Your 2020 Presidential Candidate Speculation Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1394 of them)

I think Hunt3r's point is Trump's professional life accurately predicted his political one.

wayne trotsky (Simon H.), Friday, 9 November 2018 19:55 (seven years ago)

trump represents actual valueless hypocrisy, the dark side of politicians responding to voters - here the con man as shimmering blob, morphing into whatever his marks want to hear at any given time, to be forgotten again minutes later with no consequences.

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Friday, 9 November 2018 20:09 (seven years ago)

I happily voted for a woman who was a former CIA officer and had a photo of her and GW Bush in her TV commercial (as well as the same photo of her with Obama); she flipped a gerrymandered as shit district that was held by an asshole republican guy for ages and I don’t feel even slightly uneasy about this.

joygoat, Saturday, 10 November 2018 01:00 (seven years ago)

morphing into whatever his marks want to hear at any given time, to be forgotten again minutes later with no consequences.

This is why, barring incontrovertible evidence of massive criminality, Trump will win the Republican nomination handily. He accurately mirrors what goes on inside the heads of his supporters, no matter how ignorant, misguided, racist, or nonsensical those thoughts might be.

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 10 November 2018 01:12 (seven years ago)

These people aren't going to Iowa and South Carolina for the culture.

up yrs Johnny Fever, some of the strivers actually visit to pump up interest in congressional elections

I'll admit that's the bare minimum of them, but it happens

I'll try to be more proactive in documenting the Iowa visitors who are the definite presidential strivers this cycle

mh, Saturday, 10 November 2018 01:15 (seven years ago)

It will probably pay dividends for Dem candidates to study the effects Trump's tariffs and the Chinese countertariffs are having on Iowa corn, soybean, and swine exports. It may not be high culture, but taking a clear stand in favor of free trade in agricultural exports may shift a lot of habitual Republicans there...

They Bunged Him in My Growler (Sanpaku), Saturday, 10 November 2018 01:32 (seven years ago)

As for South Carolina, I'm guessing that they've been historically dependent on German capital, like the BMW plant. Numerous German multinationals are holding off on further US investment for the duration of this presidency.

They Bunged Him in My Growler (Sanpaku), Saturday, 10 November 2018 01:34 (seven years ago)

Harder pulling ahead in D10 in CA

Οὖτις, Saturday, 10 November 2018 01:43 (seven years ago)

Er wrong thread

Οὖτις, Saturday, 10 November 2018 01:43 (seven years ago)

Nobody's gonna shift any Republicans, habitual or otherwise. Republicans are a death cult, and Presidential elections are understood as a strictly binary choice - My Team versus Satan's Team. (I'm excluding third party voters from this discussion because fuck those moss-brained suck-asses forever.)

grawlix (unperson), Saturday, 10 November 2018 01:49 (seven years ago)

...except those of us who live in irrelevant states, riiiiight?

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 November 2018 01:56 (seven years ago)

Are you disputing the moss-brained or the suck-ass

I have measured out my life in coffee shop loyalty cards (silby), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:01 (seven years ago)

you cur, i am much closer to moss-assed and suck-brained

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:03 (seven years ago)

who sucked your head?

I like queer. You like queer, senator? (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:08 (seven years ago)

lads

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:11 (seven years ago)

...except those of us who live in irrelevant states, riiiiight?

I exclude no one. Vote third party in a "safe" state*, you send the message to moss-brained suck-asses in "unsafe" states that it's OK for them to do it, too.

*there's no such thing

grawlix (unperson), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:12 (seven years ago)

I would like to unsubscribe from your newsletter.

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:18 (seven years ago)

unperson would you feel differently if at some point down the line a set of reasonably popular set of left figures took a stab at a genuine left party or do you see the US as uniquely doomed to forever be a two-party country where 40%+ just don't engage

(this is not a defense of jill stein)

wayne trotsky (Simon H.), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:20 (seven years ago)

unperson would you feel differently if at some point down the line a set of reasonably popular set of left figures took a stab at a genuine left party or do you see the US as uniquely doomed to forever be a two-party country where 40%+ just don't engage

Yes, I would feel differently if at some imaginary future point "the left" started focusing on running candidates for - and winning - local offices (school board, city council, mayor, state legislature) instead of just running for president in acts of public masturbation so egregious they'd embarrass Vito Acconci. So wake me up when that happens.

grawlix (unperson), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:31 (seven years ago)

you send the message to moss-brained suck-asses in "unsafe" states that it's OK for them to do it, too.

yeah, fuck that. such people would be thicker than you are, if they existed.

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:35 (seven years ago)

wait a sec, i'm confused, i thought the Democrat Party was the only "left" in America

you know, the party that went to Trump's last wedding and took his donations

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:37 (seven years ago)

umperson, Nerdstrom and iatee probably have weekly write-hatemail-to-Susan-Sarandon parties.

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:39 (seven years ago)

"in acts of public masturbation so egregious they'd embarrass Vito Acconci"

lol <3<3 this made my day

Dan S, Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:43 (seven years ago)

"have weekly write-hatemail-to-Susan-Sarandon parties" also pretty good

Dan S, Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:45 (seven years ago)

the political system of the u.s. is so heavily favored toward a two-party system (not just because of the established power of the current two parties but because we use a winner-take-all system rather than proportional voting) that even a reasonably popular third party couldn't just sort of co-exist with the existing two parties and share congressional space with them, it would have to become popular and powerful enough to replace one of them, the way the republicans replaced the whigs. so even if someone like bernie or whoever were to go off and start his own party, the results wouldn't be significantly different than perot in 92 or nader in 00, it would just be a weak party barely holding together around a celebrity candidate.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 10 November 2018 02:56 (seven years ago)

wait a sec, i'm confused, i thought the Democrat Party was the only "left" in America

You reveal yourself once again.

grawlix (unperson), Saturday, 10 November 2018 03:00 (seven years ago)

people judging candidates based on their past careers/positions is kind of stupid imo. look at where the candidates are now and how they're triangulating their positions to get elected

shakes are you fucking serious with this weak shit man

k3vin k., Saturday, 10 November 2018 03:18 (seven years ago)

agree with Οὖτις, some people evolve

Dan S, Saturday, 10 November 2018 03:25 (seven years ago)

up yrs Johnny Fever

I keed

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 10 November 2018 03:56 (seven years ago)

look, when it comes to voting for democrats in the general election in meaningfully close races, that's one thing. but if you're going to sit here in 2018 and stump for this prosecutor to be the democratic nominee, you're a mark

k3vin k., Saturday, 10 November 2018 04:00 (seven years ago)

and yes, (most) prosecutors are cops

k3vin k., Saturday, 10 November 2018 04:00 (seven years ago)

the guy in philly and the guy in brooklyn and their ilk largely being exceptions

k3vin k., Saturday, 10 November 2018 04:01 (seven years ago)

Consider the possibility that a black woman in America might have different motivations to become a prosecutor than are held by the majority of prosecutors, who are overwhelmingly white men, especially if that black woman then uses her experience as a stepping stone to higher offices that do not require a prosecutorial approach to various social issues.

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 10 November 2018 04:10 (seven years ago)

^yes

Dan S, Saturday, 10 November 2018 04:23 (seven years ago)

people judging candidates based on their past careers/positions is kind of stupid imo. look at where the candidates are now and how they're triangulating their positions to get elected

harris aside, this is ridiculous

Trϵϵship, Saturday, 10 November 2018 04:25 (seven years ago)

people can change but if you want to know who someone is you don't take solace in how they're "triangulating"

Trϵϵship, Saturday, 10 November 2018 04:26 (seven years ago)

yes, agree with that

Dan S, Saturday, 10 November 2018 04:28 (seven years ago)

Reason is a libertarian magazine

liked that NYTM article, although 2 years old

Dan S, Saturday, 10 November 2018 04:59 (seven years ago)

I'm aware of what reason is, thanks. I can think for myself

k3vin k., Saturday, 10 November 2018 05:15 (seven years ago)

I agree with your point about voting for someone vs stumping for them

Dan S, Saturday, 10 November 2018 05:31 (seven years ago)

don't think anybody you're talking to here is 'a mark' though

Dan S, Saturday, 10 November 2018 05:44 (seven years ago)

maybe let's relax with circling the wagons on harris then

k3vin k., Saturday, 10 November 2018 06:28 (seven years ago)

lol unperson doesnt know when i'm treating him like a buffoon

instead I REVEAL MYSELF TO BE BOB DOLE

srly wtf am i doing here

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 November 2018 11:30 (seven years ago)

Brenda Snipes might be asking herself the same question.

Broward’s elections supervisor accidentally mixed more than a dozen rejected ballots with nearly 200 valid ones, a circumstance that is unlikely to help Brenda Snipes push back against Republican allegations of incompetence.

The mistake — for which no one had a solution Friday night — was discovered after Snipes agreed to present 205 provisional ballots to the Broward County canvassing board for inspection. She had initially intended to handle the ballots administratively, but agreed to present them to the canvassing board after Republican attorneys objected.

“We have found no clear authority controlling the situation faced by the board,” said Broward County Attorney Andrew Meyers.

On Election Day, Broward County collected more than 600 provisional ballots. The vast majority were declared invalid by the county’s canvassing board judges for reasons ranging from registering to vote too late to previously voting to voting at the wrong precinct.

But a couple hundred provisional ballots were held in limbo. Those ballots were the result of a connectivity issue in the system that precincts use to look up voter registrations, said Pat Nesbit, the elections day operations manager for Broward County. Voters would swipe their ID and the precinct system would show they weren’t registered voters. But when staffers called the Broward elections headquarters, the voter’s registration would appear. Precinct workers had those 205 voters fill out provisional ballots.

I like queer. You like queer, senator? (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2018 11:56 (seven years ago)

@unperson I def get antipathy towards stunt candidacies even if I don't see the harm in safe-state votes like Morbs'. my only objection would be that leftists run for and win those lower offices you mention in literally every cycle

wayne trotsky (Simon H.), Saturday, 10 November 2018 12:37 (seven years ago)

three weeks pass...

Beato beating Warren

Joe Gargan (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 4 December 2018 19:03 (seven years ago)

in that same article

Former Vice President Joe Biden is the most popular Democrat in the potential 2020 primary, with 28 percent of Democratic and independent voters saying they’d most likely vote for him, according to the poll released on Monday.

Biden remains the front-runner even when 2016 nominee Hillary Clinton is included in the poll. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who also ran in 2016, comes in second place at 21 percent.

O’Rourke, who earned a groundswell of national attention in 2018, was ranked third with 7 percent of Democratic and independent voters backing him, garnering more support than other frequently touted potential challengers.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 4 December 2018 19:08 (seven years ago)

it's all just name recognition at this point

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 4 December 2018 19:09 (seven years ago)

I promise to make sure my peers in the first-to-caucus state do a decent vetting job this time

nothing really heats up until mid 2019 tbh. we had the slate of possible candidates who did a quick swing through to help gin up support in this year's race but it was mostly known quantities other than that california mayor dude

mh, Tuesday, 4 December 2018 19:22 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.