http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gUUXsl3sakXbS8W1AYb4xSxxEMIgD98JE1IG0
lol this isn't even on CNN.com yet
― Obama seems to have the views of a 21-year-old Hispanic girl (HI DERE), Wednesday, 3 June 2009 21:21 (seventeen years ago)
i think at this point the media just assumes everyone north of new haven is in a gay marriage.
― would you ask tom petty that? (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 3 June 2009 21:46 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/12/741817/-Obama-on-DOMA:-He-IS-Keeping-A-Promise
vs
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/06/what-was-obama-thinking.html
― Dr Morbius, Saturday, 13 June 2009 01:03 (seventeen years ago)
Dan Savage calls for civil disobedience. I'm almost ready to join him.
― Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 June 2009 00:33 (seventeen years ago)
Go for broke, I figure.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 19 June 2009 00:40 (seventeen years ago)
Still mad at Savage for his scapegoating black people in the wake of Prop 8.
― keep your penis out that's hilarious (The Reverend), Friday, 19 June 2009 04:15 (seventeen years ago)
Gays too busy mourning MJ to be pissed off about this?
― And the biggest self of self is, indeed, self (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 June 2009 20:59 (seventeen years ago)
Why would gays be pissed off by the Vice-President pledging to push harder on issues that affect them?
― get money fuck witches (HI DERE), Friday, 26 June 2009 21:01 (seventeen years ago)
cuz they'd been talking for months about how they were going to boycott this event and make a big stink at it about Obama's lack of action?
― And the biggest self of self is, indeed, self (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 June 2009 21:03 (seventeen years ago)
from all the talk previously this was shaping up to be a PR nightmare for Obama, but now its completely buried
50 of them did protest and called gay representatives "gay Uncle Toms" (which kind of points up how ppl should really read source material and not just be lazy parrots but that's another argument)
― get money fuck witches (HI DERE), Friday, 26 June 2009 21:04 (seventeen years ago)
called gay representatives "gay Uncle Toms"
wow, I'm sure these people have the best of intentions but they really can go fuck themselves
― im white beyonce (The Reverend), Friday, 26 June 2009 22:55 (seventeen years ago)
right there with you on that
― get money fuck witches (HI DERE), Friday, 26 June 2009 22:56 (seventeen years ago)
ppl should really read source material
I know, right? Uncle Tom was totally gay.
― bad crack (Eric H.), Friday, 26 June 2009 23:15 (seventeen years ago)
'Gay Excorcism'
― And the biggest self of self is, indeed, self (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 June 2009 23:29 (seventeen years ago)
lolz was "house homos" already taken
― And the biggest self of self is, indeed, self (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 June 2009 23:30 (seventeen years ago)
just view it like the 100% wrong use of "immaculate conception" for "virgin birth"
― Dr Morbius, Saturday, 27 June 2009 01:03 (seventeen years ago)
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/08/massachusetts-takes-aim-at-federal-definition-of-marriage/#more-59669
― Sleep Causes Cancer (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 July 2009 23:24 (sixteen years ago)
DC, WE TAKIN OVER
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/05/AR2009050501618.html
― spaghetti and fried bumblebees (donna rouge), Wednesday, 8 July 2009 23:33 (sixteen years ago)
DADT to be taken up by Senate committees this fall
― girlish in the worst sense of that term (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 27 July 2009 23:27 (sixteen years ago)
Maggie Gallagher, I love you:
The Borg Blinks [Maggie Gallagher]
In "The Carrie Effect," I point out that gay-marriage advocates are like the Borg. Resistance is futile.
― Heric E. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 July 2009 23:52 (sixteen years ago)
LA Times interviews Ted Olson about gay marriage.
― Heric E. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 August 2009 14:24 (sixteen years ago)
Clinton has "changed his mind" about gay marriage and is now no longer against it. Gee thanks a lot douchebag.
― man, motherfuck a paddington bear (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 25 September 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)
Way to put your figer to the wind, there, Bill.
― l'homme moderne: il forniquait et lisait des journaux (Michael White), Friday, 25 September 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/cq/20091104/pl_cq_politics/politics3239042
really, really disheartening
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 November 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
On the other hand, it wasn't exactly a landslide.
― I yanked that sucker hard, and work it did. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 16:23 (sixteen years ago)
I feel a sense of regional shame that New England is viewed as the most receptive area of the country to gay couples and not, oh, CALIFORNIA. wtf
― I forgot my mantra (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
wtf is wrong with people?
― carne asada, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)
This one's been making the rounds and is very good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2nsGtd7y3c
― cough syrup in coke cans (Eric H.), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 16:41 (sixteen years ago)
I think this is really a misnomer, as disappointed as I was by the results on Prop 8.
The Bay Area - alright, probably pretty receptive to gay rights.
But where else? Los Angeles, with its HUGE conservative Latino population? San Diego? The Central Valley? The Central Coast? Up North?
None of these areas are very politically liberal when it comes to social issues.
― Ultraviolet Thunder (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)
really surprised by this...
― feed them to the (Linden Ave) lions (will), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 16:52 (sixteen years ago)
Yes! You and your god have won! Hooray!
http://i.imgur.com/FDFx2.jpg
Fucking retards.
― StanM, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:04 (sixteen years ago)
smh
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:09 (sixteen years ago)
So that old lady who's kneeling in thanksgiving, we're pretty much just waiting for her and her kind to die, right?
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)
I realize she's someone's mother, sister, but personally, I hope that day is soon.
So angry.
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:11 (sixteen years ago)
However!
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/us/04washington.html
― jaymc, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)
the maine vote by far the most disappointing result of yesterday's elections. the other big races were party politics, take 'em or leave 'em. but this one, i just really hoped some of that supposed hardheaded maine decency would come through.
what's most dispiriting is just the sense that you can't win this fight and keep it won. even in a state where the legislature passed it and the governor signed it.
― STRATE IN2 DAKRNESS (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)
and the washington vote is good (assuming it holds up), but it's still depressing they had to call it "everything but marriage."
― STRATE IN2 DAKRNESS (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)
― StanM, Wednesday, November 4, 2009 12:04 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― carne asada, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:21 (sixteen years ago)
If segregation legislation had to be passed by/could be overturned by referenda in the states many people would still be drinking out of different water fountains. ARGH.
Also I do wonder if it isn't psychologically easier to get people to vote yes to something rather than no - so perhaps YES to marriage/civil partnerships on a ballot would be more passable than NO don't repeal the shiny new law.
― fake plastic butts (suzy), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:23 (sixteen years ago)
I'd like the numbers for how many people would have opposed the Voting Rights Act had it gone to state referenda.
― I yanked that sucker hard, and work it did. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:40 (sixteen years ago)
That is correct. And as you know from the polling numbers it really won't be long. I take a weird comfort from knowing that these folks are burning up their children's inheritances just to defer the inevitable for a couple of years.
"I will stop gay marriage or die trying" gallows lulz
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:47 (sixteen years ago)
the other people in that photo don't exactly look decrepit though :(
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)
can we estimate the years since last getting laid for each person in that photo plz
― I forgot my mantra (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)
xpost fortunately that's not the way this generational cohort stuff works when the margins are so narrow
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)
VIRGINS ALL
― TGAAPQ (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)
would put money on the denim-jacketed mouth-breathing dude being a virgin
xps
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)
The woman in the black vest in the middle of the shot is clearly undercover with the "Yes on 1" campaign and her rictus grin only hides her sorrow that she and her softball-playing girlfriend will have to postpone their honeymoon to Montana.
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)
the ad is a copy of an irish one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ULdaSrYGLQ
sinéad >>> megan imo
― plaks (I know, right?), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)
Part of it is that there will always be people who let their ease of disgust co-mingle with their lazy political beliefs, and since there is a great amount of people who view marriage as legitimizing sex and are thus squicked out by the thought of male gay sex, this aspect will never go away. Mix that with people views on identity and trad gender roles, and you've an uphill climb to make.
Still, the horrid aspects of many state's initiative/referenda process seem to be laid bare every election cycle, as there's no shortage of well-funded reactionaries who always manage to get bullshit on the ballot.
― kingfish, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 18:06 (sixteen years ago)