2020 Democratic presidential primary

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (14963 of them)

He's Texan. He can't cop to being a progressive even if he is.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 00:09 (seven years ago)

Policy wise, he's left of Obama but right of Ocasio-Cortez. That's progressive enough for a hell of a lot of Dem voters.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 00:10 (seven years ago)

Politico runs a story about beto every fucking day

Οὖτις, Saturday, 15 December 2018 00:11 (seven years ago)

that picture is p funny tho

flappy bird, Saturday, 15 December 2018 00:12 (seven years ago)

I don't really buy the "Texans can't identify as progressive" thing tbh, he knows he's playing on a national stage now. [citation needed] on his hidden progressive credentials

resident hack (Simon H.), Saturday, 15 December 2018 00:49 (seven years ago)

I buy it, because I live in Texas and just suffered through 6 months of "Liberal"/"Progressive" attack ads comparing us to something millimeters away from Hitler.

Infidels, Like Dylan In The Eighties (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 15 December 2018 00:54 (seven years ago)

Actually, I tell a lie--it was 10 months.

Infidels, Like Dylan In The Eighties (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 15 December 2018 00:55 (seven years ago)

known progressive hitler

k3vin k., Saturday, 15 December 2018 00:56 (seven years ago)

People willfully misinterpret the "socialist" part of the National Socialists, not just in Texas. Pretty much in all 50 states.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 01:00 (seven years ago)

I think you mean *Democratic* Socialists?

Dan S, Saturday, 15 December 2018 01:32 (seven years ago)

I don't buy it because a moderate Democrat isn't going to get any more votes in rural Texas than an open Leninist.

louise ck (milo z), Saturday, 15 December 2018 01:41 (seven years ago)

how much of the Texas vote is rural Texas?

Dan S, Saturday, 15 December 2018 01:48 (seven years ago)

(don't really know)

Dan S, Saturday, 15 December 2018 01:50 (seven years ago)

don't worry guys, Biden is a proven nonvotegetter

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 15 December 2018 01:59 (seven years ago)

I think you mean *Democratic* Socialists?

No, I meant Nazis. That's where the "Hitler was on the left" fallacy comes from.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 02:05 (seven years ago)

ok, wasn't sure I understood

Dan S, Saturday, 15 December 2018 02:10 (seven years ago)

I'm interested in Johnny's relative precision placing Beto between Obama & AOC, curious to hear what's behind that.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 15 December 2018 03:20 (seven years ago)

I don't have charts and graphs ready to go, tbh. I've just picked stuff up along the way, as much as I've been able to not actually living in Texas or following his every move. I know he's not all the way in the Abolish ICE or Medicare For All bag, but he's also pro pot legalization and against standardized testing. I imagine, if he indeed runs, he'll get pushed as far as we can go on foreign policy and we'll see where he lands. I know he's vigorously pro choice, though I don't expect anyone who wasn't would make it very far in a Dem primary. I dunno guys, he just scans as a very slightly left of center-left Dem and Obama was basically toeing the actual center in 2008 where Ocasio-Cortez needs a telescope to see it. He's a mushy, middly guy who I think would have a sympathetic ear to activists over time.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 06:25 (seven years ago)

I mean, definitely prove me wrong if I'm wrong. I would prefer not to be duped.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 06:30 (seven years ago)

I guess I just don't see or know of any reasonable evidence for that supposed sympathetic ear

resident hack (Simon H.), Saturday, 15 December 2018 06:32 (seven years ago)

The probability of a sympathetic ear is increased by getting progressives into congress. I am 100% in favor of AOC's idea of primarying centrist Dems in safe blue districts so the blue gets bluer.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 07:04 (seven years ago)

I don’t get what people like about Beto so much compared to the other candidates. Bernie and Warren are the ones who have a real track record of progressivism. Both can articulate issues like health care and economic inequality in clear terms and they’re not inclined to cooperate with Wall Street. Considering a candidate that isn’t one of them seems like a losing prospect if you really want a different kind of democrat.

Trϵϵship, Saturday, 15 December 2018 15:40 (seven years ago)

Bernie and Warren are also a THOUSAND YEARS OLD. Do you get that?

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 15:42 (seven years ago)

Warren isn’t

Trϵϵship, Saturday, 15 December 2018 15:42 (seven years ago)

Anyway, I’m speaking from the perspective of the change I want to see in America. I don’t care about a hot candidate who can connect with the juul generation.

Trϵϵship, Saturday, 15 December 2018 15:46 (seven years ago)

beto plays well on viral videos and knew how to copy obama's 2008 playbook. he is a standard-issue democrat which in 2018 makes him more liberal than a standard-issue democrat ten years ago. he should be trying to win the senate in 2020 against cornyn.

21st savagery fox (m bison), Saturday, 15 December 2018 15:52 (seven years ago)

I don’t care about a hot candidate who can connect with the juul generation.

lol

Anyway, I think Trump's electoral map is weaker than most of the press does, and his team does, but still I'd rather not risk it with a professorial type or crank, neither of whom would bring out the numbers of voters needed on election day to ensure a Trump beatdown. We may have to sacrifice a bit of progressive pleasure by choosing someone who can light a fire under voters' asses when it counts—the general election, not the primaries. Take the white house back. Make congress bluer. Do the right (left) thing on Scotus appointments. That's how you transform this place. Not with the candidate who gives you a chub when you're caucusing.

(To be clear, I'm not saying nominate a person like Michael Bloomberg either, whose entire constituency is wealthy donors.)

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 15:58 (seven years ago)

I don’t know if there is evidence for that. The Democrats have been trusting the wisdom of moderation for decades and over the long haul they’ve lost a ton of ground.

Trϵϵship, Saturday, 15 December 2018 15:59 (seven years ago)

Just look at what the Republicans did, man. Sure, Obama won two terms, but while he was being president, they ransacked state legislatures all around the country, gerrymandered the shit out of districts, amassed both houses of congress, shaped the federal bench by denying judicial appointments—all while having a president of the opposing party.

You're vesting too much in THE PRESIDENCY. A standard-issue dem, as m bison said, is just the boss. The left has to keep doing the work.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 16:06 (seven years ago)

I’m not vesting anything. I’m not a democratic strategist. Why would I want a more moderate candidate if my policy goals align with bernie’s?

Trϵϵship, Saturday, 15 December 2018 16:19 (seven years ago)

Me: Here's everything the Republicans did to remake the country and hold on to power at all levels, and we should study that and emulate it for the benefit of everybody.

Treeship: BUT I LIKE BERNIE!

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 16:34 (seven years ago)

*bows*

Trϵϵship, Saturday, 15 December 2018 16:36 (seven years ago)

Also we shouldn’t emulate the republicans because they completely fucked up our system through their power grabs. We should pass anti-gerrymandering legislation.

Trϵϵship, Saturday, 15 December 2018 16:37 (seven years ago)

Beto looks like Ed O'Brien from Radiohead

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 15 December 2018 16:42 (seven years ago)

while I am sympathetic to the idea that the president as a position is overemphasized, there's a symbolic level to the role that bears keeping in mind, esp as it impacts turnout and morale. just look at how much it feels like our brains are all experiencing early death from having to think about trump every goddamn day even though his actual power is quite limited in important ways

resident hack (Simon H.), Saturday, 15 December 2018 17:14 (seven years ago)

even though his actual power is quite limited in important ways

Why is everybody dancing around this? That's where all the focus should be. Push the institutions in a more progressive direction and a progressive presidency will follow. We didn't get from George H.W. Bush to Donald Trump overnight. A lot of out of the spotlight ground game went into it.

btw, I'm not advocating for gerrymandering districts the opposite way, as may have been implied. That's undemocratic bullshit. I'm talking about a reset.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 December 2018 17:36 (seven years ago)

if Sanders does run he should plaster this graph everywhere

When Trump supporters tell you who their enemy is, believe them. (CNN 12/18) pic.twitter.com/Nw9dDGZ6XI

— Carl Beijer (@CarlBeijer) December 15, 2018

resident hack (Simon H.), Saturday, 15 December 2018 18:14 (seven years ago)

where's Clinton in that graph, I wonder?

sleeve, Saturday, 15 December 2018 18:21 (seven years ago)

i doubt democrats can hope to get many votes from actual trump supporters in 2020 but candidates who are trying to win office generally don't boast about their unfavorability ratings

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 15 December 2018 18:38 (seven years ago)

i will be the one to point out that the graph pretty much lines up with name recognition (other than biden, i guess)

Karl Malone, Saturday, 15 December 2018 18:45 (seven years ago)

I think Carl was one of the people who argued that Bernie could pick off Trump supporters.

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Saturday, 15 December 2018 19:06 (seven years ago)

"ppl who voted Trump" vs "ppl who currently identify as Trump supporters" is a distinction worthy of interrogation

resident hack (Simon H.), Saturday, 15 December 2018 19:42 (seven years ago)

We may have to sacrifice a bit of progressive pleasure by choosing someone who can light a fire under voters' asses when it counts—the general election, not the primaries. Take the white house back.

I find it odd that you think these things are mutually exclusive. Obama '08 was the most 'progressive' campaign of most of our voting lives... and a blowout that drove turnout.

louise ck (milo z), Saturday, 15 December 2018 20:45 (seven years ago)

Trump's power being limited is exactly what keeps me sane. We haven't even approached the abyss of the GWB years.

flappy bird, Monday, 17 December 2018 17:52 (seven years ago)

in terms of innocent dead people, that's true. in terms of damage to gov't institutions, idk.

Οὖτις, Monday, 17 December 2018 17:58 (seven years ago)

Johnny Fever may be overlooking that some ppl are insanely trying to make the case that Biden can light a fire under people's asses

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 December 2018 18:43 (seven years ago)

the people are stoked about supporting the credit card corporations and draconian bankruptcy laws

officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 17 December 2018 19:57 (seven years ago)

I get the feeling that somewhere behind all this talk of Biden running for president is a media conspiracy spearheaded by The Onion.

A is for (Aimless), Monday, 17 December 2018 20:00 (seven years ago)

would that twere so!!!!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 17 December 2018 20:25 (seven years ago)

what no one knows is that all this time biden has been running the onion

Karl Malone, Monday, 17 December 2018 20:26 (seven years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.