven years ago)
i don't know Eliza, but there were all those NYT Trump Voter profiles that quoted them as saying, "He shouldn't say those things, BUT..."
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 16:17 (seven years ago)
Krugman has had some good tweets on this today, specifically this one:
More generally, the socially-liberal/economically conservative position -- the lower right quadrant in this figure -- is basically the Empty Quadrant of American politics -- except in green rooms 5/ pic.twitter.com/fNXcxLV9bg— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) January 29, 2019
― Plinka Trinka Banga Tink (Eliza D.), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 16:20 (seven years ago)
otoh
ha that would be nice - let the plutocrats fight it out and make way for social democracy - the benefits of a fractured ruling class https://t.co/z9yoAAHgbT— Doug Henwood (@DougHenwood) January 29, 2019
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 16:31 (seven years ago)
LOL
I mean so far Schultz's entire platform appears to be "please don't tax my riches, we'll work something out," and I don't think that's going to work.
― Plinka Trinka Banga Tink (Eliza D.), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 16:49 (seven years ago)
I thought his platform was "what's a billionaire to do to get some service around here?"
― Yerac, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 16:52 (seven years ago)
his platform is free $3 starbucks gift cards for everyone. it's a $1 billion annual program
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:02 (seven years ago)
not a fan of Mr Coffee, but isn't it possible he'd draw more votes from Yam a la Ross Perot?― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, January 29, 2019 11:07 AM (fifty-eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, January 29, 2019 11:07 AM (fifty-eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i think the notion that schultz could split the right vote emanates from the belief that right-wingers truly want a moderate, low-tax guy with a calm and principled demeanor. i don't know what more they have to do to prove to you that is not true https://t.co/DBicCeZdsT— Elizabeth Bruenig (@ebruenig) January 29, 2019
look at all the guys who ran in '16 for the republican nomination, and look who they chose. they already had the opportunity to pick a suit with a managerial disposition. they didn't want one— Elizabeth Bruenig (@ebruenig) January 29, 2019
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:09 (seven years ago)
That doesn’t mean they all don’t want one and clearly such a constituency still exists they just don’t control the party anymore (and arguably if they had unified behind one candidate they would’ve beaten trump who was never able to capture a majority in the primaries).
― Mordy, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:11 (seven years ago)
no that's true. but i'm not at all confident his candidacy would be a good thing (or a wash) for the dem nominee.
it would be a bad thing for starbucks business, so hopefully he won't do it.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:19 (seven years ago)
I am all for things that are bad for Starbucks and this guy has zero chance so yeah you go ahead and fuck up your career bro
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:22 (seven years ago)
yeah 'boycott starbucks because you hate trump' is one of those things that people could actually follow through with. there's probably not a more ideal brand for democrats to have that kind of stupid leverage over.
― iatee, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:24 (seven years ago)
I'm sure he still has unvested exec comp left of course but he has nothing to do with starbucks anymore.
― Yerac, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:33 (seven years ago)
but yeah still bad for starbucks so whatever.
― Yerac, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:34 (seven years ago)
even if it doesn't hit his pocket that directly, he's gotta still have tons of personal ties to the top of the company. plus its brand is basically what he's running on.
― iatee, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:36 (seven years ago)
Tax brackets will be renamed tall, grande, and venti
― Gunther Gleiben (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:57 (seven years ago)
if he ran for president, would he agree to sell off his investments in Starbucks, etc?
or, in the post-Trump world, does no one even bother to care about conflicts of interest
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 18:01 (seven years ago)
I’ve still never even pissed in a Starbucks.
― suzy, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 18:05 (seven years ago)
We're going to shut America down for a day to solve racism!
― We were never Breeting Borting (President Keyes), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 18:47 (seven years ago)
it's like how David Brooks and Tom Friedman spent the eight years of the Obama administration wishing that we had a cautious, consensus-minded moderate as President https://t.co/23nRWAqXqU— Seth D. Michaels 🐕 (@sethdmichaels) January 29, 2019
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 20:11 (seven years ago)
I’ve already decided to boycott Starbucks until he drops out (or until he doesn’t manage to cost the dem candidate the election). And I’m a basic bitch who actually likes Starbucks.
― Evans on Hammond (evol j), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 22:49 (seven years ago)
Meantime
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/29/tulsi-gabbard-2020-election-1134055
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 22:56 (seven years ago)
My heart, she breaks
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:34 (seven years ago)
Elizabeth Bruenig✔@ebruenig i think the notion that schultz could split the right vote emanates from the belief that right-wingers truly want a moderate, low-tax guy with a calm and principled demeanor. i don't know what more they have to do to prove to you that is not true
otm
― Trϵϵship, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:38 (seven years ago)
rip big man
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti will not run for president https://t.co/kTfhdGm7oP— Steve Clow (@steveclowLA) January 29, 2019
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:43 (seven years ago)
Elizabeth Warren responds to Howard Schultz: "We have a billionaire who says he wants to jump into the race and the first issue he's raised is 'no new taxes on billionaires'. Let's see where that goes." https://t.co/C4KzJeCZvx— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) January 29, 2019
― Plinka Trinka Banga Tink (Eliza D.), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:43 (seven years ago)
I just got invited to an "Energy Geeks for Kamala" cocktail party in Oakland
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:45 (seven years ago)
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/29/cnn-town-hall-kamala-harris-1135735
During the town hall, Harris laid out several policy objectives, including an endorsement of a “Green New Deal” to combat climate change, calling the issue an “existential threat.”
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 00:07 (seven years ago)
I feel bad for not watching, let alone going to the Kamala Harris CNN thing. Did anything interesting pop up? I think it took place on the other side of my neighborhood
― mh, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 00:26 (seven years ago)
I hope Kamala Harris likes martinis. She looks like she does. If so, she has my votel
― Your sweetie-pie-coo-coo I love ya (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 00:34 (seven years ago)
Re Garcetti: me neither
― Gunther Gleiben (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 00:42 (seven years ago)
I guess you could argue with her stance but imo this was a thoughtful reply about criminal justice reform from the Harris town hall (this was the only tweet with the full clip that I could find):
Oh, Riley Fink, you tried it. Kamala Harris takes a ‘gotcha’ question on her record as a prosecutor and just shreds it. pic.twitter.com/dADW24j19w— The Hoarse Whisperer (@HoarseWisperer) January 29, 2019
― Dan S, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:04 (seven years ago)
yeah she's gonna win
― 21st savagery fox (m bison), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:23 (seven years ago)
lol
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:26 (seven years ago)
Yeah I dont think this is gonna derail her
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:39 (seven years ago)
i'm glad to see her making it a point to not only say she opposes the death penalty but also explain why. haven't heard that from a politician in a long time actually
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:49 (seven years ago)
I get grossed out by the idea that one should be opposed to the death penalty because it “costs taxpayers money” rather than because it’s murder
― Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:50 (seven years ago)
I'm not sure that's her point
― Dan S, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:53 (seven years ago)
I think the point was wrongful convictions
― Dan S, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:56 (seven years ago)
She made both points
― Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:57 (seven years ago)
Wrongful convictions is a very important reason the death penalty is horrific.
But it is also wrong to execute guilty people.
― Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:58 (seven years ago)
yes
― Dan S, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:59 (seven years ago)
completely agree
it was a really good answer tbf
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:01 (seven years ago)
Harris "open to multiple paths" re m4a
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/29/politics/kamala-harris-medicare-for-all-eliminate-private-insurers-backlash/index.html
― resident hack (Simon H.), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:01 (seven years ago)
Some people listen to arguments that involve money, though. Capital punishment is less of a party/partisan issue than most other wedge issues, so if you can swing people by saying life in prison costs less than executing convicts, give it a shot.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:02 (seven years ago)